The Jewelry Stream; Los Angeles, CA, Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 14103-14104 [2011-5930]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
potential entitlement of 34 weeks will
increase to a maximum potential
entitlement of 47 weeks in the EUC08
program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of
Unemployment Insurance, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg. Room S–4231,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone
number (202) 693–3008 (this is not a
toll-free number) or by e-mail:
gibbons.scott@dol.gov.
Information for Claimants
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–6026 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Announcement Regarding New Mexico
and Colorado Triggering ‘‘On’’ to Tier
Four of Emergency Unemployment
Compensation 2008 (EUC08)
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Announcement regarding
New Mexico and Colorado triggering
‘‘on’’ to Tier Four of Emergency
Unemployment Compensation 2008
(EUC08).
Public law 111–312 extended
provisions in Public Law 111–92 which
amended prior laws to create a Third
and Fourth Tier of benefits within the
EUC08 program for qualified
unemployed workers claiming benefits
in high unemployment states. The
Department of Labor produces a trigger
notice indicating which states qualify
for EUC08 benefits within Tiers Three
and Four and provides the beginning
and ending dates of payable periods for
each qualifying state. The trigger notice
covering state eligibility for the EUC08
program can be found at: https://
ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_
arch.asp.
Based on data published January 25,
2011, by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
the following trigger changes have
occurred for New Mexico and Colorado
in the EUC08 program:
The three month average, seasonally
adjusted total unemployment rates for
New Mexico and Colorado met or
exceeded the 8.5% threshold to trigger
‘‘on’’ to Tier Four in the EUC08 program.
The payable period in Tier Four for New
Mexico and Colorado began February
13, 2011. As a result, the maximum
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
The duration of benefits payable in
the EUC program, and the terms and
conditions under which they are
payable, are governed by Public Laws
110–252, 110–449, 111–5, 111–92, 111–
118, 111–144, 111–157, 111–205 and
111–312, and the operating instructions
issued to the states by the U.S.
Department of Labor. Persons who
believe they may be entitled to
additional benefits under the EUC08
program, or who wish to inquire about
their rights under the program, should
contact their State Workforce Agency.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of
Unemployment Insurance, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg. Room S–4231,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone
number (202) 693–3008 (this is not a
toll-free number) or by e-mail:
gibbons.scott@dol.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–6025 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,145]
The Jewelry Stream; Los Angeles, CA,
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On November 10, 2010, the
Department of Labor (Department)
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of The Jewelry Stream,
Los Angeles, California. On November
23, 2010, the Department’s Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 71455). Workers
of The Jewelry Stream are engaged in
employment related to the production of
jewelry.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14103
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The termination of investigation
(issued on August 20, 2010) was based
on information obtained during the
initial investigation that the firm
identified in the Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) petition (‘‘M & L
Manufacturing, Inc./The Jewelry
Stream, 2520 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles,
California’’) is not one firm but are
separate, unaffiliated companies.
Therefore, the Department determined
that the petition is invalid.
In request for reconsideration, state
workforce official stated that the
individual on whose behalf the TAA
petition was filed believed that the
aforementioned companies are one firm.
In support of the request for
reconsideration, the state workforce
official supplied new and additional
information provided by the individual
who sought assistance from the state
workforce official (‘‘I started to work for
M & L Manufacturing, Inc. on August of
1990, but for some reason and without
notification I started to receive my
checks in 2005 under the name of The
Jewelry Stream * * * I was under the
impression that I had worked for the
same company from 1990 to 2008.’’)
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department received
information from the individual on
whose behalf the TAA petition was filed
regarding his former employer. The
individual states that he was not
separated from M & L Manufacturing,
Inc., but separated from The Jewelry
Stream on December 18, 2008.
Therefore, the Department determines
that the subject worker group consists of
workers and former workers of The
Jewelry Stream, Los Angeles, California.
Workers of a firm may be eligible to
apply for worker adjustment assistance
if they satisfy the criteria of subsection
(a), (c) or (f) of Section 222 of the Act,
19 U.S.C. 2272(a), (c), (f). For the
Department of Labor to issue a
certification for workers under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section
222(a)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2282(a)(1))
requires that a significant number or
proportion of the workers in the workers’
firm must have become totally or partially
separated or be threatened with total or
partial separation.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
14104
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices
II. The second criterion (set forth in
Section 222(a)(2) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the
workers’ firm must have decreased
absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or
directly competitive with articles or services
produced or supplied by the workers’ firm
have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers’
firm was directly incorporated have
increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers’ firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly
incorporating component parts not produced
in the U.S. that are like or directly
competitive with the article into which the
component part produced by the workers’
firm was directly incorporated have
increased.
(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers’
firm to a foreign country in the production
of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/
supplied by the workers’ firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a
foreign country by the workers’ firm of
articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied
by the workers’ firm.
III. The third criterion requires that the
increase in imports or shift/acquisition must
have contributed importantly to the workers’
separation or threat of separation. See
Sections 222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii),
2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(d), defines the terms ‘‘Supplier’’
and ‘‘Downstream Producer.’’ For the
Department to issue a secondary worker
certification under Section 222(c) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(c), to workers of a
Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the
following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of
the workers in the workers’ firm or an
appropriate subdivision of the firm have
become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who received
a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article
or service that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) either
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the
component parts it supplied to the firm
described in paragraph (2) accounted for at
least 20 percent of the production or sales of
the workers’ firm; or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
(B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm
with the firm described in paragraph (2)
contributed importantly to the workers’
separation or threat of separation.
Workers of a firm may also be
considered eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance if they are
publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in a category of
determination that is listed in Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(f).
