Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 40400-40402 [2011-17090]

Download as PDF 40400 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices The center will disseminate information regarding what works to prevent and intervene with school truancy and dropout problems and promote the use of evidence-based practices through training, technical assistance, and resources. State Juvenile Justice Formula and Block Grants Training and Technical Assistance Program OJJDP will award a cooperative agreement to an organization that will provide training and technical assistance to national, state, and locallevel grantees and non-grantees that will assist them in planning, establishing, operating, coordinating, and evaluating delinquency prevention and juvenile justice systems improvement projects. Training and technical assistance topic areas will fall under the Title II Formula Grants and Juvenile Accountability Block Grants (JABG) program areas. The successful applicant shall develop, enhance, and refine OJJDP programspecific training, on, but not limited to, state and local level disproportionate minority contact reduction strategies, state-level compliance monitoring, graduated sanctions, and juvenile justice systems improvement efforts. Additionally, the selected organization will coordinate the State Relations and Assistance Division’s national training conferences. Continuations In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to support: • Child Abuse Training for Judicial and Court Personnel. • Engaging Law Enforcement To Reduce Juvenile Crime, Victimization, and Delinquency. • State Advisory Group Training and Technical Assistance Project. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Fellowships OJJDP’s fellowship program is designed to enhance the Office’s efforts to develop and improve innovative programs that serve children, youth, and families. A secondary goal is to provide practitioners an opportunity to work closely with career and political Federal staff, contractors, grantees, and other public and private organizations in Washington, DC, and across the country. The fellow will provide direct operational assistance to OJJDP staff through assessment and capacity building, design and development of innovative initiatives and training programs, resource development, research and evaluation, policy development, and outreach and awareness. The fellow will also develop VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:52 Jul 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 articles for publication and other products on specific topics. Concentration of Federal Efforts Fellowship OJJDP will fund a fellow in the Concentration of Federal Efforts program for 2 years to strengthen the Office’s cross-agency partnership efforts. Currently, OJJDP staff and leadership participate in dozens of interagency efforts. The fellow will build on related ongoing work of other Federal agencies, develop new cross-agency partnerships and initiatives, identify and assess opportunities for cross-agency partnerships, and track the impact of existing partnership efforts. Dated: July 1, 2011. Jeff Slowikowski, Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. [FR Doc. 2011–17186 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–75,181] Sony Music Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Sony DADC Americas, a Subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America Including OnSite Leased Workers From Employment Plus, Aerotek, and Robert Half, Pitman, NJ; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated June 15, 2011, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Sony Music Holdings, Inc. (‘‘SMHI’’), d/b/a Sony DADC Americas, a subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, including onsite leased workers from Employment Plus, Aerotek, and Robert Half, Pitman, New Jersey (subject firm). The negative determination was issued on May 19, 2011. The Department’s Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2011 (76 FR 32229). The workers were engaged in activities related to the production of optical discs containing content. The negative determination was based on the findings that there was no increase in imports of optical discs (or like or directly competitive articles) by the subject firm or its customers and no shift to or acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 production of articles like or directly competitive with the optical discs produced by the subject firm. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that ‘‘There was a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles like those produced by the Song DADC–Pitman site. The attached documents illustrate the project plan by ‘SMHI’ to expand customers and increase capacity and services in the Sony Nuevo Laredo plant located in Mexico.’’ The documents include a ‘‘Sony DADC Communique, Volume 3, Issue 1’’ (dated January/ February 2010), a ‘‘Sony Nuevo Laredo Project Plan’’ (undated), copies of shipping documents, and copies of electronic mail messages. The Department has carefully reviewed the petitioner’s request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of June, 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–17088 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of June 13, 2011 through June 24, 2011. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM 08JYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:52 Jul 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40401 imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,014; Geneon Entertainment (USA), Santa Monica, CA: March 1, 2010. TA–W–80,037; Boralex Ashland LP, Ashland, ME: March 10, 2010. TA–W–80,048; Hancock Company, d/b/a/ As Gitman Company/IAG, Ashland, PA: December 19, 2010. TA–W–80,058; Alliance One International, Inc., Morrisville, NC: March 18, 2010. TA–W–80,076; Nexergy, Inc., Columbus, OH: March 28, 2010 TA–W–80,083; The Genie Company, Shenandoah, VA: March 31, 2011. TA–W–80,094; Motorola Mobility, Inc., Libertyville, IL: March 26, 2010. TA–W–80,110; Callaway Golf Ball Operations, Inc., Chicopee, MA: July 1, 2011. TA–W–80,115; Domtar Industries, Inc., Ashdown, AR: April 18, 2010. TA–W–80,120; Premier Manufacturing Corp., Cleveland, OH: April 11, 2010. TA–W–80,198; Tyco Healthcare Group, LP, San Jose, CA: May 20, 2010. TA–W–80,218; Unimin Corporation, Hamilton, WA: June 3, 2010. TA–W–80,065; Genesis Furniture Industries, Inc., Pontotoc, MS: March 22, 2010. TA–W–80,139; Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Webster City, IA: June 26, 2011. TA–W–80,216; Solar power Industries, Belle Vernon, PA: June 2, 2010. TA–W–80,216A; Solar Power Industries, Mt. Pleasant PA: June 2, 2010. TA–W–80,225; Finisar Corporation, Horsham, PA: April 3, 2011. TA–W–80,225A; Leased Workers from McGrath Technical Staffing, Inc., Horsham, PA: June 8, 2010. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM 08JYN1 40402 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices TA–W–80,060; Valspar Corporation, High Point, NC: June 21, 2010. TA–W–80,060A; Valspar Corporation, High Point, NC: March 16, 2010. TA–W–80,227; BOS Automotive Products, Inc., Morristown, TN: January 13, 2011. TA–W–80,233; Ellison Educational Equipment, Inc., Lake Forest, CA: June 13, 2010. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–80,205; Nidec Motor Corporation, Frankfort, IN: October 28, 2010. TA–W–80,205A: Leased Workers from Manpower, Frankfort, IN: May 26, 2010. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. None. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. None. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:52 Jul 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–80,054; W.M. Glenn Construction, Durham, NC. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–80,041; Quad/Graphics, Depew, NY. TA–W–80,068; New Enterprise Stone and Lime Company, Inc. (NESL), Erie, PA. TA–W–80,074; AES Westover, LLC, Johnson City, NY. TA–W–80,103; HiRel Systems, LLC, Duluth, MN. TA–W–80,163; Dentsply International, Inc., GAC, Bohemia, NY. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–80,026; Computer Task Group, Inc., Mechanicsburg, PA. TA–W–80,031; Thomson Reuters, Creve Coeur, MO. TA–W–80,118; PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP, Kelso, WA. TA–W–80,126; Ryder Integrated Logistics, Highland Park, MI. TA–W–80,213; Healthlink, St. Louis, MO. TA–W–80,219; Beacon Medical Services, LLC, Aurora, CO. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA–W–80,042; Capstar Drilling, Wooster, OH. PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TA–W–80,131; Invensys Operations Management, Irvine, CA. TA–W–80,170; Getty Images, Los Angles, CA. TA–W–80,206; West Clermont School, Cincinnati, OH. TA–W–80,214; California Newspaper Limited Partnership, Callejo, CA. TA–W–80,221; International Netherlands Group, ING, Windsor, CT. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning group of workers are covered by Active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petition group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA–W–75,255; Cooper Standard Automotive, Bowling Green, OH. TA–W–80,106; Delphi Corporation, El Paso, TX. TA–W–80,124; Bestway, Inc., Saint Marys, PA. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 13, 2011 through June 24, 2011. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: June 29, 2011. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–17090 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration TA–W–72,953 Matthews International Corporation, Bronze Division, Kingwood, WV; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On January 28, 2011, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and former workers of Matthews International Corporation, Bronze E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM 08JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40400-40402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of June 13, 
2011 through June 24, 2011.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker

