Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) Passenger Cars Manufactured Prior to September 1, 2006 Are Eligible for Importation, 14117-14119 [2011-5982]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
Skytop Rover, Co. (Skytop) of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Registered
Importer 06–343) has petitioned NHTSA
to decide whether nonconforming 2002
Kawasaki Ninja ZX–6R motorcycles are
eligible for importation into the United
States. Skytop contends that these
vehicles are eligible for importation
under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) because
they have safety features that comply
with, or are capable of being altered to
comply with, all applicable FMVSS.
In its petition, Skytop described the
nonconforming 2002 Kawasaki Ninja
ZX–6R as the same model as the U.S.certified 2003 Kawasaki Ninja ZX–6R.
Because the Ninja ZX–6R model was
introduced in countries other than the
U.S. as a new model before the
introduction of the U.S-certified version
in 2003, the petitioner acknowledged
that it could not base its petition on the
substantial similarity of the 2002
Kawasaki Ninja ZX–6R to the U.S.certified 2003 Kawasaki Ninja ZX–6R
motorcycles due to the model year
discrepancy and the petitioning
requirements of 49 U.S.C.
30141(a)(1)(A), as set forth in 49 CFR
part 593. Instead, the petitioner chose to
establish import eligibility on the basis
that the vehicles have safety features
that comply with, or are capable of
being modified to comply with, the
FMVSS based on destructive test data or
such other evidence that NHTSA
decides to be adequate as set forth in 49
U.S.C part 30141(a)(1)(B). The petitioner
contends that the 2002 Kawasaki Ninja
ZX–6R utilizes the same components as
the U.S.-certified 2003 Kawasaki Ninja
ZX–6R motorcycles in virtually all of
the systems subject to the applicable
FMVSS.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
2002 Kawasaki Ninja ZX–6R
motorcycles have safety features that
comply with Standard Nos. 106 Brake
Hoses, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluid,
119 New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles
Other than Passenger Cars, 122
Motorcycle Brake Systems, and 205
Glazing Materials.
The petitioner further contends that
the vehicles are capable of being altered
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
to comply with the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
inspection of all vehicles and
replacement of the following with U.S.certified components on vehicles not
already so equipped: (a) Headlamps; (b)
front and rear side-mounted reflex
reflectors; (c) rear-mounted reflex
reflector; (d) tail lamp assembly
(including stoplamp, taillamp, and
license plate lamp); and (e) front and
rear turn signal lamps.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
inspection of all vehicles and
installation of U.S.-model rearview
mirrors on vehicles not already so
equipped.
Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and
Rims for Vehicles other than Passenger
Cars: installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 123 Motorcycle Controls
and Displays: (a) installation of a U.S.model speedometer, or modification of
the speedometer so that it reads in miles
per hour; and (b) installation of an
ignition switch label.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: March 9, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–5977 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. DOT–NHTSA–2011–0028,
Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2005–
2006 Porsche Carrera (997) Passenger
Cars Manufactured Prior to September
1, 2006 Are Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for
decision that nonconforming 2005–2006
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14117
Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006 are eligible for importation.
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that 2005–2006
Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2005–2006 Porsche
Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006), and they are capable of being
readily altered to conform to the
standards.
SUMMARY:
The closing date for comments
on the petition is April 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
14118
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC (‘‘JK’’), of
Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer 90–006) has petitioned NHTSA
to decide whether nonconforming 2005–
2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
cars manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, are eligible for importation into
the United States. The vehicles which
JK believes are substantially similar are
2005–2006 Porsche Carrera (997)
passenger cars manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006, that were
manufactured for sale in the United
States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared
non-U.S. certified 2005–2006 Porsche
Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, to their U.S.-certified
counterparts, and found the vehicles to
be substantially similar with respect to
compliance with most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its
petition intended to demonstrate that
non-U.S. certified 2005–2006 Porsche
Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, as originally manufactured,
conform to many FMVSS in the same
manner as their U.S. certified
counterparts, or are capable of being
readily altered to conform to those
standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
non-U.S. certified 2005–2006 Porsche
Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1,
2006 are identical to their U.S. certified
counterparts with respect to compliance
with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission
Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109
New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch
System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids,
124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135
Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering
Control Rearward Displacement, 205
Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and
Door Retention Components, 207
Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield
Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection,
216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219
Windshield Zone Intrusion, 301 Fuel
System Integrity, and 302 Flammability
of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls Telltales,
and Indicators: Installation of U.S.
conforming instrument cluster and
cruise control lever, and installation or
activation of associated U.S.-version
software in the vehicle’s computer
system.
