Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Accommodate the Clearance of Relative Performance Options, 17727 [2011-7366]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 61 / Wednesday, March 30, 2011 / Notices possible manipulative conduct occurring in the market for the company’s stock. Euro Solar is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Link under the ticker symbol ESLP. The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 28, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 8, 2011. By the Commission. Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–7572 Filed 3–28–11; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–64119; File No. SR–OCC– 2011–02] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Accommodate the Clearance of Relative Performance Options March 24, 2011. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES I. Introduction On January 19, 2011, The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change SR–OCC–2011–02 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on February 7, 2011.2 No comment letters were received on the proposal. This order approves the proposal. II. Description The purpose of this rule change is to accommodate the clearance of options on certain indexes measuring the relative performance of one reference security or reference index relative to a second reference security or reference index (‘‘Relative Performance Options’’).3 The revised rules have been broadly drafted to cover Alpha Options, a Relative Performance Option 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Exchange Act Release No. 34–63811 (February 1, 2011), 76 FR 6648 (February 7, 2011). 3 A reference security may be an exchange-traded fund (‘‘ETF’’). 2 Securities VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:59 Mar 29, 2011 Jkt 223001 described below, and any similar product that may be listed on any participant exchange in the future. NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’) is proposing to list options (‘‘Alpha Options’’) 4 on NASDAQ OMX Alpha Indexes (‘‘Alpha Indexes’’), a family of indexes developed by NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’). Alpha Indexes measure relative total returns of one underlying stock and one underlying ETF, which are also traded on the Phlx.5 An Alpha Index is calculated by measuring the total return performance of the Target Component relative to the total return performance of the Benchmark Component based upon prices of transactions on the primary listing exchange of each underlying component. Each Alpha Index will initially be set at 100.00. Alpha Options will be cash-settled, European-style options. In the event of a corporate event that eliminates one of the underlying components of an Alpha Index, Nasdaq will cease calculation of the Alpha Index for that pair of underlying components, and all outstanding option positions will be immediately settled at the last disseminated price of that Alpha Index. Relative Performance Options are highly similar to other index options cleared by OCC except for the identity and nature of the underlying index. Therefore, OCC believes that the provisions of its By-Laws and Rules governing index options, as they are currently in effect, are generally sufficient to support the clearance and settlement of Relative Performance Options. However, minor modifications are needed to support the clearance and settlement of Alpha Options and other types of Relative Performance Options that may be introduced in the future. For example, OCC’s current Rules do not account for the possibility of an index having a negative value as could occur for certain Relative Performance Indexes. If this should ever occur, the index value would be deemed to be equal to zero or, because certain systems may not accept a zero index value, a near-zero positive amount. Therefore, OCC is modifying its By-Laws to provide for such potential adjustments of the index value by either the listing exchange or OCC. In addition, OCC’s current By-Laws do not account for the possibility that an 4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–63575 (December 17, 2010), 75 FR 81320 (December 27, 2010) [File No. SR–Phlx–2010–176]. 5 The combination of the two components is referred to as an ‘‘Alpha Pair.’’ The first component of each Alpha Pair is referred to as the ‘‘Target Component’’ and the second component is referred to as the ‘‘Benchmark Component.’’ PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 17727 expiration date may be accelerated when a reference security (i.e., an individual reference security and not a reference index) that is one of the components of an underlying relative performance index ceases to be published as a result of a cash-out merger or similar corporate event. If the value of an underlying Relative Performance Index ceases to be published as a result of such an event, the value of the overlying options would become fixed. Therefore, OCC proposes to modify its By-Laws to provide that OCC will either accelerate or not accelerate the expiration in consultation with the relevant exchange on which the index underlying a Relative Performance Option is listed. III. Discussion Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 6 requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. Because the proposed rule change modifies OCC’s Rules and By-Laws to support the clearance of Alpha Options and other types of Relative Performance Options that may be introduced in the future, the proposed rule change is facilitating the perfection of the national system for the clearance and settlement of securities transactions and therefore is consistent with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act. IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act 7 and the rules and regulations thereunder. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the proposed rule change (File No. SR– OCC–2011–02) be, and hereby is, approved.9 For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.10 Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–7366 Filed 3–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). U.S.C. 78q–1. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 9 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal’s impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 7 15 E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64119; File No. SR-OCC-2011-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Accommodate the Clearance of 
Relative Performance Options

March 24, 2011.