[[Page 40401]]

adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of 
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements 
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-80,014; Geneon Entertainment (USA), Santa Monica, CA: March 1, 
2010.
TA-W-80,037; Boralex Ashland LP, Ashland, ME: March 10, 2010.
TA-W-80,048; Hancock Company, d/b/a/ As Gitman Company/IAG, Ashland, 
PA: December 19, 2010.
TA-W-80,058; Alliance One International, Inc., Morrisville, NC: March 
18, 2010.
TA-W-80,076; Nexergy, Inc., Columbus, OH: March 28, 2010 TA-W-80,083; 
The Genie Company, Shenandoah, VA: March 31, 2011.
TA-W-80,094; Motorola Mobility, Inc., Libertyville, IL: March 26, 2010.
TA-W-80,110; Callaway Golf Ball Operations, Inc., Chicopee, MA: July 1, 
2011.
TA-W-80,115; Domtar Industries, Inc., Ashdown, AR: April 18, 2010.
TA-W-80,120; Premier Manufacturing Corp., Cleveland, OH: April 11, 
2010.
TA-W-80,198; Tyco Healthcare Group, LP, San Jose, CA: May 20, 2010.
TA-W-80,218; Unimin Corporation, Hamilton, WA: June 3, 2010.
TA-W-80,065; Genesis Furniture Industries, Inc., Pontotoc, MS: March 
22, 2010.
TA-W-80,139; Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Webster City, IA: June 26, 
2011.
TA-W-80,216; Solar power Industries, Belle Vernon, PA: June 2, 2010.
TA-W-80,216A; Solar Power Industries, Mt. Pleasant PA: June 2, 2010.
TA-W-80,225; Finisar Corporation, Horsham, PA: April 3, 2011.
TA-W-80,225A; Leased Workers from McGrath Technical Staffing, Inc., 
Horsham, PA: June 8, 2010.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.


[[Page 40402]]


TA-W-80,060; Valspar Corporation, High Point, NC: June 21, 2010.
TA-W-80,060A; Valspar Corporation, High Point, NC: March 16, 2010.
TA-W-80,227; BOS Automotive Products, Inc., Morristown, TN: January 13, 
2011.
TA-W-80,233; Ellison Educational Equipment, Inc., Lake Forest, CA: June 
13, 2010.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

TA-W-80,205; Nidec Motor Corporation, Frankfort, IN: October 28, 2010.
TA-W-80,205A: Leased Workers from Manpower, Frankfort, IN: May 26, 
2010.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 
years of age or older.

None.

    The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.

None.

    The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.

None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

TA-W-80,054; W.M. Glenn Construction, Durham, NC.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

None.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-80,041; Quad/Graphics, Depew, NY.
TA-W-80,068; New Enterprise Stone and Lime Company, Inc. (NESL), Erie, 
PA.
TA-W-80,074; AES Westover, LLC, Johnson City, NY.
TA-W-80,103; HiRel Systems, LLC, Duluth, MN.
TA-W-80,163; Dentsply International, Inc., GAC, Bohemia, NY.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-80,026; Computer Task Group, Inc., Mechanicsburg, PA.
TA-W-80,031; Thomson Reuters, Creve Coeur, MO.
TA-W-80,118; PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP, Kelso, WA.
TA-W-80,126; Ryder Integrated Logistics, Highland Park, MI.
TA-W-80,213; Healthlink, St. Louis, MO.
TA-W-80,219; Beacon Medical Services, LLC, Aurora, CO.

    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.

None.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

TA-W-80,042; Capstar Drilling, Wooster, OH.
TA-W-80,131; Invensys Operations Management, Irvine, CA.
TA-W-80,170; Getty Images, Los Angles, CA.
TA-W-80,206; West Clermont School, Cincinnati, OH.
TA-W-80,214; California Newspaper Limited Partnership, Callejo, CA.
TA-W-80,221; International Netherlands Group, ING, Windsor, CT.

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning group of workers are covered by Active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petition group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W-75,255; Cooper Standard Automotive, Bowling Green, OH.
TA-W-80,106; Delphi Corporation, El Paso, TX.
TA-W-80,124; Bestway, Inc., Saint Marys, PA.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of June 13, 2011 through June 24, 2011. Copies of 
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information 
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to 
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available 
on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 
the searchable listing of determinations.

     Dated: June 29, 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-17090 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.