Meeting To Review and Solicit Input on Tests for Inclusion in the Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program, 23992-23993 [2011-10436]
Download as PDF
23992
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
than 5 p.m., on the above-referenced
deadline date.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–10424 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Meeting To Review and Solicit Input on
Tests for Inclusion in the Project 25
Compliance Assessment Program
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Commerce’s (DOC) National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), Law
Enforcement Standards Office (OLES),
in partnership with the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) Office for
Interoperability and Compatibility
(OIC), will hold a public meeting on
May 13, 2011, via teleconference. The
purpose of the meeting is to gather input
for the development of conformance and
interoperability tests for select Project
25 (P25) conventional mode features
and functionalities. These tests are
developed for the DHS/OIC P25
Compliance Assessment Program (CAP)
Governing Board (GB) and will be
incorporated into P25 CAP Compliance
Assessment Bulletins (CABs).
DATES: The meeting will be held via
teleconference at 1 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Time on Friday, May 13, 2011.
Members of the public wishing to attend
the meeting must register by Friday,
May 6, 2011. Please see registration
instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dereck Orr, Department of Commerce,
NIST, 300 Broadway St., Boulder, CO
80305. Telephone: (303) 497–5400. Email: dereck.orr@nist.gov. More
information about DHS/OIC can be
found at https://
www.safecomprogram.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Emergency responders—emergency
medical technicians, fire personnel, and
law enforcement officers—need to
seamlessly exchange communications
across disciplines and jurisdictions in
order to successfully respond to day-today incidents and large-scale
emergencies. P25 focuses on developing
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
standards that allow radios and other
components to interoperate, regardless
of the manufacturer. In turn, these
standards enable emergency responders
to seamlessly exchange critical
communications with other disciplines
and jurisdictions.
An initial goal of P25 is to specify
formal standards for interfaces between
the components of a land mobile radio
(LMR) system. LMR systems are
commonly used by emergency
responders in portable handheld and
mobile vehicle-mounted devices.
Although formal standards are being
developed, no process is currently in
place to confirm that LMR equipment
advertised as P25-compliant meets all
aspects of P25 standards.
To address discrepancies between P25
standards and industry equipment, DHS
and NIST established the P25 CAP. The
P25 CAP is a partnership between the
DHS/OIC; NIST; industry; and the
emergency response community.
The P25 CAP provides an
independent process for evaluating P25
equipment for standards compliance
and interoperability across
manufacturers. By providing
manufacturers with a method to
consistently test their equipment for
compliance with P25 standards and
consistently report the results of such
testing, the P25 CAP helps emergency
response officials make informed
purchasing decisions.
The P25 CAP requires test laboratories
to demonstrate their competence
through a rigorous and objective
assessment process. Such a process
promotes the user community’s
confidence in, and acceptance of, test
results from DHS-recognized
laboratories. All equipment suppliers
that participate in the P25 CAP must use
recognized laboratories to conduct
performance, conformance, and
interoperability tests on their products.
P25 equipment suppliers will release
Summary Test Reports and Suppliers’
Declarations of Compliance based on
testing from laboratories recognized by
DHS.
Created by DHS/OIC, CABs describe
how the P25 CAP operates and address
issues related to the Program. The scope
of a CAB can range from policy to
guidance, covering issues such as
specific test standards to be used for a
particular P25 interface, or P25 LMR
Request for Proposal guidance.
The purpose of the meeting is to
gather input for the development of
conformance and interoperability tests
for select P25 conventional mode
features and functionalities. These tests
are developed for the DHS/OIC Project
25 (P25) Compliance Assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Program (CAP) Governing Board (GB)
and will be incorporated into P25 CAP
Compliance Assessment Bulletins
(CABs).
At the meeting, NIST will accept
input on conformance or
interoperability tests, or both, for the
following, prioritized features and
functionalities:
• Conventional squelch.
• Emergency alarm.
• Emergency group voice call.
• Group voice call.
• Radio unit monitoring.
• Transport of Talking Party
Identification.
• Late Entry.
• Location Services.
• Radio unit inhibit/uninhibit.
• Unaddressed voice call.
• Encryption.
