Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 72(d) Regarding Agency Cross Transactions, 24074-24076 [2011-10413]
Download as PDF
24074
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
representation.79 The Commission
believes that Phlx’s revised governing
documents, as proposed, will continue
to provide for the fair representation of
Phlx Members and Member
Organizations and also will provide
board qualification requirements that
are consistent with the Act and
consistent with those that have been
approved previously by the Commission
for NASDAQ.
The Commission finds that the
Exchange’s proposal to modify the
composition of Business Conduct
Committee is consistent with the Act.
The proposed revisions to the
composition of the Business Conduct
Committee will make it identical to the
composition of the equivalent NASDAQ
committee (the NASDAQ Review
Council).80 In particular, the Exchange
proposes to increase the number of NonIndustry and Member Representative
Directors on the committee as well as
require the Business Conduct
Committee to be comprised of a number
of Member Representative Directors that
equals at least 20% of the total number
of members of the committee.81
In addition, other proposed changes
to the Exchange’s committees will not
materially affect the compositional
requirements that are currently in place.
For example, the Quality of Markets and
Market Operations Review Committees
are currently, and will remain, subject
to the same compositional requirement
for Member Representative Directors,
and the Regulatory Oversight Committee
will continue to be comprised of Public
Directors. According to the Exchange,
these compositional requirements are
designed to foster the Exchange’s ability
to protect the public interest and foster
the integrity of the Exchange by bringing
a unique, unbiased perspective to these
committees and the work that they
perform. Among other things, the
Exchange intends for these changes to
increase representation of Non-Industry
Directors on the committees. The
Commission notes these proposed
changes are designed to align Phlx’s
compositional requirements with those
of its affiliated exchange, NASDAQ,
79 See NASDAQ Approval Order, supra note 71,
71 FR at 3553.
80 See id. at 3554 (‘‘The Commission believes that
[NASDAQ’s] proposed committees should enable it
to carry out its responsibilities under the Exchange
Act.’’). See also Notice, supra note 3, 76 FR at
12187.
81 Currently, the Business Conduct Committee is
required to have not less than one Member who
conducts options business at the Exchange, which
would provide less than 20% member
representation if the committee had more than five
members.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
which were previously approved by the
Commission.82
The Commission finds that the
Exchange’s proposal to eliminate FCO
Participations is also consistent with the
Act. Importantly, the Exchange
represents that it currently does not
have any persons who access the
Exchange’s FCO market exclusively
through an FCO Participation, as such
participations are no longer utilized on
the Exchange in light of the ability,
since the Exchange demutualized, of
any permit holder to trade FCO
Participations by means of a general allpurpose trading permit. As a result, the
Commission believes that the
elimination of FCO Participations will
not adversely impact the ability of
market participants to continue to
access and trade on the Exchange FCO
market.
The Commission believes that the
remaining revisions to the LLC
Agreement, By-Laws, Rules, Advices,
and Regulations, including those related
to the Exchange’s organizational
structure, renaming the Board of
Governors the Board of Directors, and
identifying NASDAQ OMX as the single
Stockholder, are consistent with the Act
and are designed to update the
Exchange’s governance process and
create equivalent governing standards
between Phlx and NASDAQ, which are
both controlled by NASDAQ OMX. The
proposed changes are designed to
conform certain Phlx provisions to more
closely parallel provisions maintained
by NASDAQ that were previously
approved by the Commission.
Finally, the Exchange’s proposed
conforming changes to various
provisions of the LLC Agreement, ByLaws, Rules, Advices, and Regulations
to amend cross references, update
terminology, and rename and renumber
sections are consistent with the Act and
are intended to make non-material
revisions to update and correct various
outdated references. For example, the
revisions to eliminate references to FCO
Participations and to XLE, as well as
other now-obsolete terms are reasonable
and are not intended to constitute a
material or substantive change to any
provision. The Commission finds that
these changes are technical in nature
and will provide clarity to the
Exchange’s LLC Agreement, By-Laws,
Rules, Advices, and Regulations.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,83 that the
