In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination; Issuance of a Consent Order; and Termination of the Investigation, 28457-28458 [2011-11450]

Download as PDF Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Notices (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2804’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)). Issued: May 11, 2011. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:27 May 16, 2011 Jkt 223001 By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–11982 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–731] In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination; Issuance of a Consent Order; and Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 11) granting Complainants’ and Respondents’ joint motion to terminate the investigation based upon entry of a consent order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on July 30, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York; and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (collectively, ‘‘Canon’’) on June 28, 2010. 75 FR 44988 (July 30, 2010). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28457 sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain toner cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,903,803 and 6,128,454. The complaint named as respondents Ninestar Image Int’l, Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Ninestar Management Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Zhuhai Seine Technology Co. of Zhuhai, China; Seine Image Int’l Co. of Shatin, Hong Kong; Ninestar Image Co., Ltd. of Shatin, Hong Kong; Ziprint Image Corp. of Walnut, California; Nano Pacific Corp. of South San Francisco, California; Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd. of City of Industry, California; Town Sky, Inc. of South San Francisco, California; ACM Technologies, Inc. of Corona, California; LD Products, Inc. of Long Beach, California; Printer Essentials.com, Inc. of Reno, Nevada; XSE Group, Inc., d/b/ a Image Star of Middletown, Connecticut; Copy Technologies, Inc., d/b/a ITM Corporation of Atlanta, Georgia; Red Powers, Inc., d/b/a LaptopTraveller.com of Alhambra, California; Direct Billing International, Inc., d/b/a OfficeSupplyOutfitters.com of Carlsbad, California; Compu-Imaging, Inc. of Doral, Florida; EIS Office Solutions, Inc. of Houston, Texas; and 123 Refills, Inc. of Irwindale, California (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). On April 6, 2011, Canon and Respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon entry of a consent order. On April 7, 2011, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion. No other responses to the motion were filed. On April 8, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety. The ALJ found that the consent order stipulation complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(c)(3) (19 CFR 210.21(c)(3)) and would not be contrary to the public interest. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID and to issue a consent order. Accordingly, this investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: May 5, 2011. E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1 28458 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Notices By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to the Commission. concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: [FR Doc. 2011–11450 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1103–0094] Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Comments Requested: Department Annual Progress Report 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review. Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48, Page 13435, on March 11, 2011, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days for public comment until June 16, 2011. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Ashley Hoornstra, Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 145 N Street, NE., Washington, DC 20530. Written comments concerning this information collection should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer. The best way to ensure your comments are received is to email them to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax them to 202–395–7285. All comments should reference the 8 digit OMB number for the collection or the title of the collection. If you have questions concerning the collection, please call Ashley Hoornstra at 202–616–1314 or the DOJ Desk Officer at 202–395–3176. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:21 May 16, 2011 Jkt 223001 Dated: May 11, 2011. Lynn Murray, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. [FR Doc. 2011–12024 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am] Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a previously approved collection; comments requested. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Department Annual Progress Report. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: None. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Law enforcement and public safety agencies that are recipients of COPS hiring grants. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is estimated that approximately 100 respondents can complete the report in an average of 1 hour. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: 100 total burden hours. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street, NE., Room 2E– 808, Washington, DC 20530. PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on May 11, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree (the ‘‘Decree’’) in United States v. SB Building Associates, Limited Partnership, SB Building GP, L.L.C., United States Land Resources, L.P., and United States Realty Resources, Inc., and 7.04 Acres of Land, More or Less, located within Block 58, Lot 1.03 of 2 through 130 Ford Avenue, Milltown, Middlesex County, New Jersey, Civil Action No. 3:08–cv–05298 (AET/LHG), was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Decree resolves the United States’ claims against the Defendants under Sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, as amended. Under the terms of the settlement, the United States will recover $300,000 for both past response costs incurred in a removal action at the Algro Knitting Mills Superfund Site in Milltown, Middlesex County, New Jersey, and stipulated penalties for Defendant SB Building, Limited Partnership’s failure to comply with an administrative order on consent with respect to the Site. The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Decree for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. SB Building Associates, Limited Partnership et al., D.J. Ref. 90– 11–3–09425. During the public comment period, the Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28457-28458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-731]


In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination; Issuance of a 
Consent Order; and Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 11) 
granting Complainants' and Respondents' joint motion to terminate the 
investigation based upon entry of a consent order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on July 30, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, 
Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York; and Canon 
Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (collectively, ``Canon'') on 
June 28, 2010. 75 FR 44988 (July 30, 2010). The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain toner 
cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of various 
claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,903,803 and 6,128,454. The 
complaint named as respondents Ninestar Image Int'l, Ltd. of Zhuhai, 
China; Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Ninestar 
Management Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Zhuhai Seine Technology Co. of 
Zhuhai, China; Seine Image Int'l Co. of Shatin, Hong Kong; Ninestar 
Image Co., Ltd. of Shatin, Hong Kong; Ziprint Image Corp. of Walnut, 
California; Nano Pacific Corp. of South San Francisco, California; 
Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd. of City of Industry, California; Town Sky, 
Inc. of South San Francisco, California; ACM Technologies, Inc. of 
Corona, California; LD Products, Inc. of Long Beach, California; 
Printer Essentials.com, Inc. of Reno, Nevada; XSE Group, Inc., d/b/a 
Image Star of Middletown, Connecticut; Copy Technologies, Inc., d/b/a 
ITM Corporation of Atlanta, Georgia; Red Powers, Inc., d/b/a 
LaptopTraveller.com of Alhambra, California; Direct Billing 
International, Inc., d/b/a OfficeSupplyOutfitters.com of Carlsbad, 
California; Compu-Imaging, Inc. of Doral, Florida; EIS Office 
Solutions, Inc. of Houston, Texas; and 123 Refills, Inc. of Irwindale, 
California (collectively, ``Respondents'').
    On April 6, 2011, Canon and Respondents filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon entry of a 
consent order. On April 7, 2011, the Commission investigative attorney 
filed a response in support of the joint motion. No other responses to 
the motion were filed.
    On April 8, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the joint 
motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety. The ALJ found 
that the consent order stipulation complied with the requirements of 
Commission Rule 210.21(c)(3) (19 CFR 210.21(c)(3)) and would not be 
contrary to the public interest. None of the parties petitioned for 
review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID and to issue a 
consent order. Accordingly, this investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    Issued: May 5, 2011.


[[Page 28458]]


    By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-11450 Filed 5-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P