In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Mobile Tablets, Portable Music Players, and Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 24051-24052 [2011-10348]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
written comments are being accepted
concerning the significance of the
nominated properties under the
National Register criteria for evaluation.
Comments may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington DC
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by May 16, 2011. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
MARYLAND
Carroll County
Koons, Jacob, Farm, 1151 Otterdale Mill Rd.,
Taneytown, 11000306
MASSACHUSETTS
Norfolk County
Fuller Brook Park, Dover Rd. to Maugus Ave.,
Wellesley, 11000307
MICHIGAN
Ontonagon County
Ontonagon School, 301 Greenland Rd.,
Ontonagon, 11000308
Wayne County
Detroit Yacht Club, 1 Riverbank Rd., Belle
Isle, Detroit, 11000309
PENNSYLVANIA
Philadelphia County
United States Custom House, 200 Chestnut
St., Philadelphia, 11000310
WISCONSIN
Waukesha County
Visitation Convent Complex, 13105
Watertown Plank Rd., Elm Grove,
11000311
[FR Doc. 2011–10346 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
ALABAMA
Montgomery County
Montgomery Greyhound Bus Station, 210 S.
Court St., Montgomery, 11000298
ARIZONA
Gordon House, 6225 N. Camino Escalante,
Tucson, 11000299
ARKANSAS
Faulkner County
Lasley’s College Apartments, 1916 & 1922
Bruce St., Conway, 11000300
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Logan County
Booneville Methodist Episcopal Church
South, 355 N. Broadway, Booneville,
11000301
Wingmead, W. side of AR 33, 1⁄2 mi. S. of
Eason Rd., Roe, 11000302
White County
Missouri Pacific Railway Caboose #928, Next
to UPRR on Market St., SW. of Vine St.,
Bald Knob, 11000303
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Woodruff County
Mathis—Hyde House, 400 N. 2nd St.,
Augusta, 11000304
CONNECTICUT
Hartford County
Freshwater Plantation, Bounded by Alden
Ave., Enfield & Franklin Sts. & Connecticut
R., Enfield, 11000305
Jkt 223001
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 28, 2011, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Nokia
Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of
White Plains, New York, and Intellisync
Corporation of White Plains, New York.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain electronic devices, including
mobile phones, mobile tablets, portable
music players, and computers, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,209,911 (‘‘the ‘911 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,212,529 (‘‘the ‘529
SUMMARY:
Prairie County
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
[Inv. No. 337–TA–771]
In the Matter of Certain Electronic
Devices, Including Mobile Phones,
Mobile Tablets, Portable Music
Players, and Computers, and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Institution of Investigation
Pima County
VerDate Mar<15>2010
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24051
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,141,664 (‘‘the
‘664 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,558,696
(‘‘the ‘696 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
6,445,932 (‘‘the ‘932 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 5,898,740 (‘‘the ‘740 patent’’);
and U.S. Patent No. 7,319,874 (‘‘the ‘874
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists or is in the process of being
established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 25, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain electronic
devices, including mobile phones,
mobile tablets, portable music players,
and computers, and components thereof
that infringe one or more of claims 1, 2,
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
24052
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices
5, 6, and 9–14 of the ‘911 patent; claims
1, 21, 25–27, 51, and 52 of the ‘529
patent; claims 3, 4, 21, 26, 28, 38, 43,
44, 61, 67, 68, 77, and 78 of the ‘664
patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 9, 11–14, 16, 18,
19, 21–23, and 25 of the ‘696 patent;
claims 1–3, 5, 9, and 15 of the ‘932
patent; claims 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the ‘740
patent; and claims 1–6, 8–15, and 21 of
the ‘874 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists or
is in the process of being established as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Nokia Corporation, Keilalahdentie 4,
(P.O. Box 226), FIN–00045 Nokia
Group, Espoo, Finland.
