Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to Five-Year Sunset Review, 13128-13130 [2011-5512]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13128
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Farrow by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Fifth, that, as authorized by Section
766.18(c) of the Regulations, the second
year of the two year denial period set
forth above shall be suspended and
shall thereafter be waived, provided that
during the first year of the denial period
and during the period of suspension,
Farrow has commited no violation of
the Act or any regulation, order or
license issued thereunder.
Sixth, that the Proposed Charging
Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and
this Order shall be made available to the
public.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Issued this 28th day of February, 2011.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–5447 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From
Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Halle or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0176 or (202) 482–
3586, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 31, 2010, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) initiated
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on PET Film
from Taiwan covering the period July 1,
2009, through June 30, 2010. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of
Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274
(August 31, 2010). The current deadline
for the preliminary results of review is
April 2, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 245-day period to 365 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
PET Film from Taiwan within this time
limit. Specifically, the Department
granted an extension until March 2,
2011 for Shinkong Synthetic Fibers
Corporation to submit its supplemental
questionnaire response. We will need
additional time to review and analyze
the supplemental questionnaire
response when it is submitted.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for
completion of the preliminary results of
this review from 245 days to 365 days;
i.e., from April 2, 2011, until July 31,
2011.
However, July 31, 2011 falls on a
Sunday, and it is the Department’s longstanding practice to issue a
determination the next business day
when the statutory deadline falls on a
weekend, federal holiday, or any other
day when the Department is closed. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of
‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for
Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As
Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
Accordingly, the deadline for the
completion of these preliminary results
is now no later than August 1, 2011.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–5515 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–821–819]
Magnesium Metal From the Russian
Federation: Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to
Five-Year Sunset Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
instituted the sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation. On
February 10, 2011, the ITC determined
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
that revocation of this antidumping duty
order would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. Therefore, the Department is
revoking the antidumping duty order on
magnesium metal from the Russian
Federation.
DATES:
Effective Date: April 15, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3477 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Department published the
antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation on
April 15, 2005. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium
Metal From the Russian Federation, 70
FR 19930 (April 15, 2005). Pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.218, the Department initiated and
the ITC instituted the sunset review of
this order on March 1, 2010. See
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review, 75 FR 9160 (March 1, 2010);
Magnesium From China and Russia, 75
FR 9252 (March 1, 2010). As a result of
its sunset review, the Department found
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and, therefore, notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the order be revoked. See
Magnesium Metal From the People’s
Republic of China and the Russian
Federation: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 38983
(July 7, 2010).
On February 10, 2011, the ITC
determined pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Act that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation
would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. See Magnesium From China and
Russia, 76 FR 11813 (March 3, 2011),
and USITC Publication 4214 (February
2011), entitled Magnesium from China
and Russia: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–
1071–1072 (Review).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
13129
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is magnesium metal (also referred to as
magnesium), which includes primary
and secondary pure and alloy
magnesium metal, regardless of
chemistry, raw material source, form,
shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or
alloy containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium. Primary
magnesium is produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal. Secondary
magnesium is produced by recycling
magnesium-based scrap into magnesium
metal. The magnesium covered by the
order includes blends of primary and
secondary magnesium.
The subject merchandise includes the
following pure and alloy magnesium
metal products made from primary and/
or secondary magnesium, including,
without limitation, magnesium cast into
ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other
shapes, and magnesium ground,
chipped, crushed, or machined into
raspings, granules, turnings, chips,
powder, briquettes, and other shapes:
(1) Products that contain at least 99.95
percent magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra-pure’’
magnesium); (2) products that contain
less than 99.95 percent but not less than
99.8 percent magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’
magnesium); and (3) chemical
combinations of magnesium and other
material(s) in which the magnesium
content is 50 percent or greater, but less
that 99.8 percent, by weight, whether or
not conforming to an ‘‘ASTM
Specification for Magnesium Alloy.’’
The scope of the order excludes: (1)
Magnesium that is in liquid or molten
form; and (2) mixtures containing 90
percent or less magnesium in granular
or powder form by weight and one or
more of certain non-magnesium
granular materials to make magnesiumbased reagent mixtures, including lime,
calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium
carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag
coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite,
feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium
aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons,
graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth
metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly
ash, magnesium oxide, periclase,
ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and
colemanite.1
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable under items
8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and
8104.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise covered by the order is
dispositive.
1 This second exclusion for magnesium-based
reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for
reagent mixtures in the 2001 investigations of
magnesium from the People’s Republic of China,
Israel, and the Russian Federation. See Notice of
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the
People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345
(September 27, 2001), and Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349
(September 27, 2001); Notice of Final Determination
of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure
Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR
49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not
magnesium alloys, because they are not chemically
combined in liquid form and cast into the same
ingot.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Revocation
As a result of the determination by the
ITC that revocation of this antidumping
duty order is not likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time, the Department is revoking the
antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation,
pursuant to section 751(d) of the Act.
Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective
date of revocation is April 15, 2010 (i.e.,
the fifth anniversary of the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of the antidumping duty
order).
Effective Date of Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
Department intends to issue instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
15 days after publication of this notice,
to terminate the suspension of
liquidation of merchandise subject to
the order which was entered, or
withdrawn, for consumption on or after
April 15, 2010, the effective date of
revocation of the antidumping duty
order. The Department will complete
any pending administrative reviews of
this order and will conduct reviews of
subject merchandise entered prior to the
effective date of revocation in response
to appropriately filed requests for
review.
