Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Relating to Amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201 of Regulation SHO Applicable to Complex Orders, 12206-12208 [2011-4885]
Download as PDF
12206
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BYX–2011–004 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63967; File No. SR–Phlx–
2011–27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ
OMX PHLX LLC Relating to
Amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201
of Regulation SHO Applicable to
Complex Orders
February 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on February
23, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
All submissions should refer to File
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Number SR–BYX–2011–004. This file
Securities and Exchange Commission
number should be included on the
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the rule change as described in Items I and
Commission process and review your
II below, which Items have been
comments more efficiently, please use
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
only one method. The Commission will The Commission is publishing this
post all comments on the Commission’s notice to solicit comments on the
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
proposed rule change from interested
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
persons.
submission, all subsequent
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
amendments, all written statements
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
with respect to the proposed rule
the Proposed Rule Change
change that are filed with the
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commission, and all written
Rule 1080.08 respecting complex orders
communications relating to the
to reflect the marking requirements of
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than Regulation SHO and to address the
handling of certain orders marked
those that may be withheld from the
‘‘short’’ in compliance with Rule 201 of
public in accordance with the
Regulation SHO, as explained further
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
below.
available for website viewing and
The text of the proposed rule change
printing in the Commission’s Public
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Washington, DC 20549, on official
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
business days between the hours of 10
principal office of the Exchange, and at
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
be posted without change; the
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Commission does not edit personal
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
identifying information from
Change
submissions. You should submit only
In its filing with the Commission, the
information that you wish to make
Exchange included statements
available publicly. All submissions
concerning the purpose of and basis for
should refer to File Number SR–BYX–
the proposed rule change and discussed
2011–004 and should be submitted on
any comments it received on the
or before March 25, 2011.
proposed rule change. The text of these
For the Commission, by the Division of
statements may be examined at the
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
places specified in Item IV below. The
12
authority.
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Cathy H. Ahn,
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
Deputy Secretary.
the most significant aspects of such
[FR Doc. 2011–4888 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am]
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:16 Mar 03, 2011
2 17
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00194
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Recently, the Exchange received
approval from the Commission to make
various enhancements to its complex
orders system, including to accept
complex orders where one component is
the underlying security of the options
components.3 Specifically, the
underlying stock or ETF can now be one
component of a complex order.4 Nasdaq
Options Services LLC (‘‘NOS’’), a
registered broker-dealer and member of
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, is responsible for the
execution of the stock or ETF
component of a complex order as agent
of the stock or ETF component.5 This is
described in Rule 1080.08(h). A
complex order with one component that
is a stock or ETF is received by the
Exchange with a net debit or credit
price. The individual option leg(s) and
stock/ETF component prices are not
specified; rather, there is a single net
debit or credit price on the order which
is used by Phlx and NOS to determine
the price of each component, including
the stock/ETF. Specifically, although
Phlx is calculating the price of the
options components, a sophisticated
algorithm is simultaneously causing
NOS to calculate and execute the stock
or ETF component of the Complex
Order, which has been electronically
communicated to NOS by the Exchange.
Thus, because the execution of one
component is contingent upon the
execution of all others, the entire
package is processed as a single
transaction and both the option leg and
stock/ETF components are
simultaneously processed.
In the Complex Order rule filing, the
Exchange explained that with respect to
short sale regulation, the proposed
handling of the stock/ETF component of
a complex order did not raise any issues
of compliance with the currently
operative provisions of Regulation
SHO.6 When a complex order has a
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63777
(January 26, 2011), 76 FR 5630 (February 1, 2011)
(SR–Phlx–2010–157) (‘‘Complex Order rule filing’’).
4 A complex order is a an order involving the
simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options series in the same underlying
security or a stock-option order, priced as a net
debit or credit, based on the relative prices of the
individual components, for the same account, for
the purpose of executing a particular investment
strategy. See Rule 1080.08(a).
5 The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. owns both the
Exchange and NOS; therefore, the Exchange and
NOS are affiliates.
6 17 CFR 242.200 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices
stock/ETF component, member
organizations must mark, pursuant to
Regulation SHO, whether that order
involves a long or short sale.7 The Phlx
trading System will accept complex
orders with a stock/ETF component
marked to reflect either a long or short
position; specifically, orders not
currently marked as ‘‘long’’ or ‘‘short’’ are
rejected by the Phlx trading System.
