Final Priorities; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program-Disability Rehabilitation Research Projects, etc., 38134-38142 [2011-16392]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38134-38142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Final Priorities; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects 
and Centers Program--Disability Rehabilitation Research Projects, etc.

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 
Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice of final priorities.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Overview Information

    [CFDA Numbers: 84.133A-6, 84.133A-7, and 84.133A-8] Final 
Priorities; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers 
Program--Disability Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP)--Americans 
with Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network Regional Centers (formerly 
the Disability Business Technical Assistance Centers (DBTACs), the ADA 
National Network Knowledge Translation Center, and the ADA National 
Network Collaborative Research Projects.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 
Rehabilitative Services announces three priorities under the DRRP 
program administered by the National Institute on Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Specifically, we announce (1) A 
priority for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network 
Regional Centers (Priority 1), (2) a priority for the ADA National 
Network Knowledge Translation Center (Priority 2), and (3) a priority 
for the ADA National Network Collaborative Research Projects (Priority 
3). The Assistant Secretary may use one or more of these priorities for 
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2011 and later years. We take this 
action to focus attention on areas of national need.

DATES: Effective Date: These priorities are effective July 29, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Medley, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5140, Potomac Center Plaza 
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700. Telephone: (202) 245-7338 or by e-
mail: lynn.medley@ed.gov.
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the 
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of final priorities (NFP) is in 
concert with NIDRR's currently approved Long-Range Plan (Plan). The 
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006 
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site: 
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
    Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve 
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2) 
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to 
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique 
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine the best 
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for 
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify 
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate 
findings.
    This notice announces three priorities that NIDRR intends to use 
for DRRP competitions in FY 2011 and possibly later years. However, 
nothing precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities if 
needed. Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for 
any of these priorities. The decision to make an award will be based on 
the quality of applications received and available funding.
    Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and 
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related 
activities, including international activities, to develop methods, 
procedures, and rehabilitation technology, that maximize the full 
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living, 
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals 
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe 
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized 
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act).

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects

    The purpose of NIDRR's Disability and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects (DRRPs) are to improve the effectiveness of services 
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, by 
developing methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technologies that 
advance a wide range of independent living and employment outcomes for 
individuals with disabilities, especially individuals with the most 
severe disabilities. DRRPs carry out one or more of the following types 
of activities, as specified and defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through 
350.19: Research, training, demonstration, development, dissemination, 
utilization, and technical assistance.
    Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
    Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR Part 350.
    We published a notice of proposed priorities (NPP) for NIDRR's 
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program in 
the Federal Register on March 22, 2011 (76 FR 15964). That notice 
contained background information and our reasons for proposing 
priorities for the ADA National Network Regional Centers (ADA Regional 
Centers), the ADA National Network Knowledge Translation Center (ADA KT 
Center), and the ADA National Network Collaborative Research Projects.
    Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPP, twelve 
parties submitted comments on the proposed priorities.
    Generally, we do not address technical and other minor changes. In 
addition, we do not address general comments that raised concerns not 
directly related to the proposed priorities.
    Analysis of Comments and Changes: An analysis of the comments and 
of any changes in the priority since publication of the NPP follows.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network Regional Centers 
(Priority 1)

    Comment: One commenter asked whether applicants under Priority 1 
have the option of proposing research activities.

[[Page 38135]]

