Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amending the BOX Trading Rules To Establish Facilitation and Solicitation Auction Mechanisms, 38226-38231 [2011-16293]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38226
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
(2) the mark-to-market of futures
contracts and stock loan positions, and
(3) exercises and assignments of cashsettled option contracts.
OCC’s settlement banks routinely
approve and are required to honor the
associated settlements made by OCC
and OCC’s clearing members within
these time frames. On most business
days, the entire bank approval process,
which irrevocably obligates each
settlement bank to make settlement, is
completed by 8:30 a.m.
Under OCC’s rules, a failure by OCC
to pay its daily settlement obligations to
clearing members by 10 a.m. constitutes
a default. During discussions among
OCC’s senior management of various
potential extreme default and liquidity
squeeze scenarios, including the
possible default of one of OCC’s largest
clearing members, OCC analyzed the
risk associated with not being able to
immediately access liquidity resources
in time to meet the 10 a.m. deadline for
OCC to pay settlement amounts to
clearing members. The deadline may be
difficult to meet if, for example, OCC
learned of a default near the 9 a.m.
deadline. In such a circumstance, OCC
would have only one hour or less when
the time needed to process and
communicate information is considered
to access the funds necessary to meet
the 10 a.m. deadline.
OCC’s immediate liquidity resources
rely heavily upon its $2.0 billion
revolving credit facility, which is
backed by Treasuries held in the
clearing fund. A one-hour advance
notice is required prior to OCC drawing
funds from the credit facility. Beyond
the credit facility, it would probably
take more than one hour to raise cash
by borrowing against the Treasuries
held in the clearing fund that are not
securing the credit facility either
through tri-party repurchase agreements
or a traditional bank loan.
The main benefit of moving the
deadline to 1 p.m. for OCC to pay
clearing members settlement amounts is
that it allows up to four hours as
opposed to the current one hour, within
which OCC can meet its daily
settlement requirement without being
required to declare an emergency in
order to do so. In addition, based on
discussions with its settlement banks,
OCC believes that notwithstanding a
change from the current 10 a.m.
deadline to a 1 p.m. deadline, the
settlement banks will continue the
current practice of approving
settlements as soon as they can make a
credit determination (i.e., confirm
present funds or extend credit to the
customer) and process OCC’s payment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
requests, which are tasks that are
typically completed by 8:30 a.m.
OCC also has incorporated in its rules
the authority to extend the deadline for
it to pay settlement amounts to clearing
members to the close of the Federal
Reserve Banks’ Fedwire Funds Service
on a settlement day, if necessary, during
an emergency situation.3 Such an
extension is consistent with the
emergency authority other
clearinghouses have to deal with late
settlement scenarios. The rule
amendments would authorize the
Board, Chairman of the Board,
Management Vice Chairman, or
President of OCC to delay settlement
beyond 1 p.m. in emergency situations.
The rule amendments would authorize
the named officers to take such action
because the decision may need to be
made under time constraints where the
Board (or even the Membership/Risk
Committee) could not be convened in
time to take the necessary action.4 OCC
anticipates that the emergency authority
would be used infrequently, if ever.
Under proposed Rule 505, such
authority could only be used upon a
determination by the Board or an
authorized officer that extension of the
settlement time is necessary or
advisable for the protection of OCC or
otherwise in the public interest. In the
event that the emergency authority is
exercised, a number of protections are
built into the process. For example, the
determination and the reasons for the
extension will be promptly reported to
the Commission, the Commodities
Futures Trading Commission, and any
other regulatory or supervisory
authorities having jurisdiction over
OCC. In addition, the clearing members
will be notified of the extension, and a
report outlining the emergency actions
will be maintained in OCC’s records.
For drafting clarity and economy, the
specific settlement times have been
removed from the applicable rules, a
new definition of ‘‘settlement day’’ has
been created, and a revised definition of
‘‘settlement time’’ has been inserted in
Article I of the By-Laws.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 5
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
3 In the event that OCC is unable to pay
settlement amounts to clearing members by the
close of the Fedwire Funds Service on a settlement
day due to an emergency or force majeure
condition, OCC will seek appropriate relief from the
regulatory or supervisory authorities having
jurisdiction over OCC.
4 Similar authority is provided to the OCC
Chairman (or the Board) to summarily suspend a
clearing member. See OCC Rule 1102.
5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of security
transactions and to generally protect
investors and the public interest.
Because the proposed rule change
modifies OCC’s Rules and By-Laws to
give OCC flexibility to make settlement
payments to its clearing members in a
timely manner during normal and
abnormal market conditions, the
proposed rule change promotes the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of security transactions and
generally protects investors and the
public interest and therefore is
consistent with the requirements of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 6
and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
OCC–2011–05) be, and hereby is,
approved.8
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–16302 Filed 6–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64734; File No. SR–BX–
2011–034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amending the BOX Trading Rules To
Establish Facilitation and Solicitation
Auction Mechanisms
June 23, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 17,
2011, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
6 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
7 15
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
Facilitation Auction mechanism and a
Solicitation Auction mechanism.
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Chapter V, (Doing Business on BOX),
Section 31 (Block Trading) of the Rules
of the Boston Options Exchange Group,
LLC (‘‘BOX’’) to establish Facilitation
and Solicitation auction mechanisms.
The text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/
NASDAQOMXBX/Filings/.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
Currently, BOX offers only one
execution mechanism for the execution
of two-sided crossing transactions—the
Price Improvement Period auction.3
Competitor options exchanges offer
multiple mechanisms to execute twosided orders, including facilitation and
solicitation mechanisms for large block
orders.4 To remain competitive with
other options exchanges for block-size
facilitation and solicitation transactions,
BOX has developed additional auction
mechanisms. This rule change proposes
implementation on BOX of a
3 Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings prescribed within the BOX
Rules.
4 See, e.g., International Securities Exchange Rule
716 and Chicago Board Options Exchange Rule
6.74B.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Facilitation Auction
The Facilitation Auction will allow
Order Flow Providers (‘‘OFPs’’) to enter
crossing transactions where the OFP
represents a block-size order as agent
(‘‘Agency Order’’) and (1) Is trading
against the Agency Order as principal
(i.e., facilitating the Agency Order) and/
or (2) has solicited an order to take the
opposite side of the Agency Order.
Thus, the Facilitation Auction will
allow block-size order executions
against facilitated or solicited orders, or
against a combination of facilitated and
solicited orders. This auction will give
OFPs the added flexibility to execute a
transaction where the OFP facilitates
only a portion of the order opposite its
Agency Order, and has solicited interest
from other parties for the remaining size
of the order opposite its Agency Order.
The Facilitation Auction will be limited
to orders of fifty (50) contracts or more.