In 2010, the Commission amended
Rule 201 and Rule 200(g) of Regulation
SHO under the Act.8 The amendments
to Rule 201 adopt a short sale-related
circuit breaker that, if triggered, imposes
a restriction on the prices at which
covered securities may be sold short
(‘‘short sale price test restriction’’).9
Specifically, Rule 201 requires a trading
center 10 to establish, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to prevent the
execution or display of a short sale
order of a covered security 11 at a price
that is less than or equal to the current
national best bid 12 if the price of that
covered security decreases by 10% or
more from the covered security’s closing
price as determined by the listing
market 13 for the covered security as of
the end of regular trading hours on the
prior day; 14 and impose these
requirements for the remainder of the
day and the following day when a
national best bid for the covered
security is calculated and disseminated
on a current and continuing basis by a
plan processor pursuant to an effective
national market system plan.15 The
amendments to Rule 200(g) provide that
a broker-dealer may mark certain
qualifying short sale orders ‘‘short
exempt.’’ 16 Thereafter, the Commission
extended the compliance date for the
amendments to Rule 201 and Rule
200(g) until February 28, 2011.17 The
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
7 17
CFR 242.200(g).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61595
(February 26, 2010), 75 FR 11232 (March 10, 2010).
See also Division of Trading and Markets:
Responses to Frequently Asked Questions
Concerning Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.
9 17 CFR 242.201.
10 The term ‘‘trading center’’ is defined in Rule
201(a)(9) of Regulation SHO. 17 CFR 242.201(a)(9).
Both the Exchange and NOS are ‘‘trading centers’’
within the definition of Rule 201(a)(9).
11 The term ‘‘covered security’’ is defined in Rule
201(a)(1) as any NMS stock as defined in Rule
600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS. 17 CFR
242.201(a)(1). See also 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
12 The term ‘‘national best bid’’ is defined in Rule
201(a)(4). 17 CFR 242.201(a)(4).
13 The term ‘‘listing market’’ is defined in Rule
201(a)(3). 17 CFR 242.201(a)(3).
14 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(i).
15 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(ii).
16 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2).
17 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63247
(November 4, 2010), 75 FR 68702 (November 9,
2010) (extending the compliance date of the
amendments to Rules 201 and 200(g) of Regulation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:16 Mar 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
Exchange is filing this proposed rule
change to address the new amendments
to Regulation SHO.
Accordingly, the purpose of the
proposed rule change is to explain the
Exchange’s handling of stock/ETF sell
components entered as part of a
complex order in accordance with the
amendments to Regulation SHO. In
particular, the Exchange is proposing to
provide that, if the stock/ETF leg of a
complex order submitted to the Phlx
trading System is a sell order, then the
stock/ETF leg must be marked ‘‘long,’’
‘‘short,’’ or ‘‘short exempt’’ in compliance
with Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO; if
it is not so marked, the order will be
rejected. Thus, the Exchange will now
accept complex orders marked ‘‘short
exempt’’ and Rule 1080.08(b)(iv) is being
adopted to reflect this.18 The Exchange
and NOS, as trading centers, must
comply with Rule 201(b)(1)(iii)(B),
which provides that a trading center
must establish, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to permit the
execution or display of a short sale
order of a covered security marked
‘‘short exempt’’ without regard to
whether the order is at a price that is
less than or equal to the current national
best bid.19
Furthermore, the Exchange proposes
to amend Rule 1080.08(h) to describe
the handling of short sales involving the
stock/ETF leg of a complex order
submitted to its Phlx trading System.
When the short sale price test restriction
is triggered for a covered security, NOS
will not execute or display 20 a short
sale order in the underlying covered
security component of a complex order
if the price is equal to or below the
current national best bid. However, NOS
will execute a short sale order in the
underlying covered security component
of a complex order if such order is
marked ‘‘short exempt,’’ regardless of
whether it is at a price that is equal to
or below the current national best bid.
If NOS cannot execute the underlying
covered security component of a
SHO from November 10, 2010 until February 28,
2011).
18 The Exchange notes that a broker or dealer may
mark a sell order ‘‘short exempt’’ only if the
provisions of Rule 201(c) or (d) are met. See 17 CFR
242.200(g)(2). Since NOS and the Exchange do not
display the stock or ETF portion of a complex order,
see infra note 20, a broker-dealer should not mark
the short sale order ‘‘short exempt’’ under Rule
201(c). See also Division of Trading and Markets:
Responses to Frequently Asked Questions
Concerning Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, Q&A Nos.