    Discussion: While Priority 1 does not require applicants to propose 
research activities, nothing in the priority precludes an applicant 
from proposing research in support of the activities that are required. 
What is critical is that an applicant addresses all of the required 
activities in its application.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Three commenters noted that paragraph (a) of Priority 1 
does not mention outreach and capacity building as key services 
provided by the ADA Regional Centers. The commenters recommended that 
NIDRR add those services to the list of activities that collectively 
make up the ADA Network Services.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that outreach to ADA stakeholders and 
efforts to build their capacity to facilitate implementation of, and 
compliance with, the ADA are important services provided by the ADA 
Regional Centers.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (a) of Priority 1 to add 
outreach and capacity building to the list of required ADA Network 
Services.
    Comment: Three commenters recommended that the ADA Regional Centers 
be required to ensure that all of their online information and 
information technology tools and products are accessible to individuals 
with disabilities. The commenters recommended that NIDRR reference 
standards developed under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act 
(section 508) to ensure that accessibility.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the ADA Regional Centers' Web sites 
and information technology tools and products must be fully accessible 
to individuals with disabilities, and will emphasize that requirement 
by adding a specific reference to it in Priority 1.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised the opening paragraph of Priority 1 to 
state that each ADA Regional Center must ensure that all Web sites and 
information technology tools and products that the ADA Regional Center 
develops or maintains are in compliance with the standards developed 
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. NIDRR has similarly 
revised the opening paragraph of Priority 2, as described elsewhere in 
this notice in the discussion of that priority.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR revise paragraph 
(b)(1) of Priority 1 to emphasize that the database maintained by the 
ADA KT Center must be fully accessible to individuals with 
disabilities.
    Discussion: Priority 1 is not the appropriate place to specify the 
accessibility requirements that the ADA KT Center must meet to ensure 
the accessibility of the database or other information technology tools 
and products developed or maintained by the ADA KT Center. NIDRR 
received a number of similar comments with respect to Priority 2, the 
ADA KT Center priority, and will address those comments in the 
discussion of that priority.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter suggested that NIDRR specify in paragraph 
(b)(1) of Priority 1 permissible methods by which the ADA Regional 
Centers can submit data to the ADA KT Center's national database. 
Specifically, the commenter suggested that we make clear that ADA 
Regional Centers can submit data into the database by direct entry of 
data, as well as submission of batch data files from their regional 
databases. This commenter noted that a number of current ADA Regional 
Centers maintain separate databases, from which they produce, and 
submit to the national database, batch files of data about the ADA 
Network Services that they provide.
    Discussion: We drafted Priority 1 to require the ADA Regional 
Center grantees to enter data directly into the database maintained by 
the ADA KT Center. Under this priority, ADA Regional Centers may not 
import batch files from their local databases into the ADA KT Center's 
database. Direct entry into a single ADA National Network database will 
facilitate the quality and consistency of data that the 10 ADA Regional 
Centers collect and will help ensure that we accurately describe and 
account for the services that they collectively provide to ADA 
stakeholders. By using a single database, rather than multiple ones, we 
avoid duplication of effort and the inefficient use of Federal 
resources.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter noted that the three required categories of 
data enumerated in paragraph (b)(1) of Priority 1 were negotiated and 
agreed upon by NIDRR, the ADA Regional Centers, and the Coordination, 
Outreach, and Research Center (CORC) during the 2006-2011 grant funding 
cycle. This commenter asked if the three data categories listed in 
paragraph (b)(1) of the priority will be recognized and required in the 
next funding cycle.
    Discussion: Paragraph (b)(1) of Priority 1 identifies three primary 
categories of data that each ADA Regional Center must collect and enter 
into the ADA KT Center's database. It is true that these three 
categories of data were agreed upon during the 2006-2011 funding cycle. 
We have included these categories in this priority to provide all 
applicants with information about the data that NIDRR will require them 
to collect. Accordingly, entities awarded a grant under Priority 1 
would be required to submit at least these categories of data during 
their grant cycle. We anticipate using this priority in the FY 2011 
grant competition.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters suggested that we revise paragraph (b)(1) 
of Priority 1 to require that the database maintained by the ADA KT 
Center be ``user-friendly'' so that the ADA Regional Centers can easily 
enter the required data.
    Discussion: The database referenced by the commenter is operated 
and maintained by the ADA KT Center, which is funded under Priority 2. 
Priority 1 is therefore not the appropriate place to address the 
requirements of the database. NIDRR received a number of similar 
comments in response to Priority 2, the ADA KT Center priority, and 
will address those comments in the discussion related to that priority.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter questioned the necessity of funding ten 
regional centers under this priority. The commenter noted the potential 
programmatic efficiency and fiscal benefits of instead having a single 
ADA technical assistance center.
    Discussion: NIDRR believes that the strength of the ADA National 
Network (that is, the 10 ADA Regional Centers working together with the 
ADA KT Center and ADA Collaborative Research Projects) exists in the 
ability of each ADA Regional Center to understand and address the 
unique regional and local constituent needs for ADA Network Services. 
Maintaining this regional structure facilitates regional and local 
relationships and partnerships that foster implementation of, and 
compliance with the ADA. At the same time, NIDRR aims to create 
efficiencies in the regional network through the activities of the ADA 
KT Center. The ADA KT Center is responsible for assisting the ADA 
Regional Centers to achieve optimal efficiency and impact of their 
training, technical assistance, and information dissemination 
activities.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters recommended that, due to the low employment 
status of individuals with disabilities, NIDRR should prioritize ADA 
Network Services to U.S. businesses to stimulate the employment or re-
employment of individuals with

[[Page 38136]]