OFPs must be willing to execute the
entire size of Agency Orders entered
into the Facilitation Auction through
the submission of a contra ‘‘Facilitation
Order.’’ Upon the entry of an Agency
Order and Facilitation Order into the
Facilitation Auction, a broadcast
message will be sent to Options
Participants, giving them one second to
enter responses with the prices and
sizes at which they would be willing to
participate in the facilitation opposite
the Agency Order (‘‘Responses’’).
Responses may be priced at the price of
the Agency Order or at a better price
and must not exceed the size of the
Agency Order to be facilitated. At the
end of the one second period for the
entry of Responses, the Facilitation
Order will be automatically executed
with the Agency Order.
Unless there is sufficient size to
execute the entire Agency Order at a
better price, Public Customer bids
(offers) and Public Customer Responses
on BOX at the time the Agency Order
is executed that are priced higher
(lower) than the facilitation price will be
executed at the facilitation price. NonPublic Customer and Market Maker bids
(offers) and Non-Public Customer and
Market Maker Responses on BOX at the
time the Agency Order is executed that
are priced higher (lower) than the
facilitation price will be executed
against the Agency Order at their stated
price, providing the Agency Order
execution at a better price for the
number of contracts associated with
such higher bids (lower offers) and
Responses.
The facilitating OFP will execute at
least forty percent (40%) of the original
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38227
size of the Facilitation Order, but only
after better-priced bids (offers) and
Responses on BOX, as well as Public
Customer bids (offers) and Responses at
the facilitation price, are executed in
full. After the facilitating OFP has
executed his forty percent (40%), NonPublic Customer and Market Maker bids
(offers) and Responses on BOX at the
facilitation price will participate in the
execution of the Agency Order based
upon price and time priority.
The following example illustrates the
execution priority within the
Facilitation Auction. An OFP submits a
Facilitation Order to buy and Agency
Order to sell 100 contracts at a proposed
execution price of $2.00. At the end of
the auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00—
offer $2.10. During the one second
auction, BOX receives the following
bids (offers) in time priority:
(1) Market Maker offer on the Book to
buy 100 contracts at $2.00.
(2) Public Customer Response to buy
50 contracts at $2.00.
Since there are no bids (offers) or
Responses at an improved price, the
Public Customer would execute 50
contracts against the Agency Order; the
Facilitation Order will execute 40
contracts (40% of 100) against the
Agency Order; and the Market Maker on
the Book would execute the remaining
10 contracts against the Agency Order;
all at $2.00.
Solicitation Auction
To better compete for block-size
solicited transactions, BOX has
developed a Solicitation Auction. The
Solicitation Auction is a process by
which an OFP can attempt to execute
orders of 500 or more contracts it
represents as agent (the ‘‘Agency
Order’’) against contra orders that the
OFP has solicited (‘‘Solicited Order’’).5
The proposed rule change will allow
OFPs to enter both sides of a proposed
solicited cross (the Agency and
Solicited Orders). These solicitation
transactions will be required to be for at
least 500 contracts and will be executed
only if the price is at or between the
national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’).
Each Agency Order entered into the
Solicitation Auction shall be all-ornone.
When a proposed solicited cross is
entered into the Solicitation Auction,
BOX will broadcast a message to
Options Participants and they will have
5 Although orders solicited from Public
Customers are not subject to the exposure
requirement of Supplementary Material .02 to
Section 17 of Chapter V of the BOX Rules, they
would be permitted to be entered into the
Solicitation Auction should OFPs choose this
alternative.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
38228
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
one second to respond with the prices
and sizes at which they would be
willing to participate in the execution of
the Agency Order (‘‘Responses’’). At the
end of the period for Responses, the
Agency Order will be automatically
executed in full or cancelled. The
Agency Order will be executed against
the Solicited Order at the proposed
execution price unless there is sufficient
size to execute the entire Agency Order
at a better price or prices, or there is a
Public Customer Order (A) at a price
equal to or better than the proposed
execution price; and (B) on the BOX
Book within a depth of the BOX Book
so that it would otherwise trade with
the Agency Order if the Agency Order
had been submitted to the BOX Book, (a
‘‘Book Priority Public Customer
Order’’).6
If at the time of execution there is
sufficient size to execute the entire
Agency Order at an improved price (or
prices), the Agency Order will be
executed at the improved price(s) and
the Solicited Order will be cancelled.7
For example, an OFP starts a
Solicitation Auction by submitting to
BOX an Agency Order to buy and a
Solicited Order to sell 1,000 contracts
with a proposed execution price of
$2.10. At the end of the one second
auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00—offer
$2.10. During the auction, BOX received
the following bids (offers) in time
priority:
(1) Market Maker Response to sell 400
contracts at $2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to
sell 300 contracts at $2.08;
(3) Public Customer Response to sell
200 contracts at $2.08;
(4) Public Customer Order on the
Book to sell 300 contracts at $2.08.
6 In contrast to the Facilitation Mechanism, only
Public Customer Orders that are within a depth of
the BOX Book so that they would otherwise trade
with the Agency Order if it were submitted to the
BOX Book are eligible to trade with the Agency
Order in the Solicitation Mechanism. Options
Participants’ orders submitted to BOX are ranked
and maintained in the BOX Book according to
price/time priority, such that within each price
level, all orders are organized by time of order
entry. No distinction is made to this priority with
regard to account designation (Public Customer,
Broker/Dealer, or Market Maker). BOX believes that
price/time priority provides an incentive for all
market participants to post their best prices quickly.
As such, BOX will consider only these Priority
Public Customer Orders based on price/time
priority. Stated otherwise, if an Agency Order of the
same block size was executed on the BOX Book
rather than through the Solicitation Auction, only
those orders with price/time priority would execute
against the Agency Order. Those Public Customer
Orders on the BOX Book beyond the depth equal
to the Agency Order size would not be executed
against the Agency Order.
7 The aggregate size of all bids (offers) and
Responses at each price will be used to determine
whether the entire Agency Order can be executed
at an improved price (or prices).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Since there is sufficient size to
execute the entire Agency Order at an
improved price, the Agency Order will
execute in time priority against each of
the bids (offers) and Responses at $2.08,
and the Solicited Order would be
cancelled. The Agency Order would
execute 400 contracts against the Market
Maker Response; 300 contracts against
the Market Maker offer on the Book; 200
contracts against the Public Customer
Response; and 100 contracts against the
Public Customer Order on the Book. The
remaining 200 contracts of the Public
Customer Order on the Book would
remain unexecuted.
If at the time of execution, there are
one or more Book Priority Public
Customer Orders on the BOX Book, the
Agency Order will be executed against
the BOX Book if there is sufficient size
available to execute the entire Agency
Order, and the Solicited Order will be
cancelled. In this instance, the aggregate
size of all bids (offers) on the BOX Book
at or better than the proposed execution
price will be used to determine whether
there is sufficient size available to
execute the entire Agency Order.
