Inventory of U.S.-Flag Launch Barges, 20080-20082 [2011-8532]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
20080
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices
The first major research correlating
past and future performance was done
in England by Greenwood and Yule in
1920. Subsequent studies, building on
that model, concluded that crash rates
for the same individual exposed to
certain risks for two different time
periods vary only slightly (See Bates
and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952).
Other studies demonstrated theories of
predicting crash proneness from crash
history coupled with other factors.
These factors—such as age, sex,
geographic location, mileage driven and
conviction history—are used every day
by insurance companies and motor
vehicle bureaus to predict the
probability of an individual
experiencing future crashes (See Weber,
Donald C., ‘‘Accident Rate Potential: An
Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal
of American Statistical Association,
June 1971). A 1964 California Driver
Record Study prepared by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles
concluded that the best overall crash
predictor for both concurrent and
nonconcurrent events is the number of
single convictions. This study used 3
consecutive years of data, comparing the
experiences of drivers in the first 2 years
with their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these
studies to the past 3-year record of the
19 applicants, two of the applicants
were convicted for a moving violation
and none of the applicants were
involved in a crash. All the applicants
achieved a record of safety while
driving with their vision impairment,
demonstrating the likelihood that they
have adapted their driving skills to
accommodate their condition. As the
applicants’ ample driving histories with
their vision deficiencies are good
predictors of future performance,
FMCSA concludes their ability to drive
safely can be projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants’
intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting
their ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
veteran drivers in this proceeding have
operated CMVs safely under those
conditions for at least 3 years, most for
much longer. Their experience and
driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she
has been performing in intrastate
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds
that exempting these applicants from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. For this reason, the
Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 19 applicants
listed in the notice of February 11, 2011
(76 FR 7894).
We recognize that the vision of an
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in
the past. As a condition of the
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will
impose requirements on the 19
individuals consistent with the
grandfathering provisions applied to
drivers who participated in the
Agency’s vision waiver program.
Those requirements are found at 49
CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be
physically examined every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who
attests that the vision in the better eye
continues to meet the standard in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical
examiner who attests that the individual
is otherwise physically qualified under
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. The comment was
considered and discussed below.
The Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation is in favor of granting a
Federal vision exemption to James W.
Hoover, George D. Ruth, and Ronald C.
Wolfe. The Department indicated that
they have reviewed the driving histories
of these three applicants and have no
objections to FMCSA granting them
vision exemptions.
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 19
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts, James L. Acree, Tracey M.
Baucom, David L. Botkins, Richard D.
Flaherty, Michael R. Holmes, James W.
Hoover, Mark C. Jeffrey, Paul J. Jones,
Pedro G. Limon, William G. Marshall,
Timothy S. Moore, Kenneth H. Morris,
Shelby V. Nicholson, Tracy J. Omeara,
Gary W. Pope, George D. Ruth,
Benjamin Stone, James H. Wallace, Sr.,
and Ronald C. Wolfe from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
subject to the requirements cited above
(49 CFR 391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the
end of the 2-year period, the person may
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: March 31, 2011.
Pamela M. Pelcovits,
Director, Office of Policy, Plans and
Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2011–8562 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket Number MARAD 2011 0030]
Inventory of U.S.-Flag Launch Barges
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Inventory of U.S.-Flag Launch
Barges.
AGENCY:
The Maritime Administration
is updating its inventory of U.S.-flag
launch barges. Additions, changes and
comments to the list are requested.
Launch barge information may be found
at https://www.marad.dot.gov/
ships_shipping_landing_page/
domestic_shipping/
launch_barge_program/
Launch_Barge_Program.htm.
DATES: Any comments on this inventory
should be submitted in writing to the
contact person by May 11, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Spittle, Office of Cargo Preference
and Domestic Trade, Maritime
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
20081
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices
Administration, MAR–730, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Telephone 202–366–5979; email: Joann.Spittle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 46 CFR part 389 (Docket No.
MARAD–2008–0045) Determination of
Availability of Coastwise-Qualified
Vessels for the Transportation of
Platform Jackets, the Final Rule requires
that the Maritime Administration
publish a notice in the Federal Register
requesting that owners or operators (or
potential owners or operators) of
coastwise qualified launch barges notify
us of:
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
(1) Their interest in participating in
the transportation and, if needed, the
launching or installation of offshore
platform jackets; (2) the contact
information for their company; and (3)
the specifications of any currently
owned or operated coastwise qualified
launch barges or plans to construct
same.
