Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Final Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 26694-26695 [2011-11259]

Download as PDF 26694 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 89 / Monday, May 9, 2011 / Notices separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 55.62 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This administrative review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: May 2, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–11253 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Naval Postgraduate School; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L 89–651, as amended by Pub. L 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 11–021. Applicant: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 15945, March 22, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:23 May 06, 2011 Jkt 223001 being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument. Dated: May 3, 2011. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–11252 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration UChicago Argonne, LLC, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 11–012. Applicant: UChicago Argonne, LLC, Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: TFS500 Atomic Layer Deposition System. Manufacturer: Beneq OY, Finland. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 15945, March 22, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as each is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: Pertinent characteristics of this instrument include its modular deposition chamber in order that the system can be reconfigured to optimize the coating process for different substrates. It also has a precursor delivery system that can be heated to 500 degrees Celsius to vaporize nonvolatile chemical precursors. Lastly, it is capable of inert gas purging between the deposition chamber and outer heating chambers to contain the precursors without the need for a gas-tight seal at this junction. Docket Number: 11–016. Applicant: UChicago Argonne, LLC, Lemont, IL 60439–4873. Instrument: Single Roll Presser. Manufacturer: A-Pro Co., Ltd., PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 South Korea. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 15945, March 22, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as each is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument is unique in that it is semi-automated with a high attention to dimensional tolerances, temperature control and safety, which ensures that the research cells made will be of industrial level quality and consistency. Docket Number: 11–018. Applicant: Purdue University, Birck Nanotechnology Center, West Lafayette, IN 47907–2057. Instrument: Rapid Thermal Annealer. Manufacturer: Quailflow Jipelec, France. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 15945, March 22, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as each is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: Key characteristics of this instrument include a temperature ramp rate of 300 degrees Celsius per second, vacuum purge capability and contamination control. Dated: May 3, 2011. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–11250 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–821] Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Final Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Room 4014, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM 09MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 89 / Monday, May 9, 2011 / Notices WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Background On December 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 74682 (December 1, 2010). On January 3, 2011, we received from United States Steel Corporation, a domestic producer of subject merchandise, a request for the Department to conduct an administrative review of Ispat Industries Limited (Ispat), for the period of review (POR) of January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. On January 28, 2011, the Department published the notice of initiation of the administrative review of the CVD order covering Ispat for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 76 FR 5137 (January 28, 2011). On February 4, 2011, Ispat notified the Department that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.1 We conducted an internal customs data query on February 7, 2011.2 We also issued a ‘‘no shipments inquiry’’ message to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which posted the message on February 16, 2011.3 The results of the customs data query indicated that Ispat had no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. We did not receive any information from CBP contrary to Ispat’s claim of no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. On March 21, 2011, we published the notice of preliminary rescission of this CVD administrative review with respect to Ispat, and provided interested parties with 20 days to comment. See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Preliminary Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 15299 (March 21, 2011) (Preliminary Rescission). The 1 This public document is available on the public file in the Department’s Central Record Unit (CRU) located in room 7046 of the main Commerce building. 2 See Memorandum to the File from Kristen Johnson, Case Analyst, IA Operations, Office 3, regarding ‘‘Customs Data Query Results,’’ (February 8, 2011). A public version of this memorandum is available on the public file in the CRU. 3 See Message number 1047301, available at https://addcvd.cbp.gov. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:23 May 06, 2011 Jkt 223001 Department received no comments on its intent to rescind the review. Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind an administrative review, with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if the Secretary concludes that, during the period covered by the review, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise to the United States by that producer or exporter. Based on our analysis of the shipment data, we determine that Ispat did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our practice,4 we are rescinding the review for Ispat. Since Ispat is the only producer/ exporter for which a review was requested and initiated, we are also rescinding, in whole, the administrative review of this CVD order for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3) of the Department’s regulations, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation that is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: May 4, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–11259 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 4 See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, In Part, 74 FR 47921 (September 18, 2009). PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26695 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. AGENCY: The Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee (RE&EEAC) will meet to hear briefings on the state of renewable energy finance and to discuss the development of recommendations on increasing the international competitiveness of U.S. exports. SUMMARY: May 31, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST), and June 1, 2011, from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. EST. ADDRESSES: Please note: The meetings will be held at two different locations: May 31st: Citigroup, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10013. June 1st: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, and Flom, 4 Times Square, New York, NY 10036. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian O’Hanlon, Office of Energy and Environmental Technologies Industries (OEEI), International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482–3492; e-mail: brian.ohanlon@trade.gov. This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to OEEI at (202) 482– 3492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Secretary of Commerce established the RE&EEAC pursuant to his discretionary authority and in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) on July 14, 2010. The RE&EEAC provides the Secretary of Commerce with consensus advice from the private sector on the development and administration of programs and policies to expand the international competitiveness of the U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency industries. The RE&EEAC held its first meeting on December 7, 2010, and a subsequent meeting on March 1, 2010. The meeting is open to the public and the room is disabled-accessible. Public seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must notify Brian O’Hanlon at the contact information above by 5 p.m. EST on Thursday, May 26, in order to DATES: E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM 09MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26694-26695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-821]


Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Final 
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., 
Room 4014, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 26695]]

Background

    On December 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review 
of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain hot-rolled carbon 
steel flat products from India. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 
Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request 
Administrative Review, 75 FR 74682 (December 1, 2010). On January 3, 
2011, we received from United States Steel Corporation, a domestic 
producer of subject merchandise, a request for the Department to 
conduct an administrative review of Ispat Industries Limited (Ispat), 
for the period of review (POR) of January 1, 2010, through December 31, 
2010.
    On January 28, 2011, the Department published the notice of 
initiation of the administrative review of the CVD order covering Ispat 
for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. See 
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews, 76 FR 5137 (January 28, 2011). On February 4, 2011, Ispat 
notified the Department that it had no shipments of subject merchandise 
to the United States during the POR.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This public document is available on the public file in the 
Department's Central Record Unit (CRU) located in room 7046 of the 
main Commerce building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We conducted an internal customs data query on February 7, 2011.\2\ 
We also issued a ``no shipments inquiry'' message to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP), which posted the message on February 16, 
2011.\3\ The results of the customs data query indicated that Ispat had 
no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise to the United 
States during the POR. We did not receive any information from CBP 
contrary to Ispat's claim of no sales, shipments, or entries of subject 
merchandise to the United States during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum to the File from Kristen Johnson, Case 
Analyst, IA Operations, Office 3, regarding ``Customs Data Query 
Results,'' (February 8, 2011). A public version of this memorandum 
is available on the public file in the CRU.
    \3\ See Message number 1047301, available at https://addcvd.cbp.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 21, 2011, we published the notice of preliminary 
rescission of this CVD administrative review with respect to Ispat, and 
provided interested parties with 20 days to comment. See Certain Hot-
Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Preliminary Rescission of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 15299 (March 21, 2011) 
(Preliminary Rescission). The Department received no comments on its 
intent to rescind the review.

Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind an 
administrative review, with respect to a particular exporter or 
producer, if the Secretary concludes that, during the period covered by 
the review, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject 
merchandise to the United States by that producer or exporter.
    Based on our analysis of the shipment data, we determine that Ispat 
did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. 
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with 
our practice,\4\ we are rescinding the review for Ispat. Since Ispat is 
the only producer/exporter for which a review was requested and 
initiated, we are also rescinding, in whole, the administrative review 
of this CVD order for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 
2010. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube from 
Turkey: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review, In Part, 74 FR 47921 (September 18, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's 
regulations, which continues to govern business proprietary information 
in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the 
return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation that is subject to 
sanction.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 
CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: May 4, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-11259 Filed 5-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.