Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 30908-30910 [2011-13264]
Download as PDF
30908
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[A(32b)–1–2011]
Foreign-Trade Zone 203—Moses Lake,
Washington, Export-Only
Manufacturing Authority, SGL
Automotive Carbon Fibers, LLC,
(Carbon Fiber); Notice of Temporary
Approval
On January 4, 2011, an application
was submitted by the Port of Moses
Lake Public Corporation, grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 203,
requesting authority on behalf of SGL
Automotive Carbon Fibers, LLC (SGL) to
manufacture carbon fiber under FTZ
procedures solely for export within Site
3 of FTZ 203 in Moses Lake,
Washington. The request was given
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (Docket 4–2011, 76 FR
1599, 1/11/2011).
Section 400.32(b)(1)(ii) of the FTZ
Board’s regulations (15 CFR part 400)
allows the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration to act for the
Board in making decisions on new
manufacturing authority when the
activity would be for export only.
Pursuant to that regulatory provision, on
May 13, 2011, the Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration approved
authority for SGL’s export-only
manufacturing activity for a two-year
period (until May 13, 2013), subject to
the FTZ Act (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u) and the
Board’s regulations, including Section
400.28.
For any potential approval by the FTZ
Board of authority beyond the initial
two-year period, the SGL application is
continuing to be processed under
Docket 4–2011, including the conduct of
an industry survey pursuant to 15 CFR
400.27(d)(3)(vi).
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–13271 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
Stephanie Moore or George McMahon,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482–
1167, respectively.
Background
On September 1, 2010, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the notice of ‘‘Opportunity to
Request Administrative Review’’ of this
order for the period September 1, 2009,
through August 31, 2010. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 53635,
(September 1, 2010). On September 30,
2010, we received timely requests for an
administrative review from the
Association of American School Paper
Suppliers (petitioner),1 in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1). On October
28, 2010, we published the notice of
initiation. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 75 FR 66349 (October 28,
2010). The preliminary results of review
are currently due June 2, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
that the Department make a preliminary
determination within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of an
order for which a review is requested.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further
states that, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within the time
period specified, the administering
authority may extend the 245-day
period to issue its preliminary results to
up to 365 days.
1 Petitioner requested that the Department
conduct an administrative review of the following
35 companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.;
American Scholar, Inc. and/or I–Scholar; Ampoules
& Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; AR Printing & Packaging
(India) Pvt.; Bafna Exports; Cello International Pvt.
Ltd. (M/S Cello Paper Products); Corporate
Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Creative Divya; D.D
International; Exel India Pvt. Ltd.; Exmart
International Pvt. Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar;
FFI International; Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.;
International Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Kejriwal Paper
Ltd., and Kejriwal Exports; Lodha Offset Limited;
Magic International Pvt. Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt.
Ltd.; Marisa International; Navneet Publications
(India) Ltd.; Orient Press Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.;
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Premier Exports;
Rajvansh International; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB
International; Sar Transport Systems; Seet Kamal
International; Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd; Super Impex;
Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash
Laminates.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We determine that completion of the
preliminary results of this review within
the 245-day period is not practicable for
the following reasons. This review
requires the Department to gather and
analyze a significant amount of
information pertaining to each of the
company’s sales practices,
manufacturing costs, and corporate
relationships. Furthermore, on May 17,
2011, the Department initiated a salesbelow-cost of production investigation
of Riddhi Enterprises (Riddhi),2 a pro se
respondent, pursuant to an allegation
submitted by petitioner on May 2, 2011.
As a result, the Department will require
additional time to receive and analyze
Riddhi’s Section D questionnaire
response. Given the complexity of these
issues, and in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are extending
the time period for issuing the
preliminary results of this review by 120
days. Accordingly, the deadline for the
completion of the preliminary results is
now September 30, 2011. Unless
extended, the final results continue to
be due 120 days after the publication of
the preliminary results, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–13244 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–824]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From India: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) issued the preliminary
results of the new shipper review of
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip (PET Film) from India for SRF
Limited (SRF), covering the period July
1, 2009, through December 31, 2009
(POR). Based on the results of our
analysis of the comments received, we
continue to find that the U.S. sale of
AGENCY:
2 The other respondent in this administrative
review is Navneet Publications (India) Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30909
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices
shipments after the POR of PET film to
the United States. On February 25, 2011,
SRF filed its response to the
Department’s supplemental
questionnaire.
