Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 21408-21410 [2011-9168]
Download as PDF
21408
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS).
Title of Collection: Current Population
Survey—Basic Labor Force.
OMB Control Number: 1220–0100.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 55,000.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 660,000.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 82,500.
Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden:
$0.
Dated: April 11, 2011.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–9169 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of March 28, 2011
through April 1, 2011.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Apr 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
21409
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
74,817 ...............
Kidde-Fenwal, UTC Fire and Security, Davis, Account Temps, Kelly,
John, Winter.
Canal Sportswear, Inc. .................................................................................
Smethport and Lauri Toys, Patch Products, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers
from Adecco Employment Service.
Apex Industries, Inc., Labor Finders/LF Staffing and Labor Ready .............
Raxon Fabrics, Vescom North America, Inc. ...............................................
Ashland, MA ................
November 1, 2009.
New York, NY .............
Smethport, PA .............
November 22, 2009.
January 28, 2010.
Spokane Valley, WA ...
Allentown, PA ..............
February 8, 2010.
February 28, 2011.
74,955 ...............
75,157 ...............
75,208 ...............
75,209 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
74,927 ...............
Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Global Manufacturing, Pfizer Research and Development, etc.
Research In Motion Limited, Former Workers from Dataviz, Inc .................
Dama Jewelry Technology, Leased Workers From Vincent Porcaro, Inc.
and Coworx Staffing Services.
ACS Outsourcing Solutions, Inc., A Xerox Company ..................................
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Human Resources Shared Services Center, Talent Acquisition Associates, etc.
Kaz, Inc .........................................................................................................
Highmark West Virginia, Inc., Health Plan Operations, Workers Working
from Their Homes in WV and OH.
AT&T Operations, Inc., ABS–GCS Managed Services, GM/GMAC Account, Zerochaos, Allegis Group.
Springs Global US, Inc., Grace Complex, Springs Global Participacoes,
Defender Industries.
Springs Global US, Inc., Riverlawn Distribution Center, Springs Global
Participacoes, Defender.
Pearl River, NY ...........
October 26, 2009.
Milford, CT ..................
Johnston, RI ................
December 16, 2009.
January 7, 2010.
Pittsburgh, PA .............
Tampa, FL ...................
February 8, 2010.
February 8, 2010.
Hudson, NY .................
Parkersburg, WV .........
September 20, 2010.
February 11, 2010.
Detroit, MI ...................
February 11, 2010.
Lancaster, SC .............
February 14, 2010.
Fort Lawn, SC .............
February 14, 2010.
75,012 ...............
75,077 ...............
75,198 ...............
75,210 ...............
75,258 ...............
75,261 ...............
75,288 ...............
75,301 ...............
75,301A ............
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
TA–W No.
Subject firm
75,199 ...............
75,251 ...............
Dell USA LP, Dell, Inc. Identity and Directory Services—Account Mgt .......
JPMorgan Chase and Company, Treasury and Securities, Core Cash
Group, Receivable Technology (IT).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
TA–W No.
Subject firm
74,738 ...............
74,765 ...............
75,197 ...............
Bombardier Mass Transit Corporation, Overhaul Division ...........................
Patriot Antenna Systems, Inc., Cobham PLC ..............................................
Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah, IT, KForce, Inc., Personnel
Source, and IBM.
International Business Machines (IBM), GTS NA West IMT Region Maintenance and Technical Support.
75,240 ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Apr 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Location
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Round Rock, TX.
Fort Worth, TX.
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Location
Fmt 4703
Impact date
Bath, NY.
Albion, MI.
Salt Lake City, UT.
Milwaukee, WI.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Impact date
21410
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
75,264 ...............
City of Firsts Community Federal Credit Union, South Branch ...................
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of March 28,
2011 through April 1, 2011. Copies of
these determinations may be requested
under the Freedom of Information Act.
Requests may be submitted by fax,
courier services, or mail to FOIA
Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or
tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the
Department’s website at https://
www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–9168 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
[OMB Control No. 1219–0133]
Proposed Extension of Existing
Information Collection; Hazard
Communication (HazCom)
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program
helps to assure that requested data can
be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is soliciting
comments concerning the extension of
the information collection for 30 CFR
part 47.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Apr 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Location
Impact date
Kokomo, IN.
DATES:
All comments must be
postmarked or received by midnight
Eastern Standard Time on June 14,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be clearly
identified with the rule title and may be
submitted to MSHA by any of the
following methods:
(1) Electronic mail: zzMSHAComments@dol.gov.
(2) Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
(3) Regular Mail: MSHA, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350,
Arlington, VA 22209–3939.
(4) Hand Delivery or Courier: MSHA,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, VA 22209–3939.
Sign in at the receptionist’s desk on the
21st floor.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mario Distasio, Chief of the Economic
Analysis Division, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at
distasio.mario@dol.gov (e-mail), 202–
693–9445 (voice mail), 202–693–9441
(facsimile).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information has practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
A copy of the information collection
request can be obtained by contacting
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION section of this notice, or
viewed on the Internet at https://
www.msha.gov and by selecting
‘‘FedReg. Docs’’ under ‘‘Rules & Regs’’ on
the right side of the screen. On the next
screen, select ‘‘Information Collection
Requests’’ to view documents
supporting this Federal Register notice.
