Final Priorities; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program, 37090-37094 [2011-15932]
Download as PDF
37090
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA Numbers 84.133E–1 and 84.133E–3]
Final Priorities; Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priorities for two
Rehabilitation Engineering Research
Centers (RERCs).
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces two priorities for
RERCs: Low Vision and Blindness
(Priority 1) and Wireless Technologies
(Priority 2). The Assistant Secretary may
use these priorities for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2011 and later years. We
take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We
intend to use these priorities to improve
rehabilitation services and outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: Effective Date: These priorities
are effective July 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP),
Washington, DC 20202–2700.
Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by e-mail:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of final priorities (NFP) is in
concert with National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation Research’s
(NIDRR’s) currently approved LongRange Plan (Plan). The Plan, which was
published in the Federal Register on
February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can be
accessed on the Internet at the following
site: https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/
list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
the best strategies and programs to
improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify
research gaps; (5) identify mechanisms
of integrating research and practice; and
(6) disseminate findings.
This notice announces two priorities
that NIDRR intends to use for RERC
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
competitions in FY 2011 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for these priorities. The
decision to make an award will be based
on the quality of applications received
and available funding.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities; to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities; and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
Rehabilitation Engineering Research
Centers Program (RERCs)
The purpose of the RERC program is
to improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
by conducting advanced engineering
research on and development of
innovative technologies that are
designed to solve particular
rehabilitation problems, or to remove
environmental barriers. RERCs also
demonstrate and evaluate such
technologies, facilitate service delivery
system changes, stimulate the
production and distribution of new
technologies and equipment in the
private sector, and provide training
opportunities.
General Requirements of RERCs
RERCs carry out research or
demonstration activities in support of
the Rehabilitation Act by—
• Developing and disseminating
innovative methods of applying
advanced technology, scientific
achievement, and psychological and
social knowledge to solve rehabilitation
problems and to remove environmental
barriers through studying and
evaluating new or emerging
technologies, products, or environments
and their effectiveness and benefits; or
• Demonstrating and disseminating:
(a) Innovative models for the delivery of
cost-effective rehabilitation technology
services to rural and urban areas; and (b)
other scientific research to assist in
meeting the employment and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
independent living needs of individuals
with severe disabilities; and
• Facilitating service delivery systems
change through: (a) The development,
evaluation, and dissemination of
innovative, consumer-responsive, and
individual- and family-centered models
for the delivery to both rural and urban
areas of innovative cost-effective
rehabilitation technology services; and
(b) other scientific research to assist in
meeting the employment and
independent living needs of and
addressing the barriers confronted by
individuals with disabilities, including
individuals with severe disabilities.
Each RERC must be operated by, or in
collaboration with, one or more
institutions of higher education or one
or more nonprofit organizations.
Each RERC must provide training
opportunities, in conjunction with
institutions of higher education or
nonprofit organizations, to assist
individuals, including individuals with
disabilities, to become rehabilitation
technology researchers and
practitioners.
Each RERC must emphasize the
principles of universal design in its
product research and development.
Universal design is the design of
products and environments to be usable
by all people, to the greatest extent
possible, without the need for
adaptation or specialized design (North
Carolina State University, 1997, The
Center for Universal Design, https://
www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/
udprinciplestext.htm).
Additional information on the RERC
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/
index.html.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and
764(b)(3).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed
priorities (NPP) for NIDRR’s Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Program in the Federal
Register on March 29, 2011 (76 FR
17396). That notice contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing the particular priorities.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the NPP, five parties
submitted comments on the proposed
priorities.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes. In
addition, we do not address general
comments that raised concerns not
directly related to the proposed
priorities.
Analysis of Comments and Changes:
An analysis of the comments and of any
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
changes in the priorities since
publication of the NPP follows.
Low Vision and Blindness
Comment: One commenter
recommended that the Low Vision and
Blindness priority should emphasize a
model of assistive technology
development in which mainstream,
mass-market products are designed with
accessibility features to meet the needs
of individuals with low vision and
blindness. The commenter noted that
this model is more likely to lead to lowcost products, relative to the model in
which specialized products are
designed for the relatively small market
of individuals with low vision and
blindness.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the
development of mass-marketed products
with accessibility features can lead to
lower costs for consumers who are blind
or have low vision. The Low Vision and
Blindness priority provides the
flexibility for applicants to propose
projects that use this kind of massmarket development model. However,
NIDRR recognizes that a model that
focuses on developing other more
specialized or customized technologies
and products may be needed in order to
develop useful and appropriate
technologies and products for
individuals who are blind or have low
vision. For this reason, we also provide
applicants with the flexibility to use
models that focus on these technologies
and products.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that NIDRR require the RERC to work
directly with companies that are in a
position to manufacture and sell
products in order to expedite the
process of transferring the RERC’s work
to consumers in the market.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that
collaborations with companies and
industry partners can expedite the
process of technology transfer. The
RERC priority requirements, which
apply to both the Low Vision and
Blindness and Wireless Technologies
priorities, include a requirement to
collaborate with relevant industry
partners to improve research capacity.
