Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 34803-34805 [2011-14745]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2011 / Notices
dropped, thus reducing the number of
groups to be tested.
In support of this petition, AAR
submitted supporting documentation
from NYAB attesting to the essential
similarity of the CCB–26 brake system to
the CCB–II brake system already
covered under the waiver. In addition,
AAR states that testing performed to
date under this waiver has allayed
concerns that air brake system
performance would vary between EMD
and GE locomotives.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
https://www.regulations.gov and in
person at the Department of
Transportation’s Docket Operations
Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Operations Facility is open from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by July 29,
2011will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jun 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or
online at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 9, 2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory & Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–14731 Filed 6–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2011–
0039]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on March 28,
2011 (76 FR 17186).
DATES: Comments must be submitted to
OMB on or before July 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk
Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex
Ansley, Recall Management Division
(NVS–215), Room W46–412, NHTSA,
1200 New Jersey Ave., Washington, DC
20590. Telephone: (202) 493–0481.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB’s
regulation, see 5 CFR 1320.8(d), an
agency must ask for public comment on
the following:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34803
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following collection of
information:
Title: Defect and Noncompliance
Reporting and Notification.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0004.
Affected Public: Businesses or
individuals.
Abstract: This notice requests
comment on NHTSA’s proposed
extension to approved collection of
information OMB No. 2127–0004. This
collection covers the information
collection requirements found within
various statutory sections in the Motor
Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (Act), 49
U.S.C. 30101, et seq., that address and
require manufacturer notifications to
NHTSA of safety-related defects and
failures to comply with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) in
motor vehicles and motor vehicle
equipment, as well as the provision of
particular information related to the
ensuing owner and dealers notifications
and free remedy campaigns that follow
those notifications. The sections of the
Act imposing these requirements
include 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30119, 30120,
and 30166. Many of these requirements
are implemented through, and
addressed with more specificity in, 49
CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports (Part 573) and 49 CFR 577,
Defect and Noncompliance Notification.
Pursuant to the Act, motor vehicle
and motor vehicle equipment
manufacturers are obligated to notify,
and then provide various information
and documents, to NHTSA in the event
a safety defect or noncompliance with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) is identified in products they
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34804
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2011 / Notices
manufactured. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b)
and 49 CFR 573.6 (requiring
manufacturers to notify NHTSA, and
provide certain information, when they
learn of a safety defect or
noncompliance). Manufacturers are
further required to notify owners,
purchasers, dealers and distributors
about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b),
30120(a), and 49 CFR 577.7, 577.13.
They are required to provide to NHTSA
copies of communications pertaining to
recall campaigns that they issue to
owners, purchasers, dealers, and
distributors. See 49 U.S.C. 30166(f) and
49 CFR 573.6(c)(10).
Manufacturers are also required to file
with NHTSA a plan explaining how
they intend to reimburse owners and
purchasers who paid to have their
products remedied before being notified
of the safety defect or noncompliance,
and explain that plan in the
notifications they issue to owners and
purchasers about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d)
and 49 CFR 573.13. They are further
required to keep lists of the respective
owners, purchasers, dealers,
distributors, lessors, and lessees of the
products determined to be defective or
noncompliant and involved in a recall
campaign, and are required to provide
NHTSA with a minimum of six
quarterly reports reporting on the
progress of their recall campaigns. See
49 CFR 573.8 and 573.7, respectively.
The Act and Part 573 also contain
numerous information collection
requirements specific to tire recall and
remedy campaigns. These requirements
relate to the proper disposal of recalled
tires, including a requirement that the
manufacturer conducting the tire recall
submit a plan and provide specific
instructions to certain persons (such as
dealers and distributors) addressing that
disposal, and a requirement that those
persons report back to the manufacturer
certain deviations from the plan. See 49
U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9).
They also require the reporting to
NHTSA of intentional and knowing
sales or leases of defective or
noncompliant tires.
49 U.S.C. 30166(n), and its
implementing regulation found at 49
CFR 573.10, mandates that anyone who
knowingly and willfully sells or leases
for use on a motor vehicle a defective
tire or a tire that is not compliant with
FMVSS, and with actual knowledge that
the tire manufacturer has notified its
dealers of the defect or noncompliance
as required under the Act, is required to
report that sale or lease to NHTSA no
more than five working days after the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jun 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
person to whom the tire was sold or
leased takes possession of it.
Estimated Burden: This collection has
an approved burden of 21,370 hours per
year.1 Our review of recall information
since we last requested approval of this
collection does not demonstrate that
this figure requires adjustment. A
summary explanation of how this total
annual figure was calculated follows.
