Proposed Priorities: Disability in the Family, 17403-17406 [2011-7359]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
knowledge translation grantees to
increase the use of research findings;
(3) Collaborating with centers for
independent living and other
stakeholder groups to develop,
implement, or evaluate strategies to
increase utilization of the research
findings; and
(4) Conducting training and
dissemination activities to facilitate the
utilization of the research findings by
community-based organizations and
other service providers, policymakers,
and individuals with disabilities.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate new knowledge through
research and development.
Another benefit of this proposed
priority is that the establishment of a
new RRTC will improve the lives of
individuals with disabilities. The new
RRTC will generate, disseminate and
promote the use of new information that
will improve the options for individuals
with disabilities to live in and
participate in their communities.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: March 24, 2011.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–7357 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17403
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA: 84.133A–09]
Proposed Priorities: Disability in the
Family
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program
administered by NIDRR. Specifically,
this notice proposes a DRRP on
Disability in the Family. The Assistant
Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2011
and later years. We take this action to
focus research attention on areas of
national need. We intend this priority to
contribute to increased participation
and community living within the
context of family life for individuals
with disabilities and their families.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Marlene Spencer, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 5133, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202–2700.
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov. You must
include the phrase ‘‘Proposed Priority
for Disability in the Family’’ in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer.
Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by email: Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
with NIDRR’s currently approved LongRange Plan (Plan). The Plan, which was
published in the Federal Register on
February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can be
accessed on the Internet at the following
site: https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/
list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
17404
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved
populations; (4) identify research gaps;
(5) identify mechanisms of integrating
research and practice; and (6)
disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for DRRP
competitions in FY 2011 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for this priority. The decision
to make an award will be based on the
quality of applications received and
available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
notice. To ensure that your comments
have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 5133, 550 12th
Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is (1) to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and (2) to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
An applicant for assistance under this
program must demonstrate in its
application how it will address, in
whole or in part, the needs of
individuals with disabilities from
minority backgrounds (34 CFR
350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant
may take to meet this requirement are
found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition,
NIDRR intends to require all DRRP
applicants to meet the requirements of
the General Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP)
Requirements priority that it published
in a notice of final priorities in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71
FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice
contains one proposed priority.
DRRP on Disability in the Family.
Background
In the United States, approximately
20.9 million American families have at
least one member with a disability. NonHispanic White families and Asian
families have the lowest incidence of
disability, while Black families and
American Indian and Alaska Native
families have a much higher incidence
of disability among family members.
Families with at least one member with
a disability are more likely to have
lower median incomes, higher poverty
rates, and a higher dependency on
Social Security benefits and public
assistance (U.S. Census, 2005).
Individuals with disabilities often
face barriers that make it difficult to
fulfill family roles. Additionally,
families with at least one member with
a disability face a wide range of barriers
to community living and community
participation. Examples of these barriers
include, but are not limited to:
Inaccessible homes and building
designs that make it difficult for a
person with a disability to live with his
or her family, or to participate with his
or her family in community activities
(National Council on Disability, 2010;
Crews & Zvotka, 2006); laws, policies,
and procedures that separate families,
such as statutes that use disability status
as grounds for terminating parental
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
rights (Lightfoot, Hill, & LaLiberte,
2010); economic burdens associated
with care-giving (e.g., reduced wages
and limited career options due to factors
such as the need for time off work to
care for family members with
disabilities) (Anderson, Dumont, Jacobs,
& Azzaria, 2007); health care
information and treatments that are not
designed to address the culture and
language barriers faced by families from
diverse cultures and backgrounds
(Baker, Miller, Dang, Yaangh, & Hansen,
2010); and a lack of effective and
coordinated family supports (e.g., health
care service and financing) across the
lifespan of the family member with a
disability (Lamar-Dukes, 2009;
Reichman, Corman, and Noonan, 2008;
Jokinen and Brown, 2005).