4.2, 5.4 and 5.5.
19 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(iii)(B).
20 The stock or ETF portion of a complex order
is not displayed as an order, because the complex
order as a whole is handled as a single order with
multiple contingencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12207
complex order in accordance with Rule
201 of Regulation SHO, the Exchange
will cancel back the complex order to
the entering member organization.
When a short sale price test restriction
is triggered in a covered security, orders
in that security marked ‘‘short’’ may be
executed by NOS if the order is at a
price above the current national best bid
at the time of execution. Thus, the
proposal is narrowly tailored to address
Rule 201 by only cancelling orders
marked ‘‘short’’ when a short sale price
test restriction is triggered in the
covered security and the sell order is at
a price equal to or below the current
national best bid at the time of
execution.
The Exchange believes that this
approach is consistent with Rule 201.
Under this proposal, the Exchange and
NOS, as trading centers, will prevent the
execution or display of a short sale of
the stock/ETF component of a complex
order priced at or below the current
national best bid when the short sale
price test restriction is triggered.
Specifically, while the Exchange and
NOS are determining, respectively, the
prices of the options component and of
the stock or ETF component of the
complex order, as described above, NOS
will check the current national best bid
of the stock or ETF component at the
time of execution. The execution of one
component is contingent upon the
execution of all other components and
once a complex order is accepted and
validated by the Phlx trading System,
the entire package is processed as a
single transaction and both the option
leg and stock/ETF components are
simultaneously processed.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 21 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 22
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by
providing clarity on the short sale order
handling procedures of the stock/ETF
component of a complex order when a
short sale price test restriction is in
effect for a covered security.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Regulation SHO in that it provides
for the handling of short exempt orders
as well as short sale orders when the
short sale price test restriction is
triggered.
21 15
22 15
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
04MRN1
12208
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 23 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 24
thereunder. The Exchange has requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day
pre-operative waiting period contained
in Exchange Act Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 25
so that the Exchange may implement the
change no later than February 28, 2011
to coincide with the compliance date for
the amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201
of Regulation SHO. The Commission
believes that waiver of the operative
delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest
because the proposed rule change,
among other things, implements the
amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201 of
Regulation SHO which have a February
28, 2011 compliance date.26 For this
reason, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be operative
upon filing with the Commission.27
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
23 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
25 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
26 See supra note 17.
27 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
24 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:16 Mar 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2011–27 on the
subject line.
be submitted on or before March 25,
2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–4885 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages requiring clearance
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
1, 1995. This notice includes a revision
Paper Comments
and an extension to OMB-approved
information collections.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
SSA is soliciting comments on the
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
accuracy of the agency’s burden
Securities and Exchange Commission,
estimate; the need for the information;
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
20549–1090.
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
All submissions should refer to File
minimize burden on respondents,
Number SR–Phlx–2011–27. This file
including the use of automated
number should be included on the
collection techniques or other forms of
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
information technology. Mail, e-mail, or
Commission process and review your
fax your comments and
comments more efficiently, please use
recommendations on the information
only one method. The Commission will
collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer
post all comments on the Commission’s
and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
the following addresses or fax numbers.
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
(OMB)
subsequent amendments, all written
Office of Management and Budget,
statements with respect to the proposed Attn: Desk Officer for SSA,
rule change that are filed with the
Fax: 202–395–6974,
Commission, and all written
E-mail address:
communications relating to the
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than (SSA)
those that may be withheld from the
Social Security Administration,
public in accordance with the
DCBFM,
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Attn: Reports Clearance Officer,
available for Web site viewing and
1333 Annex Building,
6401 Security Blvd.,
printing in the Commission’s Public
Baltimore, MD 21235,
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Fax: 410–965–6400,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
E-mail address: OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov
business days between the hours of 10
SSA submitted the information
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
collections listed below to OMB for
will be available for inspection and
clearance. Your comments on the
copying at the principal office of the
information collections would be most
Exchange.
