Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 14099 [2011-5932]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
(4) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2011.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2011–5911 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application Number D–11638]
Withdrawal of the Notice of Proposed
Exemption Involving Owens & Minor,
Inc. (the Applicant), Located in
Mechanicsville, VA
In the December 16, 2010 issue of the
Federal Register, at 75 FR 78772, the
Department of Labor published a notice
of proposed exemption from the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended, and from
certain taxes imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of
proposed exemption, if granted, would
have permitted the sale of certain shares
in a hedge fund by the Owens & Minor,
Inc. Pension Plan to the applicant.
By e-mail dated February 8, 2011, the
applicant requested that the application
for exemption be withdrawn.
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
exemption is hereby withdrawn.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2011.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director, Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–5913 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Employment and Training
Administration
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of
February 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[TA–W–73,441A]
[FR Doc. 2011–5932 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Quad Tech, Inc.,
Sussex, Wisconsin (TA–W–73,441A)
(subject firm). The determination was
issued on January 4, 2011. The
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4729). The
workers are engaged in activities related
to the production of magazines and
catalogs. Specifically, the workers of the
subject firm provide steel stackers and
equipment for printers to affiliated
locations.
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings that, with
regards to workers covered by TA–W–
73,441A, Quad Graphics did not shift to
or acquire from a foreign country the
production of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by the
subject workers; that there were no
increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced by the subject firm during the
relevant period; and that the workers are
not adversely-affected secondary
workers.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleged that ‘‘work here
decreased from work being sent
elsewhere (India)’’ and ‘‘shift from our
firm to India with silo work.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application dated February 7,
2011, a worker requested administrative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14099
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Proposed Collection of Information for
an Evaluation of the Young Parents
Demonstration Project (YPDP);
Comment Request
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
[44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)(A)]. The program
helps to ensure that requested data can
be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of the collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
The proposed information collection
is for an evaluation of the YPDP. The
YPDP is sponsored by ETA to test
innovative strategies that can improve
the skills and education of young
parents and, ultimately their
employment and earnings.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
May 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this proposed
information collection request may be
obtained by contacting Savi Swick at
202–693–3382 (this is not a toll-free
number) or e-mail: swick.savi@dol.gov.
Comments are to be submitted to
Department of Labor/Employment and
Training Administration, Attn: Savi
Swick, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
(Room N–5641) Washington, DC 20210).
Written comments may be transmitted
by facsimile to 202–693–2766 (this is
not a toll-free number) or e-mailed to
swick.savi@dol.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The proposed information collection
is for an evaluation of the YPDP. The
YPDP is sponsored by ETA to test
innovative strategies that can improve
the skills and education of young
parents and, ultimately their
employment and earnings.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,441A]
Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated February 7, 2011, a worker requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex,
Wisconsin (TA-W-73,441A) (subject firm). The determination was issued
on January 4, 2011. The Department's Notice of Determination was
published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4729). The
workers are engaged in activities related to the production of
magazines and catalogs. Specifically, the workers of the subject firm
provide steel stackers and equipment for printers to affiliated
locations.
The negative determination was based on the Department's findings
that, with regards to workers covered by TA-W-73,441A, Quad Graphics
did not shift to or acquire from a foreign country the production of
articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the
subject workers; that there were no increased imports of articles like
or directly competitive with those produced by the subject firm during
the relevant period; and that the workers are not adversely-affected
secondary workers.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that
``work here decreased from work being sent elsewhere (India)'' and
``shift from our firm to India with silo work.''
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of February 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5932 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