Responses are excluded when
determining whether sufficient size
exists to execute the Agency Order at its
proposed price.8 For example, an OFP
starts a Solicitation Auction by
submitting to BOX an Agency Order to
buy and a Solicited Order to sell 1,000
contracts with a proposed execution
price of $2.10. At the end of the one
second auction, the NBBO is bid
$2.00—offer $2.10. During the auction,
BOX received the following bids (offers)
in time priority:
(1) Market Maker offer on the Book to
sell 700 contracts at $2.09;
(2) Public Customer Order on the
Book to sell 400 contracts at $2.10.
There is a Book Priority Public
Customer Order on the Book and there
is sufficient size on the Book to execute
the entire Agency Order. As such, the
Agency Order will be executed against
the orders on the BOX Book based upon
price/time priority, and the Solicited
Order will be cancelled. In this
example, the Agency Order will execute
700 contracts against the Market Maker
on the Book at $2.09, and 300 contracts
against the Book Priority Public
Customer Order. The remaining 100
contracts of the Public Customer Order
on the Book would remain unexecuted.
8 As set forth in proposed Supplementary
Material .03 to Chapter V, Section 31, Responses are
sent by Options Participants in response to a
Facilitation or Solicitation Auction broadcast
message. Responses represent non-firm interest that
can be canceled or decremented as to price or size
at any time prior to execution and are not displayed
to any market participants.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Similar to the example above, assume
during the auction BOX received the
following bids (offers) in time priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the
Book to sell 400 contracts at $2.09;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to
sell 600 contracts at $2.10.
Then, the Agency Order will also be
executed against the orders on the Book
based upon price/time priority and the
Solicited Order will be cancelled. In this
example, the Agency Order will execute
400 contracts against the Public
Customer Order at $2.09, and 600
contracts against the Market Maker at
$2.10.
BOX determines whether sufficient
size exists on the BOX Book to execute
the Agency Order so as to prevent (i)
Any trade-through of the BOX Book and
(ii) any Book Priority Public Customer
Order from being bypassed by a
Solicitation Auction execution. If the
Agency Orders in these two examples
above had been sent directly to the BOX
Book rather than the Solicitation
Auction, the resulting execution against
the Agency Order would have been the
same.
If there is a Book Priority Public
Customer Order on the BOX Book, but
there is insufficient size to execute the
entire Agency Order at the proposed
execution price, however; both the
Agency and Solicited Orders will be
cancelled. For example, an OFP starts a
Solicitation Auction by submitting to
BOX an Agency Order to buy and a
Solicited Order to sell 1,000 contracts
with a proposed execution price of
$2.10. At the end of the one second
auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00—offer
$2.10. During the auction, BOX received
the following bids (offers) in time
priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the
Book to sell 400 contracts at $2.10;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to
sell 300 contracts at $2.10.
In this example, there is a Book
Priority Public Customer Order on the
BOX Book, but there is insufficient size
on the Book to execute the entire
Agency Order at the proposed execution
price. As such, both the Solicited Order
and Agency Order will be cancelled,
except under the Surrender Quantity
conditions described below.
Surrender Quantity
To increase the successful execution
of block Solicitation Auction trades and
Public Customer Orders on BOX while
protecting the BOX Book, BOX has
developed the ‘‘Surrender Quantity’’
function for Solicitation Auctions.
When starting a Solicitation Auction,
the OFP may designate, for the Solicited
Order, the quantity of contracts of the
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
Agency Order for which the OFP is
willing to ‘surrender’ interest to the
BOX Book (‘‘Surrender Quantity’’). The
Surrender Quantity will apply at the
time of execution only if there are (1)
Book Priority Public Customer Orders
on the BOX Book, or (2) any bids (offers)
on the BOX Book at any price better
than the proposed execution price. Only
these orders on the BOX Book will be
eligible for execution utilizing the
Surrender Quantity.
With the Surrender Quantity function,
BOX seeks to protect Public Customer
Orders that would have traded with the
Agency Order if the Agency Order had
been submitted to the BOX Book. When
the aggregate size of (1) Book Priority
Public Customer Orders and (2) all bids
(offers) on the BOX Book at prices better
than the proposed execution price, is
equal to or less than the Surrender
Quantity, the Agency Order will first
execute against all such Book Priority
Public Customer Orders and all such
bids (offers), and then against the
Solicited Order. If the aggregate size of
all such Book Priority Public Customer
Orders and all such bids (offers) exceeds
the Surrender Quantity, but there is
insufficient size to execute the entire
Agency Order, then both the Solicited
Order and the Agency Order will be
cancelled.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation
Auction by submitting to BOX an Agency
Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell
1,000 contracts with a proposed execution
price of $2.10. The OFP also designates 200
contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the
end of the one second auction the NBBO is
bid $2.00—offer $2.10. During the auction,
BOX received the following bids (offers) in
time priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the Book to
sell 200 contracts at $2.10;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell
800 contracts at $2.10.
Without the Surrender Quantity, the
Agency Order would execute against the
Public Customer Order on the Book for
200 contracts at $2.10 and against the
Market Maker on the Book for 800
contracts at $2.10. Using the Surrender
Quantity, however, the Agency Order
would still execute against the Public
Customer Order on the Book, but would
then execute against the Solicited Order
for 800 contracts at $2.10.
Additionally, use of the Surrender
Quantity function will allow block-size
Solicitation Auction trades in certain
instances in which there would
otherwise be no execution. In these
instances, use of the Surrender Quantity
will also prevent (i) a trade-through of
the BOX Book and any Book Priority
Public Customer Order from being
bypassed upon a Solicitation Auction
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
execution. Under the proposed rule
change there are other situations when,
absent use of the Surrender Quantity,
the Solicitation Auction would result in
no trade. The first is when a Book
Priority Public Customer Order is on the
BOX Book and there is insufficient
quantity on BOX, other than the
Solicited Order, to execute the entire
Agency Order. Without the Surrender
Quantity function, both the Solicited
Order and Agency Order would be
cancelled and the Public Customer
Order would remain unexecuted,
keeping the Public Customer Order on
the Book from being bypassed upon a
Solicitation Auction execution. The
second instance is when the proposed
execution price is inferior to the best bid
or offer on BOX (meaning there is a
better priced bid (offer) on BOX) or
inferior to the NBBO. Again, without the
Surrender Quantity function, no
execution would occur, keeping the
better priced bids (offers) on the BOX
Book from being bypassed upon a
Solicitation Auction execution. In both
instances, Public Customer Orders, the
better priced bids (offers), the Solicited
Order and the Agency Order remain
unexecuted. Under this proposed rule
change, however, if the Surrender
Quantity is utilized and is of sufficient
size, then the orders are executed
against the Agency Order as follows:
Public Customer Orders, better priced
bids (offers), and the Solicited Order. If
the Surrender Quantity is of insufficient
size, then no execution occurs and again
any trade-through of the BOX Book or
execution ahead of a Book Priority
Public Customer Order is prevented.