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Failure to comply is a violation of the
APO which may be subject to sanctions.
This revocation pursuant to five-year
(sunset) review and notice are in
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
13130
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the Council’s intent to take
action to address the emergency.
[FR Doc. 2011–5512 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
Special Accommodations
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Trish Kennedy at
the Council (see ADDRESSES) at least 5
working days prior to the meeting.
accordance with sections 751(c) and
751(d)(2) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA281
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
The Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council will convene a
meeting of the Ad Hoc Reef Fish
Limited Access Privilege Program
Advisory Panel.
DATES: The meeting will convene at 1
p.m. on Monday, March 28, 2011 and
conclude by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, March
29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council, 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite
1100, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone:
(813) 348–1630.
Council address: Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203 N.
Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL
33607.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Assane Diagne, Economist; Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council;
telephone: (813) 348–1630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ad
Hoc Reef Fish Limited Access Privilege
Program Advisory Panel will meet to
discuss charter for-hire days-at-sea and
headboat individual fishing quota pilot
programs, and, fishing communities in
fisheries management.
Copies of the agenda and other related
materials can be obtained by calling
(813) 348–1630.
Although other non-emergency issues
not on the agenda may come before the
Advisory Panel for discussion, in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, those issues may not be the subject
of formal action during this meeting.
Actions of the Advisory Panel will be
restricted to those issues specifically
identified in the agenda and any issues
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–5433 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA093
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Polar Bear
Captures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) to take marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
a capture-recapture program of polar
bears in the U.S. Chukchi Sea.
DATES: Effective March 14, 2011,
through May 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the authorization,
application, and associated
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) may be obtained by writing to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, telephoning the contact listed
below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT), or visiting the Internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may also be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ‘‘* * * an impact resulting
from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
an authorization to incidentally take
small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Section 101(a)(5)(D)
establishes a 45-day time limit for
NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13128-13130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-821-819]
Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to Five-Year Sunset Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
initiated and the International Trade Commission (ITC) instituted the
sunset review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the
Russian Federation. On February 10, 2011, the ITC determined
[[Page 13129]]
that revocation of this antidumping duty order would not be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Therefore, the
Department is revoking the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal
from the Russian Federation.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3477 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation on April 15, 2005. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation, 70
FR 19930 (April 15, 2005). Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.218, the Department
initiated and the ITC instituted the sunset review of this order on
March 1, 2010. See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 75 FR
9160 (March 1, 2010); Magnesium From China and Russia, 75 FR 9252
(March 1, 2010). As a result of its sunset review, the Department found
that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC
of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the order be
revoked. See Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China and
the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews
of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 38983 (July 7, 2010).
On February 10, 2011, the ITC determined pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act that revocation of the antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the Russian Federation would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See Magnesium From
China and Russia, 76 FR 11813 (March 3, 2011), and USITC Publication
4214 (February 2011), entitled Magnesium from China and Russia:
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1071-1072 (Review).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is magnesium metal (also
referred to as magnesium), which includes primary and secondary pure
and alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material
source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing
by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is
produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary
magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium
metal. The magnesium covered by the order includes blends of primary
and secondary magnesium.
The subject merchandise includes the following pure and alloy
magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium,
including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs,
rounds, billets, and other shapes, and magnesium ground, chipped,
crushed, or machined into raspings, granules, turnings, chips, powder,
briquettes, and other shapes: (1) Products that contain at least 99.95
percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ``ultra-pure''
magnesium); (2) products that contain less than 99.95 percent but not
less than 99.8 percent magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as
``pure'' magnesium); and (3) chemical combinations of magnesium and
other material(s) in which the magnesium content is 50 percent or
greater, but less that 99.8 percent, by weight, whether or not
conforming to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy.''
The scope of the order excludes: (1) Magnesium that is in liquid or
molten form; and (2) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium
in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-
magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures,
including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide,
calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline
syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash,
hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal,
cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys,
dolomite lime, and colemanite.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This second exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures
is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2001
investigations of magnesium from the People's Republic of China,
Israel, and the Russian Federation. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in
Granular Form From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 49345
(September 27, 2001), and Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349
(September 27, 2001); Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Not
Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66
FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium
alloys, because they are not chemically combined in liquid form and
cast into the same ingot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable
under items 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and 8104.90.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise covered by the order is
dispositive.
Revocation
As a result of the determination by the ITC that revocation of this
antidumping duty order is not likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time, the Department is revoking the
antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation,
pursuant to section 751(d) of the Act. Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of revocation
is April 15, 2010 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of the antidumping
duty order).
Effective Date of Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department intends to issue instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 15 days after publication of this
notice, to terminate the suspension of liquidation of merchandise
subject to the order which was entered, or withdrawn, for consumption
on or after April 15, 2010, the effective date of revocation of the
antidumping duty order. The Department will complete any pending
administrative reviews of this order and will conduct reviews of
subject merchandise entered prior to the effective date of revocation
in response to appropriately filed requests for review.
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which
may be subject to sanctions.
This revocation pursuant to five-year (sunset) review and notice
are in
[[Page 13130]]
accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-5512 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
