Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to the Opening System, 13688-13689 [2011-5762]
Download as PDF
13688
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–5763 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–64058; File No. SR–C2–
2011–006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Related to the Opening
System
March 8, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 1,
2011, the C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposal as
a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule
change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
Rule 6.11, Openings (and sometimes
Closings). The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/
Legal/RuleFilings.aspx), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary and
at the Commission.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Mar 11, 2011
proposed rule change. The text of those
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
1. Purpose
Rule 6.11 describes the Exchange’s
procedures for conducting trading
rotations. The Exchange is proposing to
amend Rule 6.11 in various respects.
First, to have more flexibility in a
manner that is consistent with other C2
rules with order eligibility provisions,
the Exchange is proposing to amend
Rule 6.11 to include an order eligibility
provision. In particular, Rule 6.11 will
be amended to provide that the
Exchange shall designate the eligible
order size, eligible order type, eligible
order origin code (i.e., public customer
orders, non-Market Maker broker-dealer
orders, and Market Maker broker-dealer
orders) that the System will accept for
rotations on a class-by-class basis. The
proposal would not, however, permit
the Exchange to discriminate among
individual market participants of the
same type (e.g., permit certain marketmaker orders but not others to be
eligible). The Rule will also be amended
to delete a reference to spread orders
and contingency orders not being
eligible to participate in opening trades
or in the determination of the opening
price, expected opening price or
expected opening size. (As revised, the
Exchange would determine whether to
designate these orders types as eligible
on a class-by-class basis, just as it would
for any other order type.) Any changes
to the order eligibility parameters
determined by the Exchange would be
announced to C2 Participants via
Regulatory Circular.
This proposed change to include
order eligibility requirements within
Rule 6.11 is consistent with the order
eligibility requirements contained in
other rules, such as the order eligibility
requirements for Rule 6.14, SAL (SAL is
a feature that auctions marketable orders
for price improvement over the national
best bid and offer). The proposed rule
change is also consistent with the
provisions of Rule 6.10, Orders Types
Defined,5 which provides that the
classes and/or systems for which the
orders types described in Rule 6.10 shall
be available will be as provided in the
5 The Exchange is also proposing to change the
title of Rule 6.10 to ‘‘Order Types Defined.’’
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange Rules, as the context may
indicate, or as otherwise specified via
Regulatory Circular.
Second, the Exchange is proposing to
adopt new Interpretation and Policy .01
to Rule 6.11 to provide that the
Exchange may determine on a class-byclass basis which electronic allocation
algorithm 6 would apply for rotations.
Currently Rule 6.11(g) provides that, in
determining priority of orders and
quotes to be traded at a single clearing
price, the System gives priority to
public customer market orders first
(with multiple orders ranked based on
time priority), then to non-public
customer market orders second (with
multiple orders being ranked based on
time priority), then to multiple quotes
and orders whose price is better than
the opening price (with multiple quotes
and orders being ranked in accordance
with the allocation algorithm in effect
for the option class), then to limit orders
and quotes at the opening price (with
multiple orders and quotes ranked in
accordance with the allocation
algorithm in effect for the class). Any
remaining marketable order(s) are then
exposed and allocated in accordance
with the matching algorithms in effect
for the class. The Exchange is proposing
to remove these specific allocation
algorithm descriptions. Instead, the
provision will be amended to provide
that, in determining the priority of
orders and quotes to be traded at a
single clearing price, the System will
give priority to market orders first, then
to limit orders and quotes whose price
is better than the opening price, and
then to resting orders and quotes at the
opening price. In addition, as indicated
above, the Exchange is proposing to
adopt new Interpretation and Policy .01
to Rule 6.11. Proposed Interpretation
and Policy .01 to Rule 6.11 will provide
that the Exchange may determine on a
class-by-class basis which electronic
allocation algorithm would apply for
rotations. This change will also provide
the Exchange with additional flexibility
to permit the allocation algorithm in
effect for a rotation to be different from
the allocation algorithm in effect for the
option class. All pronouncements
regarding allocation algorithm
determinations by the Exchange will be
announced to C2 Participants via
Regulatory Circular.
