In the Matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination That No Violation of Section 337 Exists; Termination of Investigation, 38417 [2011-16317]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2011 / Notices
from the effective date of publication in
the Federal Register unless, prior to the
end of the 2-year period, the BLM
publishes a Federal Register notice
terminating the segregation.
The lands to be segregated are
identified in the proposed withdrawal
notice that was published in the Federal
Register on April 21, 2011 (76 FR
22414).
Michael D. Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty
Management.
[FR Doc. 2011–16429 Filed 6–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–694]
In the Matter of Certain Multimedia
Display and Navigation Devices and
Systems, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Determination That No
Violation of Section 337 Exists;
Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm,
on modified grounds, the final initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the
presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) on December 16, 2010, finding
no violation of section 337 in the abovecaptioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–1999. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
The
Commission instituted the instant
investigation on December 16, 2009,
based on a complaint filed by Pioneer
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and
Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. of Long
Beach, California (collectively,
‘‘Pioneer’’). 74 FR 66676 (Dec. 16, 2009).
The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain multimedia
display and navigation devices and
systems, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of various claims of United
States Patent Nos. 5,365,448 (‘‘the ’448
patent’’), 5,424,951 (‘‘the ’951 patent’’),
and 6,122,592 (‘‘the ’592 patent’’). The
complaint named Garmin International,
Inc. of Olathe, Kansas, Garmin
Corporation of Taiwan (collectively,
‘‘Garmin’’) and Honeywell International
Inc. of Morristown, New Jersey
(‘‘Honeywell’’) as the proposed
respondents. Honeywell was
subsequently terminated from the
investigation.
On December 16, 2010, the ALJ issued
a final ID. In his final ID, the ALJ found
no violation of section 337 by Garmin.
Specifically, the ALJ found that the
accused products do not infringe claims
1 and 2 of the ’448 patent, claims 1 and
2 of the ’951 patent, or claims 1 and 2
of the ’592 patent. The ALJ found that
the ’592 patent was not proven to be
invalid and that Pioneer has established
a domestic industry under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3)(C). On February 23, 2011, the
Commission determined to review the
final ID in part. On April 18, 2011, the
Commission determined to extend the
target date and requested supplemental
briefing.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
ID and the submissions of the parties,
the Commission has determined to
affirm, on modified grounds, the ALJ’s
finding that Garmin has not violated
section 337. In particular, the
Commission has determined to reverse
the ALJ’s finding that Garmin’s products
do not infringe the asserted claims of
the ’951 patent, affirm his finding that
Garmin’s products do not infringe the
asserted claims of the ’592 patent,
reverse his finding that the asserted
claims of the ’592 patent are not invalid
under the written description
requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112, first
paragraph, and reverse his finding that
Pioneer has established a licensingbased domestic industry for the ’951
and ‘592 patents. The ‘448 patent is no
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38417
longer asserted. The investigation is
terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–.50 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–.50).
Issued: June 24, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–16317 Filed 6–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–780]
In the Matter of Certain Protective
Cases and Components Thereof;
Notice of Institution of Investigation;
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
25, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Otter Products, LLC
of Fort Collins, Colorado. A supplement
was filed on June 16, 2011. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain protective cases and components
thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
7,933,122 (‘‘the ’122 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. D600,908 (‘‘the ’908 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. D617,784 (‘‘the ’784
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. D615,536 (‘‘the
’536 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. D617,785
(‘‘the ’785 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
D634,741 (‘‘the ’741 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. D636,386 (‘‘the ’386 patent’’);
and U.S. Trademark Registration No.
3,788,534 (‘‘the ’534 trademark’’); U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 3,788,535
(‘‘the ’535 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 3,623,789 (‘‘the ’789
trademark’’); and U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 3,795,187 (‘‘the ’187
trademark’’). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 38417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16317]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-694]
In the Matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation
Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same;
Notice of Commission Determination That No Violation of Section 337
Exists; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm, on modified grounds, the final
initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (``ALJ'') on December 16, 2010, finding no violation of
section 337 in the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the instant
investigation on December 16, 2009, based on a complaint filed by
Pioneer Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc.
of Long Beach, California (collectively, ``Pioneer''). 74 FR 66676
(Dec. 16, 2009). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain multimedia display and navigation devices
and systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason
of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos.
5,365,448 (``the '448 patent''), 5,424,951 (``the '951 patent''), and
6,122,592 (``the '592 patent''). The complaint named Garmin
International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas, Garmin Corporation of Taiwan
(collectively, ``Garmin'') and Honeywell International Inc. of
Morristown, New Jersey (``Honeywell'') as the proposed respondents.
Honeywell was subsequently terminated from the investigation.
On December 16, 2010, the ALJ issued a final ID. In his final ID,
the ALJ found no violation of section 337 by Garmin. Specifically, the
ALJ found that the accused products do not infringe claims 1 and 2 of
the '448 patent, claims 1 and 2 of the '951 patent, or claims 1 and 2
of the '592 patent. The ALJ found that the '592 patent was not proven
to be invalid and that Pioneer has established a domestic industry
under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C). On February 23, 2011, the Commission
determined to review the final ID in part. On April 18, 2011, the
Commission determined to extend the target date and requested
supplemental briefing.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
ALJ's final ID and the submissions of the parties, the Commission has
determined to affirm, on modified grounds, the ALJ's finding that
Garmin has not violated section 337. In particular, the Commission has
determined to reverse the ALJ's finding that Garmin's products do not
infringe the asserted claims of the '951 patent, affirm his finding
that Garmin's products do not infringe the asserted claims of the '592
patent, reverse his finding that the asserted claims of the '592 patent
are not invalid under the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C.
112, first paragraph, and reverse his finding that Pioneer has
established a licensing-based domestic industry for the '951 and `592
patents. The `448 patent is no longer asserted. The investigation is
terminated.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.42-.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-.50).
Issued: June 24, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-16317 Filed 6-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P