Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Functionality of NASDAQ OMX PSX's Post-Only Order, 32255-32257 [2011-13776]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
advisors. Furthermore, it is likely that
those dealer financial advisors that are
small municipal advisors primarily
serve as financial advisors to issuers of
municipal securities that do not access
the capital markets frequently and,
when they do so, issue securities in
small principal amounts. Those issuers
may be less likely than larger, more
frequent issuers to understand the
conflict presented when their financial
advisors also underwrite their
securities. The Commission believes it
is appropriate for the prohibitions in the
proposed rule, as amended, to also
apply to those dealer financial advisors
that are small municipal advisors.
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
MSRB. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MSRB–2011–03 and should
be submitted on or before June 24, 2011.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Exchange Act. Comments may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
The Commission finds good cause for
approving the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, before
the 30th day after the date of
publication in the Federal Register. The
Commission notes that the proposal was
published for notice and comment, and
the Commission received eighteen
comment letters, which comments have
been discussed in detail above.
The Commission believes that
Amendment No.1 is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and
finds good cause, consistent with
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,101 to
approve the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, on an
accelerated basis.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–MSRB–2011–03 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MSRB–2011–03. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
IV. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1
V. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1, is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to the MSRB, and in
particular, Sections 15B(b)(2),102
15B(c)(1),103 and 15B(e)(4)(A) 104 of the
Exchange Act. The proposal will
become effective for new issues for
which the Time of Formal Award (as
defined in MSRB Rule G–
34(a)(ii)(C)(1)(a)) occurs more than six
months after the date of this order.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,105
that the proposed rule change (SR–
MSRB–2011–03), as modified by
Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is,
approved on an accelerated basis.
101 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
U.S.C. 78o–4(b)(2).
103 15 U.S.C. 78o–4(c)(1).
104 15 U.S.C. 78o–4(e)(4)(A).
105 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.106
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–13752 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64563; File No. SR–Phlx–
2011–70]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Modify the
Functionality of NASDAQ OMX PSX’s
Post-Only Order
May 27, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 19,
2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘PHLX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing this proposed
rule change to modify the functionality
of the Post-Only Order on NASDAQ
OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’). PHLX proposes to
implement the rule change thirty days
after the date of filing or as soon
thereafter as practicable. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at
https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/
NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at PHLX’s
principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
102 15
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32255
106 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
32256
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
PHLX proposes to modify the
functionality associated with its existing
Post-Only Order on PSX. Currently, if a
Post-Only Order would lock an order on
PSX at the time of entry, the order is repriced and displayed by the System to
one minimum price increment (i.e.,
$0.01 or $0.0001) below the current low
offer (for bids) or above the current best
bid (for offers). Thus, if the best bid and
best offer on the PSX book were $10.00
× $10.05, and a market participant
entered a Post-Only Order to buy at
$10.05, the order would be re-priced
and displayed at $10.04. This aspect of
the functionality of the order is not
changing. In addition, if a Post-Only
Order would cross an order on the
System, the order will be repriced as
described above unless the value of
price improvement associated with
executing against a resting order equals
or exceeds the sum of fees charged for
such execution and the value of any
rebate that would be provided if the
order posted to the book and
subsequently provided liquidity, in
which case the order will execute. As
provided by Rule 3307, price
improvement accrues to the party
entering the order. Thus, if a sell order
is on the book at $10 and a Post-Only
Order to buy at $10.01 is entered, the
order will execute at $10. This aspect of
the order’s functionality is also not
changing.3
At present, however, the order is
repriced in a similar manner if the order
would lock or cross a protected
quotation of another market center.
Thus, if the national best offer of $10.05
3 The functionality was described in the original
filing to establish a Post-Only Order on The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’) but was
not fully reflected in the text of NASDAQ Rule
4751. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59392 (February 11, 2009), 74 FR 7943 (February
20, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2009–006). Subsequently,
PHLX adopted identical rule text when it
established PSX as its new facility for trading cash
equity securities. Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 62877 (September 9, 2010), 75 FR 56633
(September 16, 2010) (SR–PHLX–2010–79).