In conjunction with this change, the
Exchange is also proposing to modify
Rule 6.11 to codify and describe the
6 The allocation algorithms include base
execution algorithms (price-time, pro-rata, and
price-time with primary public customer priority
and secondary trade participation right priority)
and an optional market turner priority overlay. See
Rule 6.12, Order Execution and Priority.
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
manner in which the System handles
opening imbalances in series that open
at a minimum price increment (e.g., a
series that opens at a price of $0.05
when the series is quoted in $0.05
increments and a series that opens at a
price of $0.01 when the series is quoted
in $0.01 increments). In those scenarios,
the System opens even if a sell market
order imbalance exists. In addition, the
Exchange may determine to apply a
separate electronic allocation algorithm
for series that open at a minimum price
increment due to a sell market order
imbalance. As indicated above,
pronouncements regarding allocation
algorithm determinations will be
announced via Regulatory Circular.
The matching algorithm applied for
rotations for each option class will be
pursuant to Rule 6.12. Thus, the
Exchange is not creating any new
algorithms, but is amending Rule 6.11 to
make clear that the Exchange may
determine the applicable allocation
algorithm for rotations as described
above and to provide the flexibility for
the Exchange to choose an algorithm
from among the existing algorithms to
be applied to rotations, rather than
simply defaulting to the algorithm in
effect for intra-day trading in the option
class.
Finally, the Exchange is proposing
non-substantive amendments to Rule
6.11, so that the rule text can generally
be more consistently organized,
numbered and worded. For example,
the Exchange is proposing to add
descriptive headings to sections of the
rule that do not already have such
headings, and to replace multiple
references to Exchange determinations
being announced via Regulatory
Circular with a single reference in
proposed Interpretation and Policy .02,
which will provide that all
pronouncements regarding
determinations by the Exchange
pursuant to Rule 6.11 and the
Interpretations and Policies thereunder
will be announced to Participants via
Regulatory Circular.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act 7 in general and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 8 in particular in that it is designed
to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
change would provide more flexibility
and clarity in our rotations rule. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed order eligibility provision is
consistent with order eligibility
provisions in other existing rules, such
as the SAL and order type rules.
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Paper Comments
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or
such shorter time as designated by the
Commission, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–C2–2011–006 on the
subject line.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2011–006. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
am and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–C2–
2011–006 and should be submitted on
or before April 4, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–5762 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Mar 11, 2011
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Jkt 223001
13689
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
11 17
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13688-13689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5762]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-64058; File No. SR-C2-2011-006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Related to the Opening System
March 8, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 1, 2011, the C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 6.11, Openings (and sometimes
Closings). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/RuleFilings.aspx),
at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Rule 6.11 describes the Exchange's procedures for conducting
trading rotations. The Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 6.11 in
various respects.
First, to have more flexibility in a manner that is consistent with
other C2 rules with order eligibility provisions, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Rule 6.11 to include an order eligibility provision.
In particular, Rule 6.11 will be amended to provide that the Exchange
shall designate the eligible order size, eligible order type, eligible
order origin code (i.e., public customer orders, non-Market Maker
broker-dealer orders, and Market Maker broker-dealer orders) that the
System will accept for rotations on a class-by-class basis. The
proposal would not, however, permit the Exchange to discriminate among
individual market participants of the same type (e.g., permit certain
market-maker orders but not others to be eligible). The Rule will also
be amended to delete a reference to spread orders and contingency
orders not being eligible to participate in opening trades or in the
determination of the opening price, expected opening price or expected
opening size. (As revised, the Exchange would determine whether to
designate these orders types as eligible on a class-by-class basis,
just as it would for any other order type.) Any changes to the order
eligibility parameters determined by the Exchange would be announced to
C2 Participants via Regulatory Circular.