disabilities during the economic recovery.
    Discussion: Nothing in Priority 1 precludes grantees from 
prioritizing the provision of ADA Network Services, including providing 
training and technical assistance on Title I of the ADA, to employers. 
However, the requirements in the ADA also apply to a wide range of 
public services and public accommodations, and the ADA Regional Centers 
must provide ADA Network Services that are responsive to the needs of a 
wide variety of individuals and entities with rights and 
responsibilities under all Titles of the ADA.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise Priority 1 to 
require the ADA Regional Centers to provide training and technical 
assistance focused on several specific topic areas. The commenter 
suggested that the ADA Regional Centers be required to provide training 
and technical assistance on accessible communication and information 
technology. The commenter also stated that the ADA Regional Centers 
should be required to provide training and technical assistance 
focusing on emergency preparedness for people with disabilities. This 
commenter also recommended that Priority 1 be revised to require 
training and technical assistance focusing on accessible voting for 
individuals with disabilities.
    Discussion: Under Priority 1, the ADA Regional Centers are required 
to implement a sustained program of ADA Network Services that are 
designed to contribute to the improved understanding by ADA 
stakeholders of their rights and responsibilities under the ADA. In 
paragraph (a) of the priority, we make clear that we anticipate that 
ADA stakeholders will need information on longstanding ADA requirements 
as well as recent changes affecting those requirements and information 
on issues associated with ADA compliance in emerging areas, such as 
access to information technologies and emergency management services. 
The priority does not provide an exhaustive list of required topic 
areas because we expect each ADA Regional Center to design its services 
to meet the specific needs of the ADA stakeholders it serves. 
Accordingly, while not specifically listed in the priority, ADA 
Regional Centers should be prepared to provide training and technical 
assistance on the topics mentioned by these commenters, as well as on 
all aspects of employment of people with disabilities, and on the wide 
variety of public services and accommodations covered by the ADA.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise Priority 1 to 
require the ADA Regional Centers to provide training and technical 
assistance focused on several specific topic areas. The commenter 
suggested that the ADA Regional Centers be required to provide training 
and technical assistance on accessible communication and information 
technology. The commenter also stated that the ADA Regional Centers 
should be required to provide training and technical assistance 
focusing on emergency preparedness for people with disabilities. This 
commenter also recommended that Priority 1 be revised to require 
training and technical assistance focusing on accessible voting for 
individuals with disabilities.
    Discussion: Under Priority 1, the ADA Regional Centers are required 
to implement a sustained program of ADA Network Services that are 
designed to contribute to the improved understanding by ADA 
stakeholders of their rights and responsibilities under the ADA. In 
paragraph (a) of the priority, we make clear that we anticipate that 
ADA stakeholders will need information on longstanding ADA requirements 
as well as recent changes affecting those requirements and information 
on issues associated with ADA compliance in emerging areas, such as 
access to information technologies and emergency management services. 
The priority does not provide an exhaustive list of required topic 
areas because we expect each ADA Regional Center to design its services 
to meet the specific needs of the ADA stakeholders it serves. 
Accordingly, while not specifically listed in the priority, ADA 
Regional Centers should be prepared to provide training and technical 
assistance on the topics mentioned by these commenters, as well as on 
all aspects of employment of people with disabilities, and on the wide 
variety of public services and accommodations covered by the ADA.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise Priority 1 to 
require the ADA Regional Centers to address the needs of transition-age 
youth in their information dissemination and training activities. The 
commenter noted that there is little Federal funding supporting 
programs that teach transition-age youth about their rights and 
responsibilities under the ADA. This commenter also recommended that 
Priority 1 require ADA Regional Centers to provide training and 
resources related to implementation of the U.S. Supreme Court's 
Olmstead decision. The commenter noted the importance of training in 
this area for youth with disabilities who lose home care services as 
they age out of childhood Medicare programs.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that transition-age youth with 
disabilities are an important ADA stakeholder group, and that training 
and technical assistance related to implementation of the Supreme 
Court's Olmstead decision may be of specific assistance to them as they 
seek community supports and services. However, NIDRR does not require 
the provision of training and technical assistance to specific groups 
of ADA stakeholders, nor does it require training and technical 
assistance on specific public programs and policies such as those that 
implement the Olmstead decision. ADA Regional Centers should be 
prepared to provide training and technical assistance to the wide range 
of individuals and entities with rights and responsibilities under the 
ADA, including transition-age youth with disabilities, and on the wide 
variety of public services and accommodations covered by the ADA, as 
part of their general responsibility under the priority to implement a 
sustained program of ADA Network Services that improves understanding 
by ADA stakeholders of their rights and responsibilities under the ADA.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter stated that in the wake of recent Federal 
legislation such as the 2008 amendments to the ADA, and the recent 
health care reform legislation there is a need for training and 
information on the accessibility of recreation facilities and medical 
equipment frequently used by children and youth with disabilities. The 
commenter suggested that the ADA Regional Centers should provide this 
training and information.
    Discussion: While NIDRR does not require the provision of training 
and technical assistance on specific topics such as accessibility of 
recreation facilities and medical equipment, we expect the ADA Regional 
Centers to tailor the ADA Network Services to the needs of the ADA 
stakeholders in its region. Therefore, ADA Regional Centers should be 
prepared to provide training and technical assistance on the wide 
variety of public services and accommodations covered by the ADA and 
this very well may include the accessibility of recreation facilities 
and medical equipment.
    Changes: None.

[[Page 38137]]

    Comment: Two commenters suggested that NIDRR revise Priority 1 to 
more clearly describe the role of the ADA Regional Centers as outlets 
for knowledge translation. One of these commenters suggested that NIDRR 
require each ADA Regional Center to develop a regional knowledge 
translation plan.
    Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that a more prescriptive approach 
to the role of the ADA Regional Centers, or requiring each ADA Regional 
Center to develop a regional KT plan would improve ADA Network 
Services. The core function of the ADA Regional Centers is knowledge 
translation in that ADA Regional Centers must translate and deliver 
available ADA knowledge and information to ADA stakeholders through 
outreach, training, technical assistance, information dissemination, 
and capacity building. We believe that Priority 1 provides grantees 
with an appropriate framework to ensure these knowledge translation 
activities are carried out, while giving grantees the flexibility they 
need to provide services that are responsive to the specific knowledge 
and information needs of the ADA stakeholders in their regions.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR revise Priority 1 to 
add ``legal updates'' to the list of information services and products 
to be delivered under paragraph (c)(1).
    Discussion: NIDRR does not intend the list of materials, products, 
and services in paragraph (c)(1) of Priority 1 to be exhaustive. 
Nothing in the priority precludes ADA Regional Center applicants from 
proposing to provide legal updates under paragraph (c)(1). However, 
NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis for requiring all applicants to 
do so.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise Priority 1 to 
require ADA Regional Centers to collaborate and coordinate with the 
Department's AT Act programs in their respective region when conducting 
training, technical assistance, outreach, and dissemination activities.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that collaboration between the ADA 
Regional Centers and the AT Act programs may help in the provision of 
training and technical assistance, and in expanding outreach and 
dissemination efforts to ADA stakeholders. Nothing in Priority 1 
precludes applicants from proposing partnerships with AT Act programs. 
At the same time, NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis for requiring 
all applicants to do so.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that the ADA Regional Centers 
collaborate with the Parent Training Information Centers and the 
Community Parent Resource Centers funded by the Department's Office of 
Special Education Programs (OSEP), and Parent Information and Training 
projects funded by the Department's Rehabilitation Services 
Administration (RSA), in order to provide ADA information and training 
to families of children and youth with disabilities.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that these partnerships may facilitate the 
provision of ADA information to families and parents of children and 
youth with disabilities. Nothing in Priority 1 precludes applicants 
from proposing partnerships with Parent Training and Information 
Projects funded by OSEP, or Parent Training and Information Projects 
funded by the RSA. At the same time, NIDRR does not have a sufficient 
basis for requiring all applicants to do so. Applicants for the ADA 
Regional Centers have a large number of potential collaborators and 
dissemination partners. NIDRR does not want to limit applicants' 
choices by requiring partnerships with a limited set of entities.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter asked if two organizations can partner to 
apply for one ADA Regional Center, and if so, which applicant would be 
awarded the grant.
    Discussion: Two or more organizations can partner to submit an 
application under the ADA Regional Center priority. Eligible applicants 
include States, public or private agencies, including for-profit 
agencies; public or private organizations, including for-profit 
organizations; institutions of higher education; and Indian tribes and 
tribal organizations. In submitting an application, partnering 
applicants must designate which organization will serve as the lead 
applicant. Parts 75.127-75.129 of the Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) describe requirements for group 
applications.
    Changes: None.