On March 3, 2011, the Department
extended the final results of new
shipper review from March 21, 2011 to
May 20, 2011. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip
From India: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review, 76 FR 12937 (March 9,
2011).
On April 13, 2011, the Department
placed additional CBP data concerning
post-POR shipments of PET Film to the
United States, sold by SRF, on the
record of this review and requested
comments from the parties. See
Background
Memorandum to All Interested Parties
Since the issuance of Polyethylene
from Toni Page, International Trade
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and
From India: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty New Shipper
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate
75 FR 81570 (December 28, 2010)
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S.
(Preliminary Results), the following
Customs Entries from December 2009 to
events have occurred. On January 21,
present (April 13, 2011). Petitioners and
2011, the Department issued a
SRF filed comments on the CBP data on
memorandum confirming the briefing
April 18, 2011.
schedule, in accordance with 19 CFR
Scope of the Order
351.309(c), as stated in the Preliminary
Results, 75 FR at 81573. See
The products covered by the order are
Memorandum To Interested Parties
all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed
From Elfi Blum, International Trade
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD
and strip, whether extruded or
Operations, Office 6: New Shipper
coextruded. Excluded are metallized
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and
films and other finished films that have
Countervailing Duty Orders on
had at least one of their surfaces
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, modified by the application of a
and Strip from India; Verification and
performance-enhancing resinous or
Briefing Schedule for the Final Results
inorganic layer more than 0.00001
of Review (January 21, 2011). SRF and
inches thick. Imports of PET Film are
the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films,
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC,
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
under item number 3920.62.00.90.
(collectively, Petitioners), timely filed
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
case briefs on January 27, 2011. SRF
convenience and customs purposes. The
timely filed a rebuttal brief on February
written description of the scope of the
1, 2011.
order is dispositive.
The Department obtained, from CBP,
import data for entries of PET Film from Bona Fide Analysis of U.S. Sale
In the Preliminary Results, we
India into the United States during the
determined that SRF’s U.S. sale was a
period December 2009 through January
bona fide transaction. See Memorandum
2011. On February 11, 2011, the
from Toni Page, International Trade
Department placed this information on
Analyst Regarding: Bona Fide Nature of
the record of this review. See
the Sale in the Antidumping Duty New
Memorandum To All Interested Parties
Shipper Review of Polyethylene
From Toni Page, International Trade
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and
from India: SRF Limited (December 21,
Countervailing Duty New Shipper
2010). The Department also stated it
Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate
would continue to examine, through the
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S.
Customs Entries from December 2009 to remainder of the review, all factors
relating to the bona fide analysis of the
Present (January 11, 2011). The
sale. We have further examined the
Department issued its third
bona fide nature of SRF’s U.S. sale and,
supplemental questionnaire to SRF on
for these final results, we continue to
February 11, 2011, requesting
find the sale to be bona fide. For further
information about the company’s
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
subject merchandise produced and
exported by SRF was bona fide and not
sold below normal value (NV).
Therefore, the Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to liquidate entries subject to this
review without regard to antidumping
duties.
DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1398 or (202) 482– 0197.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
details, see Memorandum to File from
Toni Page, International Trade Analyst,
Bona Fide Analysis of SRF’s Sale in the
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, dated
concurrently with this notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs and
rebuttal brief by parties to this new
shipper review are addressed in
Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
New Shipper Review of Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
(PET Film) from India (May 20, 2011)
(Issues and Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the comments raised in the
briefs and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is appended to
this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is on file in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of the
main Department building, and can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper and
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from
SRF, we have made a change to the
margin calculations used in the
Preliminary Results. As discussed in
Comment 1 of the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum, the sum of
the export subsidy rates calculated in
the companion countervailing duty new
shipper review have been added to
export price for the purpose of
calculating the antidumping margin for
these final results.
Final Results of New Shipper Review
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we determine that the
following weighted average dumping
margin exists for the period July 1, 2009,
through December 31, 2009.
Manufacturer/exporter
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
SRF Limited ..........................