This proposed change to include order eligibility requirements
within Rule 6.11 is consistent with the order eligibility requirements
contained in other rules, such as the order eligibility requirements
for Rule 6.14, SAL (SAL is a feature that auctions marketable orders
for price improvement over the national best bid and offer). The
proposed rule change is also consistent with the provisions of Rule
6.10, Orders Types Defined,\5\ which provides that the classes and/or
systems for which the orders types described in Rule 6.10 shall be
available will be as provided in the Exchange Rules, as the context may
indicate, or as otherwise specified via Regulatory Circular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange is also proposing to change the title of Rule
6.10 to ``Order Types Defined.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange is proposing to adopt new Interpretation and
Policy .01 to Rule 6.11 to provide that the Exchange may determine on a
class-by-class basis which electronic allocation algorithm \6\ would
apply for rotations. Currently Rule 6.11(g) provides that, in
determining priority of orders and quotes to be traded at a single
clearing price, the System gives priority to public customer market
orders first (with multiple orders ranked based on time priority), then
to non-public customer market orders second (with multiple orders being
ranked based on time priority), then to multiple quotes and orders
whose price is better than the opening price (with multiple quotes and
orders being ranked in accordance with the allocation algorithm in
effect for the option class), then to limit orders and quotes at the
opening price (with multiple orders and quotes ranked in accordance
with the allocation algorithm in effect for the class). Any remaining
marketable order(s) are then exposed and allocated in accordance with
the matching algorithms in effect for the class. The Exchange is
proposing to remove these specific allocation algorithm descriptions.
Instead, the provision will be amended to provide that, in determining
the priority of orders and quotes to be traded at a single clearing
price, the System will give priority to market orders first, then to
limit orders and quotes whose price is better than the opening price,
and then to resting orders and quotes at the opening price. In
addition, as indicated above, the Exchange is proposing to adopt new
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.11. Proposed Interpretation and
Policy .01 to Rule 6.11 will provide that the Exchange may determine on
a class-by-class basis which electronic allocation algorithm would
apply for rotations. This change will also provide the Exchange with
additional flexibility to permit the allocation algorithm in effect for
a rotation to be different from the allocation algorithm in effect for
the option class. All pronouncements regarding allocation algorithm
determinations by the Exchange will be announced to C2 Participants via
Regulatory Circular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The allocation algorithms include base execution algorithms
(price-time, pro-rata, and price-time with primary public customer
priority and secondary trade participation right priority) and an
optional market turner priority overlay. See Rule 6.12, Order
Execution and Priority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In conjunction with this change, the Exchange is also proposing to
modify Rule 6.11 to codify and describe the
[[Page 13689]]
manner in which the System handles opening imbalances in series that
open at a minimum price increment (e.g., a series that opens at a price
of $0.05 when the series is quoted in $0.05 increments and a series
that opens at a price of $0.01 when the series is quoted in $0.01
increments). In those scenarios, the System opens even if a sell market
order imbalance exists. In addition, the Exchange may determine to
apply a separate electronic allocation algorithm for series that open
at a minimum price increment due to a sell market order imbalance. As
indicated above, pronouncements regarding allocation algorithm
determinations will be announced via Regulatory Circular.
The matching algorithm applied for rotations for each option class
will be pursuant to Rule 6.12. Thus, the Exchange is not creating any
new algorithms, but is amending Rule 6.11 to make clear that the
Exchange may determine the applicable allocation algorithm for
rotations as described above and to provide the flexibility for the
Exchange to choose an algorithm from among the existing algorithms to
be applied to rotations, rather than simply defaulting to the algorithm
in effect for intra-day trading in the option class.
Finally, the Exchange is proposing non-substantive amendments to
Rule 6.11, so that the rule text can generally be more consistently
organized, numbered and worded. For example, the Exchange is proposing
to add descriptive headings to sections of the rule that do not already
have such headings, and to replace multiple references to Exchange
determinations being announced via Regulatory Circular with a single
reference in proposed Interpretation and Policy .02, which will provide
that all pronouncements regarding determinations by the Exchange
pursuant to Rule 6.11 and the Interpretations and Policies thereunder
will be announced to Participants via Regulatory Circular.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular in that it is designed to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would
provide more flexibility and clarity in our rotations rule. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed order eligibility provision is
consistent with order eligibility provisions in other existing rules,
such as the SAL and order type rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2011-006 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2011-006. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
am and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2011-006 and should be
submitted on or before April 4, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5762 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P