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
Installation of the following U.S.-model
components on vehicles not already so
equipped: (a) Front sidemarker lamps
with integral side reflex reflectors; (b)
headlamps; (c) integral tail lamp
housings that includes rear side marker,
rear turn signal, and brake lamps, as
well as rear and side reflex reflectors.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR
of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or
Less: Installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Installation of a U.S.-model passenger
side rearview mirror, or inscription of
the required warning statement on the
face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:
Installation of a supplemental key
warning buzzer, or installation or
activation of U.S.-version software to
meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Installation or activation of
U.S.-version software in the vehicle’s
computer system to meet the
requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.conforming model seat belts, air bag
control units, air bags, and sensors with
U.S.-model components on vehicles that
are not already so equipped; and (b)
installation or activation of U.S.-version
software to ensure that the seat belt
warning system meets the requirements
of this standard.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.certified model seat belts with U.S.model components.
Standard No. 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems: Installation of U.S.model child restraint anchorage systems
components.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk
Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
System (FDMS) at https://
www.Regulations.gov.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Issued on: March 9, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–5982 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY:
Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).
Notice of Amendment of
Systems of Records Notice ‘‘Supervised
Fiduciary/Beneficiary and General
Investigative Records—VA’’ (37VA27).
ACTION:
As required by the Privacy
Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)), notice
is hereby given that the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) is updating
system of records in its inventory
entitled ‘‘Supervised Fiduciary/
Beneficiary and General Investigative
Records—VA’’ (37VA27). VA is
amending the system of records by
revising the Purpose(s), System Manager
and address, and Routine Uses of
Records Maintained in the System. VA
is republishing the system notice in its
entirety.
DATES: Comments on this amended
system of records must be received no
later than April 14, 2011. If no public
comment is received during the period
allowed for comment or unless
otherwise published in the Federal
Register by VA, the amended system
will become effective April 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068,
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
202–273–9026. (This is not a toll free
number.) Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call 202–461–4902 for an appointment.
(This is not a toll free number.) In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Thomas J. Murphy, Director,
Compensation and Pension Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, 202–461–9700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
system of records contains guidelines
for the administration of benefits in
regards to beneficiaries who have been
deemed incompetent by medical or legal
authority. As required by law this
system of records is updated to contain
additional routine uses deemed
necessary to administer benefits covered
under title 38, United States Code,
chapter 3, section (501)(a), (b), chapter
55.
The routine uses of records
maintained in the system, including
categories of users and the purposes of
such uses, are being amended to protect
the confidentiality and govern the
release of VA records subject to 38
U.S.C. 5701, which permits disclosure
in accordance with valid routine uses.
Routine use numbers 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, and 21 have been added in
accordance with this authority.
Routine use number 1 has been
revised to require that individuals
covered by this system provide written
requests for disclosures to be made to
members of Congress or their staff.