There continue to be an average of
650 noncompliance or safety defect
notifications to NHTSA filed each year
by approximately 175 distinct
manufacturers, with an estimated 750
quarterly reports filed per quarter (or
3,000 reports per year). Although the
average number of recalls filed per year
and the average number of
manufacturers filing fluctuates each
year, we have not seen, nor expect to
see, consistent dramatic changes in
these averages.
We continue to estimate that it takes
a manufacturer an average of 4 hours to
complete each notification report to
NHTSA, that it takes another 4 hours to
complete each quarterly report, and that
maintenance of the required owner,
purchaser, dealer and distributors lists
requires 8 hours. Accordingly, the
subtotal estimate of annual burden
hours related to the reporting to NHTSA
of a safety defect or noncompliance,
completion of quarterly reports on the
progress of recall campaigns, and
maintenance of owner and purchaser
lists is 16,000 hours annually ((650
notices × 4 hours/report) + (3,000
quarterly reports × 4 hours/report) +
(175 manufacturers × 8 hours)).
In addition, we continue to estimate
an additional 2 hours will be needed to
add to a manufacturer’s information
report details relating to the
manufacturer’s intended schedule for
notifying its dealers and distributors,
and tailoring its notifications to dealers
and distributors in accordance with the
requirements of 49 CFR 577.13. This
would total to an estimated 1,300 hours
annually (650 notices × 2 hours/report).
In the event a manufacturer supplied
the defect or noncompliant product to
independent dealers through
independent distributors, that
manufacturer is required to include in
its notifications to those distributors an
instruction that the distributors are to
then provide copies of the
manufacturer’s notification of the defect
or noncompliance to all known
distributors or retail outlets further
down the distribution chain within five
1 See Federal Register notices of March 28, 2008
(73 FR 16740) and June 5, 2008 (73 FR 32073) for
the analysis and discussion associated with this
burden hour estimate.
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
working days. See 49 CFR
577.8(c)(2)(iv). As a practical matter,
this requirement would only apply to
equipment manufacturers since vehicle
manufacturers generally sell and lease
vehicles through a dealer network, and
not through independent distributors.
We continue to believe previous
estimates of roughly 90 equipment
recalls per year are sound. Although the
distributors are not technically under
any regulatory requirement to follow
that instruction, we expect that they
will, and have estimated the burden
associated with these notifications
(identifying retail outlets, making copies
of the manufacturer’s notice, and
mailing) to be 5 hours per recall
campaign. Assuming an average of 3
distributors per equipment item, (which
is a liberal estimate given that many
equipment manufacturers do not use
independent distributors) the total
number of burden hours associated with
this third party notification burden is
approximately 1,350 hours per year (90
recalls × 3 distributors × 5 hours).
As for the burden linked with a
manufacturer’s preparation of and
notification concerning its
reimbursement for pre-notification
remedies, consistent with previous
estimates (see 69 FR 11477 (March 10,
2004)), we continue to estimate that
preparing a plan for reimbursement
takes approximately 8 hours annually,
and that an additional 2 hours per year
is spent tailoring the plan to particular
defect and noncompliance notifications
to NHTSA and adding tailored language
about the plan to a particular safety
recall’s owner notification letters. In
sum, these required activities add an
additional 2,700 annual burden hours
((175 manufacturers × 8 hours) + (650
recalls × 2 hours)).
In summary, the total burden
associated with the defect and
noncompliant information collection
and reporting requirements we continue
to estimate at 21,350 hours per year.
As explained earlier, the Act and Part
573 also contain numerous information
collection requirements specific to tire
recall and remedy campaigns, as well as
a statutory and regulatory reporting
requirement that anyone that knowingly
and intentionally sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire notify
NHTSA of that activity.
Manufacturers are required to include
specific information relative to tire
disposal in the notifications they
provide NHTSA concerning
identification of a safety defect or
noncompliance with FMVSS in their
tires, as well as in the notifications
which they issue to their dealers or
other tire outlets participating in the
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2011 / Notices
recall campaign. See 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9).
We continue to estimate that there will
be about 10 tire recall campaigns per
year, and that inclusion of this
additional information will require an
additional two hours of effort beyond
the subtotal above associated with nontire recall campaigns. This additional
effort consists of one hour for the
NHTSA notification and one hour for
the dealer notification for a total of 20
burden hours (10 tire recalls a year × 2
hours per recall).
Manufacturer owned or controlled
dealers are required to notify the
manufacturer and provide certain
information should they deviate from
the manufacturer’s disposal plan.