The group eligibility requirements for
workers of a firm under Section 222(f)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(f), can be
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) the workers’ firm is publicly identified
by name by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic
industry in an investigation resulting in—
(A) an affirmative determination of serious
injury or threat thereof under section
202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market
disruption or threat thereof under section
421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of
material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A)
and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year
period beginning on the date on which—
(A) a summary of the report submitted to
the President by the International Trade
Commission under section 202(f)(1) with
respect to the affirmative determination
described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in
the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination
described in subparagraph (1) is published in
the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or
partially separated from the workers’ firm
within—
(A) the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the
1-year period preceding the 1-year period
described in paragraph (2).
Information obtained during the
initial investigation confirmed that
Criterion II has not been met because
The Jewelry Stream did not shift to a
foreign country the production of
articles like or directly competitive with
jewelry produced by the subject worker
group and, during the relevant period,
did not increase imports of articles like
or directly competitive with jewelry
produced by the subject worker group.
As such, the subject workers have not
met the criteria set forth in Section
222(a).
Moreover, The Jewelry Stream did not
produce a component part that was used
by a firm that both employed a worker
group eligible to apply for TAA and
directly incorporated the component
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
part in the production of an article or
supply of a service that was the basis for
the TAA certification. As such, the
subject workers have not met the criteria
set forth in Section 222(c).
Further, The Jewelry Stream has not
been identified by name in an
affirmative finding of injury by the
International Trade Commission. As
such, the subject workers have not met
the criteria set forth in Section 222(f).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Jewelry
Stream, Los Angeles, California.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 14th
day of February 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–5930 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,301]
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation,
a Subsidiary of AMG; Newfield, NJ;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On October 7, 2010, the Department
of Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for the
workers and former workers of
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, a
subsidiary of AMG, Newfield, New
Jersey (subject firm). The Department’s
Notice was published in the Federal
Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR
65515).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The petition states that the workers’
separations occurred between October
2009 and February 2010 and described
the service supplied as ‘‘aluminum
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14103-14104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5930]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,145]
The Jewelry Stream; Los Angeles, CA, Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On November 10, 2010, the Department of Labor (Department) issued
an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
for the workers and former workers of The Jewelry Stream, Los Angeles,
California. On November 23, 2010, the Department's Notice of
determination was published in the Federal Register (75 FR 71455).
Workers of The Jewelry Stream are engaged in employment related to the
production of jewelry.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The termination of investigation (issued on August 20, 2010) was
based on information obtained during the initial investigation that the
firm identified in the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition (``M
& L Manufacturing, Inc./The Jewelry Stream, 2520 W. 6th Street, Los
Angeles, California'') is not one firm but are separate, unaffiliated
companies. Therefore, the Department determined that the petition is
invalid.
In request for reconsideration, state workforce official stated
that the individual on whose behalf the TAA petition was filed believed
that the aforementioned companies are one firm. In support of the
request for reconsideration, the state workforce official supplied new
and additional information provided by the individual who sought
assistance from the state workforce official (``I started to work for M
& L Manufacturing, Inc. on August of 1990, but for some reason and
without notification I started to receive my checks in 2005 under the
name of The Jewelry Stream * * * I was under the impression that I had
worked for the same company from 1990 to 2008.'')
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department received
information from the individual on whose behalf the TAA petition was
filed regarding his former employer. The individual states that he was
not separated from M & L Manufacturing, Inc., but separated from The
Jewelry Stream on December 18, 2008. Therefore, the Department
determines that the subject worker group consists of workers and former
workers of The Jewelry Stream, Los Angeles, California.
Workers of a firm may be eligible to apply for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c) or (f)
of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), (c), (f). For the
Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), the following three criteria must
be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant number or
proportion of the workers in the workers' firm must have become
totally or partially separated or be threatened with total or
partial separation.
[[Page 14104]]
II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm must have
decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or supplied by the
workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles into which the component part produced by the workers' firm
was directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced directly using the services supplied by
the workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating component parts
not produced in the U.S. that are like or directly competitive with
the article into which the component part produced by the workers'
firm was directly incorporated have increased.
(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers'
firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by
the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm.
III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports
or shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation. See Sections
222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).
Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(d), defines the terms
``Supplier'' and ``Downstream Producer.'' For the Department to issue a
secondary worker certification under Section 222(c) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the
following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally
or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification
of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a),
and such supply or production is related to the article or service
that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at
least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
Workers of a firm may also be considered eligible to apply for
worker adjustment assistance if they are publicly identified by name by
the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry
in an investigation resulting in a category of determination that is
listed in Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(f).
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm under
Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(f), can be satisfied if the
following criteria are met:
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in
an investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or
threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on
the date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect
to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from
the workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period
preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Information obtained during the initial investigation confirmed
that Criterion II has not been met because The Jewelry Stream did not
shift to a foreign country the production of articles like or directly
competitive with jewelry produced by the subject worker group and,
during the relevant period, did not increase imports of articles like
or directly competitive with jewelry produced by the subject worker
group. As such, the subject workers have not met the criteria set forth
in Section 222(a).
Moreover, The Jewelry Stream did not produce a component part that
was used by a firm that both employed a worker group eligible to apply
for TAA and directly incorporated the component part in the production
of an article or supply of a service that was the basis for the TAA
certification. As such, the subject workers have not met the criteria
set forth in Section 222(c).
Further, The Jewelry Stream has not been identified by name in an
affirmative finding of injury by the International Trade Commission. As
such, the subject workers have not met the criteria set forth in
Section 222(f).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Jewelry Stream, Los Angeles,
California.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 14th day of February 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5930 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P