Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 15297-15299 [2011-6558]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–888] Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On September 14, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the 2008—2009 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). See Floor-Standing, MetalTop Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 55754 (September 14, 2010) (AR5 Preliminary Results). This review covers two exporters, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardwares Co., Ltd. (Foshan Shunde) and Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (Since Hardware). The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2008, through July 31, 2009. We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the Final Results differ from the Preliminary Results. The weighted average dumping margins are listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review’’. DATES: Effective Date: March 21, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Background On September 14, 2010, the Department published the preliminary results of this administrative review. See AR5 Preliminary Results. The merchandise covered by the order is floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables and certain parts thereof from the PRC, as described in the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’ section of the this notice. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2008, through VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:50 Mar 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 July 31, 2009. This administrative review covers Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware. In the Preliminary Results, we invited parties to comment. Additionally, on October 22, 2010 we issued to interested parties a memorandum detailing the industry-specific wage rates that the Department intended to use in these Final Results. See October 22, 2010, Memorandum from Michael J. Heaney to the File: ‘‘08/01/2008/07/31/2009 Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Floor Standing Metal Top Ironing Tables from the People’s Republic of China: Industry Specific Wage Rate Selection.’’ We invited interested parties to comment on the Department’s calculation of industry specific wage rates that are outlined in our October 22, 2010, Industry Specific Wage Rate Memorandum. On November 3, 2010, we extended the due date for filing case briefs until November 15, 2010. In response, on November 15, 2010, the Department received respective case briefs from Foshan Shunde and from Home Products International (the Petitioner in this case).1 Petitioner, Foshan Shunde, and Since Hardware submitted rebuttal briefs on November 22, 2010. On December 27, 2010, the Department extended the time frame for the final results of review by an additional 60 days. See Floor-Standing Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of Administrative Review, 75 FR 81212 (December 27, 2010). Scope of the Order For purposes of the order, the product covered consists of floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables, assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, and certain parts thereof. The subject tables are designed and used principally for the hand ironing or pressing of garments or other articles of fabric. The subject tables have full-height leg assemblies that support the ironing surface at an appropriate (often adjustable) height above the floor. The subject tables are produced in a variety of leg finishes, such as painted, plated, or matte, and they are available with various features, including iron rests, linen racks, and others. The subject 1 On November 16, 2010, Since Hardware attempted to submit a case brief. On November 22, 2010, the Department issued a letter to Since Hardware which rejected Since Hardware’s November 16, 2010, case brief as untimely filed. See November 22, 2010, letter from Robert M. James to Since Hardware. Accordingly, the Department has not considered Since Hardware’s November 16, 2010, submission in these Final Results. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15297 ironing tables may be sold with or without a pad and/or cover. All types and configurations of floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables are covered by this review. Furthermore, the order specifically covers imports of ironing tables, assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, and certain parts thereof. For purposes of the order, the term ‘‘unassembled’’ ironing table means a product requiring the attachment of the leg assembly to the top or the attachment of an included feature such as an iron rest or linen rack. The term ‘‘complete’’ ironing table means product sold as a ready-to-use ensemble consisting of the metal-top table and a pad and cover, with or without additional features, e.g., iron rest or linen rack. The term ‘‘incomplete’’ ironing table means product shipped or sold as a ‘‘bare board’’—i.e., a metal-top table only, without the pad and cover— with or without additional features, e.g. iron rest or linen rack. The major parts or components of ironing tables that are intended to be covered by the order under the term ‘‘certain parts thereof’’ consist of the metal top component (with or without assembled supports and slides) and/or the leg components, whether or not attached together as a leg assembly. The order covers separately shipped metal top components and leg components, without regard to whether the respective quantities would yield an exact quantity of assembled ironing tables. Ironing tables without legs (such as models that mount on walls or over doors) are not floor-standing and are specifically excluded. Additionally, tabletop or countertop models with short legs that do not exceed 12 inches in length (and which may or may not collapse or retract) are specifically excluded. The subject ironing tables were previously classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 9403.20.0010. Effective July 1, 2003, the subject ironing tables are classified under new HTSUS subheading 9403.20.0011. The subject metal top and leg components are classified under HTSUS subheading 9403.90.8040. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the Department’s written description of the scope remains dispositive. Separate Rates Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware requested a separate, company-specific antidumping duty rate. In the AR5 Preliminary Results, we found that both E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 15298 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Notices Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware had met the criteria for the application of a separate antidumping duty rate. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 55755– 55756. We verified Foshan Sunde’s and Since Hardware’s separate rate responses and found no discrepancies. Further, we have not received any information since the Preliminary Results with respect to Foshan Shunde or Since Hardware that would warrant reconsideration of our separate-rates determination. Therefore, we have assigned an individual dumping margin to Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware for this review period. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs by the parties and to which we have responded are addressed in the Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the Administrative Review of Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China,’’ (March 14, 2011) (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised, all of which are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in the briefs and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of the Department of Commerce. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at https://trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the comments received from interested parties, we have made the following changes from that presented in our Preliminary Results: For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have based our calculations of labor inputs on industryspecific wage rates using the methodology set forth in our Industry Specific Wage Rate Memorandum. For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have revised our calculation of brokerage and handling and applied these charges according to the weight of the merchandise and the container size of the shipment. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:50 Mar 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have corrected an error in our calculation of the surrogate value of water. For Foshan Shunde we have revised the cotton conversion factor used in our calculations. For Foshan Shunde, we have included the cost of cartons in our calculation of packing charges. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Foshan Shunde the cash deposit rate will be Final Results of Review 18.76 percent; (2) for Since Hardware, We determine that the following the cash deposit rate will be 70. 05 antidumping duty margins exist in these percent; (3) for previously-investigated final results: or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, Margin the cash deposit rate will continue to be Exporter (percent) the exporter-specific rate published for Foshan Shunde .......................... 18.76 the most recent period; (4) for all PRC Since Hardware .......................... 70.05 exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will For details on the calculation of the be the PRC-wide rate of 157.68 percent; antidumping duty weighted-average and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of margin for Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, see Memorandum to the File subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit from Michael J. Heaney, Senior rate will be the rate applicable to the International Trade Compliance PRC exporters that supplied that nonAnalyst; ‘‘Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall From the People’s Republic of China: Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & remain in effect until further notice. Hardware Co., (Foshan Shunde) Notification to Interested Parties Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ dated March 14 2011; see also This notice also serves as the final Memorandum to the File from Michael reminder to importers of their J. Heaney, Senior International Trade responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Compliance Analyst; ‘‘Floor-Standing, to file a certificate regarding the Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain reimbursement of antidumping duties Parts Thereof from the People’s prior to liquidation of the relevant Republic of China: Since Hardware entries during this review period. (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (Since Hardware) Failure to comply with this requirement Analysis Memorandum for the Final could result in the Secretary’s Results.’’ The public versions of both presumption that reimbursement of memoranda are on file in the CRU. antidumping duties occurred and in the Assessment Rates subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the This notice also serves as the only Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) reminder to parties subject to and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department administrative protective order (APO) of will determine, and CBP shall assess, their responsibility concerning the antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue return or destruction or conversion to assessment instructions to CBP 15 days judicial protective order of proprietary after the date of publication of these information disclosed under APO in final results of review. For assessment accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). purposes, where possible, we calculated Timely written notification of the return importer-specific assessment rates for or destruction of APO materials or subject ironing tables from the PRC via conversion to judicial protective order is ad valorem duty assessment rates based hereby requested. Failure to comply on the ratio of the total amount of the with the regulations and the terms of an dumping margins calculated for the APO is a sanctionable violation. examined sales to the total entered This administrative review and this value of those same sales. We will notice are published in accordance with instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. by this review. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Notices Dated: March 14, 2011. Kim Glas, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix I Issues in Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Financial Statements Used To Determine General Expenses and Profit Ratios. Comment 2: Appropriate Wage Rate Calculation. Comment 3: Brokerage and Handling. Comment 4: Zeroing. Comment 5: Whether Certain Expenses are Appropriately Classified as Packaging or Material Costs. Comment 6: Surrogate Value of Cotton. Comment 7: Surrogate Value of Water. Comment 8: Whether Foshan Shunde’s Yield Losses Are Reasonable and Necessitate Use of Facts Available; Whether Discrepancies in Since Hardware’s Calculation of Yield Losses Necessitate Use of Adverse Facts Available. Comment 9: Foshan Shunde Packing Calculation. [FR Doc. 2011–6558 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–821] Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Preliminary Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: March 21, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Room 4014, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Background On December 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 74682 (December 1, 2010). On January 3, 2011, we received from United States Steel Corporation, a domestic producer of subject VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:50 Mar 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 merchandise, a request that the Department conduct an administrative review of Ispat Industries Limited (Ispat), for the review period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. On January 28, 2011, the Department published the notice of initiation of the administrative review of the CVD order covering Ispat for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 76 FR 5137 (January 28, 2011). On February 4, 2011, Ispat notified the Department that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the period of review (POR).1 Scope of the Order The products covered under this order are certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon steel flat products of a rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch or greater, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal and whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances, in coils (whether or not in successively superimposed layers), regardless of thickness, and in straight lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75 mm and of a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness. Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm, but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief) of a thickness not less than 4.0 mm is not included within the scope of this order. Specifically included within the scope of this order are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and the substrate for motor lamination steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium or niobium (also commonly referred to as columbium), or both, added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor lamination steels contains micro-alloying levels of elements such as silicon and aluminum. Steel products to be included in the scope of this order, regardless of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff 1 This public document is available on the public file in the Department’s Central Record Unit (CRU) located in room 7046 of the main Commerce building. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15299 Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), are products in which: (i) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (ii) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (iii) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or 0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 percent of zirconium. All products that meet the physical and chemical description provided above are within the scope of this order unless otherwise excluded. The following products, by way of example, are outside or specifically excluded from the scope of this order: • Alloy hot-rolled steel products in which at least one of the chemical elements exceeds those listed above (including, e.g., ASTM specifications A543, A387, A514, A517, A506). • SAE/AISI grades of series 2300 and higher. • Ball bearings steels, as defined in the HTUS. • Tool steels, as defined in the HTUS. • Silico-manganese (as defined in the HTUS) or silicon electrical steel with a silicon level exceeding 2.25 percent. • ASTM specifications A710 and A736. • USS Abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR 400, USS AR 500). • All products (proprietary or otherwise) based on an alloy ASTM specification (sample specifications: ASTM A506, A507). • Non-rectangular shapes, not in coils, which are the result of having been processed by cutting or stamping and which have assumed the character of articles or products classified outside chapter 72 of the HTUS. The merchandise subject to this order are classified in the HTUS at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, 7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15297-15299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6558]