The Surrender Quantity provides the
potential for various market participants
to benefit from the execution they
desire. The following examples
illustrate the proposed Surrender
Quantity concept:
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation
Auction by submitting to BOX an Agency
Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell
1,000 contracts with a proposed execution
price of $2.10. The OFP also designates 200
contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the
end of the one second auction the NBBO is
bid $2.00—offer $2.10. During the auction,
BOX received the following bids (offers) in
time priority:
(1) Response of 150 contracts to sell at
$2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book of 200
contracts at $2.10;
(3) Response of 100 contracts to sell at
$2.10;
(4) Public Customer Order offer on the
Book of 100 contracts at $2.10;
(5) Response of 50 contracts to sell at
$2.10.
Since there is insufficient size to
execute the entire Agency Order and the
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38229
Surrender Quantity of 200 is greater
than the total size of Book Priority
Public Customer Orders (100), the
Agency Order will execute 100 contracts
against the Book Priority Public
Customer Order at $2.10 and the
remaining 900 contracts against the
Solicited Order at $2.10.9 In this
example, without the use of the
Surrender Quantity, the Priority Public
Customer Order would force the Agency
Order and Solicited Order to be
cancelled while the Public Customer
Order remained unexecuted.
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation
Auction by submitting to BOX an Agency
Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell
1,000 contracts with a proposed execution
price of $2.10. The OFP also designates 200
contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the
end of the one second auction the NBBO is
bid $2.00—offer $2.10. During the auction,
BOX received the following bids (offers) in
time priority:
(1) Response of 150 contracts to sell at
$2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book of 100
contracts at $2.08;
(3) Response of 100 contracts to sell at
$2.10;
(4) Public Customer Order on the Book of
50 contracts to sell at $2.08;
(5) Public Customer Order on the Book of
50 contracts to sell at $2.10
(6) Response of 50 contracts to sell at
$2.10.
Since there is insufficient size to
execute the entire Agency Order, and
the Surrender Quantity of 200 is equal
to the total size of Public Customer
Orders (100) and the better priced offers
(Market Maker offer of 100 at $2.08), the
Agency Order will execute 100 contracts
at $2.10 against the Public Customer
Orders, 100 contracts against the Market
Maker offer at $2.08, and the remaining
800 contracts against the Solicited Order
at $2.10. The Public Customer Order of
50 contracts to sell at $2.08 executes at
the proposed solicitation execution
price of $2.10. The Agency Order
executes at $2.08 for the 100 contracts
against the Market Maker offer. Without
the Surrender Quantity function, the
Book Priority Public Customer Order
and the market maker offer on BOX at
a better price would result in the
Agency Order and Solicited Order being
cancelled while the Public Customer
Orders remained unexecuted.
Public Customer bids (offers) on the
BOX Book at the time of an execution
that includes a Surrender Quantity, and
9 As noted at the beginning of this section
regarding Surrender Quantity, the only orders
eligible for execution utilizing the Surrender
Quantity are (1) Book Priority Public Customer
Orders and (2) any bids (offers) on the BOX Book
at any price better than the proposed execution
price. Responses are not eligible for execution
utilizing the Surrender Quantity.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
38230
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
that are priced higher (lower) than the
proposed Solicitation Auction execution
price, will be executed against the
Agency Order at the proposed execution
price. BOX believes this will provide
Public Customers the benefit of a better
price for the number of contracts
associated with such higher bids (lower
offers). Non-Public Customer and
Market Maker bids (offers) on the BOX
Book at the time of a Surrender Quantity
execution that are priced higher (lower)
than the proposed execution price will
be executed at their stated price. BOX
believes this will provide the Agency
Order a better execution price for those
contracts.
Additionally, the proposed rule
change would require OFPs to deliver to
customers a written notification
describing the terms and conditions of
the Solicitation Auction prior to
executing Agency Orders using the
Solicitation Auction. Such written
notification would be required to be in
a form approved by the Exchange.
Supplementary Material to Section 31
Further, the proposed rule change
specifies in Supplementary Material to
Chapter V, Section 31 that it will be a
violation of an Options Participant’s
duty of best execution to its customer if
it were to cancel a Facilitation Order to
avoid execution of the order at a better
price. The availability of the Facilitation
Auction does not alter an Options
Participant’s best execution duty to
obtain the best price for its customer.
Accordingly, while Facilitation Orders
may be canceled during the time period
given for the entry of Responses, if an
Options Participant were to cancel a
Facilitation Order when there was a
better price available on BOX and
subsequently re-enter the Facilitation
Order at the same facilitation price after
the better price was no longer available
without attempting to obtain that better
price for its customer, there would be a
presumption that the Options
Participant did so to avoid execution of
its customer order in whole or in part
by other brokers at the better price.
In addition, Options Participants will
be prohibited from using the
Solicitation Auction to circumvent
Section 17 of Chapter V which limits
principal transactions. Prohibited
actions may include, but be not limited
to, Options Participants entering
Solicitation Orders that are solicited
from (1) Affiliated broker-dealers, or (2)
broker-dealers with which the Options
Participant has an arrangement that
allows the Options Participant to realize
similar economic benefits from the
solicited transaction as it would achieve
by executing the customer order in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
whole or in part as principal. Moreover,
any Solicited Orders entered by Options
Participants to trade against Agency
Orders may not be for the account of a
BOX market maker that is assigned to
the options class.
Additionally, the proposed rule
change would allow Orders and
Responses to be entered into the BOX
Facilitation and Solicitation Auctions
and receive executions at penny
increments. Any BOX OFP may enter
Orders into the Facilitation and
Solicitation Auctions, and any BOX
Participant may enter a Response within
the proposed auction mechanisms. BOX
believes that auction competition and
executions at penny increments will
provide greater flexibility in pricing for
block-size orders and provide enhanced
opportunities for block-size orders to
benefit from price improvement.
Finally, the proposed rule change also
adds references to the Facilitation and
Solicitation Auction mechanisms to
Chapter V, Section 17 (Customer Orders
and Order Flow Providers), and to
Chapter III, Section 4(f) (Prevention of
the Misuse of Material Nonpublic
Information).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act,10 in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,11 in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change to implement
a Facilitation Auction and Solicitation
Auction on BOX is designed to help
BOX remain competitive among options
exchanges and provide market
participants additional opportunities to
execute block-size crossing transactions.
BOX believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act
because executions based upon price/
time priority provide an incentive for all
market participants to post their best
prices quickly to the market. BOX does
not believe that customers’ electronic
orders must be accorded priority over
market makers who are not acting as
agent with respect to those customers.