82 See NASDAQ Approval Order, supra note 71,
71 FR at 3554.
83 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2011–
13), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.84
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–10362 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64335; File No. SR–
NYSEAmex–2011–25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Amex LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Rule 72(d)
Regarding Agency Cross Transactions
April 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 19,
2011, NYSE Amex LLC (‘‘NYSE Amex’’
or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities with
respect to agency cross transactions. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, at https://
www.nyse.com, at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room, and at https://
www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
84 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities with
respect to agency cross transactions.3
Under Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex
Equities, when a member 4 has an order
to buy and an order to sell an equivalent
amount of the same security, and both
orders are for 25,000 shares or more, the
member may ‘‘cross’’ those orders at a
price at or within the Exchange best bid
or offer and does not have to break up
the cross transaction to trade with any
bids or offers previously displayed at
the Exchange best bid or offer, including
any interest with priority (a ‘‘72(d)
crossing transaction’’).5 Rule 72(d)—
NYSE Amex Equities further provides
that a member can effect a 72(d)
crossing transaction only for the
accounts of persons who are not
members or member organizations.
Accordingly, a Floor broker cannot use
this provision for customers who are
unaffiliated NYSE Amex members or
member organizations.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities to
change the required minimum share
3 The provisions of Rule 72 are in effect during
a pilot set to end on August 1, 2011. See Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 58673 (September 29,
2008), 73 FR 57707 (October 3, 2008) (SR–NYSE–
2008–60 and SR–Amex–2008–62) (approving the
Exchange’s merger with the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’)) and 59022 (November 26,
2008), 73 FR 73683 (December 3, 2008) (SR–
NYSEALTR–2008–10) (conforming the Exchange’s
rules with those of NYSE, including establishing
the ‘‘New Market Model Pilot’’ or ‘‘Pilot’’). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 60758
(October 1, 2009), 74 FR 51639 (October 7, 2009)
(SR–NYSEAmex–2009–65) (extending Pilot to
November 30, 2009); 61030 (November 19, 2009),
74 FR 62365 (November 27, 2009) (SR–NYSEAmex–
2009–83) (extending Pilot to March 30, 2010);
61725 (March 17, 2010), 75 FR 14223 (March 24,
2010) (SR–NYSEAmex–2010–28) (extending Pilot to
September 30, 2010); 62820 (September 1, 2010), 75
FR 54935 (September 9, 2010) (SR–NYSEAmex–
2010–86) (extending Pilot to January 31, 2011); and
63620 (December 29, 2010), 76 FR 598 (January 5,
2011) (SR–NYSEAmex–2010–122) (extending Pilot
to August 1, 2011).
4 The reference to ‘‘member’’ in Rule 72(d)—NYSE
Amex Equities and this rule proposal means only
Floor broker members. Designated Market Makers
(‘‘DMMs’’), while members of the Exchange, do not
have any agency relationships, and are therefore not
able to effect this type of cross.
5 A transaction effected at the cross price in
reliance on Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities is
printed as a ‘‘stopped stock’’ to denote that the
transaction was outside of normal market
procedures. See Rule 128A.16—NYSE Amex
Equities. The Exchange notes that block-sized
crosses outside of the Exchange best bid or offer are
addressed under Rule 127—NYSE Amex Equities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
size from 25,000 and instead require
that both the order to buy and the order
to sell be ‘‘block’’ orders, which the
Exchange proposes to define for
purposes of Rule 72 as at least 10,000
shares or a quantity of stock having a
market value of $200,000 or more,
whichever is less.6 This proposed
change would more closely align agency
cross transactions with other ‘‘block’’
orders with respect to the minimum
applicable order size.7
The Exchange further proposes to
amend Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex
Equities to modify the current
restriction that a member may not effect
a 72(d) crossing transaction for the
account of a member or member
organization. The Exchange instead
proposes to conform Rule 72(d)—NYSE
Amex Equities to Rule 90—NYSE Amex
Equities, and restrict a member from
effecting a 72(d) crossing transaction for
the account of such member or member
organization, an account of an
associated person, or an account with
respect to which the member, member
organization or associated person
thereof exercises investment discretion.
This proposed change would enable
Floor brokers to effect 72(d) crossing
transactions on behalf of unaffiliated
members or member organizations.
The Exchange also proposes to update
a reference to the term ‘‘priority’’ within
Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities,
which currently provides that a member
who is providing a better price to one
side of the cross transaction must trade
with all other market interest having
priority at that price before trading with
any part of the cross transaction. The
Exchange proposes to modify this
requirement so that the member seeking
to provide price improvement must
instead trade with all other displayed
market interest on the Exchange at that
price before trading with the cross
transaction. The proposed change
would expand protection for interest on
the Display Book® 8 by requiring the
member who is providing price
improvement to trade not only with
6 The
Exchange proposes to include the ‘‘block’’
definition as new Supplementary Material .10 to
Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex Equities.