[[Page 15297]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-888]


Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts 
Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On September 14, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of the 2008--2009 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on floor-standing, 
metal-top ironing tables from the People's Republic of China (PRC). See 
Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From 
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 75 FR 55754 (September 14, 2010) (AR5 
Preliminary Results). This review covers two exporters, Foshan Shunde 
Yongjian Housewares & Hardwares Co., Ltd. (Foshan Shunde) and Since 
Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (Since Hardware). The period of review 
(POR) is August 1, 2008, through July 31, 2009. We invited interested 
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.
    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made 
changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the Final Results differ 
from the Preliminary Results. The weighted average dumping margins are 
listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review''.

DATES: Effective Date: March 21, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4475 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 14, 2010, the Department published the preliminary 
results of this administrative review. See AR5 Preliminary Results. The 
merchandise covered by the order is floor-standing, metal-top ironing 
tables and certain parts thereof from the PRC, as described in the 
``Scope of the Order'' section of the this notice. The period of review 
(POR) is August 1, 2008, through July 31, 2009. This administrative 
review covers Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware.
    In the Preliminary Results, we invited parties to comment. 
Additionally, on October 22, 2010 we issued to interested parties a 
memorandum detailing the industry-specific wage rates that the 
Department intended to use in these Final Results. See October 22, 
2010, Memorandum from Michael J. Heaney to the File: ``08/01/2008/07/
31/2009 Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Floor Standing Metal 
Top Ironing Tables from the People's Republic of China: Industry 
Specific Wage Rate Selection.'' We invited interested parties to 
comment on the Department's calculation of industry specific wage rates 
that are outlined in our October 22, 2010, Industry Specific Wage Rate 
Memorandum. On November 3, 2010, we extended the due date for filing 
case briefs until November 15, 2010. In response, on November 15, 2010, 
the Department received respective case briefs from Foshan Shunde and 
from Home Products International (the Petitioner in this case).\1\ 
Petitioner, Foshan Shunde, and Since Hardware submitted rebuttal briefs 
on November 22, 2010. On December 27, 2010, the Department extended the 
time frame for the final results of review by an additional 60 days. 
See Floor-Standing Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof 
from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the 
Final Results of Administrative Review, 75 FR 81212 (December 27, 
2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On November 16, 2010, Since Hardware attempted to submit a 
case brief. On November 22, 2010, the Department issued a letter to 
Since Hardware which rejected Since Hardware's November 16, 2010, 
case brief as untimely filed. See November 22, 2010, letter from 
Robert M. James to Since Hardware. Accordingly, the Department has 
not considered Since Hardware's November 16, 2010, submission in 
these Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    For purposes of the order, the product covered consists of floor-
standing, metal-top ironing tables, assembled or unassembled, complete 
or incomplete, and certain parts thereof. The subject tables are 
designed and used principally for the hand ironing or pressing of 
garments or other articles of fabric. The subject tables have full-
height leg assemblies that support the ironing surface at an 
appropriate (often adjustable) height above the floor. The subject 
tables are produced in a variety of leg finishes, such as painted, 
plated, or matte, and they are available with various features, 
including iron rests, linen racks, and others. The subject ironing 
tables may be sold with or without a pad and/or cover. All types and 
configurations of floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables are covered 
by this review.
    Furthermore, the order specifically covers imports of ironing 
tables, assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, and certain 
parts thereof. For purposes of the order, the term ``unassembled'' 
ironing table means a product requiring the attachment of the leg 
assembly to the top or the attachment of an included feature such as an 
iron rest or linen rack. The term ``complete'' ironing table means 
product sold as a ready-to-use ensemble consisting of the metal-top 
table and a pad and cover, with or without additional features, e.g., 
iron rest or linen rack. The term ``incomplete'' ironing table means 
product shipped or sold as a ``bare board''--i.e., a metal-top table 
only, without the pad and cover--with or without additional features, 
e.g. iron rest or linen rack. The major parts or components of ironing 
tables that are intended to be covered by the order under the term 
``certain parts thereof'' consist of the metal top component (with or 
without assembled supports and slides) and/or the leg components, 
whether or not attached together as a leg assembly. The order covers 
separately shipped metal top components and leg components, without 
regard to whether the respective quantities would yield an exact 
quantity of assembled ironing tables.
    Ironing tables without legs (such as models that mount on walls or 
over doors) are not floor-standing and are specifically excluded. 
Additionally, tabletop or countertop models with short legs that do not 
exceed 12 inches in length (and which may or may not collapse or 
retract) are specifically excluded.
    The subject ironing tables were previously classified under 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 
9403.20.0010. Effective July 1, 2003, the subject ironing tables are 
classified under new HTSUS subheading 9403.20.0011. The subject metal 
top and leg components are classified under HTSUS subheading 
9403.90.8040. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the 
Department's written description of the scope remains dispositive.