This collaboration may also expedite the
transfer of the RERC’s work to
consumers in the market. In an effort to
increase transfer of RERC-developed
technologies to the marketplace, NIDRR
also requires RERCs to develop a
technology transfer plan in the first year
of the grant. Therefore, NIDRR believes
that an additional requirement to
collaborate with relevant industry
partners is unnecessary. The current
requirements achieve the commenter’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
aim of expediting the technology
transfer process.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that the Low Vision and Blindness
priority include more explicit language
about the RERC’s role as a clearinghouse
for information on technologies for
individuals who are blind or have low
vision.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the
RERC should have responsibility for
providing information about
technologies for individuals who are
blind or have low vision. Paragraph (4)
of the priority requires each RERC to
communicate with a wide variety of
stakeholders about trends and evolving
product concepts related to its
designated topic. Paragraph (5) of the
priority also requires each RERC to
provide technical assistance to
stakeholders on relevant policies,
guidelines, and standards related to its
designated topic. Finally, the RERC
priority requirements, which apply to
both the Low Vision and Blindness and
Wireless Technologies priorities,
include a requirement that the RERC
disseminate its research results to
relevant stakeholders. For these reasons,
we believe that this priority provides
sufficiently for the RERC’s role in
transmitting information on
technologies for individuals who are
blind or have low vision, and, therefore,
decline to add more explicit language as
requested.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that the Low Vision and Blindness
priority should contain more explicit
language about the RERC’s requirement
to collaborate with developers of
technology from outside the RERC,
researchers, and students in the field.
Discussion: The requirements that are
applicable to both RERC priorities
include a requirement to collaborate
with relevant industry partners and
relevant NIDRR-funded research
projects. While the priority does not
require collaboration with developers of
technology or with students in the field,
nothing in the priority precludes such
collaborations. NIDRR does not have a
sufficient basis for requiring all
applicants to propose to collaborate
with developers from outside of the
RERC or with students in the field. We
believe individual projects are well
positioned to determine entities with
whom to collaborate, and this priority
provides them with adequate flexibility
to do so.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter expressed
concern about language in the Low
Vision and Blindness priority that refers
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37091
to improved vision assessment for the
population of individuals who are at
risk for experiencing low vision and
blindness. This commenter stated that
such language would result in having
the RERC focus on prevention of
blindness among at-risk individuals,
instead of on assessments and
technologies to meet the needs of
individuals who already experience
vision loss.
Discussion: The priority includes
requirements for research and
development that will improve access to
graphical information, signage, and
travel information and devices, as well
as development of technologies to
promote the participation of individuals
with low vision and blindness in
science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM) education. In order
to facilitate early intervention and better
outcomes, NIDRR requires the RERC to
focus on improved vision assessment
technologies to improve the field’s
ability to detect and serve emerging
populations of individuals who are
blind or who have low vision. While
applicants may develop improved
assessment technologies that would
facilitate prevention of low vision and
blindness among at-risk populations,
the RERC must focus its resources on
the multiple requirements related to
research on and development of
technologies to promote the
independence of individuals who are
blind or who have low vision.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that NIDRR revise the
Low Vision and Blindness priority to
require the RERC to investigate and
address the employment needs of older
individuals with low vision and
blindness.
Discussion: Nothing in the priority
precludes applicants from proposing a
project or projects that emphasize
employment for older individuals with
low vision and blindness. However,
NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis
for requiring all applicants to focus on
this specific topic or population. NIDRR
does not want to limit applicants’ ability
to propose projects that address other
important topics, outcomes, or
populations by requiring research and
development to support employment of
older individuals with low vision and
blindness.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that we revise the Low
Vision and Blindness priority to require
the RERC to develop its research and
development plans based upon the
input of the diverse population of
individuals with vision loss and the
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
37092
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
organizations that represent them. This
commenter also recommended that
NIDRR require active partnerships
between the RERC and organizations
that represent individuals living with
vision loss.
Discussion: The RERC priority
requirements, which apply to both the
Low Vision and Blindness and Wireless
Technologies priorities, include a
requirement that each RERC develop
and implement a plan for including
individuals with disabilities or their
representatives in all phases of its
activities, including research,
development, training, dissemination,
and evaluation. In developing such a
plan, applicants may determine the
timing and extent of involvement of
individuals with disabilities in their
activities. Nothing in the priority
precludes applicants from proposing to
develop active partnerships with
organizations that represent individuals
who are living with vision loss.
