Wausau Daily Herald Advertising Production Division, a Subsidiary of Gannett Co., Inc.; Wausau, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 17446-17447 [2011-7266]
Download as PDF
17446
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 23, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–7295 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Notice of
Alleged Safety or Health Hazards
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor
(DOL) hereby announces the submission
of the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) sponsored
information collection request (ICR)
titled, ‘‘Notice of Alleged Safety or
Health Hazards,’’ to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval for continued use
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR, with
applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov
Web site, https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, on the day
following publication of this notice or
by contacting Michel Smyth by
telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not
a toll-free number) or sending an e-mail
to DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
Submit comments about this request
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–4816/Fax: 202–395–6881
(these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at
202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free
number) or by e-mail at
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Respondents use the Notice of Alleged
Safety or Health Hazards, Form OSHA–
7, to report unhealthful and/or unsafe
conditions in the workplace to the
OSHA. OSHAct section 8(f)(1)
authorizes employee reports. The OSHA
uses this information to evaluate the
alleged hazards and to schedule an
inspection.
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless it is
currently approved by the OMB under
the PRA and displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information if the
collection of information does not
display a currently valid OMB control
number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and
1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval
for this information collection under
OMB Control Number 1218–0064. The
current OMB approval is scheduled to
expire on March 31, 2011; however, it
should be noted that information
collections submitted to the OMB
receive a month-to-month extension
while they undergo review. For
additional information, see the related
notice published in the Federal Register
on January 13, 2011 (76 FR 2417).
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section within 30 days of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register. In
order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should
reference OMB Control Number 1218–
0064. The OMB is particularly
interested in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA).
Title of Collection: Notice of Alleged
Safety or Health Hazards, Form OSHA–
7.
OMB Control Number: 1218–0064.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 50,715.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 50,715.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 13,414.
Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden:
$1,116.
Dated: March 24, 2011.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–7362 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–75,090]
Wausau Daily Herald Advertising
Production Division, a Subsidiary of
Gannett Co., Inc.; Wausau, WI; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 1, 2011
(received March 7, 2011), the petitioner
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Wausau Daily
Herald, Advertising Production
Division, a subsidiary of Gannett Co.,
Inc., Wausau, Wisconsin (subject firm).
The determination was issued on
February 11, 2011. The Department’s
Notice of Determination will soon be
published in the Federal Register. The
workers produce newspaper
advertisements.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the period
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices
under investigation, there were no
increased imports or an acquisition of
services from a foreign country by the
workers’ firm. The negative
determination stated that the worker
separations are due to a shift of services
to other locations within the United
States and the firm did not produce an
article or supply a service that was used
by a firm with TAA-certified workers in
the production of an article or supply of
a service that was the basis for TAAcertification.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleged that ‘‘Gannett is
outsourcing ads in order to reduce the
workforce throughout Gannett
Newspapers.’’ The request also focused
on a Gannettoid newsletter, dated
August 20, 2009, that stated
‘‘Outsourcing will increase from 10% to
about 30% being outsourced’’ and a
newsletter, dated November 23, 2009,
that stated ‘‘we have reinstated
outsourcing * * * outsourcing will be
setting up visits to those sites who have
already accomplished some local area
consolidations such as * * *
Wisconsin.’’ The request also referred to
other, previously-submitted articles that
mention out-sourcing by the subject
firm.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
March, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–7266 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,897]
Penske Logistics LLC a Subsidiary of
General Electric/Penske Corporation
Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Kelly Temporary Services and
Manpower; El Paso, TX; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
17447
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
March, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–7268 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application dated February 18,
2011, the petitioners requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Penske Logistics LLC, a
subsidiary of General Electric/Penske
Corporation, El Paso, Texas (subject
firm). The determination was issued on
January 7, 2011. The Department’s
Notice of Determination was published
in the Federal Register on January 26,
2011 (76 FR 4729). The subject firm
supplies warehousing services which
includes storage, processing, and
shipping services for the automotive
industry.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the period
under investigation, subject firm sales
and/or production did not decline
during the relevant period and the
subject firm did not shift to another
country the supply of storage,
processing and shipping services (or
like or directly competitive services).
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners alleged that ‘‘All departments
have been impacted in the outsourcing
of our work requirements into Mexico
Delphi Plant locations’’ and identified
specific functions that have allegedly
shifted abroad ‘‘since 2009 (maybe
2008)’’ due to ‘‘X-dock implementation
needs into Mexico’’ and specific
locations in Mexico to where the
services allegedly shifted—‘‘Mochis
Sinaloa, Meoqui Chihuahua, Juarez
Chih, and * * * Chihuahua Chihuahua
who is currently on hold due to plant
transitioning into Durango.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the workers’ request for
reconsideration and the existing record,
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than April 8, 2011.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than April 8, 2011.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17446-17447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-75,090]
Wausau Daily Herald Advertising Production Division, a Subsidiary
of Gannett Co., Inc.; Wausau, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 1, 2011 (received March 7, 2011), the
petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of
Wausau Daily Herald, Advertising Production Division, a subsidiary of
Gannett Co., Inc., Wausau, Wisconsin (subject firm). The determination
was issued on February 11, 2011. The Department's Notice of
Determination will soon be published in the Federal Register. The
workers produce newspaper advertisements.
The negative determination was based on the findings that, during
the period
[[Page 17447]]
under investigation, there were no increased imports or an acquisition
of services from a foreign country by the workers' firm. The negative
determination stated that the worker separations are due to a shift of
services to other locations within the United States and the firm did
not produce an article or supply a service that was used by a firm with
TAA-certified workers in the production of an article or supply of a
service that was the basis for TAA-certification.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that
``Gannett is outsourcing ads in order to reduce the workforce
throughout Gannett Newspapers.'' The request also focused on a
Gannettoid newsletter, dated August 20, 2009, that stated ``Outsourcing
will increase from 10% to about 30% being outsourced'' and a
newsletter, dated November 23, 2009, that stated ``we have reinstated
outsourcing * * * outsourcing will be setting up visits to those sites
who have already accomplished some local area consolidations such as *
* * Wisconsin.'' The request also referred to other, previously-
submitted articles that mention out-sourcing by the subject firm.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-7266 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P