University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments, 20953-20954 [2011-9109]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices
techniques will be utilized to observe
the samples. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category manufactured in
the United States. Application accepted
by Commissioner of Customs: March 11,
2011.
Docket Number: 11–024. Applicant:
Mayo Clinic. 200 First St SW Rochester,
MN 55905. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: The instrument will be used to
evaluate tissue looking for
ultrastructural indicators of disease, as
well as other experiments including cell
culture morphology, transplant and host
tissue interactions, and implant artifacts
and breakage. Techniques to be used
include standard transmission electron
microscopy preparative procedures as
well as specialized techniques including
immunoelectron microscopy, negative
staining and electron tomography.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: March 14,
2011.
Docket Number: 11–025. Applicant:
California State University—Long
Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long
Beach, CA 90840. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: Neaspec
GmbH, Germany. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to study
plasmonic metal-based materials as well
as phonon modes of thin surfaces such
as silica, silicon nitride or silicon
carbide materials. Experiments will be
performed using near-field microscopy
measurements, coupling light with an
atomic microscope tip and recording
optical signals in amplitude and phase.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: March 30,
2011.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Gregory Campbell,
Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–9108 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we
invite comments on the question of
whether instruments of equivalent
scientific value, for the purposes for
which the instruments shown below are
intended to be used, are being
manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be postmarked on or before May 4, 2011.
Address written comments to Statutory
Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230. Applications may be
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
at the U.S. Department of Commerce in
Room 3720.
Docket Number: 11–023. Applicant:
UChicago Argonne, LLC., 9700 South
Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439.
Instrument: Mythen 1K Detector
System. Manufacturer: Dectris Ltd.,
Switzerland. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used for resonant
inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) to study
the electronic structure of highly
correlated systems. This instrument is
unique in that it has a small pixel pitch
(50 microns); high detection efficiency,
single photon counting with high
dynamic range; and a small, lightweight
and compact design. Justification for
Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category being manufactured in the
United States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: March 29,
2011.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Gregory Campbell,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement
Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–9107 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free
Entry of Scientific Instruments
This is a decision pursuant to Section
6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Materials Importation Act of
1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by
Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th and Constitution Ave, NW.,
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 11–009. Applicant:
University of Chicago Argonne, LLC.,
Lemont, IL 60439–4873. Instrument:
Electrode Coater. Manufacturer: A–Pro
Co., Ltd., South Korea. Intended Use:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20953
See notice at 76 FR 11200, March 1,
2011. Comments: None received.
Decision: Approved. We know of no
instruments of equivalent scientific
value to the foreign instruments
described below, for such purposes as
this is intended to be used, that was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of its order. Reasons: This
instrument is unique in that it is semiautomated and suitable for a laboratory
environment, and specially tailored for
lithium-ion electrodes.
Docket Number: 11–010. Applicant:
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706. Instrument:
Vitrobot Mark IV. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 76 FR 11200, March
1, 2011. Comments: None received.
Decision: Approved. We know of no
instruments of equivalent scientific
value to the foreign instruments
described below, for such purposes as
this is intended to be used, that was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of its order. Reasons: This
instrument is unique in following ways:
the instrumental parameters must be
computer controlled and enable storing
of parameter protocols, including
humidity, blotting time and pressure,
and equilibration time; mitigation of
errors must be derived from the
handling of TEM grids including
loading, application of sample,
plunging, and transfer to storage by
automating some of these tasks; and
sample blotting must be done
automatically with user controlled
programmable blot times and pressures.
Docket Number: 11–011. Applicant:
National Superconducting Cyclotron
Laboratory (NSCL) at Michigan State
University. Instrument: Differential
Plunger Device. Manufacturer: Institut
fur Kernphysik-Universitat zu koln
(Cologne University), Germany.
Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 1120,
March 1, 2011. Comments: None
received. Decision: Approved. We know
of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used,
that was being manufactured in the
United States at the time of its order.
Reasons: The instrument is specific to
the research in level lifetime
measurements of rare isotopes.
Docket Number: 11–014. Applicant:
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
47907. Instrument: Vibration Test
System-Shaker in Trunion with
Matching Amplifier and Cooling
Blower. Manufacturer: TIRA, Germany.
Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR
11200, March 1, 2011. Comments: None
received. Decision: Approved. We know
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
20954
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices
of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used,
that was being manufactured in the
United States at the time of its order.
Reasons: Unique features of this
instrument include its arbitrary
excitation angle, large frequency, force,
displacement range and spectral output
purity. It is also unique in that it
included the ability to rotate to varying
degrees.
Docket Number: 11–017. Applicant:
University of Chicago Argonne, LLC,
Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Electron
Guns for Caribu EBIS Charge Breeder.