However, NIDRR does not have a
sufficient basis for requiring all
applicants to do so. NIDRR does not
want to limit applicants’ ability to
propose alternative mechanisms for
including individuals with disabilities
or their representatives in the RERC’s
work.
Changes: None.
Comment: In reference to the
requirement in the priority that the
RERC must research and develop
technologies to promote the
participation of individuals with low
vision and blindness in STEM
education, one commenter expressed
concern that the RERC would focus its
work exclusively in this area and
produce solutions with limited
relevance outside of the classroom. The
commenter recommended that we revise
the priority to ensure that the RERC’s
activities are aimed at developing
technologies for use in the home, at
school, and in the community by
individuals with vision loss of all ages.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the
RERC’s work should address the needs
of individuals with low vision and
blindness of all ages and in all settings.
The Low Vision and Blindness priority
states that the RERC must research and
develop technologies that will improve
the assessment of low vision and
blindness and promote independence
for individuals with low vision and
blindness of all ages. Within the broad
requirements of the priority, applicants
are free to focus their research and
development towards finding solutions
that benefit subpopulations in settings,
inside and outside of the classroom,
where they see the greatest need.
Changes: None.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Comment: One commenter expressed
support for the requirement in the Low
Vision and Blindness priority that the
grantee must research and develop
technologies that will improve the
assessment of low vision and blindness
and promote independence for
individuals with low vision and
blindness of all ages, including those
who are deaf-blind and those with
multiple disabilities. This commenter
noted, however, that individuals with
low vision and blindness who have
other disabling conditions cannot be
easily categorized according to their
disabling conditions, and that their
technology needs are largely driven by
their functional abilities. The
commenter suggested that NIDRR revise
the priority to require research and
development that accounts for
variations in functional abilities among
individuals with low vision and
blindness and other disabling
conditions.
Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that
the priority should be revised to be
more prescriptive in terms of the
conceptual and methodological
strategies used by the RERC, as
suggested by the commenter. NIDRR
strongly believes that applicants should
have the flexibility to propose a wide
variety of research and development
approaches that meet the requirements
of the priority. The peer review process
will determine the merits of each
proposal.
Changes: None.
Wireless Technologies
Comment: One commenter suggested
that NIDRR revise the Wireless
Technologies priority to require
applicants to focus on the research and
development of low-cost or no-cost
options for access to wireless
technologies by people with disabilities.
Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the priority require
the development of access solutions that
are built into wireless technologies or
that allow third parties to provide lowcost access solutions for those
technologies.
Discussion: Nothing in the priority
precludes applicants from proposing
research and development projects that
focus on low- or no-cost access
solutions for wireless technologies,
including built-in or third-party
solutions. However, NIDRR does not
have a sufficient basis for requiring all
applicants to do so. NIDRR does not
want to limit applicants’ ability to
propose other important research and
development approaches and projects
by requiring all applicants to focus their
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
work on built-in or third-party
accessibility solutions.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that the Wireless Technologies priority
should be broad enough to include
research to develop accessibility
solutions for consumer electronics that
employ wireless technologies to
communicate with other devices.
Discussion: Nothing in the Wireless
Technologies priority precludes
applicants from proposing projects to
develop accessibility solutions for
consumer electronics that employ
wireless technologies to communicate
with other devices. However, NIDRR
does not have a sufficient basis for
requiring all applicants to do so. NIDRR
does not want to limit applicants’ ability
to propose other important research and
development projects by requiring all
applicants to focus their work in this
area.
Changes: None.
Final Priorities
Priority 1—Low Vision and Blindness.
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation
Engineering Research Center (RERC) on
Low Vision and Blindness. This RERC
must research and develop technologies
that will improve the assessment of low
vision and blindness and promote
independence for individuals with low
vision and blindness of all ages,
including those who are deaf-blind and
those with multiple disabilities.
Specifically, the RERC must improve
vision assessment for the changing and
expanding population of individuals
who are at risk for experiencing low
vision and blindness, including but not
limited to, the elderly, returning
military veterans, and prematurely born
infants. The RERC must also research
and develop technologies that will
improve individuals’ access to graphical
information, signage, and travel
information and devices and appliances
that have digital displays and control
panels. In addition, the RERC must
research and develop technologies to
promote the participation of individuals
with low vision and blindness in
science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM) education.
Regarding participation in STEM
education, these technologies include
but are not limited to accessible
scientific measurement instruments,
tools, and materials.
Priority 2—RERC on Wireless
Technologies.
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Engineering Research Center (RERC) on
Wireless Technologies. Under this
priority, the RERC must research,
develop, and evaluate innovative
technologies and products that facilitate
the use of wireless technologies for
individuals with disabilities. The RERC
must research and develop wireless
hardware and software that will meet
the needs, promote independence, and
improve the quality of life and
community participation of individuals
with disabilities. The RERC must also
work with and provide information to
relevant Federal agencies, designers,
and manufacturers regarding barriers to
and methods for facilitating the use of
wireless technologies by individuals
with disabilities.
