In the Matter of Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 36154-36155 [2011-15365]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
36154
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Notices
documentation of the materials
included in the transfer. In some
instances, skeletal elements of the same
individual were separated and sent to
multiple locations. Between 1957 and
sometime prior to 1966, the Burke
Museum transferred the remains of two
individuals from Pit 5 (identified as 5A
and 5B) to the Western Washington
University, Bellingham, WA. These
individuals stayed at Western
Washington University until October
2009, when they were transferred to
Central Washington University as part
of the NAGPRA inventory effort. In
February 1974, the Burke Museum
transferred four individuals, recovered
from Pits 4, 5, and 6 (identified as 4, 5A,
5B, and 6), to Central Washington
University. These four individuals have
remained at Central Washington
University. In March 1974, the Burke
Museum transferred all remaining
skeletal elements (4, 5A, 5B, and 6) to
Seattle University, Seattle, WA. In
January 1990, Seattle University
transferred two skeletal elements from
individual 5A to the Confederated
Tribes of the Colville Reservation,
Washington, where they were placed in
the Colville Tribal Repository, in
Nespelem, WA. In March 2006, the
Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation, Washington, transferred
temporary custody of this individual to
Central Washington University in order
to supplement the inventory of that
individual’s remains. Upon completion
of the inventory, the two elements from
individual 5A were returned to the
Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation (they are presently at the
Colville Tribal Repository). In December
1991, Seattle University transferred the
other elements of individual 5A, as well
as the skeletal elements they held from
individuals 4, 5B, and 6, to an
organization called Daybreak Star
Indian Cultural Center. In June 1993, on
behalf of Seattle University, the
Daybreak Star Indian Cultural Center
transferred the human remains in their
possession back to the Burke Museum.
In October 2006, the Burke Museum
transferred all remains in their
possession (i.e., the remains returned to
them by Daybreak Star Indian Cultural
Center) to Central Washington
University in order to facilitate the
Bureau of Reclamation’s NAGPRA
inventory effort. With the exception of
the two elements from individual 5A
that are at the Colville Tribal
Repository, all known skeletal elements
from the individuals recovered from
45OK7, as well as all the associated
funerary objects recovered in 1950, are
now at Central Washington University.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
No physical description of the human
remains was prepared at the time of
recovery. Between 1950 and 1957, Roger
Heglar, a University of Washington
graduate student, analyzed the burials
from 45OK7. That inventory
documented the partial remains of four
individuals in collections; the field
records indicated the excavators, in
1950, had believed the remains of three
individuals were recovered. A 1966
inventory by the Burke Museum also
indentified four individuals. However,
the current physical inventory
completed by Central Washington
University determined that the
collection of skeletal elements
previously identified as individual 5A
actually included skeletal elements of
two individuals. In conclusion,
elements from five individuals (4, 5A,
5B individual 1, 5B individual 2, and 6)
recovered from site 45OK7 are presently
in collections.
Osteological evidence documented by
the physical anthropologist, the
archeological association of the
materials with a prehistoric site, and the
kinds of associated funerary objects
recovered, indicate that the human
remains described above are Native
American. The geographic location of
the site within the Plateau Culture Area,
tribal oral tradition, and anthropological
and historical research all indicate that
site 45OK7 lies within an area occupied
by the San Poil and Nespelem tribes or
bands, who are members of and legally
represented by the Confederated Tribes
of the Colville Reservation, Washington.
Moreover, site 45OK7 is situated within
the exterior boundaries of the Colville
Indian Reservation, WA.
Determinations Made by the Bureau of
Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region
Officials of the Bureau of
Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region
have determined that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described in this notice
represent the physical remains of five
individuals of Native American
ancestry.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A),
the 12 objects described above are
reasonably believed to have been placed
with or near individual human remains
at the time of death or later as part of
the death rite or ceremony.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and associated funerary objects
and the Confederated Tribes of the
Colville Reservation, Washington.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains and
associated funerary objects should
contact Dr. Sean Hess, Archeologist,
Grand Coulee Power Office, Bureau of
Reclamation, PO Box 620, Grand
Coulee, WA 99133, telephone (509)
633–9233, before July 21, 2011.
Repatriation of the human remains and
associated funerary objects to the
Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation, Washington, may proceed
after that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
The Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific
Northwest Region is responsible for
notifying the Confederated Tribes of the
Colville Reservation, Washington, that
this notice has been published.
