International Business Machines (IBM), Sales and Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales Solution Department, Division 91, Off-Site Teleworker in Armonk, NY; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 32231-32232 [2011-13788]
Download as PDF
32231
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than June 13, 2011.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than June 13,
2011.
Copies of these petitions may be
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be
submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office
of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
May 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
[TAA petitions instituted between 5/16/11 and 5/20/11]
TA–W
80181
80182
80183
80184
80185
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
80186 .............
80187 .............
80188
80189
80190
80191
.............
.............
.............
.............
L’Oreal, USA (Workers) .................................
Palmer Johnson Yachts, LLC (Company) .....
Century Furniture Casegoods (Company) .....
Unigram (State/One-Stop) .............................
Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc.
(Company).
Colville Tribal Construction (State/One-Stop)
Bendonfield Management Services (Company).
Berkline/Benchcraft, LLC (Company) ............
Bristol Products Corporation (Company) .......
Rankin Manufacturing, Inc. (Company) .........
Tegrant Corporation (Company) ....................
Clark, NJ ........................................................
Sturgeon Bay, WI ...........................................
Hickory, NC ....................................................
Carson, CA .....................................................
Boston, MA .....................................................
05/16/11
05/16/11
05/19/11
05/19/11
05/19/11
05/09/11
05/04/11
05/18/11
05/11/11
05/17/11
Nespelem, WA ...............................................
Voorhees, NJ .................................................
05/19/11
05/20/11
05/18/11
04/18/11
Morristown, TN ...............................................
Bristol, TN ......................................................
New London, OH ...........................................
New Brighton, PA ...........................................
05/20/11
05/20/11
05/20/11
05/20/11
05/17/11
05/20/11
05/20/11
05/19/11
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,364]
International Business Machines (IBM),
Sales and Distribution Business Unit,
Global Sales Solution Department,
Division 91, Off-Site Teleworker in
Armonk, NY; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Date of
petition
Location
[FR Doc. 2011–13785 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
On April 6, 2011, the Department of
Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of International
Business Machines (IBM), Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales
Solution Department, off-site
teleworker, Centerport, New York. The
Department’s Notice was published in
the Federal Register on April 14, 2011
(76 FR 21033). The request for
reconsideration alleges that IBM
outsourced to India and China.
During the reconsideration
investigation, it was revealed that the
subject firm was mischaracterized.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determined that the correct subject firm
name and location is International
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Date of
institution
Subject firm (Petitioners)
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Business Machines (IBM), Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales
Solution Department, Division 91, offsite teleworker, Armonk, New York. The
subject worker group supply computer
software development and maintenance
services to the Sales and Distribution
Business Unit within IBM.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The initial negative determination
was based on the findings that Section
222(a) and Section 222(c) of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended (the Act) have
not been satisfied because fewer than
three workers were totally or partially
separated and further separations are
not threatened. The investigation also
revealed that the group eligibility
requirements under Section 222(f) of the
Act have not been satisfied because the
workers’ firm has not been identified by
name in an affirmative finding of injury
by the International Trade Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29 CFR 90.2 states that a significant
number or proportion of the workers
means at least three (3) workers in a
firm (or appropriate subdivision thereof)
with a workforce of fewer than 50
workers, or five (5) percent of the
workers or 50 workers, whichever is
less, in a workforce of 50 or more
workers.
A careful review of the administrative
record and additional information
obtained by the Department during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
that the group eligibility requirements
under Section 222(a) and (c) of the Act
have not been met because fewer than
three workers were totally or partially
separated from IBM, Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales
Solution Department, Division 91, or
threatened with such separation.
