Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 14099 [2011-5932]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices (4) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be subject to the express condition that the material facts and representations contained in each application are true and complete, and that each application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the subject of the exemption. Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2011. Ivan Strasfeld, Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. [FR Doc. 2011–5911 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–29–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration [Application Number D–11638] Withdrawal of the Notice of Proposed Exemption Involving Owens & Minor, Inc. (the Applicant), Located in Mechanicsville, VA In the December 16, 2010 issue of the Federal Register, at 75 FR 78772, the Department of Labor published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption, if granted, would have permitted the sale of certain shares in a hedge fund by the Owens & Minor, Inc. Pension Plan to the applicant. By e-mail dated February 8, 2011, the applicant requested that the application for exemption be withdrawn. Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn. Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2011. Ivan L. Strasfeld, Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–5913 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–29–P Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Employment and Training Administration Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of February 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [TA–W–73,441A] [FR Doc. 2011–5932 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, Wisconsin (TA–W–73,441A) (subject firm). The determination was issued on January 4, 2011. The Department’s Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4729). The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of magazines and catalogs. Specifically, the workers of the subject firm provide steel stackers and equipment for printers to affiliated locations. The negative determination was based on the Department’s findings that, with regards to workers covered by TA–W– 73,441A, Quad Graphics did not shift to or acquire from a foreign country the production of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the subject workers; that there were no increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the subject firm during the relevant period; and that the workers are not adversely-affected secondary workers. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that ‘‘work here decreased from work being sent elsewhere (India)’’ and ‘‘shift from our firm to India with silo work.’’ The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P By application dated February 7, 2011, a worker requested administrative VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Mar 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14099 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Proposed Collection of Information for an Evaluation of the Young Parents Demonstration Project (YPDP); Comment Request Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) [44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)(A)]. The program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of the collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The proposed information collection is for an evaluation of the YPDP. The YPDP is sponsored by ETA to test innovative strategies that can improve the skills and education of young parents and, ultimately their employment and earnings. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addressee’s section below on or before May 16, 2011. ADDRESSES: A copy of this proposed information collection request may be obtained by contacting Savi Swick at 202–693–3382 (this is not a toll-free number) or e-mail: swick.savi@dol.gov. Comments are to be submitted to Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration, Attn: Savi Swick, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., (Room N–5641) Washington, DC 20210). Written comments may be transmitted by facsimile to 202–693–2766 (this is not a toll-free number) or e-mailed to swick.savi@dol.gov. SUMMARY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The proposed information collection is for an evaluation of the YPDP. The YPDP is sponsored by ETA to test innovative strategies that can improve the skills and education of young parents and, ultimately their employment and earnings. E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,441A]


Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 7, 2011, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of Quad Tech, Inc., Sussex, 
Wisconsin (TA-W-73,441A) (subject firm). The determination was issued 
on January 4, 2011. The Department's Notice of Determination was 
published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4729). The 
workers are engaged in activities related to the production of 
magazines and catalogs. Specifically, the workers of the subject firm 
provide steel stackers and equipment for printers to affiliated 
locations.
    The negative determination was based on the Department's findings 
that, with regards to workers covered by TA-W-73,441A, Quad Graphics 
did not shift to or acquire from a foreign country the production of 
articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the 
subject workers; that there were no increased imports of articles like 
or directly competitive with those produced by the subject firm during 
the relevant period; and that the workers are not adversely-affected 
secondary workers.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that 
``work here decreased from work being sent elsewhere (India)'' and 
``shift from our firm to India with silo work.''
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of February 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5932 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.