Dated: June 15, 2011.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2011–15433 Filed 6–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–778]
In the Matter of Certain Equipment for
Communications Networks, Including
Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges,
Wireless Access Points, Cable
Modems, IP Phones, and Products
Containing Same; Notice of Institution
of Investigation; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
17, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of MOSAID
Technologies Inc. of Canada. Letters
supplementing the complaint were filed
on June 6 and June 7, 2011. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain equipment
for communications networks,
including switches, routers, gateways,
bridges, wireless access points, cable
modems, IP phones, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,035,280 (‘‘the ‘280 patent’’);
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Notices
U.S. Patent No. 7,292,600 (‘‘the ‘600
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,830,858 (‘‘the
‘858 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,842,459
(‘‘the ‘459 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,633,966 (‘‘the ‘966 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 5,841,360 (‘‘ the ‘360
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone 202–205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
June 15, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain equipment for
communications networks, including
switches, routers, gateways, bridges,
wireless access points, cable modems,
IP phones, and products containing
same that infringe one or more of claims
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
1, 5, 9, 11–13, 15, 18, 19, 23, 27, 30, 31,
36, 43, 45, 46, and 51 of the ‘280 patent;
claims 12, 13, 17, 18, 44–46, 50–53, 57,
58, 83, and 139 of the ‘600 patent;
claims 34–39, 111–114, 118, 120–131 of
the ‘858 patent; claims 15–17 and 20–
25 of the ‘459 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 6,
and 9 of the ‘966 patent; and claims 1,
6, and 9 of the ‘360 patent, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: MOSAID
Technologies Inc., 11 Hines Road, Suite
203, Ottawa, ON K2K 2X1, Canada.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman
Drive, San Jose, CA 95134–1706;
Cisco Consumer Products LLC, 120
Theory Drive, Irvine, CA 92617.
Cisco Systems International B.V.,
Harrlerbergweg 13–19, Amsterdam,
1101 CH, Netherlands.
Scientific Atlanta LLC, 5030 Sugarloaf
Parkway, Lawrenceville, GA 30044.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36155
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 16, 2011.
James R. Holbein.
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–15365 Filed 6–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection,
Comments Requested
60-day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Establishment
and distribution of National Fingerprint
Examiners Questionnaire.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Training and
Records Testimony Team will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with established review procedures of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until August 22, 2011.
This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
All comments, suggestions, or
questions regarding additional
information, to include obtaining a copy
of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to David R. Cotton, Training
Administrator, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Training and Records
Testimony Team, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–2337.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Comments
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36154-36155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15365]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-778]
In the Matter of Certain Equipment for Communications Networks,
Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points,
Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same; Notice of
Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 17, 2011, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
MOSAID Technologies Inc. of Canada. Letters supplementing the complaint
were filed on June 6 and June 7, 2011. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain equipment for communications networks, including
switches, routers, gateways, bridges, wireless access points, cable
modems, IP phones, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,035,280 (``the `280
patent'');
[[Page 36155]]
U.S. Patent No. 7,292,600 (``the `600 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
7,830,858 (``the `858 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,842,459 (``the `459
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,633,966 (``the `966 patent''); and U.S.
Patent No. 5,841,360 (`` the `360 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-205-
2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on June 15, 2011, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain equipment
for communications networks, including switches, routers, gateways,
bridges, wireless access points, cable modems, IP phones, and products
containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 9, 11-13, 15,
18, 19, 23, 27, 30, 31, 36, 43, 45, 46, and 51 of the `280 patent;
claims 12, 13, 17, 18, 44-46, 50-53, 57, 58, 83, and 139 of the `600
patent; claims 34-39, 111-114, 118, 120-131 of the `858 patent; claims
15-17 and 20-25 of the `459 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 of the
`966 patent; and claims 1, 6, and 9 of the `360 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: MOSAID Technologies Inc., 11 Hines Road,
Suite 203, Ottawa, ON K2K 2X1, Canada.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-1706;
Cisco Consumer Products LLC, 120 Theory Drive, Irvine, CA 92617.
Cisco Systems International B.V., Harrlerbergweg 13-19, Amsterdam, 1101
CH, Netherlands.
Scientific Atlanta LLC, 5030 Sugarloaf Parkway, Lawrenceville, GA
30044.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 16, 2011.
James R. Holbein.
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-15365 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
