Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Taiwan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 31940-31941 [2011-13710]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31940
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Notices
2003 clarification not to rescind the
review in part in these circumstances
but, rather, to complete the review with
respect to Ispat, JSW, and Tata and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit rates will be
effective upon publication of the final
results of this administrative review for
all shipments of hot-rolled carbon steel
flat products from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) For Ispat, JSW, and Tata,
and for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recent final results in which
that manufacturer or exporter
participated; (2) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in these reviews, a prior
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent final results for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (3) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a
firm covered in this or any previous
review or the LTFV conducted by the
Department, the cash deposit rate will
be 23.87 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV, as amended,
adjusted for export subsidies. See
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 69 FR 36060, 36062 n.2 (June
28, 2004) (‘‘India Hot-Rolled First
Review’’) (‘‘The ‘all others’ cash deposit
rate, applied by {CBP}, is reduced to
account for the export subsidy rate
found in the countervailing duty
investigation. The adjusted ‘all others’
rate is 23.87 percent.’’); Amended Final
Determination. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping and countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping and countervailing duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping and
countervailing duties.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 26, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–13706 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–814]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From Taiwan: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
an interested party, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe from
Taiwan. The period of review is
November 1, 2009, through October 31,
2010. Based on the withdrawal of
request for review submitted by United
States Steel Corporation (Petitioner), we
are now rescinding this administrative
review.
DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Bezirganian or Robert James,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 1, 2010, the Department
published a notice announcing an
opportunity for interested parties to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe from
Taiwan. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 75
FR 67079 (November 1, 2010). On
November 30, 2010, the Petitioner filed
a request that the Department initiate an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe from
Taiwan with respect to the following
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
four companies: Far East Machinery Co.,
Ltd., Kao Hsing Chang Iron & Steel
Corp. (also known as Kao Hsiung Chang
Iron & Steel Corp.), Yieh Phui Enterprise
Co., Ltd., and Chung Hung Steel
Corporation (also known as Chung Hung
Steel Co., Ltd.). Based on Petitioner’s
request, on December 28, 2010, the
Department published in the Federal
Register a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe from
Taiwan covering the period November
1, 2009, through October 31, 2010. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 75 FR 81565, 81567 (December 28,
2010). On May 4, 2011, Petitioner
submitted a letter withdrawing its
request for a review of the order with
respect to all four of the respondent
companies.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) of
the Department’s regulations, the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review, or withdraws at a
later date if the Department determines
it is reasonable to extend the time limit
for withdrawing the request. Therefore,
although Petitioner withdrew its request
after the 90-day deadline, the
Department has the discretion to extend
this time limit. Consistent with the
Department’s practice, we find it
reasonable to extend the withdrawal
deadline and to rescind the review with
respect to the four respondents because
the Department has not devoted
significant time or resources to the
review. See, e.g., Welded Large Diameter
Line Pipe From Japan: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 75 FR 38989,
38990 (July 7, 2010); see also Persulfates
from the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR
13810, 13811 (March 17, 2006).
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the four
respondent companies, antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM
02JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Notices
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers for whom this review is
being rescinded of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–13710 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XW53
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act Provisions;
Horseshoe Crabs; Application for
Exempted Fishing Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notification of a proposal to
conduct exempted fishing; request for
comments.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Acting Director, Office of
Sustainable Fisheries, has made a
preliminary determination that the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
subject exempted fishing permit (EFP)
application submitted by Limuli
Laboratories of Cape May Court House,
NJ, contains all the required information
and warrants further consideration. The
proposed EFP would allow the harvest
of up to 10,000 horseshoe crabs from the
Carl N. Shuster Jr. Horseshoe Crab
Reserve (Reserve) for biomedical
purposes and require, as a condition of
the EFP, the collection of data related to
the status of horseshoe crabs within the
reserve. The Acting Director has also
made a preliminary determination that
the activities authorized under the EFP
would be consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission’s (Commission)
Horseshoe Crab Interstate Fisheries
Management Plan (FMP). However,
further review and consultation may be
necessary before a final determination is
made to issue the EFP. Therefore, NMFS
announces that the Acting Director
proposes to recommend that an EFP be
issued that would allow up to two
commercial fishing vessels to conduct
fishing operations that are otherwise
restricted by the regulations
promulgated under the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act
(Atlantic Coastal Act). The EFP would
allow for an exemption from the
Reserve.
Regulations under the Atlantic
Coastal Act require publication of this
notification to provide interested parties
the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed EFPs.
DATES: Written comments on this action
must be received on or before June 17,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Emily Menashes, Acting
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13362, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Mark
the outside of the envelope ‘‘Comments
on Horseshoe Crab EFP Proposal.’’
