Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 30908-30910 [2011-13264]

Download as PDF 30908 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [A(32b)–1–2011] Foreign-Trade Zone 203—Moses Lake, Washington, Export-Only Manufacturing Authority, SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers, LLC, (Carbon Fiber); Notice of Temporary Approval On January 4, 2011, an application was submitted by the Port of Moses Lake Public Corporation, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 203, requesting authority on behalf of SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers, LLC (SGL) to manufacture carbon fiber under FTZ procedures solely for export within Site 3 of FTZ 203 in Moses Lake, Washington. The request was given notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (Docket 4–2011, 76 FR 1599, 1/11/2011). Section 400.32(b)(1)(ii) of the FTZ Board’s regulations (15 CFR part 400) allows the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration to act for the Board in making decisions on new manufacturing authority when the activity would be for export only. Pursuant to that regulatory provision, on May 13, 2011, the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration approved authority for SGL’s export-only manufacturing activity for a two-year period (until May 13, 2013), subject to the FTZ Act (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u) and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28. For any potential approval by the FTZ Board of authority beyond the initial two-year period, the SGL application is continuing to be processed under Docket 4–2011, including the conduct of an industry survey pursuant to 15 CFR 400.27(d)(3)(vi). Dated: May 20, 2011. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–13271 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES [A–533–843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 May 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 Stephanie Moore or George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482– 1167, respectively. Background On September 1, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative Review’’ of this order for the period September 1, 2009, through August 31, 2010. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 53635, (September 1, 2010). On September 30, 2010, we received timely requests for an administrative review from the Association of American School Paper Suppliers (petitioner),1 in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1). On October 28, 2010, we published the notice of initiation. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 66349 (October 28, 2010). The preliminary results of review are currently due June 2, 2011. Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires that the Department make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that, if it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period specified, the administering authority may extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 365 days. 1 Petitioner requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of the following 35 companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.; American Scholar, Inc. and/or I–Scholar; Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; AR Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt.; Bafna Exports; Cello International Pvt. Ltd. (M/S Cello Paper Products); Corporate Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Creative Divya; D.D International; Exel India Pvt. Ltd.; Exmart International Pvt. Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar; FFI International; Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Kejriwal Paper Ltd., and Kejriwal Exports; Lodha Offset Limited; Magic International Pvt. Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.; Marisa International; Navneet Publications (India) Ltd.; Orient Press Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Premier Exports; Rajvansh International; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB International; Sar Transport Systems; Seet Kamal International; Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd; Super Impex; Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash Laminates. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this review within the 245-day period is not practicable for the following reasons. This review requires the Department to gather and analyze a significant amount of information pertaining to each of the company’s sales practices, manufacturing costs, and corporate relationships. Furthermore, on May 17, 2011, the Department initiated a salesbelow-cost of production investigation of Riddhi Enterprises (Riddhi),2 a pro se respondent, pursuant to an allegation submitted by petitioner on May 2, 2011. As a result, the Department will require additional time to receive and analyze Riddhi’s Section D questionnaire response. Given the complexity of these issues, and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of this review by 120 days. Accordingly, the deadline for the completion of the preliminary results is now September 30, 2011. Unless extended, the final results continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 20, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–13244 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–824] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) issued the preliminary results of the new shipper review of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip (PET Film) from India for SRF Limited (SRF), covering the period July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009 (POR). Based on the results of our analysis of the comments received, we continue to find that the U.S. sale of AGENCY: 2 The other respondent in this administrative review is Navneet Publications (India) Ltd. E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 30909 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices shipments after the POR of PET film to the United States. On February 25, 2011, SRF filed its response to the Department’s supplemental questionnaire. On March 3, 2011, the Department extended the final results of new shipper review from March 21, 2011 to May 20, 2011. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 12937 (March 9, 2011). On April 13, 2011, the Department placed additional CBP data concerning post-POR shipments of PET Film to the United States, sold by SRF, on the record of this review and requested comments from the parties. See Background Memorandum to All Interested Parties Since the issuance of Polyethylene from Toni Page, International Trade Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and From India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate 75 FR 81570 (December 28, 2010) Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S. (Preliminary Results), the following Customs Entries from December 2009 to events have occurred. On January 21, present (April 13, 2011). Petitioners and 2011, the Department issued a SRF filed comments on the CBP data on memorandum confirming the briefing April 18, 2011. schedule, in accordance with 19 CFR Scope of the Order 351.309(c), as stated in the Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 81573. See The products covered by the order are Memorandum To Interested Parties all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed From Elfi Blum, International Trade polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD and strip, whether extruded or Operations, Office 6: New Shipper coextruded. Excluded are metallized Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and films and other finished films that have Countervailing Duty Orders on had at least one of their surfaces Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, modified by the application of a and Strip from India; Verification and performance-enhancing resinous or Briefing Schedule for the Final Results inorganic layer more than 0.00001 of Review (January 21, 2011). SRF and inches thick. Imports of PET Film are the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films, classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc. under item number 3920.62.00.90. (collectively, Petitioners), timely filed HTSUS subheadings are provided for case briefs on January 27, 2011. SRF convenience and customs purposes. The timely filed a rebuttal brief on February written description of the scope of the 1, 2011. order is dispositive. The Department obtained, from CBP, import data for