0.00
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30910
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices
Disclosure
The Department will disclose to
parties the calculations performed in
connection with these final results
within five days of the date of public
announcement. See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Assessment and Cash Deposit
Instructions
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review to liquidate
shipments of subject merchandise
produced and exported by SRF and
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after July 1, 2009,
through December 31, 2009, without
regard to antidumping duties.
The Department intends to also
instruct CBP that the cash deposit rate
for SRF is zero percent ad valorem of
the entered value on shipments of the
subject merchandise produced and
exported by SRF, and entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
new shipper review.
Further, effective upon publication of
the final results of this new shipper
review, we intend to instruct CBP that
importers may no longer post a bond or
other security in lieu of a cash deposit
on imports of PET Film from India,
manufactured and exported by SRF.
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice. The cash deposit rates for
all companies not covered by this
review are not changed by the results of
this new shipper review.
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Elfi
Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482–
1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix I
Background
List of Issues Addressed In the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Whether the Department Should
Adjust the Export Price in the
Antidumping Calculations by the
Calculated Countervailing Duty Rate
Comment 2: Whether SRF’s Single Sale and
its U.S. Customer Are Indicative of a Bona
Fide Sale
Comment 3: Whether the Price and Quantity
of SRF’s New Shipper Sale Are Indicative
of a Bona Fide Sale
Comment 4: Whether SRF’s PET Film Entry
Was Re-sold for a Profit
Since the issuance of Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
From India: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty New Shipper
Review, 75 FR 81574 (December 28,
2010) (Preliminary Results), the
following events have occurred. SRF
filed its response to the Department’s
second supplemental questionnaire on
December 27, 2010. On January 21,
2011, the Department issued a
memorandum confirming the briefing
schedule, which was in accordance with
19 CFR 351.309(c) and the Preliminary
Results, 75 FR at 81583. See
Memorandum To Interested Parties
From Elfi Blum, International Trade
Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6: New Shipper
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and
Countervailing Duty Orders on
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,
and Strip from India; Verification and
Briefing Schedule for the Final Results
of Review (January 21, 2011). SRF and
the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films,
Mitsubishi Polyester Film of America,
and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.,
timely filed case briefs on January 27,
2011. On January 31, 2011, the
Department rejected SRF’s case brief
because it contained untimely new
factual information. SRF timely re-filed
its case brief on February 1, 2011. Both
SRF and the petitioners timely filed
their rebuttal briefs on February 1, 2011.
On March 9, 2011, the Department
published an extension of the final
results of the new shipper review from
March 21, 2011 to May 20, 2011. See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From India: Extension of Time
Limit for Final Results of Countervailing
Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 12938
(March 9, 2011).
The Department obtained, from CBP,
import data for entries of PET Film from
India into the United States during the
period December 2009 through January
2011. On February 11, 2011, the
Department placed this information on
the record of this review. See
Memorandum To All Interested Parties
From Toni Page, International Trade
Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty New Shipper
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of return or destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–13264 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–825]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From India: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty New
Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) issued the preliminary
results of the new shipper review of
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip (PET Film) from India for SRF
Limited (SRF), covering the period
January 1, 2009, through December 31,
2009 (POR). Based on the results of our
analysis of the comments received, we
continue to find that the U.S. sale of
subject merchandise produced and
exported by SRF was bona fide. Also
based on our analysis of SRF’s
comments, we made certain revisions to
the calculations of several subsidy
programs. The final subsidy rate for the
reviewed company is listed below in the
section titled ‘‘Final Results of New
Shipper Review.’’ The Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess
countervailing duties at the final
subsidy rate.
DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30908-30910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-824]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 21, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) issued the preliminary results of the new shipper review of
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip (PET Film) from India
for SRF Limited (SRF), covering the period July 1, 2009, through
December 31, 2009 (POR). Based on the results of our analysis of the
comments received, we continue to find that the U.S. sale of
[[Page 30909]]
subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF was bona fide and not
sold below normal value (NV). Therefore, the Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries subject
to this review without regard to antidumping duties.
DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1398 or (202) 482- 0197.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Since the issuance of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review, 75 FR 81570 (December 28, 2010) (Preliminary Results), the
following events have occurred. On January 21, 2011, the Department
issued a memorandum confirming the briefing schedule, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.309(c), as stated in the Preliminary Results, 75 FR at
81573. See Memorandum To Interested Parties From Elfi Blum,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6:
New Shipper Reviews of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India;
Verification and Briefing Schedule for the Final Results of Review
(January 21, 2011). SRF and the petitioners, Dupont Teijin Films,
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics
(America), Inc. (collectively, Petitioners), timely filed case briefs
on January 27, 2011. SRF timely filed a rebuttal brief on February 1,
2011.
The Department obtained, from CBP, import data for entries of PET
Film from India into the United States during the period December 2009
through January 2011. On February 11, 2011, the Department placed this
information on the record of this review. See Memorandum To All
Interested Parties From Toni Page, International Trade Compliance
Analyst: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty New Shipper Reviews of
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: U.S.
Customs Entries from December 2009 to Present (January 11, 2011). The
Department issued its third supplemental questionnaire to SRF on
February 11, 2011, requesting information about the company's shipments
after the POR of PET film to the United States. On February 25, 2011,
SRF filed its response to the Department's supplemental questionnaire.
On March 3, 2011, the Department extended the final results of new
shipper review from March 21, 2011 to May 20, 2011. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Extension of Time Limit
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 12937
(March 9, 2011).
On April 13, 2011, the Department placed additional CBP data
concerning post-POR shipments of PET Film to the United States, sold by
SRF, on the record of this review and requested comments from the
parties. See Memorandum to All Interested Parties from Toni Page,
International Trade Compliance Analyst: Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty New Shipper Reviews of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip from India: U.S. Customs Entries from December 2009 to present
(April 13, 2011). Petitioners and SRF filed comments on the CBP data on
April 18, 2011.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip,
whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer
more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET Film are classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item
number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order
is dispositive.
Bona Fide Analysis of U.S. Sale
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that SRF's U.S. sale was
a bona fide transaction. See Memorandum from Toni Page, International
Trade Analyst Regarding: Bona Fide Nature of the Sale in the
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip from India: SRF Limited (December 21, 2010). The
Department also stated it would continue to examine, through the
remainder of the review, all factors relating to the bona fide analysis
of the sale. We have further examined the bona fide nature of SRF's
U.S. sale and, for these final results, we continue to find the sale to
be bona fide. For further details, see Memorandum to File from Toni
Page, International Trade Analyst, Bona Fide Analysis of SRF's Sale in
the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, dated concurrently with this notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal brief by parties
to this new shipper review are addressed in Memorandum from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of New Shipper Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India (May 20, 2011) (Issues and
Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the comments raised in the briefs and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of
the main Department building, and can be accessed directly on the Web
at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from SRF, we have made a change to
the margin calculations used in the Preliminary Results. As discussed
in Comment 1 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, the
sum of the export subsidy rates calculated in the companion
countervailing duty new shipper review have been added to export price
for the purpose of calculating the antidumping margin for these final
results.
Final Results of New Shipper Review
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine that
the following weighted average dumping margin exists for the period
July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Manufacturer/exporter average margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRF Limited............................................ 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 30910]]
Disclosure
The Department will disclose to parties the calculations performed
in connection with these final results within five days of the date of
public announcement. See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment and Cash Deposit Instructions
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of these final results of review to
liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF
and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, without regard to antidumping
duties.
The Department intends to also instruct CBP that the cash deposit
rate for SRF is zero percent ad valorem of the entered value on
shipments of the subject merchandise produced and exported by SRF, and
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication of the final results of this new shipper review.
Further, effective upon publication of the final results of this
new shipper review, we intend to instruct CBP that importers may no
longer post a bond or other security in lieu of a cash deposit on
imports of PET Film from India, manufactured and exported by SRF. These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice. The cash deposit rates for all companies not covered by
this review are not changed by the results of this new shipper review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification
of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I
List of Issues Addressed In the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Adjust the Export Price in
the Antidumping Calculations by the Calculated Countervailing Duty
Rate
Comment 2: Whether SRF's Single Sale and its U.S. Customer Are
Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale
Comment 3: Whether the Price and Quantity of SRF's New Shipper Sale
Are Indicative of a Bona Fide Sale
Comment 4: Whether SRF's PET Film Entry Was Re-sold for a Profit
[FR Doc. 2011-13264 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P