Solid Urea From Russia and Ukraine; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews Concerning the Antidumping Duty Orders on Solid Urea From Russia and Ukraine, 23835-23837 [2011-10281]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices
to reinstate the leases, effective the date
of termination subject to:
• The original terms and conditions
of the leases;
• The increased rental of $10 per
acre;
• The increased royalty of 162⁄3
percent; and
• The $163 cost of publishing this
Notice.
Teri
Bakken, Chief, Fluids Adjudication
Section, Bureau of Land Management
Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669,
406–896–5091. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teri Bakken,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
[FR Doc. 2011–10230 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments (1029–0055).
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM or we) is
announcing our intention to request
renewed approval for the collection of
information for States or Indian Tribes,
pursuant to an approved reclamation
program, to use police powers, if
necessary, to effect entry upon private
lands to conduct reclamation activities
or exploratory studies if the landowner’s
consent is refused or the landowner is
not available. The collection described
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The information
collection request describes the nature
of the information collection and the
expected burdens and costs.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, your comments should
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
be submitted to OMB by May 31, 2011,
in order to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Your comments should be
submitted to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Department of
the Interior Desk Officer, via e-mail at
OIRA_Docket@omb.eop.gov, or by
facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Also,
please send a copy of your comments to
John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave., NW., Room 202–SIB,
Washington, DC 20240, or electronically
to jtrelease@osmre.gov. Please reference
1029–0055 in your submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at
jtrelease@osmre.gov. You may also
review this collection by going to
https://www.reginfo.gov (Information
Collection Review, Currently Under
Review, Agency is Department of the
Interior, DOI–OSMRE).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. We have
submitted a request to OMB to approve
the collection of information for 30 CFR
877—Rights of Entry. We are requesting
a 3-year term of approval for this
information collection activity.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection of
information is displayed in 30 CFR
877.10 (1029–0055).
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d),
we published a Federal Register notice
seeking public comments on this
collection of information on February 7,
2011 (76 FR 6631). No comments were
received. This notice gives you an
additional 30 days in which to comment
on the following information collection
activity:
Title: 30 CFR 877—Rights of Entry.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0055.
Summary: This regulation establishes
procedures for non-consensual entry
upon private lands for the purpose of
abandoned mine land reclamation
activities or exploratory studies when
the landowner refuses consent or is not
available.
Bureau Form Number: None.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23835
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: State
abandoned mine land reclamation
agencies.
Total Annual Responses: 12.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours
for uncomplicated situations and 9
hours for complicated situations.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 38
hours.
Total Annual Non-wage Costs: $1,080
for publication costs.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collection of the
information, to the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to the
appropriate OMB control number in all
correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: April 21, 2011.
Stephen M. Sheffield,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2011–10205 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–340–E and 340–
H (Third Review)]
Solid Urea From Russia and Ukraine;
Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
Concerning the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Solid Urea From Russia and
Ukraine
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of full reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on solid urea from Russia and
Ukraine would be likely to lead to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
23836
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The Commission has determined
to exercise its authority to extend the
review period by up to 90 days pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On March 7, 2011, the
Commission determined that responses
to its notice of institution of the subject
five-year reviews were such that full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act should proceed (76 FR 15339,
March 21, 2011). A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in these reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after
publication of this notice. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A party
granted access to BPI following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to
receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.—The prehearing staff
report in the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on September 14,
2011, and a public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section
207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
Hearing.—The Commission will hold
a hearing in connection with the
reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
October 4, 2011, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission
Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with
the Secretary to the Commission on or
before September 27, 2011. A nonparty
who has testimony that may aid the
Commission’s deliberations may request
permission to present a short statement
at the hearing. All parties and
nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearing and make oral presentations
should attend a prehearing conference
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 29,
2011, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24,
and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony incamera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions.—Each party to
the reviews may submit a prehearing
brief to the Commission. Prehearing
briefs must conform with the provisions
of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is
September 23, 2011. Parties may also
file written testimony in connection
with their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in section 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provisions of section 207.67 of the
Commission’s rules. The deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is October 13,
2011; witness testimony must be filed
no later than three days before the
hearing. In addition, any person who
has not entered an appearance as a party
to the reviews may submit a written
statement of information pertinent to
the subject of the reviews on or before
October 13, 2011. On November 4, 2011,
the Commission will make available to
parties all information on which they
have not had an opportunity to
comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before November 8, 2011, but such final
comments must not contain new factual
information and must otherwise comply
with section 207.68 of the Commission’s
rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 2002).
Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168,
68173 (November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices
Issued: April 25, 2011.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–10281 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–692]
Certain Ceramic Capacitors and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
the Commission’s Final Determination
of No Violation of Section 337;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined that there
has been no violation of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
in this investigation, and has terminated
the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 4, 2009, based on a
complaint filed by Murata
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of Kyoto, Japan
and Murata Electronics North America,
Inc. of Smyrna, Georgia (collectively,
‘‘Murata’’). 74 FR 57193–94 (Nov. 4,
2009). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain ceramic capacitors and products
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
containing the same by reason of
infringement of various claims of United
States Patent Nos. 6,266,229 (‘‘the ’229
patent’’); 6,014,309 (‘‘the ’309 patent’’);
6,243,254 (‘‘the ’254 patent’’); and
6,377,439 (subsequently terminated
from the investigation). The complaint
named Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co.,
Ltd. of Suwon City, Korea and Samsung
Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. of
Irvine, California (collectively,
‘‘Samsung’’) as respondents.