All comments received will be posted useful if OMB and SSA receive them
without change; the Commission does
within 30 days from the date of this
not edit personal identifying
publication. To be sure we consider
information from submissions. You
your comments, we must receive them
should submit only information that
no later than April 4, 2011. You can
you wish to make available publicly. All obtain a copy of the OMB clearance
submissions should refer to File
28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Number SR–Phlx–2011–27 and should
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12206-12208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4885]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63967; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Relating
to Amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201 of Regulation SHO Applicable to
Complex Orders
February 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on February 23, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1080.08 respecting complex
orders to reflect the marking requirements of Regulation SHO and to
address the handling of certain orders marked ``short'' in compliance
with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, as explained further below.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Recently, the Exchange received approval from the Commission to
make various enhancements to its complex orders system, including to
accept complex orders where one component is the underlying security of
the options components.\3\ Specifically, the underlying stock or ETF
can now be one component of a complex order.\4\ Nasdaq Options Services
LLC (``NOS''), a registered broker-dealer and member of Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, is responsible for the execution of the
stock or ETF component of a complex order as agent of the stock or ETF
component.\5\ This is described in Rule 1080.08(h). A complex order
with one component that is a stock or ETF is received by the Exchange
with a net debit or credit price. The individual option leg(s) and
stock/ETF component prices are not specified; rather, there is a single
net debit or credit price on the order which is used by Phlx and NOS to
determine the price of each component, including the stock/ETF.
Specifically, although Phlx is calculating the price of the options
components, a sophisticated algorithm is simultaneously causing NOS to
calculate and execute the stock or ETF component of the Complex Order,
which has been electronically communicated to NOS by the Exchange.
Thus, because the execution of one component is contingent upon the
execution of all others, the entire package is processed as a single
transaction and both the option leg and stock/ETF components are
simultaneously processed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63777 (January 26,
2011), 76 FR 5630 (February 1, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2010-157) (``Complex
Order rule filing'').
\4\ A complex order is a an order involving the simultaneous
purchase and/or sale of two or more different options series in the
same underlying security or a stock-option order, priced as a net
debit or credit, based on the relative prices of the individual
components, for the same account, for the purpose of executing a
particular investment strategy. See Rule 1080.08(a).
\5\ The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. owns both the Exchange and NOS;
therefore, the Exchange and NOS are affiliates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Complex Order rule filing, the Exchange explained that with
respect to short sale regulation, the proposed handling of the stock/
ETF component of a complex order did not raise any issues of compliance
with the currently operative provisions of Regulation SHO.\6\ When a
complex order has a
[[Page 12207]]
stock/ETF component, member organizations must mark, pursuant to
Regulation SHO, whether that order involves a long or short sale.\7\
The Phlx trading System will accept complex orders with a stock/ETF
component marked to reflect either a long or short position;
specifically, orders not currently marked as ``long'' or ``short'' are
rejected by the Phlx trading System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 242.200 et seq.
\7\ 17 CFR 242.200(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2010, the Commission amended Rule 201 and Rule 200(g) of
Regulation SHO under the Act.\8\ The amendments to Rule 201 adopt a
short sale-related circuit breaker that, if triggered, imposes a
restriction on the prices at which covered securities may be sold short
(``short sale price test restriction'').\9\ Specifically, Rule 201
requires a trading center \10\ to establish, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the
execution or display of a short sale order of a covered security \11\
at a price that is less than or equal to the current national best bid
\12\ if the price of that covered security decreases by 10% or more
from the covered security's closing price as determined by the listing
market \13\ for the covered security as of the end of regular trading
hours on the prior day; \14\ and impose these requirements for the
remainder of the day and the following day when a national best bid for
the covered security is calculated and disseminated on a current and
continuing basis by a plan processor pursuant to an effective national
market system plan.\15\ The amendments to Rule 200(g) provide that a
broker-dealer may mark certain qualifying short sale orders ``short
exempt.'' \16\ Thereafter, the Commission extended the compliance date
for the amendments to Rule 201 and Rule 200(g) until February 28,
2011.\17\ The Exchange is filing this proposed rule change to address
the new amendments to Regulation SHO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61595 (February 26,
2010), 75 FR 11232 (March 10, 2010). See also Division of Trading
and Markets: Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule
201 of Regulation SHO.
\9\ 17 CFR 242.201.
\10\ The term ``trading center'' is defined in Rule 201(a)(9) of
Regulation SHO. 17 CFR 242.201(a)(9). Both the Exchange and NOS are
``trading centers'' within the definition of Rule 201(a)(9).
\11\ The term ``covered security'' is defined in Rule 201(a)(1)
as any NMS stock as defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS. 17
CFR 242.201(a)(1). See also 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
\12\ The term ``national best bid'' is defined in Rule
201(a)(4). 17 CFR 242.201(a)(4).
\13\ The term ``listing market'' is defined in Rule 201(a)(3).
