In the Matter of Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 36154-36155 [2011-15365]

Download as PDF wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 36154 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Notices documentation of the materials included in the transfer. In some instances, skeletal elements of the same individual were separated and sent to multiple locations. Between 1957 and sometime prior to 1966, the Burke Museum transferred the remains of two individuals from Pit 5 (identified as 5A and 5B) to the Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA. These individuals stayed at Western Washington University until October 2009, when they were transferred to Central Washington University as part of the NAGPRA inventory effort. In February 1974, the Burke Museum transferred four individuals, recovered from Pits 4, 5, and 6 (identified as 4, 5A, 5B, and 6), to Central Washington University. These four individuals have remained at Central Washington University. In March 1974, the Burke Museum transferred all remaining skeletal elements (4, 5A, 5B, and 6) to Seattle University, Seattle, WA. In January 1990, Seattle University transferred two skeletal elements from individual 5A to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington, where they were placed in the Colville Tribal Repository, in Nespelem, WA. In March 2006, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington, transferred temporary custody of this individual to Central Washington University in order to supplement the inventory of that individual’s remains. Upon completion of the inventory, the two elements from individual 5A were returned to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (they are presently at the Colville Tribal Repository). In December 1991, Seattle University transferred the other elements of individual 5A, as well as the skeletal elements they held from individuals 4, 5B, and 6, to an organization called Daybreak Star Indian Cultural Center. In June 1993, on behalf of Seattle University, the Daybreak Star Indian Cultural Center transferred the human remains in their possession back to the Burke Museum. In October 2006, the Burke Museum transferred all remains in their possession (i.e., the remains returned to them by Daybreak Star Indian Cultural Center) to Central Washington University in order to facilitate the Bureau of Reclamation’s NAGPRA inventory effort. With the exception of the two elements from individual 5A that are at the Colville Tribal Repository, all known skeletal elements from the individuals recovered from 45OK7, as well as all the associated funerary objects recovered in 1950, are now at Central Washington University. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 Jun 20, 2011 Jkt 223001 No physical description of the human remains was prepared at the time of recovery. Between 1950 and 1957, Roger Heglar, a University of Washington graduate student, analyzed the burials from 45OK7. That inventory documented the partial remains of four individuals in collections; the field records indicated the excavators, in 1950, had believed the remains of three individuals were recovered. A 1966 inventory by the Burke Museum also indentified four individuals. However, the current physical inventory completed by Central Washington University determined that the collection of skeletal elements previously identified as individual 5A actually included skeletal elements of two individuals. In conclusion, elements from five individuals (4, 5A, 5B individual 1, 5B individual 2, and 6) recovered from site 45OK7 are presently in collections. Osteological evidence documented by the physical anthropologist, the archeological association of the materials with a prehistoric site, and the kinds of associated funerary objects recovered, indicate that the human remains described above are Native American. The geographic location of the site within the Plateau Culture Area, tribal oral tradition, and anthropological and historical research all indicate that site 45OK7 lies within an area occupied by the San Poil and Nespelem tribes or bands, who are members of and legally represented by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington. Moreover, site 45OK7 is situated within the exterior boundaries of the Colville Indian Reservation, WA. Determinations Made by the Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region Officials of the Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region have determined that: • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the human remains described in this notice represent the physical remains of five individuals of Native American ancestry. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), the 12 objects described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington. PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Additional Requestors and Disposition Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains and associated funerary objects should contact Dr. Sean Hess, Archeologist, Grand Coulee Power Office, Bureau of Reclamation, PO Box 620, Grand Coulee, WA 99133, telephone (509) 633–9233, before July 21, 2011. Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington, may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region is responsible for notifying the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington, that this notice has been published. Dated: June 15, 2011. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2011–15433 Filed 6–20–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–778] In the Matter of Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 17, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of MOSAID Technologies Inc. of Canada. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on June 6 and June 7, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain equipment for communications networks, including switches, routers, gateways, bridges, wireless access points, cable modems, IP phones, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,035,280 (‘‘the ‘280 patent’’); SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Notices U.S. Patent No. 7,292,600 (‘‘the ‘600 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,830,858 (‘‘the ‘858 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,842,459 (‘‘the ‘459 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,633,966 (‘‘the ‘966 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 5,841,360 (‘‘ the ‘360 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–2560. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 15, 2011, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain equipment for communications networks, including switches, routers, gateways, bridges, wireless access points, cable modems, IP phones, and products containing same that infringe one or more of claims VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 Jun 20, 2011 Jkt 223001 1, 5, 9, 11–13, 15, 18, 19, 23, 27, 30, 31, 36, 43, 45, 46, and 51 of the ‘280 patent; claims 12, 13, 17, 18, 44–46, 50–53, 57, 58, 83, and 139 of the ‘600 patent; claims 34–39, 111–114, 118, 120–131 of the ‘858 patent; claims 15–17 and 20– 25 of the ‘459 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 of the ‘966 patent; and claims 1, 6, and 9 of the ‘360 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: MOSAID Technologies Inc., 11 Hines Road, Suite 203, Ottawa, ON K2K 2X1, Canada. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134–1706; Cisco Consumer Products LLC, 120 Theory Drive, Irvine, CA 92617. Cisco Systems International B.V., Harrlerbergweg 13–19, Amsterdam, 1101 CH, Netherlands. Scientific Atlanta LLC, 5030 Sugarloaf Parkway, Lawrenceville, GA 30044. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36155 the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 16, 2011. James R. Holbein. Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–15365 Filed 6–20–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection, Comments Requested 60-day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Establishment and distribution of National Fingerprint Examiners Questionnaire. ACTION: The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Training and Records Testimony Team will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with established review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until August 22, 2011. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. All comments, suggestions, or questions regarding additional information, to include obtaining a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, should be directed to David R. Cotton, Training Administrator, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Training and Records Testimony Team, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625–2337. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Comments should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36154-36155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15365]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [Inv. No. 337-TA-778]