• Over The Air Rekeying (OTAR).
• Emergency Cancel.
• All Call.
At the May 13 meeting, NIST will also
solicit comments on what appropriate
criteria should be used for assessing a
conformance tests’ suitability for
inclusion in the P25 CAP. The following
criteria are provided as a basis for
comment:
• Does the conformance test limit
devices in the test environment to the
device under test and appropriate,
validated test equipment?
• Are all packet types tested that are
relevant to the functionality under test?
• Are all call/message types tested
relevant to the functionality under test?
• Is packet/message order checked
relevant to the functionality under test?
• Are all information and reserved
fields tested within message packets
relevant to the functionality under test?
• For all information fields relevant
to the feature under test, is a linearly
independent set of values used across
the entire allowable range?
• Where behavior of a product is
specified for parameter values outside of
the normal or permissible range, are
these values tested?
• Is timing between subsequent
packets identified?
• Is radio behavior checked if events
occur before/after time-out?
• Are repeater inbound and outbound
packets ‘‘paired’’ and timing relationship
between the two quantified?
• Are all of the different
combinations of status bits tested where
relevant to a feature under test?
• Does the test standard define the
detailed procedural steps necessary for
a test operator to perform the test
consistently across multiple
laboratories?
Additionally, NIST is seeking
comment on what appropriate criteria
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
should be used for assessing an
interoperability tests’ suitability for
inclusion in the P25 CAP. The following
criteria are provided as a basis for
comment:
• For all information fields relevant
to the feature under test, is a linearly
independent set of values used across
the entire allowable range?
• Is timing between subsequent
packets identified related to
transmission or reception of voice or
message/alarm examined?
• Can functionality already be tested
using other P25 CAP-recognized testing
criteria?
• Does the interoperability test
procedure address and test adverse
responses due to configurations of
parameter values outside the normal or
permissible range?
• Does the test procedure
accommodate evaluation of a test
article’s behavior where multiple
defined responses are possible?
• If capable, does each unit under test
perform the roles of both transmitter
and receiver during the test?
• Does the test provide definitive
predictive outcomes (behaviors) for all
articles under test?
More information about the P25 CAP
is available at https://
www.safecomprogram.gov. More
information about NIST/OLES can be
found at https://www.nist.gov/oles/.
Registration: Anyone wishing to
attend this teleconference must express
interest by the close of business on
Friday, May 6, 2011. Please submit your
name, e-mail address, and phone
number to Corey Reynolds,
creynolds@corneralliance.com, and he
will provide logistics information for
the call.
To be considered at the meeting,
written comments and input on the
features and functionalities and
conformance and interoperability test
criteria should be submitted to Corey
Reynolds,
creynolds@corneralliance.com by
Friday, May 6, 2011. Verbal comments
will also be heard at the teleconference.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Katharine B. Gebbie,
Director, Physical Measurement Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2011–10436 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Alaska Individual
Fishing Quotas (IFQs) for Pacific
Halibut and Sablefish
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
ACTION: Notice (renewal of a currently
approved information collection).
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before June 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Patsy A. Bearden, (907) 586–
7008 or patsy.bearden@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
This request is for renewal of a
currently approved information
collection.
The Pacific Halibut and Sablefish
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program
was developed to reduce fishing
capacity that had increased during years
of management as an open access
fishery, while maintaining the social
and economic character of the fixed gear
fishery that is relied on as a source of
revenue for coastal communities in
Alaska. The Halibut and Sablefish IFQ
Program provides economic stability for
the commercial hook-and-line fishery
while reducing many of the
conservation and management problems
commonly associated with open access.
The IFQ Program for sablefish and
Pacific halibut fixed gear provides each
fisherman a catch quota that can be used
any time during the open season.
Individual shares are intended to allow
fishermen to set their own pace and
adjust their fishing effort. The IFQ
Program is intended to reduce the
premium that was traditionally placed
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23993
on speed, allowing fishermen to pay
more attention to efficiency and product
quality. The IFQ Program consists of
three parts: IFQ halibut and sablefish,
Western Alaska Community
Development Quota (CDQ) halibut, and
Gulf of Alaska (GOA) IFQ community
quota share. This action is a request for
renewal for the collection-ofinformation.
