Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 12939-12940 [2011-5373]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Accordingly, the deadline for completion of the preliminary results is now May 2, 2011. This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 3, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–5374 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–552–801] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the Seventh Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5403. AGENCY: Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the Department to issue the final results in a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order 90 days after the date on which the preliminary results are issued. The Department may, however, extend the deadline for completion of the final results of a new shipper review to 150 days if it determines that the case is extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The Department finds this case to be extraordinarily complicated because there is voluminous new material on the record regarding the surrogate value of whole fish that has not yet been considered in a completed review. The Department will need more time to analyze the data. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, we are extending the time for the completion of the final results of this review by 60 days to June 13, 2011. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 3, 2011. Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–5385 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration On January 25, 2011, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the seventh new shipper reviews of certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam covering the period August 1, 2009, through February 15, 2010.1 Subsequent to the publication of the Preliminary Results, the Department extended the deadlines for submission of surrogate values, case briefs, and rebuttal comments.2 The final results are currently due no later than April 14, 2011. Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Background [A–475–703] 1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 76 FR 4292 (January 25, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 See Letter from Alex Villanueva, Program Manager, Office 9, to Interested Parties: Extending Surrogate Value Submission & Briefing Schedule for New Shipper Reviews of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (February 10, 2011). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:04 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 223001 Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated the third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin (‘‘PTFE resin’’) from Italy. The Department has conducted an expedited sunset review of this order. As a result of this review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the margins identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12939 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Shuler or Nancy Decker, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1293 or (202) 482– 0196, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 1, 2010, the Department published the notice of initiation of the third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on PTFE resin from Italy pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 67082 (November 1, 2010) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). On January 12, 2011, the Federal Register published a correction to that notice, indicating that an incorrect product name for this case was listed in the Initiation Notice. See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review: Correction, 76 FR 2083 (January 12, 2011) (‘‘Correction Notice’’). We allowed interested parties an extension of time in which to file a notice of intent to participate and substantive responses. On January 13, 2011, we also notified the International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) of these new deadlines. On January 12, 2011, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. (‘‘DuPont’’ or ‘‘domestic interested party’’). Submission of the notice of intent to participate was filed by DuPont within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), as extended due to the Correction Notice. DuPont claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a producer of PTFE resin in the United States. On February 11, 2011, the Department received a substantive response from the domestic interested party within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), as extended due to the Correction Notice. We received no substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is conducting an expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty order. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is PTFE resin, filled or unfilled. The order also covers PTFE wet raw polymer exported from Italy to the United States. See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy; Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 12940 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices Antidumping Duty Order, 58 FR 26100 (April 30, 1993). The order excludes PTFE dispersions in water and fine powders. During the period covered by this review, such merchandise was classified under item number 3904.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). We are providing this HTSUS number for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope remains dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’) from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated March 1, 2011, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit in room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on PTFE resin from Italy would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following percentage margins: of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 1, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–5373 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–863] Honey from the People’s Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Bertrand, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3207. AGENCY: Background On January 28, 2011, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) Weightedcovering the period December 1, 2009, average Manufacturer/exporter margin through November 30, 2010. See (percent) Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Montefluos S.p.A./Ausimont U.S.A.1 .................................. 46.46 Reviews, 76 FR 5137 (January 28, 2011). On February 24, 2011, the American All Others .................................. 46.46 Honey Producers Association and Sioux Honey Association (collectively This notice also serves as the only ‘‘Petitioners’’) withdrew their request for reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) an administrative review for the following companies: Ahcof Industrial 1 Solvay Solexis S.p.A. and Solvay Solexis, Inc. Development Corp., Ltd.; Alfred L. are successors-in-interest to Ausimont S.p.A. and Wolff (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; Anhui Honghui Ausimont U.S.A. Inc. See Granular Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd.; Anhui Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy; Final Honghui Import & Export Trade Co., Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003). Ltd.; Anhui Cereals Oils and Foodstuffs VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:04 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 I/E (Group) Corporation; Anhui Hundred Health Foods Co., Ltd.; Anhui Native Produce Imp & Exp Corp.; APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co.; Baiste Trading Co., Ltd.; Cheng Du Wai Yuan Bee Products Co., Ltd.; Chengdu Stone Dynasty Art Stone; Damco China Limited Qingdao Branch; Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd.; Feidong Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; Fresh Honey Co., Ltd. (formerly Mgl. Yun Shen); Golden Tadco Int’l; Hangzhou Golden Harvest Health Industry Co., Ltd.; Haoliluck Co., Ltd.; Hengjide Healthy Products Co. Ltd.; Hubei Yusun Co., Ltd.; Inner Mongolia Altin Bee-Keeping; Inner Mongolia Youth Trade Development Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Cereals, Oils Foodstuffs Import Export (Group) Corp.; Jiangsu Kanghong Natural Healthfoods Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Light Industry Products Imp & Exp (Group) Corp.; Jilin Province Juhui Import; Maersk Logistics (China) Company Ltd.; Nefelon Limited Company; Ningbo Shengye Electric Appliance; Ningbo Shunkang Health Food Co., Ltd.; Ningxia Yuehai Trading Co., Ltd.; Product Source Marketing Ltd.; Qingdao Aolan Trade Co., Ltd.; QHD Sanhai Honey Co., Ltd.; Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd.; Renaissance India Mannite; Shaanxi Youthsun Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Bloom International Trading Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Hui Ai Mal Tose Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd.; Shine Bal Co., Ltd.; Sichuan-Dujiangyan Dubao Bee Industrial Co., Ltd.; Silverstream International Co., Ltd.; Sunnice Honey; Suzhou Aiyi IE Trading Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Shanding Honey Product Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Weigeda Trading Co., Ltd.; Wanxi Haohua Food Co., Ltd.; Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd.; Wuhan Shino-Food Trade Co., Ltd.; Wuhu Anjie Food Co., Ltd.; Wuhu Deli Foods Co. Ltd.; Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd.; Wuhu Qinshi Tangye; Xinjiang Jinhui Food Co., Ltd.; Youngster International Trading Co., Ltd.; and, Zhejiang Willing Foreign Trading Co. Petitioners were the only party to request a review of these companies. Partial Rescission Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. Petitioners’ request was submitted within the 90day period and, thus, is timely. Because Petitioners’ withdrawal of requests for review is timely and because no other party requested a review of the E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12939-12940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-703]


Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy: Final Results 
of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') initiated the third sunset review of the antidumping 
duty order on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin (``PTFE resin'') 
from Italy. The Department has conducted an expedited sunset review of 
this order. As a result of this review, the Department finds that 
revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the margins identified in the 
Final Results of Review section of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Shuler or Nancy Decker, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1293 or (202) 482-0196, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 1, 2010, the Department published the notice of 
initiation of the third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on 
PTFE resin from Italy pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``the Act''). See Initiation of Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review, 75 FR 67082 (November 1, 2010) (``Initiation 
Notice''). On January 12, 2011, the Federal Register published a 
correction to that notice, indicating that an incorrect product name 
for this case was listed in the Initiation Notice. See Initiation of 
Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review: Correction, 76 FR 2083 (January 12, 
2011) (``Correction Notice''). We allowed interested parties an 
extension of time in which to file a notice of intent to participate 
and substantive responses. On January 13, 2011, we also notified the 
International Trade Commission (``ITC'') of these new deadlines. On 
January 12, 2011, the Department received a notice of intent to 
participate from a domestic interested party, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & 
Co. (``DuPont'' or ``domestic interested party''). Submission of the 
notice of intent to participate was filed by DuPont within the deadline 
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), as extended due to the Correction 
Notice. DuPont claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) 
of the Act, as a producer of PTFE resin in the United States. On 
February 11, 2011, the Department received a substantive response from 
the domestic interested party within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i), as extended due to the Correction Notice. We received 
no substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. As a 
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is conducting an expedited 
sunset review of the antidumping duty order.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is PTFE resin, filled or unfilled. 
The order also covers PTFE wet raw polymer exported from Italy to the 
United States. See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy; 
Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of

[[Page 12940]]

Antidumping Duty Order, 58 FR 26100 (April 30, 1993). The order 
excludes PTFE dispersions in water and fine powders. During the period 
covered by this review, such merchandise was classified under item 
number 3904.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (``HTSUS''). We are providing this HTSUS number for convenience 
and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope remains 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum (``Decision Memorandum'') from Gary Taverman, 
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration, dated March 1, 2011, which is hereby adopted by 
this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include 
the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the 
magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked. 
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this 
review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, 
which is on file in the Central Records Unit in room 7046 of the main 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on PTFE resin from Italy 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the 
following percentage margins:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Montefluos S.p.A./Ausimont U.S.A.\1\.......................        46.46
All Others.................................................        46.46
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing the results and 
notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Solvay Solexis S.p.A. and Solvay Solexis, Inc. are 
successors-in-interest to Ausimont S.p.A. and Ausimont U.S.A. Inc. 
See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy; Final Results 
of Changed Circumstances Review, 68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003).

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-5373 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P