These market makers are not required to
yield priority to Public Customer Orders
if the market maker has time priority at
10 15
11 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a particular price level. In this way,
BOX places all of its market participants
on the same footing, with no participant
enjoying any special or unique control
over the timing of execution or order
handling advantages. All orders are
processed for execution by an electronic
computer system—the BOX Trading
Host. Specifically, orders sent to BOX
are transmitted directly from remote
electronic terminals to the trading
system. Once an order is submitted to
BOX, the order is executed against
another order based on the established
matching algorithm. The execution does
not depend on the Options Participant
but rather upon what other orders are
entered into BOX at or around the same
time as the subject order, what orders
are on the BOX Book, and where the
order is ranked based on the price/time
priority ranking algorithm. Accordingly,
Options Participants do not control or
influence the result or timing of orders
submitted to BOX. The Commission has
repeatedly found this price/time priority
model consistent with the Act 12
regarding exchanges’ electronic trading
mechanisms. The proposed Solicitation
Auction mechanism will not execute
any order ahead of any Public Customer
order on BOX where that customer
order would have otherwise traded with
the Agency Order (‘‘Book Priority Public
Customer Order’’). As such, BOX
believes the principles of price/time
priority for matching orders within its
proposed Solicitation Auction are
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
49068 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2775 (January 20,
2004) (SR–BSE–2002–15) (Order Approving BOX
Facility); 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157
(February 1, 2010) (SR–BATS–2009–031) (Order
Approving BATS Options Rules); 57478 (March 12,
2008), 73 FR 14521 (March 18, 2008) (SR–
NASDAQ–2007–004) (Order Approving NASDAQ
Options Market).
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2011 / Notices
Register or within such longer period (i)
As the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
A. By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2011–034 and should
be submitted on or before July 20, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–16293 Filed 6–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64727; File No. SR–C2–
2011–012]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BX–2011–034 on the
subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Order Approving Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1, To Reduce the Minimum Size of
the Nominating and Governance
Committee
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2011–034. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of BX. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
I. Introduction
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
June 22, 2011.
On April 27, 2011, C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘C2’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
reduce the minimum size of the
Nominating and Governance Committee
(‘‘NGC’’) from seven to five. On May 18,
2011, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change.3 The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
May 10, 2011.4 The Commission
received no comment letters regarding
the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 At the time C2 submitted the original proposed
rule change, it had not yet obtained formal approval
from its Board of Directors for the specific Bylaw
changes set forth in this proposed rule change. C2
stated that once that approval was obtained, it
would file a technical amendment to its proposed
rule change to reflect that approval. In Amendment
No. 1, the Exchange notes that the C2 Board of
Directors approved the specific Bylaw changes set
forth in SR–C2–2011–012 on May 17, 2011 and
stated that no further action was necessary in
connection with its proposal. Because Amendment
No. 1 is technical in nature, the Commission is not
required to publish it for public comment.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64394
(May 4, 2011), 76 FR 27112 (‘‘Notice’’).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38231
II. Description of the Proposal
C2 is proposing to reduce the
minimum size of its NGC from seven to
five directors. Section 4.4 of the Second
Amended and Restated Bylaws of C2
(‘‘Bylaws’’) currently provides, in
pertinent part, that the NGC shall
consist of at least seven directors,
including both Industry and NonIndustry Directors; that a majority of the
directors on the Committee shall be
Non-Industry Directors; and that the
exact number of members on the
Committee shall be determined from
time to time by C2’s Board of Directors
(the ‘‘Board’’ or ‘‘C2 Board’’). Pursuant
to the proposed rule change, Section 4.4
of the Bylaws would be amended to
provide that the NGC shall consist of at
least five directors. The other provisions
of Section 4.4 of the Bylaws would
remain unchanged.5
In outlining the purpose behind its
proposal, the Exchange noted that the
size of its Board declined from its initial
size of twenty-three to nineteen
directors in 2009 and again to sixteen
directors in 2011.6 As the size of its
Board has declined, the Exchange noted
that it has become more challenging to
populate larger-size Board committees
since there are fewer directors to serve
on a multitude of committees.7 The
Exchange’s proposal to reduce the
minimum size of the NGC is intended
to help address this issue.
III. Discussion
After careful review of the proposal,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.8 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(1) of the Act,9 which requires a
national securities exchange to be so
organized and have the capacity to carry
out the purposes of the Act and to
comply, and to enforce compliance by
its members and persons associated
with its members, with the provisions of
the Act, as well as Section 6(b)(5) of the
5 Additionally, the title of the Bylaws would be
changed to the Third Amended and Restated
Bylaws of C2.
6 Section 3.1 of the Bylaws provides that the C2
Board shall consist of not less than eleven and not
more than twenty-three directors, with the exact
size determined by the Board.
7 See Notice, supra note 4, at 27112.
8 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38226-38231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16293]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-64734; File No. SR-BX-2011-034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amending the BOX Trading
Rules To Establish Facilitation and Solicitation Auction Mechanisms
June 23, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 17, 2011, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
[[Page 38227]]
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter V, (Doing Business on BOX),
Section 31 (Block Trading) of the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange
Group, LLC (``BOX'') to establish Facilitation and Solicitation auction
mechanisms. The text of the proposed rule change is available from the
principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference
Room and also on the Exchange's Internet Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXBX/Filings/.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Currently, BOX offers only one execution mechanism for the
execution of two-sided crossing transactions--the Price Improvement
Period auction.\3\ Competitor options exchanges offer multiple
mechanisms to execute two-sided orders, including facilitation and
solicitation mechanisms for large block orders.\4\ To remain
competitive with other options exchanges for block-size facilitation
and solicitation transactions, BOX has developed additional auction
mechanisms. This rule change proposes implementation on BOX of a
Facilitation Auction mechanism and a Solicitation Auction mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings prescribed within the BOX Rules.
\4\ See, e.g., International Securities Exchange Rule 716 and
Chicago Board Options Exchange Rule 6.74B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilitation Auction
The Facilitation Auction will allow Order Flow Providers (``OFPs'')
to enter crossing transactions where the OFP represents a block-size
order as agent (``Agency Order'') and (1) Is trading against the Agency
Order as principal (i.e., facilitating the Agency Order) and/or (2) has
solicited an order to take the opposite side of the Agency Order. Thus,
the Facilitation Auction will allow block-size order executions against
facilitated or solicited orders, or against a combination of
facilitated and solicited orders. This auction will give OFPs the added
flexibility to execute a transaction where the OFP facilitates only a
portion of the order opposite its Agency Order, and has solicited
interest from other parties for the remaining size of the order
opposite its Agency Order. The Facilitation Auction will be limited to
orders of fifty (50) contracts or more.
OFPs must be willing to execute the entire size of Agency Orders
entered into the Facilitation Auction through the submission of a
contra ``Facilitation Order.'' Upon the entry of an Agency Order and
Facilitation Order into the Facilitation Auction, a broadcast message
will be sent to Options Participants, giving them one second to enter
responses with the prices and sizes at which they would be willing to
participate in the facilitation opposite the Agency Order
(``Responses''). Responses may be priced at the price of the Agency
Order or at a better price and must not exceed the size of the Agency
Order to be facilitated. At the end of the one second period for the
entry of Responses, the Facilitation Order will be automatically
executed with the Agency Order.