II. Method of Collection
Respondents have a choice of either
electronic or paper forms. Methods of
submittal include e-mail of electronic
forms, and mail and facsimile
transmission of paper forms.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0272.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(renewal of a currently approved
collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,478.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours
for Eligibility to Receive QS/IFQ
Application; 30 minutes for IFQ/CDQ
Hired Master Permit Application; 30
minutes for IFQ/CDQ Registered Buyer
Permit Application; 30 minutes for
Application for Replacement of
Certificates, Permits, or Licenses
Application; 200 hours for Application
to Become a Community Quota Entity
(CQE); 10 hours for Community Petition
to Form Governing Body; 2 hours for
Transfer of QS/IFQ Application; 2 hours
for Transfer of QS/IFQ by Sweep-up
Application; 2 hours for Transfer of QS/
IFQ to or from a CQE Application; 30
minutes for Approval of Transfer from
Governing Body; 2 hours for QS
Holder—Identification of Ownership
Interest; 40 hours for CQE Annual
Report; 4 hours for Letter of Appeal; 30
minutes for QS/IFQ Beneficiary
Designation Form; 30 minutes for
Annual Updates on the Status of
Corporations and Partnerships QS; 6
minutes for IFQ Administrative Waiver;
12 minutes for Prior Notice of IFQ
Landing; 15 minutes for Departure
Report; 12 minutes for Transshipment
Authorization; and 6 minutes for
Dockside Sales Receipt; 18 minutes for
Electronic Landing Report; 18 minutes
for Manual Landing Report; 2 hours for
Military Transfer; 4 hours for Military
Transfer Appeal; 2 hours for Emergency
Medical Transfer; and 4 hours for
Emergency Medical Transfer.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 20,388.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23992-23993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10436]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Meeting To Review and Solicit Input on Tests for Inclusion in the
Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce's (DOC) National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), Law Enforcement Standards Office
(OLES), in partnership with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Office for Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC), will hold a
public meeting on May 13, 2011, via teleconference. The purpose of the
meeting is to gather input for the development of conformance and
interoperability tests for select Project 25 (P25) conventional mode
features and functionalities. These tests are developed for the DHS/OIC
P25 Compliance Assessment Program (CAP) Governing Board (GB) and will
be incorporated into P25 CAP Compliance Assessment Bulletins (CABs).
DATES: The meeting will be held via teleconference at 1 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Time on Friday, May 13, 2011. Members of the public wishing to
attend the meeting must register by Friday, May 6, 2011. Please see
registration instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dereck Orr, Department of Commerce,
NIST, 300 Broadway St., Boulder, CO 80305. Telephone: (303) 497-5400.
E-mail: dereck.orr@nist.gov. More information about DHS/OIC can be
found at https://www.safecomprogram.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Emergency responders--emergency medical
technicians, fire personnel, and law enforcement officers--need to
seamlessly exchange communications across disciplines and jurisdictions
in order to successfully respond to day-to-day incidents and large-
scale emergencies. P25 focuses on developing standards that allow
radios and other components to interoperate, regardless of the
manufacturer. In turn, these standards enable emergency responders to
seamlessly exchange critical communications with other disciplines and
jurisdictions.
An initial goal of P25 is to specify formal standards for
interfaces between the components of a land mobile radio (LMR) system.
LMR systems are commonly used by emergency responders in portable
handheld and mobile vehicle-mounted devices. Although formal standards
are being developed, no process is currently in place to confirm that
LMR equipment advertised as P25-compliant meets all aspects of P25
standards.
To address discrepancies between P25 standards and industry
equipment, DHS and NIST established the P25 CAP. The P25 CAP is a
partnership between the DHS/OIC; NIST; industry; and the emergency
response community.
The P25 CAP provides an independent process for evaluating P25
equipment for standards compliance and interoperability across
manufacturers. By providing manufacturers with a method to consistently
test their equipment for compliance with P25 standards and consistently
report the results of such testing, the P25 CAP helps emergency
response officials make informed purchasing decisions.