Separate Rates

    Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware requested a separate, company-
specific antidumping duty rate. In the AR5 Preliminary Results, we 
found that both

[[Page 15298]]

Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware had met the criteria for the 
application of a separate antidumping duty rate. See Preliminary 
Results, 75 FR at 55755-55756. We verified Foshan Sunde's and Since 
Hardware's separate rate responses and found no discrepancies.
    Further, we have not received any information since the Preliminary 
Results with respect to Foshan Shunde or Since Hardware that would 
warrant reconsideration of our separate-rates determination. Therefore, 
we have assigned an individual dumping margin to Foshan Shunde and 
Since Hardware for this review period.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case briefs by the parties and to which we 
have responded are addressed in the Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, from Christian 
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results in the Administrative Review of Floor-Standing, Metal-Top 
Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of 
China,'' (March 14, 2011) (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is 
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised, all of 
which are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this 
notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete discussion of all 
issues raised in the briefs and the corresponding recommendations in 
this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit 
(CRU), room 7046 of the Department of Commerce. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the Web at https://trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received from interested parties, we have 
made the following changes from that presented in our Preliminary 
Results:
    For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have based our 
calculations of labor inputs on industry-specific wage rates using the 
methodology set forth in our Industry Specific Wage Rate Memorandum.
    For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have revised our 
calculation of brokerage and handling and applied these charges 
according to the weight of the merchandise and the container size of 
the shipment.
    For both Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, we have corrected an 
error in our calculation of the surrogate value of water.
    For Foshan Shunde we have revised the cotton conversion factor used 
in our calculations.
    For Foshan Shunde, we have included the cost of cartons in our 
calculation of packing charges.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following antidumping duty margins exist in 
these final results:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                          Exporter                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foshan Shunde...............................................       18.76
Since Hardware..............................................       70.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For details on the calculation of the antidumping duty weighted-
average margin for Foshan Shunde and Since Hardware, see Memorandum to 
the File from Michael J. Heaney, Senior International Trade Compliance 
Analyst; ``Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts 
Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Foshan Shunde Yongjian 
Housewares & Hardware Co., (Foshan Shunde) Analysis Memorandum for the 
Final Results,'' dated March 14 2011; see also Memorandum to the File 
from Michael J. Heaney, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst; 
``Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof 
from the People's Republic of China: Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., 
Ltd. (Since Hardware) Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results.'' The 
public versions of both memoranda are on file in the CRU.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of these final results of review. For 
assessment purposes, where possible, we calculated importer-specific 
assessment rates for subject ironing tables from the PRC via ad valorem 
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of the 
dumping margins calculated for the examined sales to the total entered 
value of those same sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these final results of this administrative review for 
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Foshan Shunde 
the cash deposit rate will be 18.76 percent; (2) for Since Hardware, 
the cash deposit rate will be 70. 05 percent; (3) for previously-
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above 
that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) for 
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide 
rate of 157.68 percent; and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied 
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as the final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and in the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction or conversion to judicial 
protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of 
the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and this notice are published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 15299]]


    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Kim Glas,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I

Issues in Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Financial Statements Used To Determine General Expenses 
and Profit Ratios.
Comment 2: Appropriate Wage Rate Calculation.
Comment 3: Brokerage and Handling.
Comment 4: Zeroing.
Comment 5: Whether Certain Expenses are Appropriately Classified as 
Packaging or Material Costs.
Comment 6: Surrogate Value of Cotton.
Comment 7: Surrogate Value of Water.
Comment 8: Whether Foshan Shunde's Yield Losses Are Reasonable and 
Necessitate Use of Facts Available; Whether Discrepancies in Since 
Hardware's Calculation of Yield Losses Necessitate Use of Adverse 
Facts Available.
Comment 9: Foshan Shunde Packing Calculation.

[FR Doc. 2011-6558 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.