Nokia Inc., 102 Corporate Park Drive,
White Plains, NY 10604. Intellisync
Corporation, 102 Corporate Park
Drive, White Plains, NY 10604.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino,
CA 95014.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: April 25, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–10348 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–567]
In the Matter of Certain Foam
Footwear; Notice of Commission
Decision Not To Review a Remand
Initial Determination; Finding of a
Violation of Section 337; Request for
Written Submissions Regarding
Remedy, Bonding, and the Public
Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) remand initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) and has found a
violation of section 337 in the abovecaptioned investigation. The
Commission is requesting written
submissions regarding remedy, bonding,
and the public interest.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 11, 2006, based on a complaint,
as amended, filed by Crocs, Inc.
(‘‘Crocs’’) of Niwot, Colorado. 71 FR
27514–15 (May 11, 2006). The
complaint alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. CC1337), in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain foam footwear, by reason of
infringement of claims 1–2 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,993,858; U.S. Patent No.
D517,789; and the Crocs trade dress (the
image and overall appearance of Crocsbrand footwear). The complaint further
alleged that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337, and requested that
the Commission issue a permanent
general exclusion order and permanent
cease and desist orders. The complaint
named eleven (11) respondents that
included: (1) Collective Licensing
International, LLC of Englewood,
Colorado; (2) Double Diamond
Distribution Ltd. (‘‘Double Diamond’’) of
Canada; (3) Effervescent Inc.
(‘‘Effervescent’’) of Fitchburg,
Massachusetts; (4) Gen-X Sports, Inc. of
Toronto, Ontario; (5) Holey Shoes
Holding Ltd. of Canada; (6) Australia
Unlimited, Inc. of Seattle, Washington;
(7) Cheng’s Enterprises Inc. of Carlstadt,
New Jersey; (8) D. Myers & Sons, Inc. of
Baltimore, Maryland; (9) Inter-Pacific
Trading Corp. of Los Angeles,
California; (10) Pali Hawaii of Honolulu,
Hawaii; and (11) Shaka Shoes of KaliuaKona, Hawaii. The Commission
terminated the investigation as to the
trade dress allegation on September 11,
2006. A twelfth respondent, Old
Dominion Footwear, Inc. of Madison
Heights, Virginia, was added to the
investigation on October 10, 2006. All
but two respondents have been
terminated from the investigation on the
basis of a consent order, settlement
agreement, or undisputed Commission
determination of non-infringement. The
two remaining respondents are Double
Diamond and Effervescent.
On April 11, 2008, the ALJ issued his
final ID finding no violation of section
337. The ALJ’s final ID made no finding
on whether either asserted patent was
unenforceable due to inequitable
conduct. The ALJ’s final ID also
included his recommendation on
remedy and bonding should the
Commission find that there was a
violation. On July 25, 2008, after review,
the Commission affirmed the ALJ’s final
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24051-24052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10348]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-771]
In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile
Phones, Mobile Tablets, Portable Music Players, and Computers, and
Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on March 28, 2011, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Nokia Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York, and
Intellisync Corporation of White Plains, New York. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain electronic devices, including
mobile phones, mobile tablets, portable music players, and computers,
and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 7,209,911 (``the `911 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
6,212,529 (``the `529 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,141,664 (``the `664
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,558,696 (``the `696 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 6,445,932 (``the `932 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 5,898,740 (``the
`740 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,319,874 (``the `874 patent'').
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists or is in the process of being established as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on April 25, 2011, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic
devices, including mobile phones, mobile tablets, portable music
players, and computers, and components thereof that infringe one or
more of claims 1, 2,
[[Page 24052]]
5, 6, and 9-14 of the `911 patent; claims 1, 21, 25-27, 51, and 52 of
the `529 patent; claims 3, 4, 21, 26, 28, 38, 43, 44, 61, 67, 68, 77,
and 78 of the `664 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 9, 11-14, 16, 18, 19, 21-23,
and 25 of the `696 patent; claims 1-3, 5, 9, and 15 of the `932 patent;
claims 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the `740 patent; and claims 1-6, 8-15, and 21
of the `874 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists
or is in the process of being established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Nokia Corporation, Keilalahdentie 4, (P.O. Box 226), FIN-00045 Nokia
Group, Espoo, Finland.
Nokia Inc., 102 Corporate Park Drive, White Plains, NY 10604.
Intellisync Corporation, 102 Corporate Park Drive, White Plains, NY
10604.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: April 25, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-10348 Filed 4-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