NIDRR has funded a wide spectrum of
cross-disability research and
development activities related to
families and individuals with
disabilities. NIDRR grantees have
addressed family topics including, but
not limited to: parenting with a
disability, caring for children with
disabilities who have chronic health
care conditions, child custody, family
care-giving, family-based and peer
support networks, and technologies that
address the family-related needs of
individuals with disabilities.
NIDRR grantees also have produced
information about the capabilities of
parents with disabilities, information
about how policies affect families that
have members with disabilities, and
technologies to assist parents with
disabilities in caring for their children.
This work has laid a foundation on
which to base the identification,
development, testing, and evaluation of
interventions, programs, technologies,
and products that facilitate participation
and community living for individuals
with disabilities and their families.
References
Anderson, D., Dumont, S., Jacobs, P.,
and Azzaria, L. (2007). The personal
costs of caring for a child with a
disability: A review of the
literature. Public Health Reports,
122, 3–16.
Baker, D.L., Miller, E., Dang, M.T.,
Yaangh, C., & Hansen, R.L. (2010).
Developing culturally responsive
approaches with Southeast Asian
American families experiencing
developmental disabilities.
Pediatrics, 26, S146–S150.
Crews, D.E. & Zavotka, S. (2006). Aging,
Disability and Frailty: Implications
for Universal Design. Journal of
Physiological Anthropology, 25,
113–118.
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
Jokinen, N.S. & Brown, R.I. (2005).
Family quality of life from the
perspective of older parents. Journal
of Intellectual Disability, 49(10),
789–793.
Lamar-Dukes, P. (2009). Reaching the
hard to reach: A review of an
initiative aimed at increasing
participation and supports for
people of color with disabilities and
their families in disability
organizations. Research and
Practice for Persons with Severe
Disabilities, 34, 76–80.
Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T.
(2010). The inclusion of disability
as a condition for termination of
parental rights. Child Abuse and
Neglect, 34(12), 927–934.
National Council on Disability (2010).
The state of housing in America in
the 21st century: A disability
perspective. [On-line]. Available:
https://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/
publications/2010/
NCD_Housing_Report508.pdf.
Reichman, N.E., Corman, H., & Noonan,
K. (2008). Impact of child disability
on the family. Maternal and Child
Health Journal, 12, 679–683.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Disability
and American families: 2000. [Online]. Available: https://
www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/
censr-23.pdf.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Priority
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
proposes a priority for a Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)
on Disability in the Family. The DRRP
must contribute to the outcome of
increased participation and community
living for individuals with disabilities
and their families.
To contribute to this outcome, the
DRRP must:
1. Conduct research activities,
development activities, or both;
2. Identify or develop, and test or
evaluate interventions, programs,
technologies, or products;
3. Conduct knowledge translation
activities (i.e., training, technical
assistance, utilization, dissemination) in
order to facilitate stakeholder (e.g.,
people with disabilities, families that
have at least one member with a
disability) use of the interventions,
programs, technologies, or products that
resulted from the research activities,
development activities, or both;
4. Involve key stakeholder groups in
the activities described in paragraphs 1
through 3 in order to maximize the
relevance and usability of the
interventions, programs, technologies,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
or products to be developed or studied;
and
5. Include families who are from
traditionally underserved populations
and who have at least one member with
a disability as participants when
conducting the activities described in
paragraphs 1 through 3.
To contribute to this outcome, the
DRRP may:
1. Focus its activities at the individual
level, the family level, the systems level,
or any combination of the three levels;
2. Include in its activities families
with a person with a disability of any
age and any disability;
3. Interpret the term ‘‘family’’ broadly;
and
4. Choose from a wide range of
research and development topics and
approaches within any of the domains
in NIDRR’s currently approved Long
Range Plan (i.e., participation and
community living, technology for access
and function, health and function,
employment) in order to contribute to
the outcome goal of increased
participation and community living for
individuals with disabilities and their
families.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority
We will announce the final priority in
a notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17405
preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or
selection criteria, subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate and promote new knowledge
through research, development, and
knowledge translation activities.