Requirements Applicable to Both
Priorities
A RERC established under either of
the proposed priorities in this notice
must be designed to contribute to the
following outcomes:
(1) Increased technical and scientific
knowledge relevant to its designated
priority research area. The RERC must
contribute to this outcome by
conducting high-quality, rigorous
research and development projects.
(2) Increased innovation in
technologies, products, environments,
performance guidelines, and monitoring
and assessment tools applicable to its
designated priority research area. The
RERC must contribute to this outcome
through the development and testing of
these innovations.
(3) Improved research capacity in its
designated priority research area. The
RERC must contribute to this outcome
by collaborating with the relevant
industry, professional associations,
institutions of higher education, health
care providers, or educators, as
appropriate.
(4) Improved awareness and
understanding of cutting edge
developments in technologies within its
designated priority research area. The
RERC must contribute to this outcome
by identifying and communicating with
NIDRR, individuals with disabilities
and their representatives, disability
organizations, service providers,
professional journals, manufacturers,
and other interested parties regarding
trends and evolving product concepts
related to its designated priority
research area.
(5) Increased impact of research in the
designated priority research area. The
RERC must contribute to this outcome
by providing technical assistance to
relevant public and private
organizations, individuals with
disabilities, employers, and schools on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
policies, guidelines, and standards
related to its designated priority
research area.
(6) Increased transfer of RERCdeveloped technologies to the
marketplace. The RERC must contribute
to this outcome by developing and
implementing a plan for ensuring that
all technologies developed by the RERC
are made available to the public. The
technology transfer plan must be
developed in the first year of the project
period in consultation with the NIDRRfunded Disability Rehabilitation
Research Project, Center on Knowledge
Translation for Technology Transfer.
In addition, under each priority, the
RERC must—
• Have the capability to design, build,
and test prototype devices and assist in
the technology transfer and knowledge
translation of successful solutions to
relevant production and service delivery
settings;
• Evaluate the efficacy and safety of
its new products, instrumentation, or
assistive devices;
• Provide as part of its proposal, and
then implement, a plan that describes
how it will include, as appropriate,
individuals with disabilities or their
representatives in all phases of its
activities, including research,
development, training, dissemination,
and evaluation;
• Provide as part of its proposal, and
then implement, in consultation with
the NIDRR-funded National Center for
the Dissemination of Disability
Research, a plan to disseminate its
research results to individuals with
disabilities and their representatives,
disability organizations, service
providers, professional journals,
manufacturers, and other interested
parties;
• Conduct a state-of-the-science
conference on its designated priority
research area in the fourth year of the
project period, and publish a
comprehensive report on the final
outcomes of the conference in the fifth
year of the project period; and
• Coordinate research projects of
mutual interest with relevant NIDRRfunded projects, as identified through
consultation with the NIDRR project
officer.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37093
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) Awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from
proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use one or more of these priorities, we
invite applications through a notice in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this final
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this final regulatory action are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this final regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the final priorities justify the
costs.
Summary of potential costs and
benefits: The benefits of the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. These final priorities will
generate new knowledge through
research and development. Another
benefit of these final priorities is that
the establishment of new RERCs will
improve the lives of individuals with
disabilities. The new RERCs will
generate and promote the use of new
technologies and information that will
improve the options for individuals
with disabilities with regard to
community living and community
participation.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
37094
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this
site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: https://
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Dated: June 21, 2011.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–15932 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
appropriate, can be found at: https://
www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/
index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Spataro or Mary Louise Dirrigl.
Telephone: (202) 245–7468.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you can call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of this list and the letters
or other Departmental documents
described in this list in an accessible
format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by
contacting Jessica Spataro or Mary
Louise Dirrigl at (202) 245–7468.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following list identifies correspondence
from the Department issued from
October 1, 2010 through December 31,
2010. Included on the list are those
letters that contain interpretations of the
requirements of the IDEA and its
implementing regulations, as well as
letters and other documents that the
Department believes will assist the
public in understanding the
requirements of the law and its
regulations. The date of and topic
addressed by each letter are identified,
and summary information is also
provided, as appropriate. To protect the
privacy interests of the individual or
individuals involved, personally
identifiable information has been
redacted, as appropriate.
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Part B—Assistance for Education of All
Children With Disabilities
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Section 614—Evaluations, Eligibility
Determinations, Individualized
Education Programs, And Educational
Placements
Topic Addressed: Individualized
Education Programs.
Æ Letter dated December 16, 2010 to
individual (personally identifiable
information redacted), responding to
concerns about the use of seclusion and
restraint with students with disabilities
in schools.
List of Correspondence
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; Department of
Education.