Unless there is sufficient size to execute the entire Agency Order
at a better price, Public Customer bids (offers) and Public Customer
Responses on BOX at the time the Agency Order is executed that are
priced higher (lower) than the facilitation price will be executed at
the facilitation price. Non-Public Customer and Market Maker bids
(offers) and Non-Public Customer and Market Maker Responses on BOX at
the time the Agency Order is executed that are priced higher (lower)
than the facilitation price will be executed against the Agency Order
at their stated price, providing the Agency Order execution at a better
price for the number of contracts associated with such higher bids
(lower offers) and Responses.
The facilitating OFP will execute at least forty percent (40%) of
the original size of the Facilitation Order, but only after better-
priced bids (offers) and Responses on BOX, as well as Public Customer
bids (offers) and Responses at the facilitation price, are executed in
full. After the facilitating OFP has executed his forty percent (40%),
Non-Public Customer and Market Maker bids (offers) and Responses on BOX
at the facilitation price will participate in the execution of the
Agency Order based upon price and time priority.
The following example illustrates the execution priority within the
Facilitation Auction. An OFP submits a Facilitation Order to buy and
Agency Order to sell 100 contracts at a proposed execution price of
$2.00. At the end of the auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10.
During the one second auction, BOX receives the following bids (offers)
in time priority:
(1) Market Maker offer on the Book to buy 100 contracts at $2.00.
(2) Public Customer Response to buy 50 contracts at $2.00.
Since there are no bids (offers) or Responses at an improved price,
the Public Customer would execute 50 contracts against the Agency
Order; the Facilitation Order will execute 40 contracts (40% of 100)
against the Agency Order; and the Market Maker on the Book would
execute the remaining 10 contracts against the Agency Order; all at
$2.00.
Solicitation Auction
To better compete for block-size solicited transactions, BOX has
developed a Solicitation Auction. The Solicitation Auction is a process
by which an OFP can attempt to execute orders of 500 or more contracts
it represents as agent (the ``Agency Order'') against contra orders
that the OFP has solicited (``Solicited Order'').\5\ The proposed rule
change will allow OFPs to enter both sides of a proposed solicited
cross (the Agency and Solicited Orders). These solicitation
transactions will be required to be for at least 500 contracts and will
be executed only if the price is at or between the national best bid or
offer (``NBBO''). Each Agency Order entered into the Solicitation
Auction shall be all-or-none.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Although orders solicited from Public Customers are not
subject to the exposure requirement of Supplementary Material .02 to
Section 17 of Chapter V of the BOX Rules, they would be permitted to
be entered into the Solicitation Auction should OFPs choose this
alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When a proposed solicited cross is entered into the Solicitation
Auction, BOX will broadcast a message to Options Participants and they
will have
[[Page 38228]]
one second to respond with the prices and sizes at which they would be
willing to participate in the execution of the Agency Order
(``Responses''). At the end of the period for Responses, the Agency
Order will be automatically executed in full or cancelled. The Agency
Order will be executed against the Solicited Order at the proposed
execution price unless there is sufficient size to execute the entire
Agency Order at a better price or prices, or there is a Public Customer
Order (A) at a price equal to or better than the proposed execution
price; and (B) on the BOX Book within a depth of the BOX Book so that
it would otherwise trade with the Agency Order if the Agency Order had
been submitted to the BOX Book, (a ``Book Priority Public Customer
Order'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In contrast to the Facilitation Mechanism, only Public
Customer Orders that are within a depth of the BOX Book so that they
would otherwise trade with the Agency Order if it were submitted to
the BOX Book are eligible to trade with the Agency Order in the
Solicitation Mechanism. Options Participants' orders submitted to
BOX are ranked and maintained in the BOX Book according to price/
time priority, such that within each price level, all orders are
organized by time of order entry. No distinction is made to this
priority with regard to account designation (Public Customer,
Broker/Dealer, or Market Maker). BOX believes that price/time
priority provides an incentive for all market participants to post
their best prices quickly. As such, BOX will consider only these
Priority Public Customer Orders based on price/time priority. Stated
otherwise, if an Agency Order of the same block size was executed on
the BOX Book rather than through the Solicitation Auction, only
those orders with price/time priority would execute against the
Agency Order. Those Public Customer Orders on the BOX Book beyond
the depth equal to the Agency Order size would not be executed
against the Agency Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If at the time of execution there is sufficient size to execute the
entire Agency Order at an improved price (or prices), the Agency Order
will be executed at the improved price(s) and the Solicited Order will
be cancelled.\7\ For example, an OFP starts a Solicitation Auction by
submitting to BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell
1,000 contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10. At the end of
the one second auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10. During the
auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in time priority:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The aggregate size of all bids (offers) and Responses at
each price will be used to determine whether the entire Agency Order
can be executed at an improved price (or prices).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Market Maker Response to sell 400 contracts at $2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell 300 contracts at $2.08;
(3) Public Customer Response to sell 200 contracts at $2.08;
(4) Public Customer Order on the Book to sell 300 contracts at
$2.08.
Since there is sufficient size to execute the entire Agency Order
at an improved price, the Agency Order will execute in time priority
against each of the bids (offers) and Responses at $2.08, and the
Solicited Order would be cancelled. The Agency Order would execute 400
contracts against the Market Maker Response; 300 contracts against the
Market Maker offer on the Book; 200 contracts against the Public
Customer Response; and 100 contracts against the Public Customer Order
on the Book. The remaining 200 contracts of the Public Customer Order
on the Book would remain unexecuted.
If at the time of execution, there are one or more Book Priority
Public Customer Orders on the BOX Book, the Agency Order will be
executed against the BOX Book if there is sufficient size available to
execute the entire Agency Order, and the Solicited Order will be
cancelled. In this instance, the aggregate size of all bids (offers) on
the BOX Book at or better than the proposed execution price will be
used to determine whether there is sufficient size available to execute
the entire Agency Order. Responses are excluded when determining
whether sufficient size exists to execute the Agency Order at its
proposed price.\8\ For example, an OFP starts a Solicitation Auction by
submitting to BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell
1,000 contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10. At the end of
the one second auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10. During the
auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in time priority:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As set forth in proposed Supplementary Material .03 to
Chapter V, Section 31, Responses are sent by Options Participants in
response to a Facilitation or Solicitation Auction broadcast
message. Responses represent non-firm interest that can be canceled
or decremented as to price or size at any time prior to execution
and are not displayed to any market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell 700 contracts at $2.09;
(2) Public Customer Order on the Book to sell 400 contracts at
$2.10.