Another benefit of this proposed
priority is that the establishment of a
new DRRP will improve the lives of
individuals with disabilities and their
family members. The new DRRP will
generate and promote the use of new
information that will improve the
options for individuals with disabilities
with regard to community living and
community participation.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
17406
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: March 24, 2011.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–7359 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Postponement of Public Hearing on
the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Mountaineer
Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and
Storage Project, Mason County, WV
U.S. Department of Energy.
Postponement of public hearing.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) announced the availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Mountaineer Commercial Scale
Carbon Capture and Storage Project
(DOE/EIS–0445D) for public review and
comment in a Federal Register notice
on Friday, March 11, 2011. The notice
also provided the location and time for
a public hearing for the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement,
scheduled for Wednesday, March 30,
2011. The purpose of this notice is to
inform interested parties that DOE has
decided to postpone the public hearing;
DOE will issue another notice
announcing the new date and time for
this meeting.
NOTICE:
Issued in Washington, DC on March 23,
2011.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security,
Safety & Health, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011–7332 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Subsequent Arrangement
Office of Nonproliferation and
International Security, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Proposed subsequent
arrangement.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
This notice is being issued
under the authority of section 131a. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended. The Department is providing
notice of a proposed subsequent
arrangement under the Agreement for
Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of
Nuclear Energy Between the European
Atomic Energy Community
(EURATOM) and the United States of
America and the Agreement for
Cooperation between the Government of
the United States of America and the
Government of Norway Concerning
Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.
DATES: This subsequent arrangement
will take effect no sooner than April 13,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Sean Oehlbert, Office of
Nonproliferation and International
Security, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
Telephone: 202–586–3806 or e-mail:
Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.
SUMMARY:
This
subsequent arrangement concerns a
request for a three-year extension (April
2011 to April 2014) of the current
programmatic approval for retransfer of
U.S.-obligated irradiated fuel rods
between Studsvik Nuclear AB, Sweden,
and Institutt for Energiteknikk, Norway.
The rods are being transferred for
irradiation service, tests and
examinations, and will be returned to
Sweden for further test and final
disposal. The total shipping amounts
will be the same as allowed under the
current approval—a maximum of 30,000
grams uranium, 400 grams U–235 and
400 grams plutonium in all shipments,
combined, with a maximum of 100
grams of plutonium per shipment.
The original programmatic consent
was approved in June 2006 and
published in the Federal Register June
13, 2006, (71 FR 34080). A one-year
extension was approved in January 2007
and published in the Federal Register
January 23, 2007, (72 FR 2876). A threeyear extension was approved in March
2008 and published in the Federal
Register March 5, 2008, (73 FR 11894).
The current extension is set to expire
April 2011. If approved, the third
extension, for three years, will extend to
April 2014. Additional transactions are
scheduled to occur between April 2011
and April 2014 and will be subject to
the U.S.-EURATOM Agreement for
Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of
Nuclear Energy.
In accordance with section 131a. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, it has been determined that
this subsequent arrangement will not be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inimical to the common defense and
security.
Dated: March 8, 2011.
For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2011–7326 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Subsequent Arrangement
Office of Nonproliferation and
International Security, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Proposed subsequent
arrangement.
AGENCY:
This notice is being issued
under the authority of section 131a. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended. The Department is providing
notice of a proposed subsequent
arrangement under the Agreement for
Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of
Nuclear Energy Between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of Canada
and the Agreement for Cooperation in
the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy
Between the United States of America
and the European Atomic Energy
Community.