Consistent with previous analysis, we
continue to ascribe zero burden hours to
this requirement since to date no such
reports have been provided and our
original expectation that dealers would
comply with manufacturers’ plans has
proven true.
Accordingly, we estimate 20 burden
hours a year will be spent complying
with the tire recall campaign
requirements found in 49 CFR
573.6(c)(9).
And, as we have yet to receive a
single report of a defective or
noncompliant tire being intentionally
sold or leased in the fourteen years
since this rule was proposed, our
previous estimate of zero burden hours
remains unchanged with this notice.
In summary, our previous estimate of
21,370 total burden hours associated
with this approved information
collection stands.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
NHTSA receives reports of defect or
noncompliance from roughly 175
manufacturers per year. Again, this
figure fluctuates from year to year, but
we do not have a basis at this juncture
to suspect this annual figure will change
significantly. Accordingly, we estimate
that there will continue to be
approximately 175 manufacturers per
year filing defect or noncompliance
reports and completing the other
information collection responsibilities
associated with those filings.
We discussed above that we have yet
to receive a single report filed pursuant
to 49 CFR 573.10. This information
collection requirement, to reiterate,
requires anyone who sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire, with
knowledge of that tire’s defectiveness or
noncompliance, to report that sale or
lease to NHTSA. Given the lack of filing
history over many years, we estimate
that there will continue to be zero
reports filed and therefore zero
respondents as to this requirement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jun 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
In summary, we estimate that there
will be a total of 175 respondents per
year associated with OMB No. 2127–
0004.
Comments are invited on: whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued on: June 2, 2011.
Frank Borris,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2011–14745 Filed 6–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35530]
Arkansas Midland Railroad Company,
Inc., Trackage Rights Exemption;
Caddo Valley Railroad Company
Pursuant to a written trackage rights
agreement, Caddo Valley Railroad
Company (CVR) has agreed to grant
local trackage rights to Arkansas
Midland Railroad Company, Inc.
(AKMD) over approximately 2.57 miles
of CVR’s rail line, known as the Gurdon
Segment, extending between a
connection with Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP) at milepost 426.88 in
Gurdon, Ark. and milepost 429.5 north
of Gurdon.1
The earliest this transaction may be
consummated is July 7, 2011, the
effective date of the exemption (30 days
after the exemption was filed), unless
otherwise ordered by the Board.2
1 AKMD states that the mileposts of the Gurdon
Segment are slightly changed in this transaction
from those listed in the emergency service
proceeding involving the same line. See Ark.
Midland R.R.—Alternative Rail Service—Caddo
Valley R.R., FD 35416 (STB served Sept. 17, 2010,
Oct. 15, 2010, and Feb. 11, 2011). Specifically, the
connection with UP at Gurdon is a technical
correction of one-hundredth of a mile based on
AKMD’s physical observation, and at the other end
of the segment, the milepost has been shortened to
exclude trackage and an attendant grade crossing
that was not needed or used for any rail service
purpose.
2 On June 7, 2011, AKMD concurrently filed a
petition requesting that the Board allow this
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34805
The purpose of the transaction is to
allow AKMD to continue to provide rail
service on the Gurdon Segment pending
transfer of the line to AKMD.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under §§ 11324 and 11325
that involve only Class III rail carriers.
Accordingly, the Board may not impose
labor protective conditions here,
because all of the carriers involved are
Class III carriers.
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(7). If the notice contains false
or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502(d) may be filed at any time. The
filing of a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35530, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Thomas J. Litwiler,
Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker
Drive, Suite 920, Chicago, IL 60606.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: June 8, 2011.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011–14558 Filed 6–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Designation of Three Entities and One
Individual Pursuant to Executive Order
13553
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control
(‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the names of
one individual and three entities newlydesignated as persons whose property
and interests in property are blocked
pursuant to Executive Order 13553 of
SUMMARY:
trackage rights transaction to become effective on
June 15, 2011, the day after AKMD’s current
emergency service authority expires on the Gurdon
Segment, rather than on July 7. That request will
be addressed in a separate Board decision.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34803-34805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14745]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2011-0039]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on March 28, 2011 (76 FR 17186).
DATES: Comments must be submitted to OMB on or before July 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention:
Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Ansley, Recall Management
Division (NVS-215), Room W46-412, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 493-0481.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation, see 5 CFR
1320.8(d), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following collection of information:
Title: Defect and Noncompliance Reporting and Notification.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0004.
Affected Public: Businesses or individuals.