Priority 2--ADA National Network Knowledge Translation Center

    Comment: One commenter suggested that NIDRR specifically include 
RSA when referencing the Network's ``Federal partners'' in paragraph 
(a)(4) of Priority 2.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that RSA is an important Federal partner. 
In paragraph (a)(4) of Priority 2, which relates to annual meetings of 
the ADA National Network Project Directors, we have only specifically 
identified the U.S. Department of Justice and the Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission because these partners have direct 
responsibility for enforcing the ADA. However, we also make clear in 
paragraph (a)(4) of Priority 2 that the ADA KT Center may include 
``other relevant agencies'' in its organization of annual meetings of 
the ADA Regional Centers' Project Directors meetings and RSA could 
certainly be included under this category.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR require the ADA KT 
Center to partner with OSEP's network of Parent Training and 
Information Projects, as well as with RSA's Parent Training and 
Information Projects. The commenter noted that families of children 
with disabilities do not have adequate knowledge of the 
responsibilities of day care providers under the ADA, or of how 
families of children with disabilities may be protected by specific ADA 
provisions. The commenter recommended that we require the ADA KT Center 
to enter into these partnerships to ensure that targeted ADA 
information is provided to families and parents of children with 
disabilities, and to child care providers.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that these partnerships may help ensure 
that ADA information is provided to families and parents of children 
with disabilities. Nothing in Priority 2 precludes applicants from 
proposing partnerships with OSEP's Parent Training and Information 
Projects or RSA's Parent Training and Information Projects. However, 
NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis for requiring all applicants to 
do so. Applicants for this ADA KT Center have a large number of 
potential collaborators and dissemination partners with whom they may 
wish to work. NIDRR does not want to limit applicants' choices by 
requiring partnerships with a limited set of entities.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters noted that paragraph (a) of Priority 2 does 
not mention outreach and capacity building as key services provided by 
the ADA Regional Centers. The commenters recommended that NIDRR revise 
the priority to include those activities in the list of ADA Network 
Services.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that outreach to ADA stakeholders, and 
efforts to build their capacity to facilitate implementation of and 
compliance with the ADA, are important services provided by the ADA

[[Page 38138]]

National Network, including the ADA KT Center.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (a) of Priority 2 to add 
outreach and capacity building to the list of required ADA Network 
Services.
    Comment: One commenter noted the importance of the ADA KT Center's 
toll-free telephone number as a way for ADA stakeholders to contact the 
ADA National Network and receive technical assistance on the ADA. This 
commenter recommended that the ADA KT Center be required to maintain, 
administer, and provide logistical and financial support for the ADA 
National Network's toll-free telephone number.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that this toll-free telephone number is an 
important resource for ADA stakeholders to contact the ADA National 
Network. Although NIDRR expects the 10 ADA Regional Centers and the ADA 
KT Center to negotiate and implement the most efficient means of 
maintenance and administration of this resource, it is beyond the scope 
of this priority to prescribe the mechanisms by which telephone 
services for the ADA National Network will be maintained.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Three commenters recommended that we revise Priority 2 to 
require the ADA KT Center to ensure that all of its online information 
and information technology tools and products are accessible to 
individuals with disabilities. Specifically, the commenters recommended 
that NIDRR revise the priority to require that these online tools and 
products comply with standards developed in accordance with section 508 
of the Rehabilitation Act to ensure their accessibility.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the Web sites and information 
technology tools and products of the ADA KT Center should be fully 
accessible to individuals with disabilities, and will emphasize the 
requirement by adding a specific reference to it in Priority 2.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised the opening paragraph of Priority 2 to 
state that the ADA KT Center must ensure that all Web sites and 
information technology tools and products it develops or maintains are 
in compliance with the standards developed under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act. NIDRR has similarly revised the opening paragraph 
of Priority 1, as described elsewhere in this notice, in the discussion 
of that priority.
    Comment: Two commenters recommended that Priority 2 require that 
the ADA KT Center ensure that all of their online information and 
information technology tools and products are user-friendly.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the database maintained by the ADA KT 
Center under paragraph (d)(1) of Priority 2 should be easy to use for 
the ADA Regional Center staff who must use it. The users of this 
database are a small group of ADA Regional Center grantees. Under 
paragraph (d)(1) of Priority 2, the ADA KT Center is required to ensure 
a user-friendly interface for these users. For the other online 
information and information technology tools and products that are 
described in Priority 2, there are a large number of users with varying 
needs. Because ``user-friendliness'' can vary widely depending on the 
user, and in the absence of agreed-upon, enforceable standards for the 
``user-friendliness'' of online information and information technology 
tools and products, NIDRR does not believe it can apply this 
requirement broadly as part of Priority 2.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters suggested that the ADA KT Center should be 
required to collaborate with the ADA Regional Centers under paragraph 
(b)(2) of Priority 2, to identify knowledge gaps among ADA stakeholders 
and related ADA research topics.
    Discussion: Priority 2 requires the ADA KT Center to collaborate 
directly with ADA stakeholders to help identify ADA knowledge gaps. 
Although Proposed Priority 2 did not explicitly say so, the ADA KT 
Center may propose to collaborate with the ADA Regional Centers to help 
identify ADA knowledge gaps among ADA stakeholders, a point we will 
clarify in the final priority. However, NIDRR believes that making this 
collaboration a requirement could limit opportunities and resources for 
other appropriate and innovative collaborations related to this task. 
For this reason, we will not require this collaboration under the 
priority.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (b)(2) of Priority 2 to state 
that the ADA KT Center may collaborate with the ADA Regional Centers to 
help identify ADA knowledge gaps.
    Comment: Two commenters suggested that, under paragraph (d)(1) of 
Priority 2, the ADA KT Center should be required to collaborate with 
the ADA Regional Centers to continue the operation and maintenance of 
the existing database for data submitted by each of the ADA Regional 
Centers.
    Discussion: The operation and maintenance of a database involves a 
variety of ongoing tasks to ensure that software and hardware are fully 
functional and available for use. These tasks to be carried out by the 
ADA KT Center do not require direct collaboration with the ADA Regional 
Centers. However, under paragraph (d)(4) of Priority 2, the ADA KT 
Center is required to collaborate with NIDRR and the ADA Regional 
Centers to ensure that the database is accurate, comprehensive, easy-
to-use, and up-to-date.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Three commenters suggested that the ADA KT Center should 
be required to collaborate with the ADA Regional Centers under 
paragraph (d)(2) of Priority 2, in order to help identify the training 
and technical assistance needs related to analysis and use of the 
database.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the ADA KT Center should be required 
to work with the ADA Regional Centers to identify the ADA Regional 
Centers' database-related training and technical assistance needs so 
that the ADA KT Center is better able to tailor the training and 
technical assistance services it provides to the needs of the ADA 
Regional Centers.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (d)(2) of Priority 2 to 
require the ADA KT Center to identify the database-related training and 
technical assistance needs of the ten ADA Regional Centers.
    Comment: Three commenters suggested that NIDRR revise paragraph 
(d)(2) of Priority 2 to specify that the provision of database-related 
training and technical assistance should be on an as-needed basis.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the ADA KT Center should provide 
database-related training and technical assistance to the ADA Regional 
Centers on an as-needed basis. NIDRR also believes that the ADA KT 
Center must provide regular, consistent training and technical 
assistance to all 10 ADA Regional Centers to help ensure the quality 
and consistency of data that are gathered and entered directly into the 
database by the Regional Centers.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (d) of Priority 2 to specify 
that the ADA KT Center must provide formal, scheduled training and 
technical assistance to all 10 ADA Regional Centers on the use of the 
database and that the ADA KT Center must provide targeted database-
related training and technical assistance to individual centers on an 
as-needed basis.
    Comment: Three commenters noted that paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(4) 
of Priority 2 appear to be duplicative and suggested that NIDRR delete 
the data-quality monitoring requirements in paragraph (d)(3) of 
Priority 2.
    Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that these paragraphs have 
duplicative