ACTION: List of Correspondence from
October 1, 2010 through December 31,
2010.
AGENCY:
The Secretary is publishing
the following list pursuant to section
607(f) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Under section 607(f) of the IDEA, the
Secretary is required, on a quarterly
basis, to publish in the Federal Register
a list of correspondence from the U.S.
Department of Education (Department)
received by individuals during the
previous quarter that describes the
interpretations of the Department of the
IDEA or the regulations that implement
the IDEA. This list and the letters or
other Departmental documents
described in this list, with personally
identifiable information redacted, as
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Section 615—Procedural Safeguards
Topic Addressed: Impartial Due
Process Hearings.
Æ Letter dated October 4, 2010 to
School Law Center, LLC attorneys Amy
Goetz and Atlee Reilly, clarifying that
the IDEA does not prevent a parent
whose child changes school districts
from filing a timely due process
complaint against a local educational
agency (LEA) where the child
previously attended school.
Æ Letter dated November 10, 2010 to
Texas Education Agency General
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Counsel David Anderson, clarifying that
it would be inconsistent with the IDEA
for a State to adopt a regulation
suspending the timeline for convening a
resolution session when the State
receives a complaint shortly before or
during the LEA’s winter break.
Topic Addressed: Finality Of Due
Process Hearing Decisions.
Æ Letter dated October 20, 2010 to
District of Columbia Acting State
Superintendent of Education Beth H.
Colleye, regarding requests for
reconsideration of final due process
hearing decisions.
Æ Letter dated October 28, 2010 to
Maryland attorney Matthew Scott
Weiner, regarding requests for
reconsideration of final due process
hearing decisions.
Part C—Infants and Toddlers With
Disabilities
Section 639—Procedural Safeguards
Topic Addressed: Access To Records.
Æ Letter dated October 13, 2010 to
Florida Department of Health Early
Steps Program Part C Coordinator Lynne
Marie Price, regarding whether a State
must provide parents with a copy of a
test protocol that contains personally
identifiable information about their
child as part of their child’s Part C IDEA
records.
Other Letters That Do Not Interpret Idea
But May Be of Interest to Readers
Topic Addressed: Harassment And
Bullying.
Æ Dear Colleague Letter dated October
26, 2010 from Office for Civil Rights
Assistant Secretary Russlynn Ali,
regarding bullying and harassment,
including disability harassment.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this
site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: https://
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37090-37094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15932]
[[Page 37090]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA Numbers 84.133E-1 and 84.133E-3]
Final Priorities; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Program
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priorities for two Rehabilitation Engineering
Research Centers (RERCs).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services announces two priorities for RERCs: Low Vision
and Blindness (Priority 1) and Wireless Technologies (Priority 2). The
Assistant Secretary may use these priorities for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2011 and later years. We take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We intend to use these priorities
to improve rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with
disabilities.
DATES: Effective Date: These priorities are effective July 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700. Telephone: (202) 245-7532 or by e-
mail: marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of final priorities (NFP) is in
concert with National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research's (NIDRR's) currently approved Long-Range Plan (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine the best
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
This notice announces two priorities that NIDRR intends to use for
RERC competitions in FY 2011 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for these
priorities. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality
of applications received and available funding.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities; to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities; and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act).
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Program (RERCs)
The purpose of the RERC program is to improve the effectiveness of
services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act by conducting advanced
engineering research on and development of innovative technologies that
are designed to solve particular rehabilitation problems, or to remove
environmental barriers. RERCs also demonstrate and evaluate such
technologies, facilitate service delivery system changes, stimulate the
production and distribution of new technologies and equipment in the
private sector, and provide training opportunities.
General Requirements of RERCs
RERCs carry out research or demonstration activities in support of
the Rehabilitation Act by--
Developing and disseminating innovative methods of
applying advanced technology, scientific achievement, and psychological
and social knowledge to solve rehabilitation problems and to remove
environmental barriers through studying and evaluating new or emerging
technologies, products, or environments and their effectiveness and
benefits; or
Demonstrating and disseminating: (a) Innovative models for
the delivery of cost-effective rehabilitation technology services to
rural and urban areas; and (b) other scientific research to assist in
meeting the employment and independent living needs of individuals with
severe disabilities; and
Facilitating service delivery systems change through: (a)
The development, evaluation, and dissemination of innovative, consumer-
responsive, and individual- and family-centered models for the delivery
to both rural and urban areas of innovative cost-effective
rehabilitation technology services; and (b) other scientific research
to assist in meeting the employment and independent living needs of and
addressing the barriers confronted by individuals with disabilities,
including individuals with severe disabilities.
Each RERC must be operated by, or in collaboration with, one or
more institutions of higher education or one or more nonprofit
organizations.
Each RERC must provide training opportunities, in conjunction with
institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations, to assist
individuals, including individuals with disabilities, to become
rehabilitation technology researchers and practitioners.