Routine use number 15 was added to
allow for the disclosure of information
to the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA) and the General
Services Administration (GSA) in
records management inspections
conducted under authority of chapter 29
of title 44, United States Code. Routine
use number 16 was added to allow for
the disclosure of information to the
Department of Justice (DoJ), either on
VA’s initiative or in response to DOJ’s
request for information, after either VA
or DoJ determines that such information
is relevant to DoJ’s representation of the
United States or any of its components
in legal proceedings before a court or
adjudicative body, provided that, in
each case, the agency also determines
prior to disclosure that release of the
records to DoJ is a use of the
information contained in the records
that is compatible with the purpose for
which VA collected the records. VA, on
its own initiative, may disclose records
in this system of records in legal
proceedings before a court or
administrative body after determining
that the disclosure of records to the
court or administrative body is a use of
the information contained in the records
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14119
that is compatible with the purpose for
which VA collected the records. Routine
use number 17 was added to allow for
the disclosure of relevant information to
individuals, organizations, public or
private agencies, or other entities with
whom VA has a contract or agreement
or where there is a subcontract to
perform such services as VA may deem
practicable for the purposes of laws
administered by VA, in order for the
contractor or subcontractor to perform
the services of the contract or
agreement. Routine use number 18 was
added to allow the disclosure of
information by VA of any information in
the system, except the names and
mailing addresses of veterans and their
dependents, that is relevant to a
suspected violation or reasonably
imminent violation of law, whether
civil, criminal or regulatory in nature
and whether arising by general or
program statute or by regulation, rule or
order issued pursuant thereto, to a
Federal, State, local, Tribal, or foreign
agency charged with the responsibility
of investigating or prosecuting such
violation, or charged with enforcing or
implementing the statute, rule,
regulation or order. Routine use number
19 was added to allow the disclosure of
information to Federal agencies to assist
such agencies in preventing and
detecting possible fraud or abuse in
operations and programs. Routine use
number 20 was added to allow VA to
disclose any information or records to
appropriate agencies, entities, and
persons when (1) VA suspects or has
confirmed that the integrity or
confidentiality of information in the
system of records has been
compromised; (2) VA has determined
that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed compromise, there is a risk of
embarrassment or harm to the
reputations of the record subjects, harm
to economic or property interests,
identity theft or fraud, or harm to the
programs (whether maintained by VA or
another agency or entity) that rely upon
the potentially compromised
information; and (3) the disclosure is
made to such agencies, entities, or
persons whom VA determines are
reasonably necessary to assist or carry
out VA’s efforts to respond to the
suspected or confirmed compromise
and prevent, minimize, or remedy such
harm. This routine use allows
disclosures by VA to respond to a
suspected or confirmed data breach,
including the conduct of any risks
analysis or provision of credit
protection services as provided in 38
U.S.C. 5724, as the terms are defined in
38 U.S.C. 5727. Routine use number 21
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14117-14119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5982]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. DOT-NHTSA-2011-0028, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) Passenger Cars Manufactured Prior to
September 1, 2006 Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming
2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006 are eligible for importation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006, that were not originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are
eligible for importation into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for
sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer
as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of
the 2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior
to September 1, 2006), and they are capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the
[[Page 14118]]
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The
docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the heading of
this document notice. Please note that even after the comment closing
date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it
becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the Docket for
new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC (``JK''), of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer 90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming
2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006, are eligible for importation into the United States.
The vehicles which JK believes are substantially similar are 2005-2006
Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, that were manufactured for sale in the United States and
certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 2005-2006
Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to September 1,
2006, to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to
be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate
that non-U.S. certified 2005-2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars
manufactured prior to September 1, 2006, as originally manufactured,
conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S. certified
counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to
those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2005-
2006 Porsche Carrera (997) passenger cars manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006 are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts
with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift
Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood
Latch System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 124 Accelerator Control
Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in
Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward
Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention
Components, 207 Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212
Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush
Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 301 Fuel System Integrity,
and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls Telltales, and Indicators: Installation
of U.S. conforming instrument cluster and cruise control lever, and
installation or activation of associated U.S.-version software in the
vehicle's computer system.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Installation of the following U.S.-model components on
vehicles not already so equipped: (a) Front sidemarker lamps with
integral side reflex reflectors; (b) headlamps; (c) integral tail lamp
housings that includes rear side marker, rear turn signal, and brake
lamps, as well as rear and side reflex reflectors.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Installation of a U.S.-model
passenger side rearview mirror, or inscription of the required warning
statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a supplemental
key warning buzzer, or installation or activation of U.S.-version
software to meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Installation or activation of U.S.-version software in the
vehicle's computer system to meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Inspection of all
vehicles and replacement of any non U.S.-conforming model seat belts,
air bag control units, air bags, and sensors with U.S.-model components
on vehicles that are not already so equipped; and (b) installation or
activation of U.S.-version software to ensure that the seat belt
warning system meets the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.-certified model seat belts with U.S.-
model components.
Standard No. 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems: Installation of
U.S.-model child restraint anchorage systems components.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
[[Page 14119]]
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: March 9, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Acting Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-5982 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P