[[Page 38139]]

requirements. Paragraph (d)(3) requires regular and ongoing monitoring 
of data quality. Monitoring for data quality includes, for example, 
analyses to determine rates of missing or incomplete data, and analyses 
to determine whether data fall within the specified ranges of response 
options. The requirements in paragraph (d)(4) are broader, and involve 
ongoing discussions to ensure that the data fields and response options 
accurately reflect up-to-date ADA policies and regulations, as well as 
discussions about how to optimize the user-friendliness of the 
database.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Three commenters asked NIDRR to require that the database 
described in paragraph (d)(1) of Priority 2 allow the ADA Regional 
Centers to generate reports that support their Annual Performance 
Reporting requirements.
    Discussion: NIDRR believes that this request is already 
sufficiently covered by the requirement in paragraph (d)(1) of Priority 
2, which states that the database must provide data retrieval 
capabilities. The detailed information in the database can be used by 
the ADA Regional Centers aggregated to produce reports that meet ADA 
Regional Centers' more general annual performance reporting 
requirements for NIDRR.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters asked whether NIDRR intended to transfer 
the database described under paragraph (d)(1) from the DBTAC CORC to 
the new ADA KT Center. The commenters asked NIDRR to provide details 
about the existing database software framework and design so that 
applicants can prepare a cost estimate for the requirement to operate 
and maintain the database.
    Discussion: NIDRR does intend to transfer the database described 
under paragraph (d)(1) to the new ADA KT Center. NIDRR will make 
information about the database software framework and design available 
to interested applicants. Applicants that are interested in receiving 
this information should contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT in this notice.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter noted that the existing database described 
in paragraph (d)(1) of Priority 2 is designed to collect information 
about the delivery of ADA Network Services. This commenter recommended 
that NIDRR require the ADA KT Center to work with the ADA Regional 
Centers to design a system for measuring the outcomes of ADA Network 
Services.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the addition of a formal mechanism 
for measuring the outcomes of the ADA Network Services would benefit 
the Network and its stakeholders and will therefore make a change to 
this effect in paragraph (d) of Priority 2.
    Changes: NIDRR has added a provision to paragraph (d) to require 
the development and implementation of a process and system for 
measuring and tracking the outcomes of ADA Network Services.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR revise paragraph 
(a)(2) of Priority 2 to further specify that the ADA KT Center must 
work with each individual ADA Regional Center to develop regional KT 
plans, and then work with the 10 ADA Regional Centers to organize the 
most effective strategies to optimize the efficiency and impact of the 
ADA Network Services.
    Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that the outcome of optimal 
efficiency and impact of the ADA National Network Services would be 
facilitated by requiring each ADA Regional Center to work with the ADA 
KT Center to develop a regional KT plan. Such a requirement would be 
redundant with the core function of the ADA Regional Centers, which is 
to translate and deliver available ADA information and knowledge to ADA 
stakeholders.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: Two commenters suggested that NIDRR revise paragraph 
(d)(1) of Priority 2 to specify the methods by which the ADA Regional 
Centers will submit data to the database to include direct entry of 
data, and submission of batch files.
    Discussion: Priority 2, the ADA KT Center priority, is not the 
appropriate place to specify the methods by which the ADA Regional 
Centers will submit data to the database. NIDRR received a number of 
similar comments on Priority 1, the ADA Regional Center priority, and 
addressed those comments there.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that the ADA KT Center consider 
the impact of policy and practice on ADA research.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that ADA research should be informed by, 
and be relevant to, ADA policy and practice. Under paragraph (b)(2) of 
Priority 2, the ADA KT Center must collaborate with ADA stakeholders to 
determine ADA knowledge gaps. Nothing in the priority precludes 
applicants from proposing collaborations with policymakers, service 
providers, and other relevant stakeholders to determine knowledge gaps 
and shape future ADA research topics.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR revise paragraph 
(a)(3) of Priority 2 to allow applicants to either propose to maintain 
the current ADA document portal, or to propose an alternative mechanism 
so that ADA Regional Centers and ADA stakeholders can have easy access 
to ADA documents that they need.
    Discussion: NIDRR agrees that applicants for the ADA KT Center 
should be allowed to propose alternatives and improvements to the 
current ADA document portal.
    Changes: NIDRR has revised paragraph (a)(3) of Priority 2 to allow 
applicants to propose and implement new methods that allow fast and 
efficient identification and retrieval of documents relevant to the 
ADA.