Each RERC must emphasize the principles of universal design in its
product research and development. Universal design is the design of
products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest
extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design
(North Carolina State University, 1997, The Center for Universal
Design, https://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm).
Additional information on the RERC program can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(3).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed priorities (NPP) for NIDRR's
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program in
the Federal Register on March 29, 2011 (76 FR 17396). That notice
contained background information and our reasons for proposing the
particular priorities.
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPP, five
parties submitted comments on the proposed priorities.
Generally, we do not address technical and other minor changes. In
addition, we do not address general comments that raised concerns not
directly related to the proposed priorities.
Analysis of Comments and Changes: An analysis of the comments and
of any
[[Page 37091]]
changes in the priorities since publication of the NPP follows.
Low Vision and Blindness
Comment: One commenter recommended that the Low Vision and
Blindness priority should emphasize a model of assistive technology
development in which mainstream, mass-market products are designed with
accessibility features to meet the needs of individuals with low vision
and blindness. The commenter noted that this model is more likely to
lead to low-cost products, relative to the model in which specialized
products are designed for the relatively small market of individuals
with low vision and blindness.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the development of mass-marketed
products with accessibility features can lead to lower costs for
consumers who are blind or have low vision. The Low Vision and
Blindness priority provides the flexibility for applicants to propose
projects that use this kind of mass-market development model. However,
NIDRR recognizes that a model that focuses on developing other more
specialized or customized technologies and products may be needed in
order to develop useful and appropriate technologies and products for
individuals who are blind or have low vision. For this reason, we also
provide applicants with the flexibility to use models that focus on
these technologies and products.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested that NIDRR require the RERC to
work directly with companies that are in a position to manufacture and
sell products in order to expedite the process of transferring the
RERC's work to consumers in the market.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that collaborations with companies and
industry partners can expedite the process of technology transfer. The
RERC priority requirements, which apply to both the Low Vision and
Blindness and Wireless Technologies priorities, include a requirement
to collaborate with relevant industry partners to improve research
capacity. This collaboration may also expedite the transfer of the
RERC's work to consumers in the market. In an effort to increase
transfer of RERC-developed technologies to the marketplace, NIDRR also
requires RERCs to develop a technology transfer plan in the first year
of the grant. Therefore, NIDRR believes that an additional requirement
to collaborate with relevant industry partners is unnecessary. The
current requirements achieve the commenter's aim of expediting the
technology transfer process.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested that the Low Vision and Blindness
priority include more explicit language about the RERC's role as a
clearinghouse for information on technologies for individuals who are
blind or have low vision.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the RERC should have responsibility
for providing information about technologies for individuals who are
blind or have low vision. Paragraph (4) of the priority requires each
RERC to communicate with a wide variety of stakeholders about trends
and evolving product concepts related to its designated topic.
Paragraph (5) of the priority also requires each RERC to provide
technical assistance to stakeholders on relevant policies, guidelines,
and standards related to its designated topic. Finally, the RERC
priority requirements, which apply to both the Low Vision and Blindness
and Wireless Technologies priorities, include a requirement that the
RERC disseminate its research results to relevant stakeholders. For
these reasons, we believe that this priority provides sufficiently for
the RERC's role in transmitting information on technologies for
individuals who are blind or have low vision, and, therefore, decline
to add more explicit language as requested.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested that the Low Vision and Blindness
priority should contain more explicit language about the RERC's
requirement to collaborate with developers of technology from outside
the RERC, researchers, and students in the field.
Discussion: The requirements that are applicable to both RERC
priorities include a requirement to collaborate with relevant industry
partners and relevant NIDRR-funded research projects. While the
priority does not require collaboration with developers of technology
or with students in the field, nothing in the priority precludes such
collaborations. NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis for requiring
all applicants to propose to collaborate with developers from outside
of the RERC or with students in the field. We believe individual
projects are well positioned to determine entities with whom to
collaborate, and this priority provides them with adequate flexibility
to do so.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter expressed concern about language in the Low
Vision and Blindness priority that refers to improved vision assessment
for the population of individuals who are at risk for experiencing low
vision and blindness. This commenter stated that such language would
result in having the RERC focus on prevention of blindness among at-
risk individuals, instead of on assessments and technologies to meet
the needs of individuals who already experience vision loss.
Discussion: The priority includes requirements for research and
development that will improve access to graphical information, signage,
and travel information and devices, as well as development of
technologies to promote the participation of individuals with low
vision and blindness in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM) education. In order to facilitate early intervention
and better outcomes, NIDRR requires the RERC to focus on improved
vision assessment technologies to improve the field's ability to detect
and serve emerging populations of individuals who are blind or who have
low vision. While applicants may develop improved assessment
technologies that would facilitate prevention of low vision and
blindness among at-risk populations, the RERC must focus its resources
on the multiple requirements related to research on and development of
technologies to promote the independence of individuals who are blind
or who have low vision.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter recommended that NIDRR revise the Low Vision
and Blindness priority to require the RERC to investigate and address
the employment needs of older individuals with low vision and
blindness.