In addition, we are also seeking
information on non-coastwise qualified
(U.S.-flag) launch barges as well.
Dated: April 5, 2011.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Murray Bloom,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
REPORTED U.S.-FLAG LAUNCH BARGES
[September 2010]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Julie B ...................................
Marty J ..................................
Barge 455–3 .........................
Barge 400L ...........................
Barge 500–1 .........................
Barge 410 .............................
455 4 .....................................
455 5 .....................................
455 6 .....................................
455 7 .....................................
455 8 .....................................
455 9 .....................................
MWB 403 ..............................
H–851 ...................................
H–114 ...................................
H–122 ...................................
H–541 ...................................
H–627 ...................................
McDermott Tidelands 021 ....
McDermott Tidelands No.
012.
McDermott Tidelands No.
014.
McDermott Tidelands 020 ....
McDermott Tidelands 021 ....
INTERMAC 600 ....................
MARMAC 400 .......................
MARMAC 300 .......................
MARMAC 22 .........................
MARMAC 21 .........................
MARMAC 20 .........................
MARMAC 19 .........................
MARMAC 18 .........................
MARMAC 17 .........................
MARMAC 16 .........................
MARMAC 15 .........................
MARMAC 12 .........................
MARMAC 11 .........................
MARMAC 9 ...........................
COLUMBIA NORFOLK .........
FAITHFUL SERVANT ...........
ATLANTA BRIDGE ...............
BROOKLYN BRIDGE ...........
CHARLOTTE BRIDGE .........
CHICAGO BRIDGE ..............
MEMPHIS BRIDGE ..............
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
Crowley Marine Services ......
HMC Leasing, Inc. ................
Heerema Shipping ................
Heerema Shipping ................
Heerema Shipping ................
Heerema Shipping ................
Heerema Shipping ................
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
2008
2008
2008
1997
1982
1974
2009
2009
2009
2009
2010
2010
1979
1987
1982
1978
2000
1978
1980
1973
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
853
525
400
540
580
240
240
130
105
105
100
105
99.5
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
206.7
137.8
100
138
160
72
72.2
23,600
19,226
19,226
19,646
16,397
12,035
19,226
19,226
19,226
19,226
19,226
19,226
16,322
128,452
39,226
16,788
41,067
51,829
4,700
4,217
23,100
18,766
18,766
19,146
15,897
11,535
18,766
18,766
18,766
18,766
18,766
18,766
6,800
60,000
25,000
5,500
20,500
26,000
2,200
4,000
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
1973
240
72.2
4,217
4,000
X
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
J. Ray McDermott, Inc. .........
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
McDonough Marine Service
Moran Towing .......................
Puglia Engineering, Inc. .......
Trailer Bridge, Inc. ................
Trailer Bridge, Inc. ................
Trailer Bridge, Inc. ................
Trailer Bridge, Inc. ................
Trailer Bridge, Inc. ................
1980
1981
1973
2001
1998
2003
2002
1999
1999
1998
1997
1995
1995
1994
1994
1993
1982
1979
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
240
240
500
400
300
260
260
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
329′ 31⁄2″
492
402
402
402
402
402
72
72
120
99′-9″
100
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
78
131
100
100
100
100
100
5,186
5,186
32,290
10,861
10,267
5,198
5,120
4,943
4,765
4,765
4,765
4,765
4,765
4,765
4,765
4,765
8,036
23,174
6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
5,000
5,000
15,600
4,400
4,200
2,400
2,400
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
2,200
8,000
23,000
6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
X
X
17:49 Apr 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Length (ft.)
Sfmt 4703
Beam (ft.)
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
DWT (L.T.)
Coastwise
qualified
Owner
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Built
Approx
launch
capacity
(L.T.)
Vessel name
11APN1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
20082
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2011–8532 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0006]
Koenigsegg Automotive AB; Morgan
Motor Company Limited; Receipt of
Applications for Renewals of
Temporary Exemptions From the
Advanced Air Bag Requirements of
FMVSS No. 208
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications
for renewals of temporary exemptions
and request for comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
procedures in 49 CFR Part 555,
Koenigsegg Automotive AB
Koenigsegg’’) and Morgan Motor
Company Limited (‘‘Morgan’’) have
petitioned the agency for renewals of
temporary exemption from advanced air
bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208,
‘‘Occupant crash protection.’’The basis
for each application is that compliance
would cause substantial economic
hardship to a manufacturer that has
tried in good faith to comply with the
standard.