I. Background
Section 101(a)(7) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, as
amended (Mine Act) requires, in part,
that mandatory standards prescribe the
use of labels or other appropriate forms
of warning as are necessary to insure
that miners are apprised of all hazards
to which they are exposed, relevant
symptoms and appropriate emergency
treatment, and proper conditions and
precautions for safe use or exposure.
MSHA collected evidence from the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health’s (NIOSH)
Occupational Health Survey of Mining
and other sources indicating that there
were chemical exposures occurring in
every type of mine, although every
miner may not have been exposed.
MSHA became concerned that miners
were being exposed to chemicals and
may not have known the hazards of
those chemicals or the appropriate
precautions to prevent injury or illness
caused by exposure to a hazardous
chemical.
III. Current Actions
This notice contains the request for an
extension of the existing collection of
information in 30 CFR Part 47. MSHA
does not intend to publish the results
from this information collection and is
not seeking approval to either display or
not display the expiration date for the
OMB approval of this information
collection.
There are no certification exceptions
identified with this information
collection and the collection of this
information does not employ statistical
methods.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Mine Safety and Health
Administration.
OMB Number: 1219–0133.
Frequency: Daily, weekly, monthly,
semi-annually, and on occasion.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Cost to Federal Government: There
are no costs to the federal government.
Total Number of Respondents: 22,381.
Total Number of Responses: 813,753.
Total Burden Hours: 177,668 hours.
Total Hour Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $13,199.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for Office of
II. Desired Focus of Comments
MSHA is particularly interested in
comments that:
• Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21408-21410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
March 28, 2011 through April 1, 2011.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the
[[Page 21409]]
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,817................. Kidde-Fenwal, UTC Fire Ashland, MA................... November 1, 2009.
and Security, Davis,
Account Temps, Kelly,
John, Winter.
74,955................. Canal Sportswear, Inc.. New York, NY.................. November 22, 2009.
75,157................. Smethport and Lauri Smethport, PA................. January 28, 2010.
Toys, Patch Products,
Inc., On-Site Leased
Workers from Adecco
Employment Service.
75,208................. Apex Industries, Inc., Spokane Valley, WA............ February 8, 2010.
Labor Finders/LF
Staffing and Labor
Ready.
75,209................. Raxon Fabrics, Vescom Allentown, PA................. February 28, 2011.
North America, Inc..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,927................. Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Pearl River, NY............... October 26, 2009.
Global Manufacturing,
Pfizer Research and
Development, etc.
75,012................. Research In Motion Milford, CT................... December 16, 2009.
Limited, Former
Workers from Dataviz,
Inc.
75,077................. Dama Jewelry Johnston, RI.................. January 7, 2010.
Technology, Leased
Workers From Vincent
Porcaro, Inc. and
Coworx Staffing
Services.
75,198................. ACS Outsourcing Pittsburgh, PA................ February 8, 2010.
Solutions, Inc., A
Xerox Company.
75,210................. PricewaterhouseCoopers Tampa, FL..................... February 8, 2010.
LLP, Human Resources
Shared Services
Center, Talent
Acquisition
Associates, etc.
75,258................. Kaz, Inc............... Hudson, NY.................... September 20, 2010.
75,261................. Highmark West Virginia, Parkersburg, WV............... February 11, 2010.
Inc., Health Plan
Operations, Workers
Working from Their
Homes in WV and OH.
75,288................. AT&T Operations, Inc., Detroit, MI................... February 11, 2010.
ABS-GCS Managed
Services, GM/GMAC
Account, Zerochaos,
Allegis Group.
75,301................. Springs Global US, Lancaster, SC................. February 14, 2010.
Inc., Grace Complex,
Springs Global
Participacoes,
Defender Industries.
75,301A................ Springs Global US, Fort Lawn, SC................. February 14, 2010.
Inc., Riverlawn
Distribution Center,
Springs Global
Participacoes,
Defender.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
75,199................. Dell USA LP, Dell, Inc. Round Rock, TX.
Identity and Directory
Services--Account Mgt.
75,251................. JPMorgan Chase and Fort Worth, TX.
Company, Treasury and
Securities, Core Cash
Group, Receivable
Technology (IT).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,738................. Bombardier Mass Transit Bath, NY.
Corporation, Overhaul
Division.
74,765................. Patriot Antenna Albion, MI.
Systems, Inc., Cobham
PLC.
75,197................. Regence Blue Cross Blue Salt Lake City, UT.
Shield of Utah, IT,
KForce, Inc.,
Personnel Source, and
IBM.
75,240................. International Business Milwaukee, WI.
Machines (IBM), GTS NA
West IMT Region
Maintenance and
Technical Support.
[[Page 21410]]
75,264................. City of Firsts Kokomo, IN.
Community Federal
Credit Union, South
Branch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of March 28, 2011 through April 1, 2011. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's website at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-9168 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P