Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 39446-39447 [2011-16764]

Download as PDF sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 39446 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Notices operator of Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 (PINGP). Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–42 and DPR–60 authorize the licensee to operate PINGP at reactor core power levels not in excess of 1,677 megawatts thermal for each unit, in accordance with the provisions of the PINGP renewed licenses and technical specifications. The notice also serves as the record of decision for Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–42 and DPR–60, consistent with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 51.103, ‘‘Record of Decision—General.’’ NUREG–1437, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 39, Regarding Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2,’’ issued May 2011, discusses the Commission’s consideration of a range of reasonable alternatives, including replacement power from a new natural-gas-fired, combined-cycle plant; a combination of natural gas, wind, and wood-fired generation and conservation; a combination of wind, conservation, and continued operation of one of the PINGP units; and not renewing the licenses (the no-action alternative). The factors considered in the record of decision appear in the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for PINGP. Subsequent to the issuance of the final SEIS, the NRC received two letters commenting on the final SEIS. The first letter was from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, dated June 15, 2011. The second letter was from the Prairie Island Indian Community, dated June 20, 2011. The NRC staff has reviewed the comments and has determined that the comments provide no new or significant information, and therefore, none of the findings in the final SEIS are changed as a result of the comments. The PINGP units are pressurizedwater reactors located within the city limits of Red Wing, MN, on the west bank of the Mississippi River in southeastern Minnesota. The application for the renewed licenses complied with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission’s regulations. As required by the Atomic Energy Act and the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR chapter I, the Commission has made appropriate findings, which are set forth in the licenses. Prior public notice of the action involving the proposed issuance of the renewed licenses and of an opportunity for a hearing on the proposed issuance of the renewed VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Jul 05, 2011 Jkt 223001 licenses was published in the Federal Register on June 17, 2008 (73 FR 34335). For further details with respect to this action, see (1) Northern States Power Company’s license renewal application for PINGP dated April 11, 2008, as supplemented by letters dated through May 11, 2011; (2) the Commission’s safety evaluation report, issued October 16, 2009, and supplemented on April 15, 2011; (3) the licensee’s updated safety analysis report; and (4) the Commission’s final environmental impact statement (NUREG–1437, Supplement 39), issued May 2011. These documents are available at the NRC’s Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, and online in the NRC Library at https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Copies of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–42 and DPR–60, may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: Director, Division of License Renewal. Copies of the PINGP safety evaluation report and the final environmental impact statement (NUREG–1437, Supplement 39) may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161, (https:// www.ntis.gov), 703–605–6000, or Attention: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250–7954, (https://www.gpo.gov/ fdsys), 202–512–1800. All orders should clearly identify the NRC publication number and the requestor’s Government Printing Office deposit account number or VISA or MasterCard number and expiration date. Dated at Rockville, MD, this 27th day of June 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Bo M. Pham, Chief, Projects Branch 1, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011–16848 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. Extension: Rule 17f–2(d); SEC File No. 270–36; PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 OMB Control No. 3235–0028. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the existing collection of information provided for in Rule 17f–2(d) [17 CFR 240.17f–2(d)], under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (‘‘Act’’). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. Rule 17f–2(d) requires that records produced pursuant to the fingerprinting requirements of Section 17(f)(2) of the Act be maintained; permits the designated examining authorities of broker-dealers or members of exchanges, under certain circumstances, to store and maintain records required to be kept by this rule; and permits the required records to be maintained on microfilm. The general purpose for Rule 17f–2 is to: (i) Identify security risk personnel; (ii) provide criminal record information so that employers can make fully informed employment decisions; and (iii) deter persons with criminal records from seeking employment or association with covered entities. The rule enables the Commission or other examining authority to ascertain whether all required persons are being fingerprinted and whether proper procedures regarding fingerprint are being followed. Retention of these records for the term of employment of all personnel plus three years ensures that law enforcement officials will have easy access to fingerprint cards on a timely basis. This in turn acts as an effective deterrent to employee misconduct. Approximately 5,300 respondents are subject to the recordkeeping requirements of the rule. Each respondent keeps approximately 60 new records per year, which takes approximately 2 minutes per record for the respondent to maintain, for an annual burden of approximately 2 hours (60 records times 2 minutes) per respondent or a total annual burden of approximately 10,300 hours (5,300 respondents times 2 hours) for all respondents. All records subject to the rule must be retained for the term of employment plus 3 years. In addition, we estimate the total cost to respondents is approximately $119,000. The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Notices comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: June 29, 2011. Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–16764 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Rule 15b6–1 and Form BDW; OMB Control No. 3235–0018; SEC File No. 270–17] sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Upon written request, copies available from: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request to revise the collection of information discussed below. The Code of Federal Regulations citation to this collection of information is the following rule: 17 CFR 240.15b6–1. Registered broker-dealers use Form BDW (17 CFR 249.501a) to withdraw from registration with the Commission, the self-regulatory organizations, and the states. On average, the Commission estimates that it would take a brokerdealer approximately one hour to complete and file a Form BDW to withdraw from Commission registration as required by Rule 15b6–1. The Commission estimates that approximately 515 broker-dealers withdraw from Commission registration annually 1 and, therefore, file a Form BDW via the Internet with Web CRD, a computer system operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. that maintains information regarding registered broker1 This estimate is based on Form BDW data collected over the past three years. In fiscal year (from 10/1 through 9/30) 2008, 503 broker-dealers withdrew from registration. In fiscal year 2009, 533 broker-dealers withdrew from registration. In fiscal year 2010, 510 broker-dealers withdrew from registration. (503 + 533 + 510)/3 = 515. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Jul 05, 2011 Jkt 223001 dealers and their registered personnel. Therefore, the 515 broker-dealers that withdraw from registration by filing Form BDW would incur an aggregate annual reporting burden of approximately 515 hours.2 The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an e-mail to: Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice. Dated: June 29, 2011. Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–16765 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. IC–29711; File No. 812–13914] J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, et al.; Notice of Application and Temporary Order June 29, 2011. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Temporary order and notice of application for a permanent order under section 9(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’). AGENCY: Summary of Application: Applicants have received a temporary order exempting them from section 9(a) of the Act, with respect to an injunction entered against J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (‘‘J.P. Morgan Securities’’) on June 29, 2011 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (‘‘Injunction’’), until the Commission takes final action on an application for a permanent order. PO 00000 2 (515 × 1 hour) = 515 hours. Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39447 Applicants also have applied for a permanent order. Applicants: J.P. Morgan Securities; Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. (‘‘BSAM’’); Bear Stearns Health Innoventures Management, L.L.C. (‘‘BSHIM’’); BSCGP Inc. (‘‘BSCGP’’); Constellation Growth Capital LLC (‘‘Constellation’’); Constellation Ventures Management II, LLC (‘‘Constellation II’’); Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (‘‘Highbridge’’); JF International Management Inc. (‘‘JFIMI’’); JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited (‘‘JPMAMUK’’); JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. (‘‘JPMDS’’); J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments, Inc. (‘‘JPMII’’); J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (‘‘JPMIM’’); J.P. Morgan Latin America Management Company, LLC (‘‘JPMLAM’’); J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC (‘‘JPMP’’); J.P. Morgan Private Investments Inc. (‘‘JPMPI’’); OEP Co-Investors Management II, Ltd. (‘‘OEP II’’); OEP CoInvestors Management III, Ltd. (‘‘OEP III’’, and together with OEP II, the ‘‘OEP Entities’’); Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated (‘‘Security Capital’’); Sixty Wall Street GP Corporation (‘‘Sixty Wall GP’’); Sixty Wall Street Management Company, LLC (‘‘Sixty Wall Management’’); and Technology Coinvestors Management, LLC (‘‘TCM’’) (collectively, the ‘‘Applicants’’).1 Filing Date: The application was filed on June 21, 2011 and amended on June 29, 2011. Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission’s Secretary and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on July 25, 2011, and should be accompanied by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Commission’s Secretary. ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549– 1090; Applicants: J.P. Morgan 1 Applicants request that any relief granted pursuant to the application also apply to any other company of which J.P. Morgan Securities is or may become an affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Act (together with the Applicants, the ‘‘Covered Persons’’). E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39446-39447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16764]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.
Extension:
    Rule 17f-2(d); SEC File No. 270-36; OMB Control No. 3235-0028.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing collection of 
information provided for in Rule 17f-2(d) [17 CFR 240.17f-2(d)], under 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Act''). 
The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information 
to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17f-2(d) requires that records produced pursuant to the 
fingerprinting requirements of Section 17(f)(2) of the Act be 
maintained; permits the designated examining authorities of broker-
dealers or members of exchanges, under certain circumstances, to store 
and maintain records required to be kept by this rule; and permits the 
required records to be maintained on microfilm. The general purpose for 
Rule 17f-2 is to: (i) Identify security risk personnel; (ii) provide 
criminal record information so that employers can make fully informed 
employment decisions; and (iii) deter persons with criminal records 
from seeking employment or association with covered entities. The rule 
enables the Commission or other examining authority to ascertain 
whether all required persons are being fingerprinted and whether proper 
procedures regarding fingerprint are being followed. Retention of these 
records for the term of employment of all personnel plus three years 
ensures that law enforcement officials will have easy access to 
fingerprint cards on a timely basis. This in turn acts as an effective 
deterrent to employee misconduct.
    Approximately 5,300 respondents are subject to the recordkeeping 
requirements of the rule. Each respondent keeps approximately 60 new 
records per year, which takes approximately 2 minutes per record for 
the respondent to maintain, for an annual burden of approximately 2 
hours (60 records times 2 minutes) per respondent or a total annual 
burden of approximately 10,300 hours (5,300 respondents times 2 hours) 
for all respondents. All records subject to the rule must be retained 
for the term of employment plus 3 years. In addition, we estimate the 
total cost to respondents is approximately $119,000.
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No 
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to

[[Page 39447]]

comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does 
not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control 
number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or 
send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.

     Dated: June 29, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16764 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.