DATES: This subsequent arrangement
will take effect no sooner than April 13,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Sean Oehlbert, Office of
Nonproliferation and International
Security, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
Telephone: 202–586–3806 or e-mail:
Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
subsequent arrangement concerns the
retransfer of 44,379 kg of U.S.-origin
natural uranium hexafluoride (UF6)
(67.60% U), 30,000 kg of which is
uranium, from Cameco Corporation
(Cameco) in Port Hope, Ontario, Canada,
to URENCO in Capenhurst, Chester,
United Kingdom. The material, UF6
produced from U.S.-origin concentrates,
which is currently located at Cameco,
will be transferred to URENCOCapenhurst for toll-enrichment and
ultimate end use in the United States by
STP Nuclear Operating Co. The material
was originally obtained by Cameco from
Crowe Butte Resources, Inc. pursuant to
export license XSOU8798.
In accordance with section 131a. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, it has been determined that
this subsequent arrangement concerning
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17403-17406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7359]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA: 84.133A-09]
Proposed Priorities: Disability in the Family
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority for the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered by
NIDRR. Specifically, this notice proposes a DRRP on Disability in the
Family. The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for competitions
in fiscal year (FY) 2011 and later years. We take this action to focus
research attention on areas of national need. We intend this priority
to contribute to increased participation and community living within
the context of family life for individuals with disabilities and their
families.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Marlene Spencer,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 5133,
Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov. You must include the phrase ``Proposed
Priority for Disability in the Family'' in the subject line of your
electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene Spencer.
Telephone: (202) 245-7532 or by e-mail: Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's currently approved Long-Range Plan (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine
[[Page 17404]]
best strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
This notice proposes a priority that NIDRR intends to use for DRRP
competitions in FY 2011 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for this
priority. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality of
applications received and available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this notice. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priority, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific topic that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in room 5133, 550 12th Street, SW., PCP,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is (1) to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and (2) to improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Rehabilitation Act).
An applicant for assistance under this program must demonstrate in
its application how it will address, in whole or in part, the needs of
individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds (34 CFR
350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant may take to meet this
requirement are found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition, NIDRR intends
to require all DRRP applicants to meet the requirements of the General
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP) Requirements
priority that it published in a notice of final priorities in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP program can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice contains one proposed priority.
DRRP on Disability in the Family.
Background
In the United States, approximately 20.9 million American families
have at least one member with a disability. Non-Hispanic White families
and Asian families have the lowest incidence of disability, while Black
families and American Indian and Alaska Native families have a much
higher incidence of disability among family members. Families with at
least one member with a disability are more likely to have lower median
incomes, higher poverty rates, and a higher dependency on Social
Security benefits and public assistance (U.S. Census, 2005).
Individuals with disabilities often face barriers that make it
difficult to fulfill family roles. Additionally, families with at least
one member with a disability face a wide range of barriers to community
living and community participation. Examples of these barriers include,
but are not limited to: Inaccessible homes and building designs that
make it difficult for a person with a disability to live with his or
her family, or to participate with his or her family in community
activities (National Council on Disability, 2010; Crews & Zvotka,
2006); laws, policies, and procedures that separate families, such as
statutes that use disability status as grounds for terminating parental
rights (Lightfoot, Hill, & LaLiberte, 2010); economic burdens
associated with care-giving (e.g., reduced wages and limited career
options due to factors such as the need for time off work to care for
family members with disabilities) (Anderson, Dumont, Jacobs, & Azzaria,
2007); health care information and treatments that are not designed to
address the culture and language barriers faced by families from
diverse cultures and backgrounds (Baker, Miller, Dang, Yaangh, &
Hansen, 2010); and a lack of effective and coordinated family supports
(e.g., health care service and financing) across the lifespan of the
family member with a disability (Lamar-Dukes, 2009; Reichman, Corman,
and Noonan, 2008; Jokinen and Brown, 2005).
NIDRR has funded a wide spectrum of cross-disability research and
development activities related to families and individuals with
disabilities. NIDRR grantees have addressed family topics including,
but not limited to: parenting with a disability, caring for children
with disabilities who have chronic health care conditions, child
custody, family care-giving, family-based and peer support networks,
and technologies that address the family-related needs of individuals
with disabilities.