Accordingly, the rule is being amended to provide
a complete description of the order’s current
behavior when crossing an existing order on the
System. PHLX also notes that NASDAQ has filed an
identical proposed rule change to modify its PostOnly Order. See SR–NASDAQ–2011–070 (May 19,
2011).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
is being displayed on another market
center but not on PSX, at present an
order to buy at $10.05 would be
repriced and displayed at $10.04. Under
the changed functionality that PHLX is
proposing, if the order locks or crosses
the other market center, the order will
be accepted at the locking price (i.e., the
current low offer (for bids) or to the
current best bid (for offers)) and
displayed by the System to one
minimum price increment (i.e., $0.01 or
$0.0001) below the current low offer (for
bids) or above the current best bid (for
offers). Thus, if the national best bid and
offer, as displayed on another market
center, was $10 × $10.05, an order to
buy at $10.05 or higher would be
accepted at the locking price of $10.05,
but would be displayed at $10.04.
Subsequently, an incoming order to sell
at $10.05 or lower would be matched
against the Post-Only buy order. In this
case, the incoming sell order would
receive price improvement.
As a result of the change, the order
will resemble more closely PSX’s Price
to Comply order, which uses a similar
logic of retaining a locking price but
displaying at a non-locking price. The
modified Post-Only Order will serve to
allow the market participant entering
the order to post its order at its desired
price, unless the price would lock or
cross the PSX book, in which case the
order will execute or be repriced, as is
currently the case, to avoid the internal
lock/cross. The revised order type is
designed to provide market participants
with better control over their execution
costs and to provide them with a means
to offer price improvement
opportunities to other market
participants.
2. Statutory Basis
PHLX believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 6 of the Act,4 in general, and
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,5 in
particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. PHLX also believes that
the modified order is consistent with
4 15
5 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Rule 610(d) under Regulation NMS.6
Rule 610(d) requires exchanges to
establish, maintain, and enforce rules
that require members reasonably to
avoid ‘‘[d]isplaying quotations that lock
or cross any protected quotation in an
NMS stock.’’ Such rules must be
‘‘reasonably designed to assure the
reconciliation of locked or crossed
quotations in an NMS stock,’’ and must
‘‘prohibit * * * members from engaging
in a pattern or practice of displaying
quotations that lock or cross any
quotation in an NMS stock.’’ Rule 600
under Regulation NMS 7 defines a
‘‘quotation’’ as a ‘‘bid or offer,’’ and in
turn defines ‘‘bid or offer’’ to mean ‘‘the
bid price or the offer price
communicated by a member * * * to
any broker or dealer, or to any customer,
at which it is willing to buy or sell one
or more round lots of an NMS security
* * *.’’ Thus, the hidden price of the
Post-Only Order is not a quotation
under Regulation NMS, and is therefore
covered neither by the provisions of
Rule 610 pertaining to displayed
quotations nor by the provision
requiring rules to assure reconciliation
of locked or crossed quotations. In this
respect, the order is similar to PSX’s
existing Price to Comply order, which
uses a hidden locking price and a
displayed non-locking price to ensure
compliance with this rule. It is also
similar to the Post Only Order of the
BATS Exchange and the BATS–Y
Exchange, as described in BATS
Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(4) and (6) and
BATS–Y Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(4) and
(6), and the Post Only Order of the
EDGA Exchange and EDGX Exchange,
as described in EDGA Exchange Rule
11.5(c)(4) and (5) and EDGX Exchange
Rule 11.5(c)(4) and (5).
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
PHLX does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
Rather, the change will promote greater
competition by allowing PHLX to adopt
functionality already in use at
competing national securities
exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
6 17
7 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
CFR 242.610(d).
CFR 242.600.
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.9
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2011–70 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2011–70. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
provide the Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with
a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
9 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and
3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2011–70, and should
be submitted on or before June 24, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–13776 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Small Business Size Standards;
Waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of proposed retraction of
a Class Waiver from the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for Product
Service Code (PSC) 9130, Liquid
Propellants—Petroleum Base, under
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 324110
(Petroleum Refineries).
