In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation, 30968 [2011-13189]

Download as PDF 30968 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices order could impact United States consumers. Any submissions are due on June 6, 2011. Issued: May 23, 2011. By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–13188 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–760] In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 2, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Sharp Corporation of Japan (‘‘Sharp’’) that named as respondents: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan; AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas; BenQ America of Irvine, California; BenQ Corporation of jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 May 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 Taiwan; Haier America Trading LLC, of New York, New York; Haier Group Company of China; LG Electronics Inc. of South Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; SANYO Electric Co. of Japan; SANYO North America Corporation of San Diego, California; TCL Corporation of China; TTE Technology, Inc. d/b/a TCL America of Indianapolis, Indiana; and VIZIO, Inc. of Irvine, California. 76 FR 11512 (Mar. 2, 2011). The complaint alleged a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display (‘‘LCD’’) devices, products containing same, and methods for using same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,879,364; 7,304,626; 7,532,183; 7,283,192; 6,937,300; 7,057,689; and 7,838,881. On April 21, 2011, Sharp and the AU Optronics respondents (‘‘AUO’’) filed a joint motion for termination of the investigation on the basis of settlement and licensing agreements. No other party opposed the motion. The agreements call for Sharp and AUO to terminate the investigation and to dismiss parallel district court proceedings. The other respondents make or sell products that contain accused AUO LCD components, and the settlement between Sharp and AUO thereby resolved all disputes in the investigation. On May 3, 2011, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order No. 9). No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 23, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–13189 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to issuing PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2), authorizing the importation of such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing. Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on March 14, 2011, Almac Clinical Services Inc. (ACSI), 25 Fretz Road, Souderton, Pennsylvania 18964, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug Schedule Oxycodone (9143) ........................ Hydromorphone (9150) ................ Tapentadol (9780) ........................ Fentanyl (9801) ............................ II II II II The company plans to import small quantities of the listed controlled substances in dosage form to conduct clinical trials. Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, registered with DEA to manufacture such basic classes of controlled substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43, and in such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47. Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 27, 2011. This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on September 23, 1975, 40 FR 43745–46, all applicants for registration to import the basic class of any controlled substance in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied. E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 30968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-760]


In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products 
Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of Commission 
Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 9) granting a 
joint motion to terminate the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 2, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Sharp Corporation of 
Japan (``Sharp'') that named as respondents: AU Optronics Corp. of 
Taiwan; AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas; BenQ 
America of Irvine, California; BenQ Corporation of Taiwan; Haier 
America Trading LLC, of New York, New York; Haier Group Company of 
China; LG Electronics Inc. of South Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. 
of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; SANYO Electric Co. of Japan; SANYO 
North America Corporation of San Diego, California; TCL Corporation of 
China; TTE Technology, Inc. d/b/a TCL America of Indianapolis, Indiana; 
and VIZIO, Inc. of Irvine, California. 76 FR 11512 (Mar. 2, 2011). The 
complaint alleged a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation, 
and sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid 
crystal display (``LCD'') devices, products containing same, and 
methods for using same by reason of the infringement of certain claims 
of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,879,364; 7,304,626; 7,532,183; 7,283,192; 
6,937,300; 7,057,689; and 7,838,881.
    On April 21, 2011, Sharp and the AU Optronics respondents (``AUO'') 
filed a joint motion for termination of the investigation on the basis 
of settlement and licensing agreements. No other party opposed the 
motion. The agreements call for Sharp and AUO to terminate the 
investigation and to dismiss parallel district court proceedings. The 
other respondents make or sell products that contain accused AUO LCD 
components, and the settlement between Sharp and AUO thereby resolved 
all disputes in the investigation.
    On May 3, 2011, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order No. 9).
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 23, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-13189 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P