Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest, 31632-31633 [2011-13451]
Download as PDF
31632
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on July
7, 2011, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
July 13, 2011 and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year reviews
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by July 13,
2011. However, should the Department
of Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 Fed. Reg. 68036
(November 8, 2002). Even where
electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also
be filed in paper form, as specified in II
(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Ames True Temper and Council Tool
Co., Inc. to be individually adequate. Comments
from other interested parties will not be accepted
(see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 Fed.
Reg. 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 25, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–13450 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled In Re Certain Protective Cases
and Components thereof, DN 2809; the
Commission is soliciting comments on
any public interest issues raised by the
complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to
the Commission, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
filed on Otter Products LLC on May 25,
2011. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain protective cases and components
thereof. The complaint names as
respondents A.G. Findings and Mfg. Co.,
Inc. of Sunrise, FL; AFC Trident Inc. of
Chino, CA; Alibaba.com Hong Kong Ltd.
of Hangzhou, China; Anbess Electronics
Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Cellairis
Franchise, Inc. of Alpharetta, GA; Cellet
Products of Santa Fe Springs, CA;
DHgate.com of Beijing, China; Griffin
Technology, Inc. of Nashville, TN;
Guangzhou Evotech Industry Co., Ltd.,
of Guangdong, China; Hardcandy Cases
LLC, of Sacramento, CA; Hoffco Brands
Inc. of Wheat Ridge, CO; Hong Kong
Better Technology Group Ltd. of
Shenzhen, China; Hong Kong HJJ Co.,
Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Hypercel
Corporation of Valencia, CA; InMotion
Entertainment of Jacksonville, FL; Mega
Watts Computers LLC of Tulsa, OK;
National Cellular of Brooklyn, NY;
OEMBargain.com of Wantagh, NY; One
Step Up Ltd. of New York, NY; Papaya
Holdings Ltd. of Central, Hong Kong;
Quanyun Electronics Co., Ltd. of
Shenzhen, China; ShenZhen Star & Way
Trade Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou City,
China; Sinatech Industrial Co., Ltd. of
Guangzhou, China; Smilecase of
Windsor Mill, MD; Suntel Global
Investment Ltd. of Guangzhou, China;
TheCaseInPoint.com of Titusville, FL;
TheCaseSpace of Fort Collins, CO;
Topter Technology Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen
China and Trait Technology (Shenzhen)
Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China
The complainant, proposed
respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited
to file comments, not to exceed five
pages in length, on any public interest
issues raised by the complaint.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation would negatively affect the
public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production
of like or directly competitive articles in
the United States, or United States
consumers.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, five
business days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Submissions should
refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No.
2809’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. The
Commission’s rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means only to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the
rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
documents/handbook_on_electronic_
filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding electronic filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10,
210.50(a)(4)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–13451 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Second
Review)]
Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet
from Japan; Institution of a Five-Year
Review Concerning the Antidumping
Duty Order on Tin- and ChromiumCoated Steel Sheet from Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty order on tin- and
chromium-coated steel sheet from Japan
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the
information specified below to the
Commission; 1 to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for
responses is July 1, 2011. Comments on
the adequacy of responses may be filed
with the Commission by August 15,
2011. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207), as most recently amended at 74 FR
2847 (January 16, 2009).
DATES: Effective Date: June 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. HearingSUMMARY:
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–248,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31633
impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On August 28, 2000,
the Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
tin- and chromium-coated steel sheet
from Japan (65 FR 52067). Following
five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective July 21, 2006,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
tin- and chromium-coated steel sheet
from Japan (71 FR 41422). The
Commission is now conducting a
second review to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. It
will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited
review. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited review
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is Japan.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and its full first five-year
review determination, the Commission
defined the Domestic Like Product as
tin- and chromium-coated steel sheet
corresponding to Commerce’s definition
of the scope of the investigation.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31632-31633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13451]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating
to the Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint entitled In Re Certain Protective
Cases and Components thereof, DN 2809; the Commission is soliciting
comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to
the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. The public version of
the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has received a complaint
filed on Otter Products LLC on May 25, 2011. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and
the sale within the United States after importation of certain
protective cases and components thereof. The complaint names as
respondents A.G. Findings and Mfg. Co., Inc. of Sunrise, FL; AFC
Trident Inc. of Chino, CA; Alibaba.com Hong Kong Ltd. of Hangzhou,
China; Anbess Electronics Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Cellairis
Franchise, Inc. of Alpharetta, GA; Cellet Products of Santa Fe Springs,
CA; DHgate.com of Beijing, China; Griffin Technology, Inc. of
Nashville, TN; Guangzhou Evotech Industry Co., Ltd., of Guangdong,
China; Hardcandy Cases LLC, of Sacramento, CA; Hoffco Brands Inc. of
Wheat Ridge, CO; Hong Kong Better Technology Group Ltd. of Shenzhen,
China; Hong Kong HJJ Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Hypercel Corporation
of Valencia, CA; InMotion Entertainment of Jacksonville, FL; Mega Watts
Computers LLC of Tulsa, OK; National Cellular of Brooklyn, NY;
OEMBargain.com of Wantagh, NY; One Step Up Ltd. of New York, NY; Papaya
Holdings Ltd. of Central, Hong Kong; Quanyun Electronics Co., Ltd. of
Shenzhen, China; ShenZhen Star & Way Trade Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou City,
China; Sinatech Industrial Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China; Smilecase of
Windsor Mill, MD; Suntel Global Investment Ltd. of Guangzhou, China;
TheCaseInPoint.com of Titusville, FL; TheCaseSpace of Fort Collins, CO;
Topter Technology Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen China and Trait Technology
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China
The complainant, proposed respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed
five pages in length, on any public interest issues raised by the
complaint. Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion
order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would
negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United
States consumers.
[[Page 31633]]
In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are
used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject
to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of
business, five business days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for
comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial
determination in this investigation.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with
the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket
number (``Docket No. 2809'') in a prominent place on the cover page
and/or the first page. The Commission's rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for
Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/documents/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons
with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary
(202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All
nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10
and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 26, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-13451 Filed 5-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P