NIDRR grantees also have produced information about the
capabilities of parents with disabilities, information about how
policies affect families that have members with disabilities, and
technologies to assist parents with disabilities in caring for their
children. This work has laid a foundation on which to base the
identification, development, testing, and evaluation of interventions,
programs, technologies, and products that facilitate participation and
community living for individuals with disabilities and their families.
References
Anderson, D., Dumont, S., Jacobs, P., and Azzaria, L. (2007). The
personal costs of caring for a child with a disability: A review of the
literature. Public Health Reports, 122, 3-16.
Baker, D.L., Miller, E., Dang, M.T., Yaangh, C., & Hansen, R.L. (2010).
Developing culturally responsive approaches with Southeast Asian
American families experiencing developmental disabilities. Pediatrics,
26, S146-S150.
Crews, D.E. & Zavotka, S. (2006). Aging, Disability and Frailty:
Implications for Universal Design. Journal of Physiological
Anthropology, 25, 113-118.
[[Page 17405]]
Jokinen, N.S. & Brown, R.I. (2005). Family quality of life from the
perspective of older parents. Journal of Intellectual Disability,
49(10), 789-793.
Lamar-Dukes, P. (2009). Reaching the hard to reach: A review of an
initiative aimed at increasing participation and supports for people of
color with disabilities and their families in disability organizations.
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34, 76-80.
Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2010). The inclusion of
disability as a condition for termination of parental rights. Child
Abuse and Neglect, 34(12), 927-934.
National Council on Disability (2010). The state of housing in America
in the 21st century: A disability perspective. [On-line]. Available:
https://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2010/NCD_Housing_Report508.pdf.
Reichman, N.E., Corman, H., & Noonan, K. (2008). Impact of child
disability on the family. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 679-
683.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Disability and American families: 2000.
[On-line]. Available: https://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-23.pdf.
Proposed Priority
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for a Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project (DRRP) on Disability in the Family. The DRRP must
contribute to the outcome of increased participation and community
living for individuals with disabilities and their families.
To contribute to this outcome, the DRRP must:
1. Conduct research activities, development activities, or both;
2. Identify or develop, and test or evaluate interventions,
programs, technologies, or products;
3. Conduct knowledge translation activities (i.e., training,
technical assistance, utilization, dissemination) in order to
facilitate stakeholder (e.g., people with disabilities, families that
have at least one member with a disability) use of the interventions,
programs, technologies, or products that resulted from the research
activities, development activities, or both;
4. Involve key stakeholder groups in the activities described in
paragraphs 1 through 3 in order to maximize the relevance and usability
of the interventions, programs, technologies, or products to be
developed or studied; and
5. Include families who are from traditionally underserved
populations and who have at least one member with a disability as
participants when conducting the activities described in paragraphs 1
through 3.
To contribute to this outcome, the DRRP may:
1. Focus its activities at the individual level, the family level,
the systems level, or any combination of the three levels;
2. Include in its activities families with a person with a
disability of any age and any disability;
3. Interpret the term ``family'' broadly; and
4. Choose from a wide range of research and development topics and
approaches within any of the domains in NIDRR's currently approved Long
Range Plan (i.e., participation and community living, technology for
access and function, health and function, employment) in order to
contribute to the outcome goal of increased participation and community
living for individuals with disabilities and their families.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority
We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final priority after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years in that
similar projects have been completed successfully. This proposed
priority will generate and promote new knowledge through research,
development, and knowledge translation activities. Another benefit of
this proposed priority is that the establishment of a new DRRP will
improve the lives of individuals with disabilities and their family
members. The new DRRP will generate and promote the use of new
information that will improve the options for individuals with
disabilities with regard to community living and community
participation.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document
[[Page 17406]]
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which
is available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: March 24, 2011.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-7359 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P