Priority 3--ADA National Network Collaborative Research Projects

    Comment: Several commenters questioned the eligibility requirement 
in the opening paragraph of Priority 3, which states that eligibility 
is restricted to applicants that have received a grant under the ADA 
Regional Center priority. Three commenters suggested that other 
entities, including other NIDRR grantees with expertise that is 
relevant to the ADA, should be allowed to apply. Another commenter 
questioned the eligibility limitation because, in the commenter's view, 
the ADA Regional Centers are not able to conduct research that is 
national in scope.
    Discussion: NIDRR's ADA National Network program is evolving into a 
network of grantees that is capable of conducting multi-site research 
and generating new knowledge of national significance related to ADA 
implementation and compliance. NIDRR has designed Priority 3 to utilize 
this network. Therefore, only ADA Regional Centers are eligible to 
apply as lead applicants under Priority 3. While the lead applicant 
must be an ADA Regional Center, applicants are free to include research 
partners that are not part of the ADA National Network in their 
research proposal.
    With regard to the commenter that stated that the ADA Regional 
Centers are not able to provide research that is national in scope, 
NIDRR believes that the network of ADA Regional Centers does have the 
capacity to conduct high-quality, multi-site ADA research that is of 
national significance. NIDRR requires lead applicants to collaborate 
with three or more ADA Regional Centers to help ensure that the 
research is of significance to all U.S. regions.

[[Page 38140]]

    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter suggested that restricting the eligibility 
to ADA Regional Centers in Priority 3 would limit applicants' choice of 
research partners.
    Discussion: Nothing in Priority 3 restricts applicants in their 
choice of research partners. While applicants must propose to 
collaborate with at least three additional ADA Regional Centers, they 
may also propose an unlimited number of research partners that are not 
part of the ADA National Network.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter asked whether each ADA Regional Center is 
expected to participate in an ADA Collaborative Research Project.
    Discussion: ADA Regional Centers are not required to participate in 
an ADA Collaborative Research Project.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter asked NIDRR to set minimum budget 
commitments for ADA Regional Centers who participate in ADA 
Collaborative Research Projects.
    Discussion: NIDRR has not set minimum budgets for ADA Regional 
Centers that choose to participate in ADA Collaborative Research 
Projects because the costs for the ADA Regional Center's participation 
in an ADA Collaborative Research Project are covered under the 
Collaborative Research grant. The recipients of the Collaborative 
Research Project grants under Priority 3 are expected to subcontract 
with the other participating ADA Regional Centers.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter asked whether, under Priority 3, the new ADA 
KT Center would be eligible to apply for an ADA Collaborative Research 
grant.
    Discussion: Receiving an award under Priority 2, the ADA KT Center 
priority, does not make that grantee eligible for an award under the 
ADA National Network Collaborative Research Projects priority. An 
applicant must have received a grant under Priority 1, the ADA National 
Network Regional Center priority, in order to be eligible for an ADA 
National Network Collaborative Research grant.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter expressed concern that NIDRR may be focusing 
exclusively on employment-related ADA research, to the exclusion of ADA 
research that focuses on participation and community living or health 
and function outcomes. The commenter asked NIDRR to add language to 
Priority 3 to emphasize that the priority is not solely focused on 
employment-related research.
    Discussion: Nothing in Priority 3 precludes applicants from 
focusing their ADA research on questions related to participation and 
community living outcomes, or health and function outcomes. The 
priority makes clear that applicants must conduct research on one or 
more areas in the ADA, and may focus their research on one or more 
titles in the ADA--not just employment-related research that would be 
relevant under Title I. NIDRR does not believe that there is anything 
in Priority 3 that emphasizes one area of ADA research over others.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter suggested that Priority 3 emphasize research 
that explores the connections and emerging policy issues that arise 
between the ADA and other statutes that promote inclusion of people 
with disabilities, including the Air Carrier Access Act, Fair Housing 
Act, Transportation Act, and Communications Act.
    Discussion: Nothing in Priority 3 precludes applicants from 
proposing collaborative research on these policy topics. However, NIDRR 
does not have sufficient basis to require all applicants to do so.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter asked whether the ADA Collaborative Research 
Projects would be restricted to large database exploration, or if 
development, intervention, and utility studies would be encouraged.
    Discussion: Priority 3 does not restrict the type of research 
studies that can be proposed and conducted. The priority only specifies 
that applicants must use appropriate and clearly-identified research 
designs to generate reliable and valid findings.
    Changes: None.