Abstract: This notice requests comment on NHTSA's proposed
extension to approved collection of information OMB No. 2127-0004. This
collection covers the information collection requirements found within
various statutory sections in the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966
(Act), 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., that address and require manufacturer
notifications to NHTSA of safety-related defects and failures to comply
with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) in motor vehicles
and motor vehicle equipment, as well as the provision of particular
information related to the ensuing owner and dealers notifications and
free remedy campaigns that follow those notifications. The sections of
the Act imposing these requirements include 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30119,
30120, and 30166. Many of these requirements are implemented through,
and addressed with more specificity in, 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports (Part 573) and 49 CFR 577,
Defect and Noncompliance Notification.
Pursuant to the Act, motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment
manufacturers are obligated to notify, and then provide various
information and documents, to NHTSA in the event a safety defect or
noncompliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) is
identified in products they
[[Page 34804]]
manufactured. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b) and 49 CFR 573.6 (requiring
manufacturers to notify NHTSA, and provide certain information, when
they learn of a safety defect or noncompliance). Manufacturers are
further required to notify owners, purchasers, dealers and distributors
about the safety defect or noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b),
30120(a), and 49 CFR 577.7, 577.13. They are required to provide to
NHTSA copies of communications pertaining to recall campaigns that they
issue to owners, purchasers, dealers, and distributors. See 49 U.S.C.
30166(f) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(10).
Manufacturers are also required to file with NHTSA a plan
explaining how they intend to reimburse owners and purchasers who paid
to have their products remedied before being notified of the safety
defect or noncompliance, and explain that plan in the notifications
they issue to owners and purchasers about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.13. They are
further required to keep lists of the respective owners, purchasers,
dealers, distributors, lessors, and lessees of the products determined
to be defective or noncompliant and involved in a recall campaign, and
are required to provide NHTSA with a minimum of six quarterly reports
reporting on the progress of their recall campaigns. See 49 CFR 573.8
and 573.7, respectively.
The Act and Part 573 also contain numerous information collection
requirements specific to tire recall and remedy campaigns. These
requirements relate to the proper disposal of recalled tires, including
a requirement that the manufacturer conducting the tire recall submit a
plan and provide specific instructions to certain persons (such as
dealers and distributors) addressing that disposal, and a requirement
that those persons report back to the manufacturer certain deviations
from the plan. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9). They also
require the reporting to NHTSA of intentional and knowing sales or
leases of defective or noncompliant tires.
49 U.S.C. 30166(n), and its implementing regulation found at 49 CFR
573.10, mandates that anyone who knowingly and willfully sells or
leases for use on a motor vehicle a defective tire or a tire that is
not compliant with FMVSS, and with actual knowledge that the tire
manufacturer has notified its dealers of the defect or noncompliance as
required under the Act, is required to report that sale or lease to
NHTSA no more than five working days after the person to whom the tire
was sold or leased takes possession of it.
Estimated Burden: This collection has an approved burden of 21,370
hours per year.\1\ Our review of recall information since we last
requested approval of this collection does not demonstrate that this
figure requires adjustment. A summary explanation of how this total
annual figure was calculated follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Federal Register notices of March 28, 2008 (73 FR 16740)
and June 5, 2008 (73 FR 32073) for the analysis and discussion
associated with this burden hour estimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There continue to be an average of 650 noncompliance or safety
defect notifications to NHTSA filed each year by approximately 175
distinct manufacturers, with an estimated 750 quarterly reports filed
per quarter (or 3,000 reports per year). Although the average number of
recalls filed per year and the average number of manufacturers filing
fluctuates each year, we have not seen, nor expect to see, consistent
dramatic changes in these averages.
We continue to estimate that it takes a manufacturer an average of
4 hours to complete each notification report to NHTSA, that it takes
another 4 hours to complete each quarterly report, and that maintenance
of the required owner, purchaser, dealer and distributors lists
requires 8 hours. Accordingly, the subtotal estimate of annual burden
hours related to the reporting to NHTSA of a safety defect or
noncompliance, completion of quarterly reports on the progress of
recall campaigns, and maintenance of owner and purchaser lists is
16,000 hours annually ((650 notices x 4 hours/report) + (3,000
quarterly reports x 4 hours/report) + (175 manufacturers x 8 hours)).
In addition, we continue to estimate an additional 2 hours will be
needed to add to a manufacturer's information report details relating
to the manufacturer's intended schedule for notifying its dealers and
distributors, and tailoring its notifications to dealers and
distributors in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR 577.13. This
would total to an estimated 1,300 hours annually (650 notices x 2
hours/report).