17 CFR 242.201(a)(3).
\14\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(i).
\15\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(ii).
\16\ 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2).
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63247 (November 4,
2010), 75 FR 68702 (November 9, 2010) (extending the compliance date
of the amendments to Rules 201 and 200(g) of Regulation SHO from
November 10, 2010 until February 28, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the purpose of the proposed rule change is to explain
the Exchange's handling of stock/ETF sell components entered as part of
a complex order in accordance with the amendments to Regulation SHO. In
particular, the Exchange is proposing to provide that, if the stock/ETF
leg of a complex order submitted to the Phlx trading System is a sell
order, then the stock/ETF leg must be marked ``long,'' ``short,'' or
``short exempt'' in compliance with Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO; if
it is not so marked, the order will be rejected. Thus, the Exchange
will now accept complex orders marked ``short exempt'' and Rule
1080.08(b)(iv) is being adopted to reflect this.\18\ The Exchange and
NOS, as trading centers, must comply with Rule 201(b)(1)(iii)(B), which
provides that a trading center must establish, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to permit the
execution or display of a short sale order of a covered security marked
``short exempt'' without regard to whether the order is at a price that
is less than or equal to the current national best bid.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The Exchange notes that a broker or dealer may mark a sell
order ``short exempt'' only if the provisions of Rule 201(c) or (d)
are met. See 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2). Since NOS and the Exchange do not
display the stock or ETF portion of a complex order, see infra note
20, a broker-dealer should not mark the short sale order ``short
exempt'' under Rule 201(c). See also Division of Trading and
Markets: Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201
of Regulation SHO, Q&A Nos. 4.2, 5.4 and 5.5.
\19\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(iii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1080.08(h) to
describe the handling of short sales involving the stock/ETF leg of a
complex order submitted to its Phlx trading System. When the short sale
price test restriction is triggered for a covered security, NOS will
not execute or display \20\ a short sale order in the underlying
covered security component of a complex order if the price is equal to
or below the current national best bid. However, NOS will execute a
short sale order in the underlying covered security component of a
complex order if such order is marked ``short exempt,'' regardless of
whether it is at a price that is equal to or below the current national
best bid. If NOS cannot execute the underlying covered security
component of a complex order in accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation
SHO, the Exchange will cancel back the complex order to the entering
member organization. When a short sale price test restriction is
triggered in a covered security, orders in that security marked
``short'' may be executed by NOS if the order is at a price above the
current national best bid at the time of execution. Thus, the proposal
is narrowly tailored to address Rule 201 by only cancelling orders
marked ``short'' when a short sale price test restriction is triggered
in the covered security and the sell order is at a price equal to or
below the current national best bid at the time of execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The stock or ETF portion of a complex order is not
displayed as an order, because the complex order as a whole is
handled as a single order with multiple contingencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this approach is consistent with Rule
201. Under this proposal, the Exchange and NOS, as trading centers,
will prevent the execution or display of a short sale of the stock/ETF
component of a complex order priced at or below the current national
best bid when the short sale price test restriction is triggered.
Specifically, while the Exchange and NOS are determining, respectively,
the prices of the options component and of the stock or ETF component
of the complex order, as described above, NOS will check the current
national best bid of the stock or ETF component at the time of
execution. The execution of one component is contingent upon the
execution of all other components and once a complex order is accepted
and validated by the Phlx trading System, the entire package is
processed as a single transaction and both the option leg and stock/ETF
components are simultaneously processed.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \21\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \22\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general to
protect investors and the public interest, by providing clarity on the
short sale order handling procedures of the stock/ETF component of a
complex order when a short sale price test restriction is in effect for
a covered security. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Regulation SHO in that it
provides for the handling of short exempt orders as well as short sale
orders when the short sale price test restriction is triggered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12208]]
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \23\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \24\
thereunder. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the
30-day pre-operative waiting period contained in Exchange Act Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) \25\ so that the Exchange may implement the change no
later than February 28, 2011 to coincide with the compliance date for
the amendments to Rules 200(g) and 201 of Regulation SHO. The
Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest because the
proposed rule change, among other things, implements the amendments to
Rules 200(g) and 201 of Regulation SHO which have a February 28, 2011
compliance date.\26\ For this reason, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be operative upon filing with the
Commission.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\26\ See supra note 17.
\27\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2011-27 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-27. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-27
and should be submitted on or before March 25, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4885 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P