7 See, e.g., Rule 104—NYSE Amex Equities and
Rule 127—NYSE Amex Equities, which provide
that a ‘‘block’’ shall be at least 10,000 shares or a
quantity of stock having a market value of $200,000
or more, whichever is less.
8 The Display Book system is an order
management and execution facility. The Display
Book receives and displays orders to the DMMs,
contains order information and provides a
mechanism to execute and report transactions and
publish the results to the Consolidated Tape. The
Display Book is connected to a number of other
Exchange systems for the purposes of comparison,
surveillance and reporting information to customers
and other market data and national market systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24075
priority interest, but with all displayed
interest in the Display Book.9 The
Exchange proposes to similarly
incorporate this change in Example 1
within Rule 72(d)—NYSE Amex
Equities by deleting the clause related to
‘‘priority’’ and replacing it with a
reference to ‘‘displayed.’’
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
remove the reference to ‘‘prevailing
quotation’’ within Rule 72(d)—NYSE
Amex Equities and replace it with a
reference to the ‘‘Exchange best bid or
offer.’’ This change would provide
clarity regarding the price at which a
member could effect a 72(d) crossing
transaction, but does not alter the
meaning of the current rule or the
mechanics of a 72(d) crossing
transaction.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),10 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),11 in
particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
Specifically, the proposed rule change
would more closely align Rule 72(d)—
NYSE Amex Equities with other
Exchange rules concerning block-sized
orders and the accounts for which
agency orders may be crossed while also
expanding protection for interest on the
Display Book by requiring that such
interest must be executed before a
member could break up an agency cross.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
9 The Exchange notes that displayed interest does
not include the reserve portion of any orders on the
Display Book. This proposed amendment to Rule
72(d) does not change the obligation of the member
providing price improvement to comply with Rule
90.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
24076
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Number SR–NYSEAmex–2011–25 on
the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
[Release No. 34–64341; File No. SR–FINRA–
2011–017]
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.13 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 14 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),15 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–10413 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
Electronic Comments
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAmex–2011–25. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEAmex–2011–25 and should be
submitted on or before May 20, 2011.
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue
Allocations and Distributions)
April 26, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 18,
2011, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared substantially by FINRA. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations and
Distributions) to simplify the spinning
provision and to delay the
implementation date of paragraphs (b)
and (d)(4).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1. Purpose
On November 29, 2010, FINRA issued
Regulatory Notice 10–60 announcing
12 15
13 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
1 15
16 17
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24074-24076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-64335; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2011-25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 72(d)
Regarding Agency Cross Transactions
April 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 19, 2011, NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities with
respect to agency cross transactions. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, at https://www.nyse.com, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and at https://www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of
[[Page 24075]]
the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities with
respect to agency cross transactions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The provisions of Rule 72 are in effect during a pilot set
to end on August 1, 2011. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
58673 (September 29, 2008), 73 FR 57707 (October 3, 2008) (SR-NYSE-
2008-60 and SR-Amex-2008-62) (approving the Exchange's merger with
the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'')) and 59022 (November 26,
2008), 73 FR 73683 (December 3, 2008) (SR-NYSEALTR-2008-10)
(conforming the Exchange's rules with those of NYSE, including
establishing the ``New Market Model Pilot'' or ``Pilot''). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 60758 (October 1, 2009), 74 FR
51639 (October 7, 2009) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-65) (extending Pilot to
November 30, 2009); 61030 (November 19, 2009), 74 FR 62365 (November
27, 2009) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-83) (extending Pilot to March 30, 2010);
61725 (March 17, 2010), 75 FR 14223 (March 24, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-
2010-28) (extending Pilot to September 30, 2010); 62820 (September
1, 2010), 75 FR 54935 (September 9, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-86)
(extending Pilot to January 31, 2011); and 63620 (December 29,
2010), 76 FR 598 (January 5, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-122) (extending
Pilot to August 1, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities, when a member \4\ has an
order to buy and an order to sell an equivalent amount of the same
security, and both orders are for 25,000 shares or more, the member may
``cross'' those orders at a price at or within the Exchange best bid or
offer and does not have to break up the cross transaction to trade with
any bids or offers previously displayed at the Exchange best bid or
offer, including any interest with priority (a ``72(d) crossing
transaction'').\5\ Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities further provides that
a member can effect a 72(d) crossing transaction only for the accounts
of persons who are not members or member organizations. Accordingly, a
Floor broker cannot use this provision for customers who are
unaffiliated NYSE Amex members or member organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The reference to ``member'' in Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex
Equities and this rule proposal means only Floor broker members.
