Orange Juice From Brazil; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct a Full Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Orderon Orange Juice From Brazil, 30197 [2011-12673]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Notices jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2807’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 18, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–12671 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:47 May 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 30197 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s web site. [Investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Review)] Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Orange Juice From Brazil; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct a Full Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Orderon Orange Juice From Brazil United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orderon orange juice from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 9, 2011, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (76 FR 5822, February 2, 2011) were adequate.A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the By order of the Commission. Issued: May 18, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–12673 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under The Clean Air Act Notice is hereby given that on May 4, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree (‘‘Decree’’) in United States v. Rocky Mountain Pipeline System, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 11–CV–1188RPM–CBS was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The Decree between the United States and Rocky Mountain Pipeline System, LLC, Western Convenience Stores, Inc., and Offen Petroleum, Inc. (collectively, the ‘‘Defendants’’) resolves claims asserted in a simultaneously filed complaint brought pursuant to Section 211(d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7545(d), for alleged violations of Section 211 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545, and regulations promulgated thereunder at 40 CFR Part 80 (‘‘Fuels Regulations’’) and 40 CFR Part 79 (‘‘Registration Regulations’’). In it’s complaint the United States alleges that the Defendants are all refiners that produced gasoline by sequentially blending natural gasoline with previously certified gasoline and ethanol in tank trucks. Further the United States alleges that the Defendants’ blending operations violated the Fuels Regulations and Registration Regulations by failing to comply with the sampling, testing, record keeping and reporting requirements of those regulations and by producing and distributing gasoline that exceeded the applicable Reid Vapor Pressure standards. The proposed Decree requires the Defendants to implement an environmental mitigation project, take actions to prevent future violations of the Fuel and Registration Regulations, and pay a civil penalty of $2.5 million. The environmental mitigation project requires Rocky Mountain Pipeline System to installation a domed cover on an existing fuel storage tank at its Dupont Terminal. The cover will significantly E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 30197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1089 (Review)]


Orange Juice From Brazil; Notice of Commission Determination To 
Conduct a Full Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Orderon 
Orange Juice From Brazil

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping 
duty orderon orange juice from Brazil would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and 
announced at a later date. For further information concerning the 
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 
CFR part 207).

DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 9, 2011, the Commission determined 
that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review 
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that 
both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to 
its notice of institution (76 FR 5822, February 2, 2011) were 
adequate.A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's web site.

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: May 18, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-12673 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P