This notice of receipt of applications
for renewal of temporary exemptions is
published in accordance with the
statutory provisions of 49 U.S.C.
30113(b)(2). Please note that we are
publishing together the notice of receipt
of the two applications for renewal to
ensure efficient use of agency resources
and to facilitate processing of the
applications. NHTSA has made no
judgments on the merits of each
application. NHTSA will consider each
application separately. We ask that
commenters also consider each
application separately and submit
comments specific to individual
applications.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before May 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit your
comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document.
You may call the Docket at 202–366–
9324.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act discussion below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
We shall consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
below. To the extent possible, we shall
also consider comments filed after the
closing date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Dorothy Nakama, Office of the Chief
Counsel, NCC–112, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366–2992; Fax: (202)
366–3820.
I. Advanced Air Bag Requirements and
Small Volume Manufacturers
In 2000, NHTSA upgraded the
requirements for air bags in passenger
cars and light trucks, requiring what are
commonly known as ‘‘advanced air
bags.’’ 1 The upgrade was designed to
meet the goals of improving protection
for occupants of all sizes, belted and
unbelted, in moderate-to-high-speed
crashes, and of minimizing the risks
posed by air bags to infants, children,
and other occupants, especially in lowspeed crashes. The rule accomplished
this by establishing new test
requirements and injury criteria and
specifying the use of an entire family of
1 See
65 FR 30680 (May 12, 2000) (Docket No.
NHTSA–2000–7013).
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
test dummies: the then-existing dummy
representing 50th percentile adult
males, and new dummies representing
5th percentile adult females, 6-year-old
children, 3-year-old children, and
1-year-old infants.
The advanced air bag requirements
were a culmination of a comprehensive
plan that the agency announced in 1996
to address the adverse effects of air bags.
This plan also included an extensive
consumer education program to
encourage the placement of children in
rear seats.
The new requirements were phased in
beginning with the 2004 model year.
Small volume manufacturers (i.e.,
original vehicle manufacturers
producing or assembling fewer than
5,000 vehicles annually for sale in the
United States) were not subject to the
advanced air bag requirements until
September 1, 2006.
In recent years, NHTSA has addressed
a number of petitions for exemption
from the advanced air bag requirements
of FMVSS No. 208. The majority of
these requests have come from small
manufacturers which have petitioned on
the basis of substantial economic
hardship to a manufacturer that has
tried in good faith to comply with the
standard.
Although NHTSA has granted a
number of these petitions in situations
where the manufacturer is supplying
standard air bags in lieu of advanced air
bags,2 NHTSA is considering (1)
whether it is in the public interest to
continue to grant such petitions,
particularly in the same manner as in
the past, given the number of years
these requirements have now been in
effect and the benefits of advanced air
bags, and (2) to the extent such petitions
are granted, what plans and
countermeasures to protect child and
infant occupants, short of compliance
with the advanced air bags, should be
expected.
Given the passage of time since the
advanced air bag requirements were
established and have been
implemented, and in light of the
benefits of advanced air bags, NHTSA is
considering whether it is in the public
interest to continue to grant exemptions
from these requirements, particularly in
the same manner as in the past. The
costs of compliance with the advanced
air bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208
are costs that all entrants to the U.S.
automobile marketplace should expect
to bear. Furthermore, NHTSA
understands that, in contrast to the
2 See, e.g., grant of petition to Panoz, 72 FR 28759
(May 22, 2007), or grant of petition to Koenigsegg,
72 FR 17608 (April 9, 2007).
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20080-20082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8532]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket Number MARAD 2011 0030]
Inventory of U.S.-Flag Launch Barges
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Inventory of U.S.-Flag Launch Barges.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration is updating its inventory of U.S.-
flag launch barges. Additions, changes and comments to the list are
requested. Launch barge information may be found at https://www.marad.dot.gov/ships_shipping_landing_page/domestic_shipping/launch_barge_program/Launch_Barge_Program.htm.