There is a Book Priority Public Customer Order on the Book and
there is sufficient size on the Book to execute the entire Agency
Order. As such, the Agency Order will be executed against the orders on
the BOX Book based upon price/time priority, and the Solicited Order
will be cancelled. In this example, the Agency Order will execute 700
contracts against the Market Maker on the Book at $2.09, and 300
contracts against the Book Priority Public Customer Order. The
remaining 100 contracts of the Public Customer Order on the Book would
remain unexecuted.
Similar to the example above, assume during the auction BOX
received the following bids (offers) in time priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the Book to sell 400 contracts at
$2.09;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell 600 contracts at $2.10.
Then, the Agency Order will also be executed against the orders on
the Book based upon price/time priority and the Solicited Order will be
cancelled. In this example, the Agency Order will execute 400 contracts
against the Public Customer Order at $2.09, and 600 contracts against
the Market Maker at $2.10.
BOX determines whether sufficient size exists on the BOX Book to
execute the Agency Order so as to prevent (i) Any trade-through of the
BOX Book and (ii) any Book Priority Public Customer Order from being
bypassed by a Solicitation Auction execution. If the Agency Orders in
these two examples above had been sent directly to the BOX Book rather
than the Solicitation Auction, the resulting execution against the
Agency Order would have been the same.
If there is a Book Priority Public Customer Order on the BOX Book,
but there is insufficient size to execute the entire Agency Order at
the proposed execution price, however; both the Agency and Solicited
Orders will be cancelled. For example, an OFP starts a Solicitation
Auction by submitting to BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited
Order to sell 1,000 contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10.
At the end of the one second auction, the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer
$2.10. During the auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in
time priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the Book to sell 400 contracts at
$2.10;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell 300 contracts at $2.10.
In this example, there is a Book Priority Public Customer Order on
the BOX Book, but there is insufficient size on the Book to execute the
entire Agency Order at the proposed execution price. As such, both the
Solicited Order and Agency Order will be cancelled, except under the
Surrender Quantity conditions described below.
Surrender Quantity
To increase the successful execution of block Solicitation Auction
trades and Public Customer Orders on BOX while protecting the BOX Book,
BOX has developed the ``Surrender Quantity'' function for Solicitation
Auctions. When starting a Solicitation Auction, the OFP may designate,
for the Solicited Order, the quantity of contracts of the
[[Page 38229]]
Agency Order for which the OFP is willing to `surrender' interest to
the BOX Book (``Surrender Quantity''). The Surrender Quantity will
apply at the time of execution only if there are (1) Book Priority
Public Customer Orders on the BOX Book, or (2) any bids (offers) on the
BOX Book at any price better than the proposed execution price. Only
these orders on the BOX Book will be eligible for execution utilizing
the Surrender Quantity.
With the Surrender Quantity function, BOX seeks to protect Public
Customer Orders that would have traded with the Agency Order if the
Agency Order had been submitted to the BOX Book. When the aggregate
size of (1) Book Priority Public Customer Orders and (2) all bids
(offers) on the BOX Book at prices better than the proposed execution
price, is equal to or less than the Surrender Quantity, the Agency
Order will first execute against all such Book Priority Public Customer
Orders and all such bids (offers), and then against the Solicited
Order. If the aggregate size of all such Book Priority Public Customer
Orders and all such bids (offers) exceeds the Surrender Quantity, but
there is insufficient size to execute the entire Agency Order, then
both the Solicited Order and the Agency Order will be cancelled.
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation Auction by submitting to
BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell 1,000
contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10. The OFP also
designates 200 contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the end of
the one second auction the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10. During
the auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in time
priority:
(1) Public Customer Order on the Book to sell 200 contracts at
$2.10;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book to sell 800 contracts at
$2.10.
Without the Surrender Quantity, the Agency Order would execute
against the Public Customer Order on the Book for 200 contracts at
$2.10 and against the Market Maker on the Book for 800 contracts at
$2.10. Using the Surrender Quantity, however, the Agency Order would
still execute against the Public Customer Order on the Book, but would
then execute against the Solicited Order for 800 contracts at $2.10.
Additionally, use of the Surrender Quantity function will allow
block-size Solicitation Auction trades in certain instances in which
there would otherwise be no execution. In these instances, use of the
Surrender Quantity will also prevent (i) a trade-through of the BOX
Book and any Book Priority Public Customer Order from being bypassed
upon a Solicitation Auction execution. Under the proposed rule change
there are other situations when, absent use of the Surrender Quantity,
the Solicitation Auction would result in no trade. The first is when a
Book Priority Public Customer Order is on the BOX Book and there is
insufficient quantity on BOX, other than the Solicited Order, to
execute the entire Agency Order. Without the Surrender Quantity
function, both the Solicited Order and Agency Order would be cancelled
and the Public Customer Order would remain unexecuted, keeping the
Public Customer Order on the Book from being bypassed upon a
Solicitation Auction execution. The second instance is when the
proposed execution price is inferior to the best bid or offer on BOX
(meaning there is a better priced bid (offer) on BOX) or inferior to
the NBBO. Again, without the Surrender Quantity function, no execution
would occur, keeping the better priced bids (offers) on the BOX Book
from being bypassed upon a Solicitation Auction execution. In both
instances, Public Customer Orders, the better priced bids (offers), the
Solicited Order and the Agency Order remain unexecuted. Under this
proposed rule change, however, if the Surrender Quantity is utilized
and is of sufficient size, then the orders are executed against the
Agency Order as follows: Public Customer Orders, better priced bids
(offers), and the Solicited Order. If the Surrender Quantity is of
insufficient size, then no execution occurs and again any trade-through
of the BOX Book or execution ahead of a Book Priority Public Customer
Order is prevented. The Surrender Quantity provides the potential for
various market participants to benefit from the execution they desire.
The following examples illustrate the proposed Surrender Quantity
concept:
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation Auction by submitting to
BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell 1,000
contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10. The OFP also
designates 200 contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the end of
the one second auction the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10. During
the auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in time
priority:
(1) Response of 150 contracts to sell at $2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book of 200 contracts at $2.10;
(3) Response of 100 contracts to sell at $2.10;
(4) Public Customer Order offer on the Book of 100 contracts at
$2.10;
(5) Response of 50 contracts to sell at $2.10.
Since there is insufficient size to execute the entire Agency Order
and the Surrender Quantity of 200 is greater than the total size of
Book Priority Public Customer Orders (100), the Agency Order will
execute 100 contracts against the Book Priority Public Customer Order
at $2.10 and the remaining 900 contracts against the Solicited Order at
$2.10.\9\ In this example, without the use of the Surrender Quantity,
the Priority Public Customer Order would force the Agency Order and
Solicited Order to be cancelled while the Public Customer Order
remained unexecuted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As noted at the beginning of this section regarding
Surrender Quantity, the only orders eligible for execution utilizing
the Surrender Quantity are (1) Book Priority Public Customer Orders
and (2) any bids (offers) on the BOX Book at any price better than
the proposed execution price. Responses are not eligible for
execution utilizing the Surrender Quantity.