entries of PET Film from Bona Fide Analysis of U.S. Sale In the Preliminary Results, we India into the United States during the determined that SRF’s U.S. sale was a period December 2009 through January bona fide transaction. See Memorandum 2011. On February 11, 2011, the from Toni Page, International Trade Department placed this information on Analyst Regarding: Bona Fide Nature of the record of this review. See the Sale in the Antidumping Duty New Memorandum To All Interested Parties Shipper Review of Polyethylene From Toni Page, International Trade Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and from India: SRF Limited (December 21, Countervailing Duty New Shipper 2010). The Department also stated it Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate would continue to examine, through the Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S. Customs Entries from December 2009 to remainder of the review, all factors relating to the bona fide analysis of the Present (January 11, 2011). The sale. We have further examined the Department issued its third bona fide nature of SRF’s U.S. sale and, supplemental questionnaire to SRF on for these final results, we continue to February 11, 2011, requesting find the sale to be bona fide. For further information about the company’s jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF was bona fide and not sold below normal value (NV). Therefore, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries subject to this review without regard to antidumping duties. DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398 or (202) 482– 0197. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 details, see Memorandum to File from Toni Page, International Trade Analyst, Bona Fide Analysis of SRF’s Sale in the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, dated concurrently with this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal brief by parties to this new shipper review are addressed in Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India (May 20, 2011) (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the comments raised in the briefs and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of the main Department building, and can be accessed directly on the Web at http:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the comments received from SRF, we have made a change to the margin calculations used in the Preliminary Results. As discussed in Comment 1 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, the sum of the export subsidy rates calculated in the companion countervailing duty new shipper review have been added to export price for the purpose of calculating the antidumping margin for these final results. Final Results of New Shipper Review In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine that the following weighted average dumping margin exists for the period July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009. Manufacturer/exporter Weightedaverage margin (percent) SRF Limited .......................... 0.00 E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 30910 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices Disclosure The Department will disclose to parties the calculations performed in connection with these final results within five days of the date of public announcement. See 19 CFR 351.224(b). Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Assessment and Cash Deposit Instructions The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, without regard to antidumping duties. The Department intends to also instruct CBP that the cash deposit rate for SRF is zero percent ad valorem of the entered value on shipments of the subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF, and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this new shipper review. Further, effective upon publication of the final results of this new shipper review, we intend to instruct CBP that importers may no longer post a bond or other security in lieu of a cash deposit on imports of PET Film from India, manufactured and exported by SRF. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. The cash deposit rates for all companies not covered by this review are not changed by the results of this new shipper review. Dated: May 20, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Elfi Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 1398. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendix I Background List of Issues Addressed In the Issues and Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Adjust the Export Price in the Antidumping Calculations by the Calculated Countervailing Duty Rate Comment 2: Whether SRF’s Single Sale and its U.S. Customer Are Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale Comment 3: Whether the Price and Quantity of SRF’s New Shipper Sale Are Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale Comment 4: Whether SRF’s PET Film Entry Was Re-sold for a Profit Since the issuance of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review, 75 FR 81574 (December 28, 2010) (Preliminary Results), the following events have occurred. SRF filed its response to the Department’s second supplemental questionnaire on December 27, 2010. On January 21, 2011, the Department issued a memorandum confirming the briefing schedule, which was in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c) and the Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 81583. See Memorandum To Interested Parties From Elfi Blum, International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6: New Shipper Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; Verification and Briefing Schedule for the Final Results of Review (January 21, 2011). SRF and the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film of America, and Toray Plastics (America), Inc., timely filed case briefs on January 27, 2011. On January 31, 2011, the Department rejected SRF’s case brief because it contained untimely new factual information. SRF timely re-filed its case brief on February 1, 2011. Both SRF and the petitioners timely filed their rebuttal briefs on February 1, 2011. On March 9, 2011, the Department published an extension of the final results of the new shipper review from March 21, 2011 to May 20, 2011. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 12938 (March 9, 2011). The Department obtained, from CBP, import data for entries of PET Film from India into the United States during the period December 2009 through January 2011. On February 11, 2011, the Department placed this information on the record of this review. See Memorandum To All Interested Parties From Toni Page, International Trade Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty New Shipper jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 May 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 [FR Doc. 2011–13264 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–825] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) issued the preliminary results of the new shipper review of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip (PET Film) from India for SRF Limited (SRF), covering the period January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009 (POR). Based on the results of our analysis of the comments received, we continue to find that the U.S. sale of subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF was bona fide. Also based on our analysis of SRF’s comments, we made certain revisions to the calculations of several subsidy programs. The final subsidy rate for the reviewed company is listed below in the section titled ‘‘Final Results of New Shipper Review.’’ The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess countervailing duties at the final subsidy rate. DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30908-30910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) issued the preliminary results of the new shipper review of 
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip (PET Film) from India 
for SRF Limited (SRF), covering the period July 1, 2009, through 
December 31, 2009 (POR). Based on the results of our analysis of the 
comments received, we continue to find that the U.S. sale of

[[Page 30909]]

subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF was bona fide and not 
sold below normal value (NV). Therefore, the Department will instruct 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries subject 
to this review without regard to antidumping duties.

DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1398 or (202) 482- 0197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Since the issuance of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 
Review, 75 FR 81570 (December 28, 2010) (Preliminary Results), the 
following events have occurred. On January 21, 2011, the Department 
issued a memorandum confirming the briefing schedule, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.309(c), as stated in the Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 
81573. See Memorandum To Interested Parties From Elfi Blum, 
International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6: 
New Shipper Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 
Verification and Briefing Schedule for the Final Results of Review 
(January 21, 2011). SRF and the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films, 
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics 
(America), Inc. (collectively, Petitioners), timely filed case briefs 
on January 27, 2011. SRF timely filed a rebuttal brief on February 1, 
2011.
    The Department obtained, from CBP, import data for entries of PET 
Film from India into the United States during the period December 2009 
through January 2011. On February 11, 2011, the Department placed this 
information on the record of this review. See Memorandum To All 
Interested Parties From Toni Page, International Trade Compliance 
Analyst: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty New Shipper Reviews of 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S. 
Customs Entries from December 2009 to Present (January 11, 2011). The 
Department issued its third supplemental questionnaire to SRF on 
February 11, 2011, requesting information about the company's shipments 
after the POR of PET film to the United States. On February 25, 2011, 
SRF filed its response to the Department's supplemental questionnaire.
    On March 3, 2011, the Department extended the final results of new 
shipper review from March 21, 2011 to May 20, 2011. See Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Extension of Time Limit 
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 12937 
(March 9, 2011).
    On April 13, 2011, the Department placed additional CBP data 
concerning post-POR shipments of PET Film to the United States, sold by 
SRF, on the record of this review and requested comments from the 
parties. See Memorandum to All Interested Parties from Toni Page, 
International Trade Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty New Shipper Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip from India: U.S. Customs Entries from December 2009 to present 
(April 13, 2011). Petitioners and SRF filed comments on the CBP data on 
April 18, 2011.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, 
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip, 
whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other 
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by 
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer 
more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET Film are classifiable in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item 
number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order 
is dispositive.

Bona Fide Analysis of U.S. Sale

    In the Preliminary Results, we determined that SRF's U.S. sale was 
a bona fide transaction. See Memorandum from Toni Page, International 
Trade Analyst Regarding: Bona Fide Nature of the Sale in the 
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 
Sheet, and Strip from India: SRF Limited (December 21, 2010). The 
Department also stated it would continue to examine, through the 
remainder of the review, all factors relating to the bona fide analysis 
of the sale. We have further examined the bona fide nature of SRF's 
U.S. sale and, for these final results, we continue to find the sale to 
be bona fide. For further details, see Memorandum to File from Toni 
Page, International Trade Analyst, Bona Fide Analysis of SRF's Sale in 
the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate 
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, dated concurrently with this notice.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal brief by parties 
to this new shipper review are addressed in Memorandum from Christian 
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Results of New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 
Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India (May 20, 2011) (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 
the comments raised in the briefs and addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of 
the main Department building, and can be accessed directly on the Web 
at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper and electronic version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received from SRF, we have made a change to 
the margin calculations used in the Preliminary Results. As discussed 
in Comment 1 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, the 
sum of the export subsidy rates calculated in the companion 
countervailing duty new shipper review have been added to export price 
for the purpose of calculating the antidumping margin for these final 
results.

Final Results of New Shipper Review

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine that 
the following weighted average dumping margin exists for the period 
July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                 Manufacturer/exporter                    average margin
                                                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRF Limited............................................            0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 30910]]

Disclosure

    The Department will disclose to parties the calculations performed 
in connection with these final results within five days of the date of 
public announcement. See 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment and Cash Deposit Instructions

    The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 
days after the date of publication of these final results of review to 
liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF 
and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, without regard to antidumping 
duties.
    The Department intends to also instruct CBP that the cash deposit 
rate for SRF is zero percent ad valorem of the entered value on 
shipments of the subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF, and 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication of the final results of this new shipper review.
    Further, effective upon publication of the final results of this 
new shipper review, we intend to instruct CBP that importers may no 
longer post a bond or other security in lieu of a cash deposit on 
imports of PET Film from India, manufactured and exported by SRF. These 
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice. The cash deposit rates for all companies not covered by 
this review are not changed by the results of this new shipper review.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information

    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification 
of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 20, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I

List of Issues Addressed In the Issues and Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Adjust the Export Price in 
the Antidumping Calculations by the Calculated Countervailing Duty 
Rate
Comment 2: Whether SRF's Single Sale and its U.S. Customer Are 
Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale
Comment 3: Whether the Price and Quantity of SRF's New Shipper Sale 
Are Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale
Comment 4: Whether SRF's PET Film Entry Was Re-sold for a Profit

[FR Doc. 2011-13264 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P