 In the Matter of Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, 
Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, 
Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same; Notice of 
Institution of Investigation; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 
19 U.S.C. 1337

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 17, 2011, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
MOSAID Technologies Inc. of Canada. Letters supplementing the complaint 
were filed on June 6 and June 7, 2011. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain equipment for communications networks, including 
switches, routers, gateways, bridges, wireless access points, cable 
modems, IP phones, and products containing same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,035,280 (``the `280 
patent'');

[[Page 36155]]

U.S. Patent No. 7,292,600 (``the `600 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 
7,830,858 (``the `858 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,842,459 (``the `459 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,633,966 (``the `966 patent''); and U.S. 
Patent No. 5,841,360 (`` the `360 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also 
be obtained by accessing its Internet server at  http://www.usitc.gov. 
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the 
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-205-
2560.
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in 
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 
CFR 210.10 (2011).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 15, 2011, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain equipment 
for communications networks, including switches, routers, gateways, 
bridges, wireless access points, cable modems, IP phones, and products 
containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 9, 11-13, 15, 
18, 19, 23, 27, 30, 31, 36, 43, 45, 46, and 51 of the `280 patent; 
claims 12, 13, 17, 18, 44-46, 50-53, 57, 58, 83, and 139 of the `600 
patent; claims 34-39, 111-114, 118, 120-131 of the `858 patent; claims 
15-17 and 20-25 of the `459 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 of the 
`966 patent; and claims 1, 6, and 9 of the `360 patent, and whether an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: MOSAID Technologies Inc., 11 Hines Road, 
Suite 203, Ottawa, ON K2K 2X1, Canada.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-1706;
Cisco Consumer Products LLC, 120 Theory Drive, Irvine, CA 92617.
Cisco Systems International B.V., Harrlerbergweg 13-19, Amsterdam, 1101 
CH, Netherlands.
Scientific Atlanta LLC, 5030 Sugarloaf Parkway, Lawrenceville, GA 
30044.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: June 16, 2011.
James R. Holbein.
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-15365 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P