Discussion: Nothing in the priority precludes applicants from
proposing a project or projects that emphasize employment for older
individuals with low vision and blindness. However, NIDRR does not have
a sufficient basis for requiring all applicants to focus on this
specific topic or population. NIDRR does not want to limit applicants'
ability to propose projects that address other important topics,
outcomes, or populations by requiring research and development to
support employment of older individuals with low vision and blindness.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise the Low Vision
and Blindness priority to require the RERC to develop its research and
development plans based upon the input of the diverse population of
individuals with vision loss and the
[[Page 37092]]
organizations that represent them. This commenter also recommended that
NIDRR require active partnerships between the RERC and organizations
that represent individuals living with vision loss.
Discussion: The RERC priority requirements, which apply to both the
Low Vision and Blindness and Wireless Technologies priorities, include
a requirement that each RERC develop and implement a plan for including
individuals with disabilities or their representatives in all phases of
its activities, including research, development, training,
dissemination, and evaluation. In developing such a plan, applicants
may determine the timing and extent of involvement of individuals with
disabilities in their activities. Nothing in the priority precludes
applicants from proposing to develop active partnerships with
organizations that represent individuals who are living with vision
loss. However, NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis for requiring all
applicants to do so. NIDRR does not want to limit applicants' ability
to propose alternative mechanisms for including individuals with
disabilities or their representatives in the RERC's work.
Changes: None.
Comment: In reference to the requirement in the priority that the
RERC must research and develop technologies to promote the
participation of individuals with low vision and blindness in STEM
education, one commenter expressed concern that the RERC would focus
its work exclusively in this area and produce solutions with limited
relevance outside of the classroom. The commenter recommended that we
revise the priority to ensure that the RERC's activities are aimed at
developing technologies for use in the home, at school, and in the
community by individuals with vision loss of all ages.
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the RERC's work should address the
needs of individuals with low vision and blindness of all ages and in
all settings. The Low Vision and Blindness priority states that the
RERC must research and develop technologies that will improve the
assessment of low vision and blindness and promote independence for
individuals with low vision and blindness of all ages. Within the broad
requirements of the priority, applicants are free to focus their
research and development towards finding solutions that benefit
subpopulations in settings, inside and outside of the classroom, where
they see the greatest need.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter expressed support for the requirement in the
Low Vision and Blindness priority that the grantee must research and
develop technologies that will improve the assessment of low vision and
blindness and promote independence for individuals with low vision and
blindness of all ages, including those who are deaf-blind and those
with multiple disabilities. This commenter noted, however, that
individuals with low vision and blindness who have other disabling
conditions cannot be easily categorized according to their disabling
conditions, and that their technology needs are largely driven by their
functional abilities. The commenter suggested that NIDRR revise the
priority to require research and development that accounts for
variations in functional abilities among individuals with low vision
and blindness and other disabling conditions.
Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that the priority should be
revised to be more prescriptive in terms of the conceptual and
methodological strategies used by the RERC, as suggested by the
commenter. NIDRR strongly believes that applicants should have the
flexibility to propose a wide variety of research and development
approaches that meet the requirements of the priority. The peer review
process will determine the merits of each proposal.
Changes: None.
Wireless Technologies
Comment: One commenter suggested that NIDRR revise the Wireless
Technologies priority to require applicants to focus on the research
and development of low-cost or no-cost options for access to wireless
technologies by people with disabilities. Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the priority require the development of access
solutions that are built into wireless technologies or that allow third
parties to provide low-cost access solutions for those technologies.
Discussion: Nothing in the priority precludes applicants from
proposing research and development projects that focus on low- or no-
cost access solutions for wireless technologies, including built-in or
third-party solutions. However, NIDRR does not have a sufficient basis
for requiring all applicants to do so. NIDRR does not want to limit
applicants' ability to propose other important research and development
approaches and projects by requiring all applicants to focus their work
on built-in or third-party accessibility solutions.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested that the Wireless Technologies
priority should be broad enough to include research to develop
accessibility solutions for consumer electronics that employ wireless
technologies to communicate with other devices.
Discussion: Nothing in the Wireless Technologies priority precludes
applicants from proposing projects to develop accessibility solutions
for consumer electronics that employ wireless technologies to
communicate with other devices. However, NIDRR does not have a
sufficient basis for requiring all applicants to do so. NIDRR does not
want to limit applicants' ability to propose other important research
and development projects by requiring all applicants to focus their
work in this area.
Changes: None.