Example: The OFP starts a Solicitation Auction by submitting to
BOX an Agency Order to buy and a Solicited Order to sell 1,000
contracts with a proposed execution price of $2.10. The OFP also
designates 200 contracts as the Surrender Quantity. At the end of
the one second auction the NBBO is bid $2.00--offer $2.10. During
the auction, BOX received the following bids (offers) in time
priority:
(1) Response of 150 contracts to sell at $2.08;
(2) Market Maker offer on the Book of 100 contracts at $2.08;
(3) Response of 100 contracts to sell at $2.10;
(4) Public Customer Order on the Book of 50 contracts to sell at
$2.08;
(5) Public Customer Order on the Book of 50 contracts to sell at
$2.10
(6) Response of 50 contracts to sell at $2.10.
Since there is insufficient size to execute the entire Agency
Order, and the Surrender Quantity of 200 is equal to the total size of
Public Customer Orders (100) and the better priced offers (Market Maker
offer of 100 at $2.08), the Agency Order will execute 100 contracts at
$2.10 against the Public Customer Orders, 100 contracts against the
Market Maker offer at $2.08, and the remaining 800 contracts against
the Solicited Order at $2.10. The Public Customer Order of 50 contracts
to sell at $2.08 executes at the proposed solicitation execution price
of $2.10. The Agency Order executes at $2.08 for the 100 contracts
against the Market Maker offer. Without the Surrender Quantity
function, the Book Priority Public Customer Order and the market maker
offer on BOX at a better price would result in the Agency Order and
Solicited Order being cancelled while the Public Customer Orders
remained unexecuted.
Public Customer bids (offers) on the BOX Book at the time of an
execution that includes a Surrender Quantity, and
[[Page 38230]]
that are priced higher (lower) than the proposed Solicitation Auction
execution price, will be executed against the Agency Order at the
proposed execution price. BOX believes this will provide Public
Customers the benefit of a better price for the number of contracts
associated with such higher bids (lower offers). Non-Public Customer
and Market Maker bids (offers) on the BOX Book at the time of a
Surrender Quantity execution that are priced higher (lower) than the
proposed execution price will be executed at their stated price. BOX
believes this will provide the Agency Order a better execution price
for those contracts.
Additionally, the proposed rule change would require OFPs to
deliver to customers a written notification describing the terms and
conditions of the Solicitation Auction prior to executing Agency Orders
using the Solicitation Auction. Such written notification would be
required to be in a form approved by the Exchange.
Supplementary Material to Section 31
Further, the proposed rule change specifies in Supplementary
Material to Chapter V, Section 31 that it will be a violation of an
Options Participant's duty of best execution to its customer if it were
to cancel a Facilitation Order to avoid execution of the order at a
better price. The availability of the Facilitation Auction does not
alter an Options Participant's best execution duty to obtain the best
price for its customer. Accordingly, while Facilitation Orders may be
canceled during the time period given for the entry of Responses, if an
Options Participant were to cancel a Facilitation Order when there was
a better price available on BOX and subsequently re-enter the
Facilitation Order at the same facilitation price after the better
price was no longer available without attempting to obtain that better
price for its customer, there would be a presumption that the Options
Participant did so to avoid execution of its customer order in whole or
in part by other brokers at the better price.
In addition, Options Participants will be prohibited from using the
Solicitation Auction to circumvent Section 17 of Chapter V which limits
principal transactions. Prohibited actions may include, but be not
limited to, Options Participants entering Solicitation Orders that are
solicited from (1) Affiliated broker-dealers, or (2) broker-dealers
with which the Options Participant has an arrangement that allows the
Options Participant to realize similar economic benefits from the
solicited transaction as it would achieve by executing the customer
order in whole or in part as principal. Moreover, any Solicited Orders
entered by Options Participants to trade against Agency Orders may not
be for the account of a BOX market maker that is assigned to the
options class.
Additionally, the proposed rule change would allow Orders and
Responses to be entered into the BOX Facilitation and Solicitation
Auctions and receive executions at penny increments. Any BOX OFP may
enter Orders into the Facilitation and Solicitation Auctions, and any
BOX Participant may enter a Response within the proposed auction
mechanisms. BOX believes that auction competition and executions at
penny increments will provide greater flexibility in pricing for block-
size orders and provide enhanced opportunities for block-size orders to
benefit from price improvement.
Finally, the proposed rule change also adds references to the
Facilitation and Solicitation Auction mechanisms to Chapter V, Section
17 (Customer Orders and Order Flow Providers), and to Chapter III,
Section 4(f) (Prevention of the Misuse of Material Nonpublic
Information).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to
implement a Facilitation Auction and Solicitation Auction on BOX is
designed to help BOX remain competitive among options exchanges and
provide market participants additional opportunities to execute block-
size crossing transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOX believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act
because executions based upon price/time priority provide an incentive
for all market participants to post their best prices quickly to the
market. BOX does not believe that customers' electronic orders must be
accorded priority over market makers who are not acting as agent with
respect to those customers. These market makers are not required to
yield priority to Public Customer Orders if the market maker has time
priority at a particular price level. In this way, BOX places all of
its market participants on the same footing, with no participant
enjoying any special or unique control over the timing of execution or
order handling advantages. All orders are processed for execution by an
electronic computer system--the BOX Trading Host. Specifically, orders
sent to BOX are transmitted directly from remote electronic terminals
to the trading system. Once an order is submitted to BOX, the order is
executed against another order based on the established matching
algorithm. The execution does not depend on the Options Participant but
rather upon what other orders are entered into BOX at or around the
same time as the subject order, what orders are on the BOX Book, and
where the order is ranked based on the price/time priority ranking
algorithm. Accordingly, Options Participants do not control or
influence the result or timing of orders submitted to BOX. The
Commission has repeatedly found this price/time priority model
consistent with the Act \12\ regarding exchanges' electronic trading
mechanisms. The proposed Solicitation Auction mechanism will not
execute any order ahead of any Public Customer order on BOX where that
customer order would have otherwise traded with the Agency Order
(``Book Priority Public Customer Order''). As such, BOX believes the
principles of price/time priority for matching orders within its
proposed Solicitation Auction are consistent with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 49068 (January 13,
2004), 69 FR 2775 (January 20, 2004) (SR-BSE-2002-15) (Order
Approving BOX Facility); 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157
(February 1, 2010) (SR-BATS-2009-031) (Order Approving BATS Options
Rules); 57478 (March 12, 2008), 73 FR 14521 (March 18, 2008) (SR-
NASDAQ-2007-004) (Order Approving NASDAQ Options Market).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal
[[Page 38231]]
Register or within such longer period (i) As the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2011-034 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-034. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of BX. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-034 and should be
submitted on or before July 20, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16293 Filed 6-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P