Moreover, new information obtained
during the reconsideration investigation
confirmed that only one person worked
within Division 91 of the Sales and
Distribution Department (working onsite at Armonk, New York or reporting
remotely to Armonk, New York).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
International Business Machines (IBM),
Sales and Distribution Business Unit,
Global Sales Solution Department,
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
32232
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
Division 91, off-site teleworker,
Armonk, New York.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 23rd
day of May, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–13788 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration Program Year (PY) 2011
Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
Allotments to Outlying Areas
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice announces PY
2011 WIA Title I Youth, Adult and
Dislocated Worker Activities program
allotments for outlying areas. The WIA
allotments for the outlying areas are
based on a formula determined by the
Secretary. As required by WIA section
182(d), on February 17, 2000, a Notice
of the discretionary formula for
allocating PY 2000 funds for the
outlying areas (American Samoa, Guam,
Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Northern
Marianas, Palau, and the Virgin Islands)
was published in the Federal Register at
65 FR 8236 (February 17, 2000). The
rationale for the formula and
methodology was fully explained in the
February 17, 2000, Federal Register
Notice. The formula for PY 2011 is the
same as used for PY 2000 and is
described in the section on Youth
Activities program allotments.
Comments are invited on the formula
used to allot funds to the outlying areas.
DATES: Comments on the formula used
to allot funds to the outlying areas must
be received by July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to the Employment and Training
Administration, Office of Financial and
Administrative Management, 200
Constitution Ave., NW., Room N–4702,
Washington, DC 20210, Attention: Mr.
Kenneth Leung, Telephone: (202) 693–
3471 (this is not a toll-free number).
Fax: (202) 693–2859. E-mail:
Leung.Kenneth@dol.gov.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
WIA
Youth Activities allotments—Evan
Rosenberg at (202) 693–3593 or LaSharn
Youngblood at (202) 693–3606; WIA
Adult and Dislocated Worker Activities
allotments—Mike Qualter at (202) 693–
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
3014; Workforce Information Grant
allotments—Anthony Dais at (202) 693–
2784.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Labor (DOL or
Department) is announcing PY 2011
WIA Youth, Adult and Dislocated
Worker program allotments to outlying
areas. The allotments are based on the
funds appropriated in the Full-Year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011,
Public Law 112–10, signed April 15,
2011. This appropriation requires an
across-the-board rescission of 0.2
percent to all Federal Fiscal Year (FY)
2011 discretionary program funding.
Included in this Notice are tables listing
the PY 2011 allotments (including the
0.2 percent rescission) for programs
under WIA Title I Youth Activities
(Table A), Adult Activities (Table B) and
Dislocated Worker Employment and
Training Activities (Table C).
On December 17, 2003, Public Law
108–188, the Compact of Free
Association Amendments Act of 2003
(‘‘the Compact’’), was signed. The
Compact provided for consolidation of
WIA Title I funding for the Marshall
Islands and Micronesia into
supplemental education grants provided
from the Department of Education’s
appropriation. See 48 USC
1921d(f)(1)(B)(iii). The Compact also
specified that the Republic of Palau
remained eligible for WIA Title I
funding. See 48 USC 1921d(f)(1)(B)(ix).
The Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2010 (Pub. L. 111–117) (in the
Department Of Education’s General
Provisions at Section 309, Title III,
Division D) amended the Compact to
extend the availability of WIA Title I
funding to Palau through FY 2010.
Section 1104 of the Full-Year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011,
further extended the same funding to
Palau through FY 2011.
Youth Activities Allotments. PY 2011
Youth Activities funds for outlying
areas total $2,064,785 (including the 0.2
percent rescission). Table A includes a
breakdown of the Youth Activities
program allotments for States (as
previously shared) and each of the five
outlying areas. Before determining the
amount available for States, the total
funding available for the outlying areas
was reserved at 0.25 percent of the full
amount appropriated for Youth
Activities (after the 0.2 percent
rescission).
The methodology for distributing
funds to all outlying areas is not
specified by WIA, but is at the
Secretary’s discretion. The methodology
used is the same as used since PY 2000,
i.e., funds are distributed among the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
remaining outlying areas by formula
based on relative share of number of
unemployed, a 90 percent holdharmless of the prior year share, a
$75,000 minimum, and a 130 percent
stop-gain of the prior year share. As in
PY 2010, data for the relative share
calculation in the PY 2011 formula were
from 2000 Census data for all outlying
areas, obtained from the Bureau of the
Census (Bureau) and are based on 2000
Census surveys for those areas
conducted either by the Bureau or the
outlying areas under the guidance of the
Bureau.