Final Priorities
Priority 1--Low Vision and Blindness.
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation Engineering
Research Center (RERC) on Low Vision and Blindness. This RERC must
research and develop technologies that will improve the assessment of
low vision and blindness and promote independence for individuals with
low vision and blindness of all ages, including those who are deaf-
blind and those with multiple disabilities. Specifically, the RERC must
improve vision assessment for the changing and expanding population of
individuals who are at risk for experiencing low vision and blindness,
including but not limited to, the elderly, returning military veterans,
and prematurely born infants. The RERC must also research and develop
technologies that will improve individuals' access to graphical
information, signage, and travel information and devices and appliances
that have digital displays and control panels. In addition, the RERC
must research and develop technologies to promote the participation of
individuals with low vision and blindness in science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Regarding participation
in STEM education, these technologies include but are not limited to
accessible scientific measurement instruments, tools, and materials.
Priority 2--RERC on Wireless Technologies.
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation
[[Page 37093]]
Engineering Research Center (RERC) on Wireless Technologies. Under this
priority, the RERC must research, develop, and evaluate innovative
technologies and products that facilitate the use of wireless
technologies for individuals with disabilities. The RERC must research
and develop wireless hardware and software that will meet the needs,
promote independence, and improve the quality of life and community
participation of individuals with disabilities. The RERC must also work
with and provide information to relevant Federal agencies, designers,
and manufacturers regarding barriers to and methods for facilitating
the use of wireless technologies by individuals with disabilities.
Requirements Applicable to Both Priorities
A RERC established under either of the proposed priorities in this
notice must be designed to contribute to the following outcomes:
(1) Increased technical and scientific knowledge relevant to its
designated priority research area. The RERC must contribute to this
outcome by conducting high-quality, rigorous research and development
projects.
(2) Increased innovation in technologies, products, environments,
performance guidelines, and monitoring and assessment tools applicable
to its designated priority research area. The RERC must contribute to
this outcome through the development and testing of these innovations.
(3) Improved research capacity in its designated priority research
area. The RERC must contribute to this outcome by collaborating with
the relevant industry, professional associations, institutions of
higher education, health care providers, or educators, as appropriate.
(4) Improved awareness and understanding of cutting edge
developments in technologies within its designated priority research
area. The RERC must contribute to this outcome by identifying and
communicating with NIDRR, individuals with disabilities and their
representatives, disability organizations, service providers,
professional journals, manufacturers, and other interested parties
regarding trends and evolving product concepts related to its
designated priority research area.
(5) Increased impact of research in the designated priority
research area. The RERC must contribute to this outcome by providing
technical assistance to relevant public and private organizations,
individuals with disabilities, employers, and schools on policies,
guidelines, and standards related to its designated priority research
area.
(6) Increased transfer of RERC-developed technologies to the
marketplace. The RERC must contribute to this outcome by developing and
implementing a plan for ensuring that all technologies developed by the
RERC are made available to the public. The technology transfer plan
must be developed in the first year of the project period in
consultation with the NIDRR-funded Disability Rehabilitation Research
Project, Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
In addition, under each priority, the RERC must--
Have the capability to design, build, and test prototype
devices and assist in the technology transfer and knowledge translation
of successful solutions to relevant production and service delivery
settings;
Evaluate the efficacy and safety of its new products,
instrumentation, or assistive devices;
Provide as part of its proposal, and then implement, a
plan that describes how it will include, as appropriate, individuals
with disabilities or their representatives in all phases of its
activities, including research, development, training, dissemination,
and evaluation;
Provide as part of its proposal, and then implement, in
consultation with the NIDRR-funded National Center for the
Dissemination of Disability Research, a plan to disseminate its
research results to individuals with disabilities and their
representatives, disability organizations, service providers,
professional journals, manufacturers, and other interested parties;
Conduct a state-of-the-science conference on its
designated priority research area in the fourth year of the project
period, and publish a comprehensive report on the final outcomes of the
conference in the fifth year of the project period; and
Coordinate research projects of mutual interest with
relevant NIDRR-funded projects, as identified through consultation with
the NIDRR project officer.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
Awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use one or more of these priorities, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this final regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with this final regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this final regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the final priorities justify the costs.
Summary of potential costs and benefits: The benefits of the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Programs
have been well established over the years in that similar projects have
been completed successfully. These final priorities will generate new
knowledge through research and development. Another benefit of these
final priorities is that the establishment of new RERCs will improve
the lives of individuals with disabilities. The new RERCs will generate
and promote the use of new technologies and information that will
improve the options for individuals with disabilities with regard to
community living and community participation.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in
[[Page 37094]]
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or
computer diskette) on request to the Grants and Contracts Services
Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363. If you
use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document,
as well as all other documents of this Department published in the
Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at: https://www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: June 21, 2011.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-15932 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P