Final Priorities

Priority 1--Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network 
Regional Centers

    The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative 
Services establishes a priority for the funding of 10 Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) to serve as the ADA National 
Network Regional Centers (formerly known as Disability Business 
Technical Assistance Centers (DBTACs)), one within each of the 10 U.S. 
Department of Education regions that cover the United States. Together, 
the 10 ADA National Network Regional Centers (ADA Regional Centers), 
along with the ADA National Network Knowledge Translation Center (ADA 
KT Center, funded under a separate priority) and the ADA Collaborative 
Research Projects (funded under a separate priority) will comprise the 
ADA National Network.
    Each ADA Regional Center must ensure that all Web sites and 
information technology tools and products that the ADA Regional Center 
develops or maintains are in compliance with standards developed under 
section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d).
    Each ADA Regional Center must be designed to contribute to the 
following outcomes:
    (a) Improved understanding by ADA stakeholders of their rights and 
responsibilities under the ADA. Each ADA Regional Center must 
contribute to this outcome by implementing a sustained program of 
outreach, training, technical assistance, information dissemination, 
and capacity building (collectively, ADA Network Services), aimed at 
ADA stakeholders, including local, regional, and national groups 
representing such stakeholders. NIDRR anticipates that ADA stakeholders 
will need information on both longstanding ADA requirements as well as 
recent legislative and regulatory changes affecting those requirements, 
such as the ADA Amendments Act, the revised title II and III 
regulations (28 CFR Parts 35 and 36, respectively), the anticipated 
revisions to the title I regulations (29 CFR Part 1630), and 
information on issues associated with ADA compliance in emerging areas 
such as access to information technologies and emergency management 
services. For purposes of this priority, the term ``ADA stakeholders'' 
refers to individuals and entities with rights and responsibilities 
under the ADA.
    (b) Improved understanding of ADA stakeholders' need for and 
receipt of ADA Network Services over time, including services to 
address emerging issues related to compliance with ADA requirements. 
Each of the 10 ADA Regional Centers must contribute to this outcome 
by--
    (1) Entering, directly into the database maintained by the ADA KT 
Center, the required data about each of the ADA Network Services that 
it provides. These data must include, but are not limited to, (1) the 
ADA title or titles, regulations, and specific topics that are 
addressed by the ADA Network Services provided, (2) the modality of 
service provision (e.g., in-person presentation, webinar), and (3) non-
personally identifiable information about the recipient or recipients 
of the ADA Network Services;
    (2) Collaborating with the ADA KT Center to analyze data about ADA 
stakeholder requests for information and

[[Page 38141]]

the services that the ADA Regional Center provides, and applying new 
knowledge from those analyses to further tailor and improve the 
provision of ADA Network Services; and
    (3) Identifying and implementing other appropriate methods for 
assessing the needs of ADA stakeholders.
    (c) Enhanced efficiency and effectiveness of ADA Network Services. 
Each of the ten ADA Regional Centers must contribute to this outcome 
by--
    (1) Partnering with the ADA KT Center and other ADA Regional 
Centers to develop, provide, and distribute ADA training and technical 
assistance materials, and other informational products and services. 
These materials, products, and services include, but are not limited 
to, the ADA National Network Web site, as well as materials, products, 
and services that are relevant to ADA stakeholders in multiple regions.
    (2) Attending and participating in the annual meetings of the ADA 
Regional Centers' Project Directors, to be held in Washington, DC.

Priority 2-- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network 
Knowledge Translation Center (ADA KT Center)

    The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative 
Services establishes a priority for the funding of a Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP) to serve as an Americans with 
Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network Knowledge Translation Center 
(ADA KT Center). For purposes of this priority, the term ``ADA 
stakeholders'' refers to individuals and entities with rights and 
responsibilities under the ADA.
    The ADA KT Center must ensure that all Web sites and information 
technology tools and products that it develops or maintains are in 
compliance with standards developed under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d).
    Under this priority, the ADA KT Center must be designed to 
contribute to the following outcomes:
    (a) Optimal efficiency and impact of the ADA National Network's 
outreach, training, technical assistance, information dissemination, 
and capacity building activities (ADA Network Services). The ADA KT 
Center must contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Establishing and implementing an online system to enable the 10 
ADA Regional Centers to share training and technical assistance 
documents and other materials;
    (2) Facilitating the joint development of ADA products and 
materials by the 10 ADA Regional Centers in content areas in which it 
is possible to maximize resources and avoid duplication of efforts;
    (3) Serving as the central repository for ADA National Network 
information and products, and maintaining ADA Network document portals 
and Web sites currently funded by NIDRR. In this role, the ADA KT 
Center may propose new methods and approaches to ensure fast and 
efficient identification and retrieval of ADA documents by ADA Regional 
Centers and ADA stakeholders; and
    (4) Organizing and providing logistical and financial support for 
annual meetings of the ADA Regional Centers' Project Directors in 
Washington, DC. These meetings will facilitate collaboration between 
the 10 ADA Regional Centers, and will allow the Project Directors of 
the ADA Regional Centers to meet and share information directly with 
their Federal partners in the U.S. Department of Justice, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission, and other relevant agencies.
    (b) Increased use of available ADA-related research findings to 
inform behavior, practices, or policies that improve equal access in 
society for individuals with disabilities. The ADA KT Center must 
contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Systematically reviewing existing ADA-related research. The ADA 
KT Center must identify and conduct systematic reviews of individual 
ADA research studies to assess the quality of those studies and to 
synthesize the findings from those studies. In so doing, the ADA KT 
Center must select appropriate review methods, taking into account the 
type of research and stage of knowledge development in each area of ADA 
research. These areas may include, but are not limited to research on 
specific titles of the ADA, research on ADA issues in specific 
industries, and research on ADA issues that are relevant to individuals 
with specific types of disabilities; and
    (2) Identifying, for future research, topics that would provide new 
knowledge or tools to help individuals with rights and responsibilities 
under the ADA (ADA stakeholders) implement and comply with the ADA. The 
ADA KT Center must identify future research topics based on the 
information gathered through the systematic reviews conducted under 
paragraph (b)(1) of this priority, in combination with information 
about gaps in ADA stakeholder knowledge related to ADA implementation. 
The ADA KT Center must collaborate with ADA stakeholders, which may 
include the ADA Regional Centers, to determine these knowledge gaps.
    (c) Increased awareness and utilization of ADA-related research 
findings by appropriate ADA stakeholder groups. The ADA KT Center must 
contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Combining or adapting knowledge translation approaches from the 
existing literature to disseminate and promote the use of ADA-related 
research generated by the ADA National Network Collaborative Research 
Projects (funded under a separate priority) and other NIDRR grantees as 
appropriate; and
    (2) Organizing and providing logistical and financial support for a 
conference on ADA-related research. This conference must highlight 
research findings produced by the ADA National Network Research 
Collaborative Research Projects and other ADA researchers. This 
conference must take place in year five of the ADA National Network 
grant cycle.
    (d) Improved understanding of ADA stakeholders' need for and 
receipt of ADA Network Services over time, including services to 
address emerging issues related to compliance with ADA requirements. 
The ADA KT Center must contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Continuing the operation and maintenance of the existing 
database for data submitted by each of the ADA Regional Centers. This 
database was previously known as the Outcome Measurement System, and is 
presently operated by the DBTAC Coordination, Outreach, and Research 
Center (CORC). This database was designed to contain data on each 
DBTAC's core activities, including training, technical assistance, 
public awareness events, and dissemination of materials. In operating 
and maintaining this database, the ADA KT Center must ensure 
confidentiality of personally identifiable information, and provide 
quality control and data-retrieval capabilities, using cost-effective 
technologies and a user-friendly interface;
    (2) Working with the 10 ADA Regional Centers to identify their 
database-related training and technical assistance needs, and provide 
training and technical assistance on analyzing data and using the 
database. The ADA KT Center must provide this formal, scheduled 
training and technical assistance to all 10 ADA Regional Centers. The 
ADA KT Center must also provide targeted database-related training and 
technical assistance to individual ADA Regional Centers on an as-needed 
basis;
    (3) Monitoring the quality of data submitted by the ADA Regional 
Centers;