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) is proposing the
retraction of a class waiver from the
non-manufacturer rule for PSC 9130,
Liquid Propellants, Petroleum Base,
NAICS code 324110.
DATES: Comments and source
information must be submitted June 20,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to Amy Garcia, Procurement Analyst,
SUMMARY:
10 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32257
Small Business Administration, Office
of Government Contracting, 409 3rd
Street, SW., Suite 8800, Washington, DC
20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy Garcia, Procurement Analyst, by
telephone at (202) 205–6842; by Fax at
(202) 481–1630; or by e-mail at
amy.garcia@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
8(a)(17) of the Small Business Act (Act),
15 U.S.C. 637(a)(17), and SBA’s
implementing regulations require that
recipients of Federal supply contracts
set aside for small businesses, SDVO
small businesses, women-owned small
businesses, or Participants in the SBA’s
8(a) BD Program provide the product of
a small business manufacturer or
processor, if the recipient is other than
the actual manufacturer or processor of
the product. This requirement is
commonly referred to as the
Nonmanufacturer Rule. 13 CFR
121.406(b), 125.15(c), 127.505, Section
8(a)(17)(b)(iv) of the Act authorizes SBA
to waive the Nonmanufacturer Rule for
any ‘‘class of products’’ for which there
are no small business manufacturers or
processors available to participate in the
Federal market.
In order to be considered available to
participate in the Federal market for a
class of products, a small business
manufacturer must have submitted a
proposal for a contract solicitation or
received a contract from the Federal
Government within the last 24 months.
13 CFR 121.1202(c). The SBA defines
‘‘class of products’’ based on the Office
of Management and Budget’s NAICS. In
addition, SBA uses PSCs to further
identify particular products within the
NAICS code to which a waiver would
apply. The SBA may then identify a
specific item within a PSC and NAICS
to which a class waiver would apply.
The SBA is proposing a retraction of
the class waiver from the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for PSC 9130
(Liquid Propellants—Petroleum Base)
under NAICS code 324110. The waiver
from the Nonmanufacturer Rule for PSC
9130 is being retracted based on
information SBA received from the
Defense Logistics Agency, Defense
Energy Support Center (DESC), Fort
Belvoir, VA. On May 11, 2009 (74 FR
21838) SBA published in the Federal
Register a Notice of Intent to grant a
waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule for
PSC 9130 (Liquid Propellants—
Petroleum Base). SBA finalized the
waiver on June 8, 2009 (74 FR 2702).
DESC was not aware of the notice until
after the closing date for submission of
comments. DESC has awarded prime
contracts to, or received offers from,
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32255-32257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13776]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-64563; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-70]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify
the Functionality of NASDAQ OMX PSX's Post-Only Order
May 27, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 19, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``PHLX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing this proposed rule change to modify the
functionality of the Post-Only Order on NASDAQ OMX PSX (``PSX''). PHLX
proposes to implement the rule change thirty days after the date of
filing or as soon thereafter as practicable. The text of the proposed
rule change is available at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at PHLX's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the
[[Page 32256]]
places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
PHLX proposes to modify the functionality associated with its
existing Post-Only Order on PSX. Currently, if a Post-Only Order would
lock an order on PSX at the time of entry, the order is re-priced and
displayed by the System to one minimum price increment (i.e., $0.01 or
$0.0001) below the current low offer (for bids) or above the current
best bid (for offers). Thus, if the best bid and best offer on the PSX
book were $10.00 x $10.05, and a market participant entered a Post-Only
Order to buy at $10.05, the order would be re-priced and displayed at
$10.04. This aspect of the functionality of the order is not changing.
In addition, if a Post-Only Order would cross an order on the System,
the order will be repriced as described above unless the value of price
improvement associated with executing against a resting order equals or
exceeds the sum of fees charged for such execution and the value of any
rebate that would be provided if the order posted to the book and
subsequently provided liquidity, in which case the order will execute.
As provided by Rule 3307, price improvement accrues to the party
entering the order. Thus, if a sell order is on the book at $10 and a
Post-Only Order to buy at $10.01 is entered, the order will execute at
$10. This aspect of the order's functionality is also not changing.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The functionality was described in the original filing to
establish a Post-Only Order on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(``NASDAQ'') but was not fully reflected in the text of NASDAQ Rule
4751. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59392 (February 11,
2009), 74 FR 7943 (February 20, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-006).