The P25 CAP requires test laboratories to demonstrate their
competence through a rigorous and objective assessment process. Such a
process promotes the user community's confidence in, and acceptance of,
test results from DHS-recognized laboratories. All equipment suppliers
that participate in the P25 CAP must use recognized laboratories to
conduct performance, conformance, and interoperability tests on their
products. P25 equipment suppliers will release Summary Test Reports and
Suppliers' Declarations of Compliance based on testing from
laboratories recognized by DHS.
Created by DHS/OIC, CABs describe how the P25 CAP operates and
address issues related to the Program. The scope of a CAB can range
from policy to guidance, covering issues such as specific test
standards to be used for a particular P25 interface, or P25 LMR Request
for Proposal guidance.
The purpose of the meeting is to gather input for the development
of conformance and interoperability tests for select P25 conventional
mode features and functionalities. These tests are developed for the
DHS/OIC Project 25 (P25) Compliance Assessment Program (CAP) Governing
Board (GB) and will be incorporated into P25 CAP Compliance Assessment
Bulletins (CABs).
At the meeting, NIST will accept input on conformance or
interoperability tests, or both, for the following, prioritized
features and functionalities:
Conventional squelch.
Emergency alarm.
Emergency group voice call.
Group voice call.
Radio unit monitoring.
Transport of Talking Party Identification.
Late Entry.
Location Services.
Radio unit inhibit/uninhibit.
Unaddressed voice call.
Encryption.
Over The Air Rekeying (OTAR).
Emergency Cancel.
All Call.
At the May 13 meeting, NIST will also solicit comments on what
appropriate criteria should be used for assessing a conformance tests'
suitability for inclusion in the P25 CAP. The following criteria are
provided as a basis for comment:
Does the conformance test limit devices in the test
environment to the device under test and appropriate, validated test
equipment?
Are all packet types tested that are relevant to the
functionality under test?
Are all call/message types tested relevant to the
functionality under test?
Is packet/message order checked relevant to the
functionality under test?
Are all information and reserved fields tested within
message packets relevant to the functionality under test?
For all information fields relevant to the feature under
test, is a linearly independent set of values used across the entire
allowable range?
Where behavior of a product is specified for parameter
values outside of the normal or permissible range, are these values
tested?
Is timing between subsequent packets identified?
Is radio behavior checked if events occur before/after
time-out?
Are repeater inbound and outbound packets ``paired'' and
timing relationship between the two quantified?
Are all of the different combinations of status bits
tested where relevant to a feature under test?
Does the test standard define the detailed procedural
steps necessary for a test operator to perform the test consistently
across multiple laboratories?
Additionally, NIST is seeking comment on what appropriate criteria
[[Page 23993]]
should be used for assessing an interoperability tests' suitability for
inclusion in the P25 CAP. The following criteria are provided as a
basis for comment:
For all information fields relevant to the feature under
test, is a linearly independent set of values used across the entire
allowable range?
Is timing between subsequent packets identified related to
transmission or reception of voice or message/alarm examined?
Can functionality already be tested using other P25 CAP-
recognized testing criteria?
Does the interoperability test procedure address and test
adverse responses due to configurations of parameter values outside the
normal or permissible range?
Does the test procedure accommodate evaluation of a test
article's behavior where multiple defined responses are possible?
If capable, does each unit under test perform the roles of
both transmitter and receiver during the test?
Does the test provide definitive predictive outcomes
(behaviors) for all articles under test?
More information about the P25 CAP is available at https://www.safecomprogram.gov. More information about NIST/OLES can be found
at https://www.nist.gov/oles/.
Registration: Anyone wishing to attend this teleconference must
express interest by the close of business on Friday, May 6, 2011.
Please submit your name, e-mail address, and phone number to Corey
Reynolds, creynolds@corneralliance.com, and he will provide logistics
information for the call.
To be considered at the meeting, written comments and input on the
features and functionalities and conformance and interoperability test
criteria should be submitted to Corey Reynolds,
creynolds@corneralliance.com by Friday, May 6, 2011. Verbal comments
will also be heard at the teleconference.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Katharine B. Gebbie,
Director, Physical Measurement Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2011-10436 Filed 4-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P