Designated Market Makers (``DMMs''), while members of the Exchange,
do not have any agency relationships, and are therefore not able to
effect this type of cross.
\5\ A transaction effected at the cross price in reliance on
Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities is printed as a ``stopped stock'' to
denote that the transaction was outside of normal market procedures.
See Rule 128A.16--NYSE Amex Equities. The Exchange notes that block-
sized crosses outside of the Exchange best bid or offer are
addressed under Rule 127--NYSE Amex Equities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities to
change the required minimum share size from 25,000 and instead require
that both the order to buy and the order to sell be ``block'' orders,
which the Exchange proposes to define for purposes of Rule 72 as at
least 10,000 shares or a quantity of stock having a market value of
$200,000 or more, whichever is less.\6\ This proposed change would more
closely align agency cross transactions with other ``block'' orders
with respect to the minimum applicable order size.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange proposes to include the ``block'' definition as
new Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities.
\7\ See, e.g., Rule 104--NYSE Amex Equities and Rule 127--NYSE
Amex Equities, which provide that a ``block'' shall be at least
10,000 shares or a quantity of stock having a market value of
$200,000 or more, whichever is less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further proposes to amend Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex
Equities to modify the current restriction that a member may not effect
a 72(d) crossing transaction for the account of a member or member
organization. The Exchange instead proposes to conform Rule 72(d)--NYSE
Amex Equities to Rule 90--NYSE Amex Equities, and restrict a member
from effecting a 72(d) crossing transaction for the account of such
member or member organization, an account of an associated person, or
an account with respect to which the member, member organization or
associated person thereof exercises investment discretion. This
proposed change would enable Floor brokers to effect 72(d) crossing
transactions on behalf of unaffiliated members or member organizations.
The Exchange also proposes to update a reference to the term
``priority'' within Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities, which currently
provides that a member who is providing a better price to one side of
the cross transaction must trade with all other market interest having
priority at that price before trading with any part of the cross
transaction. The Exchange proposes to modify this requirement so that
the member seeking to provide price improvement must instead trade with
all other displayed market interest on the Exchange at that price
before trading with the cross transaction. The proposed change would
expand protection for interest on the Display Book[supreg] \8\ by
requiring the member who is providing price improvement to trade not
only with priority interest, but with all displayed interest in the
Display Book.\9\ The Exchange proposes to similarly incorporate this
change in Example 1 within Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities by deleting
the clause related to ``priority'' and replacing it with a reference to
``displayed.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Display Book system is an order management and execution
facility. The Display Book receives and displays orders to the DMMs,
contains order information and provides a mechanism to execute and
report transactions and publish the results to the Consolidated
Tape. The Display Book is connected to a number of other Exchange
systems for the purposes of comparison, surveillance and reporting
information to customers and other market data and national market
systems.
\9\ The Exchange notes that displayed interest does not include
the reserve portion of any orders on the Display Book. This proposed
amendment to Rule 72(d) does not change the obligation of the member
providing price improvement to comply with Rule 90.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to remove the reference to
``prevailing quotation'' within Rule 72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities and
replace it with a reference to the ``Exchange best bid or offer.'' This
change would provide clarity regarding the price at which a member
could effect a 72(d) crossing transaction, but does not alter the
meaning of the current rule or the mechanics of a 72(d) crossing
transaction.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\11\ in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
Specifically, the proposed rule change would more closely align Rule
72(d)--NYSE Amex Equities with other Exchange rules concerning block-
sized orders and the accounts for which agency orders may be crossed
while also expanding protection for interest on the Display Book by
requiring that such interest must be executed before a member could
break up an agency cross.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
[[Page 24076]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\15\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-25 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-25. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2011-25 and should be submitted on or before May 20, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-10413 Filed 4-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P