On December 22, 2010, the ALJ issued
his final ID, finding no violation of
section 337 by Respondents with
respect to any of the asserted claims of
the asserted patents. Specifically, the
ALJ found that the accused products do
not infringe the asserted claims of the
’254 patent. The ALJ also found that
none of the cited references anticipates
the asserted claims and that none of the
cited references renders the asserted
claims obvious. The ALJ further found
that the asserted claims are not rendered
unenforceable due to inequitable
conduct. The ALJ, however, found that
asserted claims 11–14, 19, and 20 of the
’254 patent fail to satisfy the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112 for lack
of written description. Regarding the
’309 patent, the ALJ found that the
accused products do not infringe
asserted claim 3 and that none of the
cited references anticipates or renders
obvious asserted claim 3. The ALJ
further found that the asserted claim is
not rendered unenforceable due to
inequitable conduct. With respect to the
’229 patent, the ALJ found that the
accused products meet all the
limitations of the asserted claims and
that the asserted claims are not rendered
unenforceable due to inequitable
conduct. The ALJ further found that the
cited references do not anticipate the
asserted claims but found that the prior
art renders the asserted claims obvious.
The ALJ concluded that an industry
exists within the United States that
practices the ’254 patent and the ’229
patent but that a domestic industry that
practices the ’309 patent does not exist
as required by 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2) and
(3).
On January 4, 2011, Murata and the
Commission investigative attorney filed
petitions for review of the ID. That same
day, Samsung filed a contingent petition
for review of the ID. On January 12,
2011, the parties filed responses to the
various petitions and contingent
petition for review.
On February 23, 2011, the
Commission determined to review the
final ID in part and requested briefing
on several issues it determined to
review, and on remedy, the public
interest and bonding. 76 FR 11275 (Mar.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
23837
1, 2011). The Commission determined
to review the findings related to the ’229
patent and in particular the finding that
the AAPA (Applicant Admitted Prior
Art) does not invalidate the asserted
claims of the ’229 patent. The
Commission determined not to review
any issues related to the ’309 patent and
the ’254 patent and terminated those
patents from the investigation.
On March 8, 2011, the parties filed
written submissions on the issues under
review, remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. On March 15, 2011, the parties
filed reply submissions on the issues on
review, remedy, the public interest and
bonding.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
ID, the Commission has determined that
there is no violation of section 337.
Specifically, the Commission has
determined to (1) reverse the ALJ’s
finding to the extent that it suggests that
the AAPA cannot constitute prior art
and (2) find that the asserted claims of
the ’229 patent are obvious in light of
a combination of (i) the AAPA and the
knowledge in the art at the time of filing
the patent’s priority document, (ii) the
AAPA and Nagakari (Japanese
unexamined patent application H11–
21429), or (iii) the AAPA and the
deNeuf product (product samples sold
by Murata and provided by Mr. deNeuf).
The Commission vacates the ALJ’s
finding that the AAPA does not
anticipate the asserted claims of the ’229
patent; however, given the
Commission’s finding that the asserted
claims of the ’229 patent are invalid for
obviousness, the Commission does not
reach the issue of anticipation. The
Commission adopts the ALJ’s findings
regarding the ’229 patent in all other
respects.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–46 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–46).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 22, 2011,
James R. Holbein,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–10238 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23835-23837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10281]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-340-E and 340-H (Third Review)]
Solid Urea From Russia and Ukraine; Scheduling of Full Five-Year
Reviews Concerning the Antidumping Duty Orders on Solid Urea From
Russia and Ukraine
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on solid urea from Russia and Ukraine would be
likely to lead to
[[Page 23836]]
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). For further information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael Comly (202-205-3174), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On March 7, 2011, the Commission determined that
responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews
were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act
should proceed (76 FR 15339, March 21, 2011). A record of the
Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of
the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
Participation in the reviews and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance
following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the
reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary
will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice.
Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by
19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted
access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of
institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.--The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on September 14, 2011, and a public
version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the
Commission's rules.
Hearing.--The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the
reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on October 4, 2011, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission
on or before September 27, 2011. A nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a
short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to
appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a
prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 29, 2011, at
the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and
written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission's
rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their
hearing testimony incamera no later than 7 business days prior to the
date of the hearing.
Written submissions.--Each party to the reviews may submit a
prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with
the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the
deadline for filing is September 23, 2011. Parties may also file
written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing,
as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and
posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section
207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing
briefs is October 13, 2011; witness testimony must be filed no later
than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written
statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or
before October 13, 2011. On November 4, 2011, the Commission will make
available to parties all information on which they have not had an
opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this
information on or before November 8, 2011, but such final comments must
not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with
section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules;
any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's
rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions
with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as
amended, 67 Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic
filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed
in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168, 68173 (November 8,
2002).
Additional written submissions to the Commission, including
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall
not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such
submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request
by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on
all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or
BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed.
The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 23837]]
Issued: April 25, 2011.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-10281 Filed 4-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
