In the Matter of Certain Handbags, Luggage, Accessories, and Packaging Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Substitute Respondents and To Add Respondents, 24522 [2011-10551]

Download as PDF 24522 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the Domestic Market Area or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2005, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced by the Domestic Industry, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: April 25, 2011. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–10280 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6 [Investigation No. 337–TA–754] In the Matter of Certain Handbags, Luggage, Accessories, and Packaging Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Substitute Respondents and To Add Respondents U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Apr 29, 2011 Jkt 223001 Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 5, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. of Paris, France and Louis Vuitton U.S. Manufacturing, Inc., San Dimas, California (collectively ‘‘Louis Vuitton’’), based on an Amended Complaint filed December 10, 2010, alleging violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain handbags, luggage, accessories, and packaging thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 297,594; 1,643,625; 1,653,663; 1,875,198; 2,773,107; 2,177,828; 2,181,753; and 1,519,828. 76 FR 585–6 (Jan. 5, 2011). The complainant named as respondents T&T Handbag Industrial Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China; Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China; Meada Corporation (d/b/a/Diophy Internation) of El Monte, California (‘‘Meada’’); Pacpro, Inc. of El Monte, California; Jianyong Zheng (a/k/a/Jui Go Zheng, Jiu An Zheng, Jian Yong Zheng, Peter Zheng) of Arcadia, California; Alice Bei Wang (a/k/a Alice B. Wang) of Arcadia, California (‘‘Alice B. Wang’’); Trendy Creations, Inc. of Chatsworth, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 California; The Inspired Bagger of Dallas, Texas; House of Bags of Los Angeles, California; Ronett Trading, Inc. (d/b/a/Ronett Wholesale & Import) of New York, New York; EZ Shine Group, Inc. of New York, New York; Master of Handbags of Los Angeles, California; Choicehandbags.com, Inc. (d/b/a/Choice Handbags) of Los Angeles, California; and Rasul Enterprises, LLC (d/b/a/The Handbag Warehouse) of Dallas, Texas. On March 24, 2011, Louis Vuitton filed a motion for leave to amend the Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation for the following reasons: (1) To add Jiu An Zheng and Jiu Gao Zheng in place of Jianyong Zhen; (2) to add Rimen Leather Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Rimen Leather Goods Company Limited, and Guangzhou Rui Ma Leatherware Co., Ltd., in place of Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd.; and (3) to add Monhill, Inc. and Zhixian Lu as respondents. On April 1, 2011, respondents Meada and Alice B. Wang filed a response opposing the motion. No other party filed a response. On April 11, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Louis Vuitton’s motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)). No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 27, 2011. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–10551 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Filing of Settlement Agreement Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Notice is hereby given that on or about April 25, 2011, a proposed Settlement Agreement in In re: Old AII, Inc. (f/k/a Aleris International, Inc.) et al., Case No. 09–10478 (BLS), was lodged pursuant to Fed. R. Bank. Proc. 9019 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The proposed Settlement Agreement resolves a claim asserted in this Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding by the United E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 24522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [Investigation No. 337-TA-754]


 In the Matter of Certain Handbags, Luggage, Accessories, and 
Packaging Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Motion To Amend the 
Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Substitute Respondents and To 
Add Respondents

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 6) 
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 5, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Louis Vuitton 
Malletier S.A. of Paris, France and Louis Vuitton U.S. Manufacturing, 
Inc., San Dimas, California (collectively ``Louis Vuitton''), based on 
an Amended Complaint filed December 10, 2010, alleging violations of 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain handbags, 
luggage, accessories, and packaging thereof by reason of infringement 
of certain claims of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 297,594; 
1,643,625; 1,653,663; 1,875,198; 2,773,107; 2,177,828; 2,181,753; and 
1,519,828. 76 FR 585-6 (Jan. 5, 2011). The complainant named as 
respondents T&T Handbag Industrial Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China; 
Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China; Meada Corporation (d/b/a/
Diophy Internation) of El Monte, California (``Meada''); Pacpro, Inc. 
of El Monte, California; Jianyong Zheng (a/k/a/Jui Go Zheng, Jiu An 
Zheng, Jian Yong Zheng, Peter Zheng) of Arcadia, California; Alice Bei 
Wang (a/k/a Alice B. Wang) of Arcadia, California (``Alice B. Wang''); 
Trendy Creations, Inc. of Chatsworth, California; The Inspired Bagger 
of Dallas, Texas; House of Bags of Los Angeles, California; Ronett 
Trading, Inc. (d/b/a/Ronett Wholesale & Import) of New York, New York; 
EZ Shine Group, Inc. of New York, New York; Master of Handbags of Los 
Angeles, California; Choicehandbags.com, Inc. (d/b/a/Choice Handbags) 
of Los Angeles, California; and Rasul Enterprises, LLC (d/b/a/The 
Handbag Warehouse) of Dallas, Texas.
    On March 24, 2011, Louis Vuitton filed a motion for leave to amend 
the Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation for the following 
reasons: (1) To add Jiu An Zheng and Jiu Gao Zheng in place of Jianyong 
Zhen; (2) to add Rimen Leather Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Rimen Leather Goods 
Company Limited, and Guangzhou Rui Ma Leatherware Co., Ltd., in place 
of Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd.; and (3) to add Monhill, Inc. and Zhixian 
Lu as respondents. On April 1, 2011, respondents Meada and Alice B. 
Wang filed a response opposing the motion. No other party filed a 
response.
    On April 11, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Louis 
Vuitton's motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 
210.14(b)). No petitions for review of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: April 27, 2011.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-10551 Filed 4-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P