I. Introduction

    On January 19, 2011, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2011-02 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ The proposed rule change 
was published for comment in the Federal Register on February 7, 
2011.\2\ No comment letters were received on the proposal. This order 
approves the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-63811 (February 1, 
2011), 76 FR 6648 (February 7, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    The purpose of this rule change is to accommodate the clearance of 
options on certain indexes measuring the relative performance of one 
reference security or reference index relative to a second reference 
security or reference index (``Relative Performance Options'').\3\ The 
revised rules have been broadly drafted to cover Alpha Options, a 
Relative Performance Option described below, and any similar product 
that may be listed on any participant exchange in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A reference security may be an exchange-traded fund 
(``ETF'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') is proposing to list options 
(``Alpha Options'') \4\ on NASDAQ OMX Alpha Indexes (``Alpha 
Indexes''), a family of indexes developed by NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. 
(``Nasdaq''). Alpha Indexes measure relative total returns of one 
underlying stock and one underlying ETF, which are also traded on the 
Phlx.\5\ An Alpha Index is calculated by measuring the total return 
performance of the Target Component relative to the total return 
performance of the Benchmark Component based upon prices of 
transactions on the primary listing exchange of each underlying 
component. Each Alpha Index will initially be set at 100.00. Alpha 
Options will be cash-settled, European-style options. In the event of a 
corporate event that eliminates one of the underlying components of an 
Alpha Index, Nasdaq will cease calculation of the Alpha Index for that 
pair of underlying components, and all outstanding option positions 
will be immediately settled at the last disseminated price of that 
Alpha Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-63575 (December 17, 
2010), 75 FR 81320 (December 27, 2010) [File No. SR-Phlx-2010-176].
    \5\ The combination of the two components is referred to as an 
``Alpha Pair.'' The first component of each Alpha Pair is referred 
to as the ``Target Component'' and the second component is referred 
to as the ``Benchmark Component.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Relative Performance Options are highly similar to other index 
options cleared by OCC except for the identity and nature of the 
underlying index. Therefore, OCC believes that the provisions of its 
By-Laws and Rules governing index options, as they are currently in 
effect, are generally sufficient to support the clearance and 
settlement of Relative Performance Options. However, minor 
modifications are needed to support the clearance and settlement of 
Alpha Options and other types of Relative Performance Options that may 
be introduced in the future. For example, OCC's current Rules do not 
account for the possibility of an index having a negative value as 
could occur for certain Relative Performance Indexes. If this should 
ever occur, the index value would be deemed to be equal to zero or, 
because certain systems may not accept a zero index value, a near-zero 
positive amount. Therefore, OCC is modifying its By-Laws to provide for 
such potential adjustments of the index value by either the listing 
exchange or OCC.
    In addition, OCC's current By-Laws do not account for the 
possibility that an expiration date may be accelerated when a reference 
security (i.e., an individual reference security and not a reference 
index) that is one of the components of an underlying relative 
performance index ceases to be published as a result of a cash-out 
merger or similar corporate event. If the value of an underlying 
Relative Performance Index ceases to be published as a result of such 
an event, the value of the overlying options would become fixed. 
Therefore, OCC proposes to modify its By-Laws to provide that OCC will 
either accelerate or not accelerate the expiration in consultation with 
the relevant exchange on which the index underlying a Relative 
Performance Option is listed.

III. Discussion

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \6\ requires, among other things, 
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. Because 
the proposed rule change modifies OCC's Rules and By-Laws to support 
the clearance of Alpha Options and other types of Relative Performance 
Options that may be introduced in the future, the proposed rule change 
is facilitating the perfection of the national system for the clearance 
and settlement of securities transactions and therefore is consistent 
with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \7\ and the 
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2011-02) be, and 
hereby is, approved.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \9\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7366 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P