Subsequently, PHLX adopted identical rule text when it established
PSX as its new facility for trading cash equity securities.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877 (September 9, 2010), 75 FR
56633 (September 16, 2010) (SR-PHLX-2010-79). Accordingly, the rule
is being amended to provide a complete description of the order's
current behavior when crossing an existing order on the System. PHLX
also notes that NASDAQ has filed an identical proposed rule change
to modify its Post-Only Order. See SR-NASDAQ-2011-070 (May 19,
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At present, however, the order is repriced in a similar manner if
the order would lock or cross a protected quotation of another market
center. Thus, if the national best offer of $10.05 is being displayed
on another market center but not on PSX, at present an order to buy at
$10.05 would be repriced and displayed at $10.04. Under the changed
functionality that PHLX is proposing, if the order locks or crosses the
other market center, the order will be accepted at the locking price
(i.e., the current low offer (for bids) or to the current best bid (for
offers)) and displayed by the System to one minimum price increment
(i.e., $0.01 or $0.0001) below the current low offer (for bids) or
above the current best bid (for offers). Thus, if the national best bid
and offer, as displayed on another market center, was $10 x $10.05, an
order to buy at $10.05 or higher would be accepted at the locking price
of $10.05, but would be displayed at $10.04. Subsequently, an incoming
order to sell at $10.05 or lower would be matched against the Post-Only
buy order. In this case, the incoming sell order would receive price
improvement.
As a result of the change, the order will resemble more closely
PSX's Price to Comply order, which uses a similar logic of retaining a
locking price but displaying at a non-locking price. The modified Post-
Only Order will serve to allow the market participant entering the
order to post its order at its desired price, unless the price would
lock or cross the PSX book, in which case the order will execute or be
repriced, as is currently the case, to avoid the internal lock/cross.
The revised order type is designed to provide market participants with
better control over their execution costs and to provide them with a
means to offer price improvement opportunities to other market
participants.
2. Statutory Basis
PHLX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. PHLX also believes that the
modified order is consistent with Rule 610(d) under Regulation NMS.\6\
Rule 610(d) requires exchanges to establish, maintain, and enforce
rules that require members reasonably to avoid ``[d]isplaying
quotations that lock or cross any protected quotation in an NMS
stock.'' Such rules must be ``reasonably designed to assure the
reconciliation of locked or crossed quotations in an NMS stock,'' and
must ``prohibit * * * members from engaging in a pattern or practice of
displaying quotations that lock or cross any quotation in an NMS
stock.'' Rule 600 under Regulation NMS \7\ defines a ``quotation'' as a
``bid or offer,'' and in turn defines ``bid or offer'' to mean ``the
bid price or the offer price communicated by a member * * * to any
broker or dealer, or to any customer, at which it is willing to buy or
sell one or more round lots of an NMS security * * *.'' Thus, the
hidden price of the Post-Only Order is not a quotation under Regulation
NMS, and is therefore covered neither by the provisions of Rule 610
pertaining to displayed quotations nor by the provision requiring rules
to assure reconciliation of locked or crossed quotations. In this
respect, the order is similar to PSX's existing Price to Comply order,
which uses a hidden locking price and a displayed non-locking price to
ensure compliance with this rule. It is also similar to the Post Only
Order of the BATS Exchange and the BATS-Y Exchange, as described in
BATS Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(4) and (6) and BATS-Y Exchange Rule
11.9(c)(4) and (6), and the Post Only Order of the EDGA Exchange and
EDGX Exchange, as described in EDGA Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(4) and (5)
and EDGX Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\6\ 17 CFR 242.610(d).
\7\ 17 CFR 242.600.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
PHLX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. Rather, the change
will promote greater competition by allowing PHLX to adopt
functionality already in use at competing national securities
exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
[[Page 32257]]
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2011-70 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-70. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices
of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2011-70, and should be submitted on or before June 24, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13776 Filed 6-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P