Comments may also be sent via fax to
(301) 713–0596. Comments on this
notice may also be submitted by e-mail
to: Horseshoe-Crab.EFP@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following document
identifier: ‘‘Horseshoe Crab EFP
Proposal.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Meyers, Chief (A), Partnerships
and Communication Division, Office of
Sustainable Fisheries, (301) 713–2334,
ext. 174.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Limuli Laboratories submitted an
application for an EFP on April 19,
2011, to collect up to 10,000 horseshoe
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31941
crabs for biomedical and data collection
purposes from the Reserve. The
applicant has applied for, and received,
a similar EFP every year from 2001–
2010. The current EFP application
specifies that: (1) The same methods
would be used in 2011 that were used
in years 2001–2010, (2) at least 15
percent of the bled horseshoe crabs
would be tagged, and (3) there had not
been any sighting or capture of marine
mammals or endangered species in the
trawling nets of fishing vessels engaged
in the collection of horseshoe crabs
since 1993. The project submitted by
Limuli Laboratories would provide
morphological data on horseshoe crab
catch, would tag a portion of the caught
horseshoe crabs, and would use the
blood from the caught horseshoe crabs
to manufacture Limulus Amebocyte
Lysate (LAL), an important health and
safety product used for the detection of
endotoxins. The LAL assay is used by
medical professionals, drug companies,
and pharmacies to detect endotoxins in
intravenous pharmaceuticals and
medical devices that come into contact
with human blood or spinal fluid.
Results of 2010 EFP
During the 2010 season, a total of
7,497 horseshoe crabs were gathered
over a period of 16 days, from the Carl
N. Schuster Jr. Horseshoe Crab Reserve
(Reserve) for the manufacture of LAL.
After transportation to the laboratory,
the horseshoe crabs were inspected for
size, injuries, and responsiveness. The
injured horseshoe crabs numbered 553,
or 7.38% of the total, while 66, or
0.88%, were noted as unresponsive. In
addition, 66 horseshoe crabs were
rejected due to small size. Overall, 6,812
horseshoe crabs were used (bled) in the
manufacture of a LAL.
Two hundred of the bled horseshoe
crabs were randomly selected for
activity, morphometric and aging
studies. The majority (96 percent) of
these horseshoe crabs were considered
‘‘active,’’ and 4 percent were ‘‘very
active.’’ Morphometric studies noted
that average inter-ocular distances,
prosoma widths and weights of these
200 horseshoe crabs were comparable to
previous years (2001–2009). The ages of
the specimens in 2010 were more
evenly distributed throughout the age
classes than in previous years, with
40.5% categorized as young, 30.5%
medium aged, 25.5% old aged, and very
few first-year horseshoe crabs (2.5%).
The 200 studied horseshoe crabs and
925 additional bled horseshoe crabs
were tagged and released into the
Delaware Bay. To date, the tagging of
4,413 horseshoe crabs during 2001–2010
has resulted in 96 live recaptures. The
E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM
02JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31940-31941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-814]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Taiwan: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from an interested party, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel
pipe from Taiwan. The period of review is November 1, 2009, through
October 31, 2010. Based on the withdrawal of request for review
submitted by United States Steel Corporation (Petitioner), we are now
rescinding this administrative review.
DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1131 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2010, the Department published a notice announcing
an opportunity for interested parties to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel
pipe from Taiwan. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 67079 (November 1, 2010). On November 30,
2010, the Petitioner filed a request that the Department initiate an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded
non-alloy steel pipe from Taiwan with respect to the following four
companies: Far East Machinery Co., Ltd., Kao Hsing Chang Iron & Steel
Corp. (also known as Kao Hsiung Chang Iron & Steel Corp.), Yieh Phui
Enterprise Co., Ltd., and Chung Hung Steel Corporation (also known as
Chung Hung Steel Co., Ltd.). Based on Petitioner's request, on December
28, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Taiwan covering the period
November 1, 2009, through October 31, 2010. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 81565, 81567 (December 28, 2010). On May
4, 2011, Petitioner submitted a letter withdrawing its request for a
review of the order with respect to all four of the respondent
companies.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations,
the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of
the publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws at a later date if the Department determines it is reasonable
to extend the time limit for withdrawing the request. Therefore,
although Petitioner withdrew its request after the 90-day deadline, the
Department has the discretion to extend this time limit. Consistent
with the Department's practice, we find it reasonable to extend the
withdrawal deadline and to rescind the review with respect to the four
respondents because the Department has not devoted significant time or
resources to the review. See, e.g., Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe
From Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 38989, 38990 (July 7, 2010); see also Persulfates from
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 13810, 13811 (March 17, 2006).
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For the
four respondent companies, antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
[[Page 31941]]
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15
days after publication of this notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers for whom this
review is being rescinded of their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during
this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-13710 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