Adult Employment and Training
Activities Allotments. The total
appropriated funds for PY 2011 for
Adult Activities are $770,921,920 of
which $1,927,305 is for outlying areas
(including the 0.2 percent rescission).
Table B includes a breakdown of the
Adult Activities program allotments for
States (as previously shared) and each of
the five areas. Table B shows the PY
2011 Adult Employment and Training
Activities allotments and comparison to
PY 2010 allotments by State. Like the
Youth Activities program, the total
available for the outlying areas was
reserved at 0.25 percent of the full
amount appropriated for Adult
Activities (after the 0.2 percent
rescission). As discussed in the Youth
Activities paragraph, beginning in PY
2005, WIA funding for the Marshall
Islands and Micronesia is no longer
provided; instead, funding is provided
in the Department of Education’s
appropriation. The Adult Activities
funds for grants to the remaining
outlying areas, for which the
distribution methodology is at the
Secretary’s discretion, were distributed
among the areas by the same principles,
formula and data as used for outlying
areas for Youth Activities.
Dislocated Worker Employment and
Training Activities Allotments.
Appropriated funds for PY 2011 for the
Dislocated Worker Activities program
total $1,287,544,000, with $3,218,860
for outlying areas (including the 0.2
percent rescission). Table C includes a
breakdown of the Dislocated Worker
program allotments for States (as
previously shared) and each of the five
outlying areas. The total appropriation
includes formula funds for the States,
National Reserve funds for the
distribution of National Emergency
Grants, technical assistance and
training, demonstration projects, and
the outlying areas’ Dislocated Worker
allotments. Like the Youth and Adult
Activities programs, the total available
for the outlying areas was reserved at
0.25 percent of the full amount
appropriated for Dislocated Worker
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32231-32232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-74,364]
International Business Machines (IBM), Sales and Distribution
Business Unit, Global Sales Solution Department, Division 91, Off-Site
Teleworker in Armonk, NY; Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On April 6, 2011, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers
and former workers of International Business Machines (IBM), Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales Solution Department, off-site
teleworker, Centerport, New York. The Department's Notice was published
in the Federal Register on April 14, 2011 (76 FR 21033). The request
for reconsideration alleges that IBM outsourced to India and China.
During the reconsideration investigation, it was revealed that the
subject firm was mischaracterized. During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department determined that the correct subject firm
name and location is International Business Machines (IBM), Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales Solution Department, Division
91, off-site teleworker, Armonk, New York. The subject worker group
supply computer software development and maintenance services to the
Sales and Distribution Business Unit within IBM.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial negative determination was based on the findings that
Section 222(a) and Section 222(c) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(the Act) have not been satisfied because fewer than three workers were
totally or partially separated and further separations are not
threatened. The investigation also revealed that the group eligibility
requirements under Section 222(f) of the Act have not been satisfied
because the workers' firm has not been identified by name in an
affirmative finding of injury by the International Trade Commission.
29 CFR 90.2 states that a significant number or proportion of the
workers means at least three (3) workers in a firm (or appropriate
subdivision thereof) with a workforce of fewer than 50 workers, or five
(5) percent of the workers or 50 workers, whichever is less, in a
workforce of 50 or more workers.
A careful review of the administrative record and additional
information obtained by the Department during the reconsideration
investigation confirmed that the group eligibility requirements under
Section 222(a) and (c) of the Act have not been met because fewer than
three workers were totally or partially separated from IBM, Sales and
Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales Solution Department, Division
91, or threatened with such separation. Moreover, new information
obtained during the reconsideration investigation confirmed that only
one person worked within Division 91 of the Sales and Distribution
Department (working on-site at Armonk, New York or reporting remotely
to Armonk, New York).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of International Business Machines
(IBM), Sales and Distribution Business Unit, Global Sales Solution
Department,
[[Page 32232]]
Division 91, off-site teleworker, Armonk, New York.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 23rd day of May, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-13788 Filed 6-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P