DATES: Any comments on this inventory should be submitted in writing to
the contact person by May 11, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joann Spittle, Office of Cargo
Preference and Domestic Trade, Maritime
[[Page 20081]]
Administration, MAR-730, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Telephone 202-366-5979; e-mail: Joann.Spittle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 46 CFR part 389 (Docket No.
MARAD-2008-0045) Determination of Availability of Coastwise-Qualified
Vessels for the Transportation of Platform Jackets, the Final Rule
requires that the Maritime Administration publish a notice in the
Federal Register requesting that owners or operators (or potential
owners or operators) of coastwise qualified launch barges notify us of:
(1) Their interest in participating in the transportation and, if
needed, the launching or installation of offshore platform jackets; (2)
the contact information for their company; and (3) the specifications
of any currently owned or operated coastwise qualified launch barges or
plans to construct same.
In addition, we are also seeking information on non-coastwise
qualified (U.S.-flag) launch barges as well.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78).
Dated: April 5, 2011.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Murray Bloom,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
Reported U.S.-Flag Launch Barges
[September 2010]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approx
Length launch Coastwise
Vessel name Owner Built (ft.) Beam (ft.) DWT (L.T.) capacity qualified
(L.T.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julie B..................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2008 400 130 23,600 23,100 X
Marty J..................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2008 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
Barge 455-3................................. Crowley Marine Services........ 2008 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
Barge 400L.................................. Crowley Marine Services........ 1997 400 100 19,646 19,146 X
Barge 500-1................................. Crowley Marine Services........ 1982 400 105 16,397 15,897 X
Barge 410................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 1974 400 99.5 12,035 11,535 X
455 4....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2009 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
455 5....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2009 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
455 6....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2009 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
455 7....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2009 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
455 8....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2010 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
455 9....................................... Crowley Marine Services........ 2010 400 105 19,226 18,766 X
MWB 403..................................... HMC Leasing, Inc............... 1979 400 105 16,322 6,800 X
H-851....................................... Heerema Shipping............... 1987 853 206.7 128,452 60,000
H-114....................................... Heerema Shipping............... 1982 525 137.8 39,226 25,000
H-122....................................... Heerema Shipping............... 1978 400 100 16,788 5,500
H-541....................................... Heerema Shipping............... 2000 540 138 41,067 20,500
H-627....................................... Heerema Shipping............... 1978 580 160 51,829 26,000
McDermott Tidelands 021..................... J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1980 240 72 4,700 2,200 X
McDermott Tidelands No. 012................. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1973 240 72.2 4,217 4,000 X
McDermott Tidelands No. 014................. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1973 240 72.2 4,217 4,000 X
McDermott Tidelands 020..................... J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1980 240 72 5,186 5,000 X
McDermott Tidelands 021..................... J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1981 240 72 5,186 5,000 X
INTERMAC 600................................ J. Ray McDermott, Inc.......... 1973 500 120 32,290 15,600
MARMAC 400.................................. McDonough Marine Service....... 2001 400 99'-9'' 10,861 4,400 X
MARMAC 300.................................. McDonough Marine Service....... 1998 300 100 10,267 4,200 X
MARMAC 22................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 2003 260 72 5,198 2,400 X
MARMAC 21................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 2002 260 72 5,120 2,400 X
MARMAC 20................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1999 250 72 4,943 2,200 X
MARMAC 19................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1999 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 18................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1998 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 17................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1997 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 16................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1995 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 15................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1995 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 12................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1994 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 11................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1994 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
MARMAC 9.................................... McDonough Marine Service....... 1993 250 72 4,765 2,200 X
COLUMBIA NORFOLK............................ Moran Towing................... 1982 329' 3\1/ 78 8,036 8,000 X
2\''
FAITHFUL SERVANT............................ Puglia Engineering, Inc........ 1979 492 131 23,174 23,000
ATLANTA BRIDGE.............................. Trailer Bridge, Inc............ 1998 402 100 6,017 6,017 X
BROOKLYN BRIDGE............................. Trailer Bridge, Inc............ 1998 402 100 6,017 6,017 X
CHARLOTTE BRIDGE............................ Trailer Bridge, Inc............ 1998 402 100 6,017 6,017 X
CHICAGO BRIDGE.............................. Trailer Bridge, Inc............ 1998 402 100 6,017 6,017 X
MEMPHIS BRIDGE.............................. Trailer Bridge, Inc............ 1998 402 100 6,017 6,017 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20082]]
[FR Doc. 2011-8532 Filed 4-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