[[Page 38142]]

    (4) Collaborating with NIDRR and the ADA Regional Centers to ensure 
that the database is accurate, comprehensive, easy to use, and up-to-
date; and
    (5) Working with NIDRR and the ADA Regional Centers to develop and 
implement a system for measuring and tracking the outcomes of ADA 
National Network Services.

Priority 3--ADA National Network Collaborative Research Projects

    The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative 
Services establishes a priority for the funding of Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP) to serve as National ADA 
Network Collaborative Research Projects (Collaboratives). Each 
Collaborative must be designed to contribute to knowledge of national 
significance related to ADA implementation and compliance. To be 
eligible under this priority, an applicant must have received a grant 
under the ADA National Network Regional Center priority (Priority 1). 
Each Collaborative must conduct research using the regional structure 
of the ADA National Network as a foundation for multi-site research 
that would inform ADA implementation efforts. Each Collaborative must 
consist of the applicant and an additional three or more of the NIDRR-
funded ADA Regional Centers (for a minimum of four ADA Regional 
Centers). In addition, each Collaborative may include researchers who 
are not a part of the ADA National Network. For purposes of this 
priority, the term ``ADA stakeholders'' refers to individuals and 
entities with rights and responsibilities under the ADA. Each 
Collaborative must be designed to contribute to the following outcomes:
    (a) Improved knowledge related to ADA implementation. The 
Collaborative must contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Conducting research on one or more areas in the ADA. These 
areas may include, but are not limited to research on specific titles 
of the ADA, research on ADA issues in specific industries, or research 
on ADA issues that are relevant to individuals with specific types of 
disabling conditions;
    (2) Addressing research questions or hypotheses of national 
significance that are directly relevant to individuals and entities 
with rights and responsibilities under the ADA (ADA stakeholders); and
    (3) Using appropriate and clearly-identified research designs to 
generate reliable and valid findings.
    (b) Improved ADA stakeholder awareness and utilization of research 
findings produced by the ADA National Network. The Collaboratives must 
contribute to this outcome by--
    (1) Preparing research products (e.g., articles and presentations) 
that describe the findings of the Collaborative's research. The 
Collaboratives must also share these research products and research 
findings with the ADA Regional Centers and the ADA KT Center, which the 
Department intends to fund under separate priorities, for further 
dissemination to ADA stakeholders; and
    (2) Participating in the ADA National Network research conference.

Types of Priorities

    When inviting applications for a competition using one or more 
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute, 
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal 
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
    Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only 
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
    Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference 
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1) 
Awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the 
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) 
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of 
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
    Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are 
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority. 
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a 
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
    This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional 
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject 
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.

    Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in 
which we choose to use these priorities, we invite applications 
through a notice in the Federal Register.

    Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance 
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have 
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this final regulatory 
action.
    The potential costs associated with this final regulatory action 
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have 
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and 
efficiently.
    In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative 
and qualitative--of this final regulatory action, we have determined 
that the benefits of the final priorities justify the costs.

Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits

    The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects 
(DRRPs) have been well established over the years in that similar 
projects have been completed successfully. These final priorities will 
provide training and technical assistance related to the Americans with 
Disabilities Act (ADA), and generate new knowledge through research and 
development. Another benefit of these final priorities is that the 
establishment of the ADA National Network will improve the lives of 
individuals with disabilities. The new DRRPs will generate, 
disseminate, and promote the use of information about the ADA that will 
improve the options for individuals with disabilities to perform 
regular activities in the community.
    Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this 
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, 
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts 
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363. 
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free 
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the 
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System 
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, 
as well as all other documents of this Department published in the 
Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at: https://www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

    Dated: June 24, 2011.
Andrew J. Pepin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-16392 Filed 6-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P