Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft Prevention Standard; Jaguar Land Rover, 12220-12221 [2011-4952]
Download as PDF
12220
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices
Comments: Comments should be
referred to the docket number that
appears at the top of this document.
Written comments may be submitted to
the Docket Clerk, U.S. DOT Dockets,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Comments also may be submitted by
electronic means via the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. Specifically
address whether this information
collection is necessary for proper
performance of the functions of the
agency and will have practical utility,
accuracy of the burden estimates, ways
to minimize this burden, and ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected. All
comments received will be available for
examination at the above address
between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT (or
EST), Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An electronic version
of this document is available on the
World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.regulations.gov.
Authority: 49 CFR 1.66.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: February 14, 2011.
Christine Gurland,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–4939 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft
Prevention Standard; Jaguar Land
Rover
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the petition of Jaguar Land Rover North
America’s, (Land Rover) petition for an
exemption of the Range Rover Evoque
vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from the Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:16 Mar 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, W43–439, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard’s phone number is
(202) 366–5222. Her fax number is (202)
493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated November 22, 2010, Land
Rover requested an exemption from the
parts-marking requirements of the theft
prevention standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the Range Rover Evoque vehicle line
beginning with MY 2012. The petition
has been filed pursuant to 49 CFR part
543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Land Rover provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the Range Rover Evoque vehicle line.
Land Rover stated that the Range Rover
Evoque vehicles will be equipped with
a passive, transponder based, electronic
engine immobilizer antitheft device as
standard equipment beginning with the
2012 model year. Key components of its
antitheft device will include a power
train module, instrument cluster, body
control module, remote frequency
receive immobilizer antenna unit, smart
key, door control units and a perimeter
alarm system. The immobilizer device is
automatically immobilized when the
Smart Key is removed from the vehicle.
Land Rover stated that the Smart Key is
programmed and synchronized to the
vehicle by means of a unique
identification code key and a secret
code key which is randomly generated
and unique to each vehicle.
Additionally, Land Rover states that its
antitheft device will include an audible
and visual perimeter alarm system as
standard equipment that can be armed
manually or programmed to arm
automatically with the Smart Key. If the
hood, luggage compartment, or doors
are opened during an unauthorized
PO 00000
Frm 00208
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entry, the vehicle siren alarm will sound
and the exterior lights will flash.
Land Rover stated that there are three
methods of vehicle operation and
engine start: (1) Pulling the driver’s door
handle with correct Smart Key
authentication, and pressing the ignition
start button; (2) unlocking the vehicle
with the Smart Key unlock button; and
(3) using the emergency key blade.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Land Rover
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of
the device, Land Rover conducted tests
based on its own specified standards.
Land Rover provided a detailed list of
the tests conducted (i.e., temperature
and humidity cycling, high and low
temperature cycling, mechanical shock,
random vibration, thermal stress/shock
tests, material resistance tests, dry heat,
dust and fluid ingress tests). Land Rover
stated that it believes that its device is
reliable and durable because it complied
with specified requirements for each
test. Additionally, Land Rover stated
that the vehicle’s key recognition
sequence includes in excess of a billion
code combinations with encrypted data
that is secure against copying. The
coded data transfer between modules
also use a unique secure identifier,
random number and secure public
algorithm.
Land Rover stated that since the
Range Rover Evoque is a new vehicle
line, there is no data from a previous
generation vehicle to compare theft rate
data, although, it stated, the immobilizer
in the Range Rover Evoque is
substantially similar to the antitheft
device installed on the MY 2010 Jaguar
XJ vehicle line that was previously
granted an exemption by the agency on
November 16, 2009. Land Rover stated
that based on 2006–2008 MY theft data
information published by NHTSA, Land
Rover vehicles equipped with
immobilizers had theft rates that were
below the median. Land Rover also
stated that the immobilizer in the Range
Rover Evoque line is no less effective
than devices NHTSA has already
granted full exemptions (i.e., Jaguar XK
and XJ). Additionally, Land Rover
submitted a Highway Loss Data Institute
news release (July 19, 2000) showing an
approximate 50% reduction in theft for
vehicles installed with an immobilizer
device.
Based on the evidence submitted by
Land Rover, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Range Rover
Evoque vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Land Rover has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Range Rover
Evoque vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541). This conclusion is based on the
information Land Rover provided about
its device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of an
unauthorized person to enter or move a
vehicle by means other than a key;
preventing defeat or circumvention of
the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Land Rover’s
petition for exemption for the Range
Rover Evoque vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR
part 541. The agency notes that 49 CFR
part 541, Appendix A–1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the
Theft Prevention Standard for a given
model year. 49 CFR 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the anti-theft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Land Rover decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking
of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Land Rover
wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:16 Mar 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part
543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption
applies only to vehicles that belong to
a line exempted under this part and
equipped with the antitheft device on
which the line’s exemption is based.
Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ‘‘to modify an
exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that § 543.9(c)(2)
could place on exempted vehicle
manufacturers and itself. The agency
did not intend in drafting Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: March 1, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–4952 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft
Prevention Standard; Toyota
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the petition of Toyota Motor North
America, Inc’s., (Toyota) petition for an
exemption of the Corolla vehicle line in
accordance with 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00209
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12221
The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with model
year (MY) 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Standards, NHTSA, W43–443, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck’s phone number
is (202) 366–4139. Her fax number is
(202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated January 24, 2011, Toyota
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard (49 CFR part 541)
for the Toyota Corolla vehicle line
beginning with MY 2012. The petition
requested an exemption from partsmarking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Toyota provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for the Corolla
vehicle line. Toyota will install a
passive, transponder-based, electronic
engine immobilizer device as standard
equipment on its Corolla vehicle line
beginning with MY 2012.
Key components of the antitheft
device include an engine immobilizer,
transponder key electronic control unit
(ECE), assembly, transponder key
amplifier, security indicator, ignition
key and Electronic control module
(ECM). The device’s security indicators
provide the status of the immobilizer to
users and others inside/outside the
vehicle. When the immobilizer is
activated, the indicator flashes
continuously. When the immobilizer is
not activated, the indicator is turned off.
The antitheft device does not
incorporate an audible or visual alarm
as standard equipment. Toyota’s
submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7 in
that it meets the general requirements
contained in 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of 543.6.
Toyota stated that the immobilizer is
activated when the ignition key is
turned from the ‘‘ON’’ position and/or
removed from the vehicle’s ignition.
The device is deactivated when the
‘‘conventional key’’ is inserted into the
key cylinder and turned toward the
‘‘ON’’ position. Toyota stated that after
the key is inserted into the key cylinder,
the transponder chip in the key sends
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12220-12221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4952]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft
Prevention Standard; Jaguar Land Rover
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the petition of Jaguar Land Rover
North America's, (Land Rover) petition for an exemption of the Range
Rover Evoque vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption
from the Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because
the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-
439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated November 22, 2010, Land
Rover requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the Range Rover Evoque
vehicle line beginning with MY 2012. The petition has been filed
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, Land
Rover provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the
Range Rover Evoque vehicle line. Land Rover stated that the Range Rover
Evoque vehicles will be equipped with a passive, transponder based,
electronic engine immobilizer antitheft device as standard equipment
beginning with the 2012 model year. Key components of its antitheft
device will include a power train module, instrument cluster, body
control module, remote frequency receive immobilizer antenna unit,
smart key, door control units and a perimeter alarm system. The
immobilizer device is automatically immobilized when the Smart Key is
removed from the vehicle. Land Rover stated that the Smart Key is
programmed and synchronized to the vehicle by means of a unique
identification code key and a secret code key which is randomly
generated and unique to each vehicle. Additionally, Land Rover states
that its antitheft device will include an audible and visual perimeter
alarm system as standard equipment that can be armed manually or
programmed to arm automatically with the Smart Key. If the hood,
luggage compartment, or doors are opened during an unauthorized entry,
the vehicle siren alarm will sound and the exterior lights will flash.
Land Rover stated that there are three methods of vehicle operation
and engine start: (1) Pulling the driver's door handle with correct
Smart Key authentication, and pressing the ignition start button; (2)
unlocking the vehicle with the Smart Key unlock button; and (3) using
the emergency key blade.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Land
Rover provided information on the reliability and durability of its
proposed device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device,
Land Rover conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Land
Rover provided a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e.,
temperature and humidity cycling, high and low temperature cycling,
mechanical shock, random vibration, thermal stress/shock tests,
material resistance tests, dry heat, dust and fluid ingress tests).
Land Rover stated that it believes that its device is reliable and
durable because it complied with specified requirements for each test.
Additionally, Land Rover stated that the vehicle's key recognition
sequence includes in excess of a billion code combinations with
encrypted data that is secure against copying. The coded data transfer
between modules also use a unique secure identifier, random number and
secure public algorithm.
Land Rover stated that since the Range Rover Evoque is a new
vehicle line, there is no data from a previous generation vehicle to
compare theft rate data, although, it stated, the immobilizer in the
Range Rover Evoque is substantially similar to the antitheft device
installed on the MY 2010 Jaguar XJ vehicle line that was previously
granted an exemption by the agency on November 16, 2009. Land Rover
stated that based on 2006-2008 MY theft data information published by
NHTSA, Land Rover vehicles equipped with immobilizers had theft rates
that were below the median. Land Rover also stated that the immobilizer
in the Range Rover Evoque line is no less effective than devices NHTSA
has already granted full exemptions (i.e., Jaguar XK and XJ).
Additionally, Land Rover submitted a Highway Loss Data Institute news
release (July 19, 2000) showing an approximate 50% reduction in theft
for vehicles installed with an immobilizer device.
Based on the evidence submitted by Land Rover, the agency believes
that the antitheft device for the Range Rover Evoque vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with
[[Page 12221]]
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Land Rover has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for the Range Rover Evoque vehicle line is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information
Land Rover provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter
or move a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full Land
Rover's petition for exemption for the Range Rover Evoque vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency
notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that
are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year.
49 CFR 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the
release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for
which the petition is granted and a general description of the anti-
theft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies
of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Land Rover decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Land Rover wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Sec. 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Sec.
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: March 1, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-4952 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P