Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam, 18782 [2011-7996]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES 18782 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Notices Register. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Conference.—The Commission’s Director of Investigations has scheduled a conference in connection with these investigations for 8:45 a.m. on April 20, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC. Requests to appear at the conference should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before April 18, 2011. Parties in support of the imposition of antidumping and countervailing duties in these investigations and parties in opposition to the imposition of such duties will each be collectively allocated one hour within which to make an oral presentation at the conference. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the conference. Written submissions.—As provided in sections 201.8 and 207.15 of the Commission’s rules, any person may submit to the Commission on or before April 25, 2011, a written brief containing information and arguments pertinent to the subject matter of the investigations. Parties may file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the conference no later than three days before the conference. If briefs or written testimony contain BPI, they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.12 of the Commission’s rules. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:18 Apr 04, 2011 Jkt 223001 By order of the Commission. Issued: March 31, 2011. James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to the Commission. Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 1063, 1064, 1066– 1068 (Review). [FR Doc. 2011–7997 Filed 4–4–11; 8:45 am] By order of the Commission. Issued: March 30, 2011. James R. Holbein, Acting Secretary to the Commission. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [FR Doc. 2011–7996 Filed 4–4–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review)] Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on January 4, 2010 (75 FR 1078, January 8, 2010) and determined on April 9, 2010 that it would conduct full reviews (75 FR 22424, April 28, 2010). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on August 11, 2010 (75 FR 48724). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on February 1, 2011, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on March 30, 2011. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4221 (March 2011), entitled Frozen 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders covering frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on March 18, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 4:11–cv– 01037 (S.D. Tex.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Consent Decree resolves the United States’ claims for response costs against a number of defendants, pursuant to Section 107(a)(3) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a)(3). The complaint filed simultaneously with the lodging of the Consent Decree names as defendants Exxon Mobil Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Eurecat U.S. Incorporated, Akzo Nobel, Inc., Flint Hills Resources, LP, Irving Oil Limited, ConocoPhillips Company, Texaco, Inc., and Chevron U.S.A., Inc. The claims against the defendants relate to response costs incurred by the United States in connection with response activities taken with respect to the Many Diversified Interests Site, at Operable Unit 1 (‘‘OU–1’’), located in Houston, Texas. Specifically, the United States’ complaint alleges that the defendants sent spent catalyst that contained hazardous substances, including, but not limited to nickel and molybdenum, to OU–1 for disposal or treatment. Under the Consent Decree, the defendants will pay the United States $1,750,000 in reimbursement of a portion of the response costs incurred by the United States in connection with OU–1. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov, or E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM 05APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1063, 1064, 1066-1068 (Review)]


Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and 
Vietnam

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and 
Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson determines that revocation of 
the antidumping duty orders covering frozen warmwater shrimp from 
Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam would not be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry 
in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on January 4, 2010 (75 FR 
1078, January 8, 2010) and determined on April 9, 2010 that it would 
conduct full reviews (75 FR 22424, April 28, 2010). Notice of the 
scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be 
held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice 
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
August 11, 2010 (75 FR 48724). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, 
on February 1, 2011, and all persons who requested the opportunity were 
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on March 30, 2011. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4221 (March 2011), 
entitled Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, 
and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 1063, 1064, 1066-1068 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 30, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-7996 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P