In the event a manufacturer supplied the defect or noncompliant
product to independent dealers through independent distributors, that
manufacturer is required to include in its notifications to those
distributors an instruction that the distributors are to then provide
copies of the manufacturer's notification of the defect or
noncompliance to all known distributors or retail outlets further down
the distribution chain within five working days. See 49 CFR
577.8(c)(2)(iv). As a practical matter, this requirement would only
apply to equipment manufacturers since vehicle manufacturers generally
sell and lease vehicles through a dealer network, and not through
independent distributors. We continue to believe previous estimates of
roughly 90 equipment recalls per year are sound. Although the
distributors are not technically under any regulatory requirement to
follow that instruction, we expect that they will, and have estimated
the burden associated with these notifications (identifying retail
outlets, making copies of the manufacturer's notice, and mailing) to be
5 hours per recall campaign. Assuming an average of 3 distributors per
equipment item, (which is a liberal estimate given that many equipment
manufacturers do not use independent distributors) the total number of
burden hours associated with this third party notification burden is
approximately 1,350 hours per year (90 recalls x 3 distributors x 5
hours).
As for the burden linked with a manufacturer's preparation of and
notification concerning its reimbursement for pre-notification
remedies, consistent with previous estimates (see 69 FR 11477 (March
10, 2004)), we continue to estimate that preparing a plan for
reimbursement takes approximately 8 hours annually, and that an
additional 2 hours per year is spent tailoring the plan to particular
defect and noncompliance notifications to NHTSA and adding tailored
language about the plan to a particular safety recall's owner
notification letters. In sum, these required activities add an
additional 2,700 annual burden hours ((175 manufacturers x 8 hours) +
(650 recalls x 2 hours)).
In summary, the total burden associated with the defect and
noncompliant information collection and reporting requirements we
continue to estimate at 21,350 hours per year.
As explained earlier, the Act and Part 573 also contain numerous
information collection requirements specific to tire recall and remedy
campaigns, as well as a statutory and regulatory reporting requirement
that anyone that knowingly and intentionally sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire notify NHTSA of that activity.
Manufacturers are required to include specific information relative
to tire disposal in the notifications they provide NHTSA concerning
identification of a safety defect or noncompliance with FMVSS in their
tires, as well as in the notifications which they issue to their
dealers or other tire outlets participating in the
[[Page 34805]]
recall campaign. See 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9). We continue to estimate that
there will be about 10 tire recall campaigns per year, and that
inclusion of this additional information will require an additional two
hours of effort beyond the subtotal above associated with non-tire
recall campaigns. This additional effort consists of one hour for the
NHTSA notification and one hour for the dealer notification for a total
of 20 burden hours (10 tire recalls a year x 2 hours per recall).
Manufacturer owned or controlled dealers are required to notify the
manufacturer and provide certain information should they deviate from
the manufacturer's disposal plan. Consistent with previous analysis, we
continue to ascribe zero burden hours to this requirement since to date
no such reports have been provided and our original expectation that
dealers would comply with manufacturers' plans has proven true.
Accordingly, we estimate 20 burden hours a year will be spent
complying with the tire recall campaign requirements found in 49 CFR
573.6(c)(9).
And, as we have yet to receive a single report of a defective or
noncompliant tire being intentionally sold or leased in the fourteen
years since this rule was proposed, our previous estimate of zero
burden hours remains unchanged with this notice.
In summary, our previous estimate of 21,370 total burden hours
associated with this approved information collection stands.
Estimated Number of Respondents: NHTSA receives reports of defect
or noncompliance from roughly 175 manufacturers per year. Again, this
figure fluctuates from year to year, but we do not have a basis at this
juncture to suspect this annual figure will change significantly.
Accordingly, we estimate that there will continue to be approximately
175 manufacturers per year filing defect or noncompliance reports and
completing the other information collection responsibilities associated
with those filings.
We discussed above that we have yet to receive a single report
filed pursuant to 49 CFR 573.10. This information collection
requirement, to reiterate, requires anyone who sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire, with knowledge of that tire's
defectiveness or noncompliance, to report that sale or lease to NHTSA.
Given the lack of filing history over many years, we estimate that
there will continue to be zero reports filed and therefore zero
respondents as to this requirement.
In summary, we estimate that there will be a total of 175
respondents per year associated with OMB No. 2127-0004.
Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
Issued on: June 2, 2011.
Frank Borris,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2011-14745 Filed 6-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P>?USGPO Galley End:?>