Manufacturer: Budker Institute of
Nuclear Physics, Russia. Intended Use:
See notice at 76 FR 11200, March 1,
2011. Comments: None received.
Decision: Approved. We know of no
instruments of equivalent scientific
value to the foreign instruments
described below, for such purposes as
this is intended to be used, that was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of its order. Reasons: The
main requirement to the EBIS charge
breeder is its high efficiency and long
maintenance free operational period.
resistant carbon steel flat products
(CORE) from Korea. See Countervailing
Duty Orders and Amendments of Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determinations: Certain Steel Products
from Korea, 58 FR 43752 (August 17,
1993). On August 2, 2010, the
Department published a notice of
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ of this countervailing duty
order. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 75
FR 45094 (August 2, 2010). In
accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice
of initiation of the administrative review
on September 29, 2010, for the January
1, 2009, through December 31, 2009,
period of review (POR). See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 60076
(September 29, 2010). The preliminary
results for this review are currently due
no later than May 3, 2011.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Import Administration.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested and the final
results of review within 120 days after
the date on which the preliminary
results are published. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
Because the Department will require
additional time to review and analyze
supplemental information expected
from the Government of Korea and the
respondent, Hyundai HYSCO Ltd., and
may issue further supplemental
questionnaires, it is not practicable to
complete this review by the original
deadline (i.e., May 3, 2011). Therefore,
the Department is extending the time
limit for completion of the preliminary
results by 120 days to not later than
August 31, 2011, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
[FR Doc. 2011–9109 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–818]
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products From the Republic of Korea:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On August 17, 1993, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
countervailing duty order on corrosion-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–9111 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 13, 2010, the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) affirmed the
United States Court of International
Trade’s (‘‘CIT’s’’) decision sustaining the
Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the
Department’s’’) redetermination on
remand of the final results of the
antidumping duty investigation on
certain lined paper products (‘‘CLPP’’)
from India. See Association of American
School Paper Suppliers v. United States,
Court No. 2010–1219 (CAFC December
13, 2010) (CAFC Rule 36 affirmance);
see also Association of American School
Paper Suppliers v. United States,
Consol. Court No. 06–00395, Slip Op.
09–136 (CIT December 10, 2009)
(‘‘AASPS, Slip. Op. 09–136’’).1 This case
arises out of the Department’s final
determination of sales at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the antidumping duty
investigation of CLPP from India.2 As
there is now a final and conclusive
court decision in this action, the
Department is amending the Final
Determination and Antidumping Duty
Order.3
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
AGENCY:
1 This action includes Court No. 06–00395 and
Court No. 06–00399.
2 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, and Negative Determination
of Critical Circumstances: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India, 71 FR 45012 (August 8, 2006)
(‘‘Final Determination’’).
3 Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the
People’s Republic of China; and Notice of
Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949
(September 28, 2006) (‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20953-20954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of Decision on
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments
This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW.,
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 11-009. Applicant: University of Chicago Argonne,
LLC., Lemont, IL 60439-4873. Instrument: Electrode Coater.
Manufacturer: A-Pro Co., Ltd., South Korea. Intended Use: See notice at
76 FR 11200, March 1, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to
the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is
intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States
at the time of its order. Reasons: This instrument is unique in that it
is semi-automated and suitable for a laboratory environment, and
specially tailored for lithium-ion electrodes.
Docket Number: 11-010. Applicant: University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706. Instrument: Vitrobot Mark IV. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 11200,
March 1, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of
no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to
be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time
of its order. Reasons: This instrument is unique in following ways: the
instrumental parameters must be computer controlled and enable storing
of parameter protocols, including humidity, blotting time and pressure,
and equilibration time; mitigation of errors must be derived from the
handling of TEM grids including loading, application of sample,
plunging, and transfer to storage by automating some of these tasks;
and sample blotting must be done automatically with user controlled
programmable blot times and pressures.
Docket Number: 11-011. Applicant: National Superconducting
Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) at Michigan State University. Instrument:
Differential Plunger Device. Manufacturer: Institut fur Kernphysik-
Universitat zu koln (Cologne University), Germany. Intended Use: See
notice at 76 FR 1120, March 1, 2011. Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to
the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is
intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States
at the time of its order. Reasons: The instrument is specific to the
research in level lifetime measurements of rare isotopes.
Docket Number: 11-014. Applicant: Purdue University, West
Lafayette, IN 47907. Instrument: Vibration Test System-Shaker in
Trunion with Matching Amplifier and Cooling Blower. Manufacturer: TIRA,
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 11200, March 1, 2011.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know
[[Page 20954]]
of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to
be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time
of its order. Reasons: Unique features of this instrument include its
arbitrary excitation angle, large frequency, force, displacement range
and spectral output purity. It is also unique in that it included the
ability to rotate to varying degrees.
Docket Number: 11-017. Applicant: University of Chicago Argonne,
LLC, Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Electron Guns for Caribu EBIS Charge
Breeder. Manufacturer: Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia.
Intended Use: See notice at 76 FR 11200, March 1, 2011. Comments: None
received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of its order. Reasons: The main
requirement to the EBIS charge breeder is its high efficiency and long
maintenance free operational period.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-9109 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
