Rear Visibility; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Rearview Mirrors; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Low-Speed Vehicles; Phase-in Reporting Requirements, 11418-11423 [2011-4737]
Download as PDF
11418
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
required field of view for all passenger
cars, trucks, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, buses, and low-speed vehicles
rated at 10,000 pounds or less, gross
vehicle weight, as specified in the
Cameron Gulbransen Kids
Transportation Safety Act of 2007 (75
FR 76186). NHTSA’s proposal would
specify an area immediately behind
each vehicle and require that the driver
must be able to see that area when the
vehicle’s transmission is in reverse,
thereby minimizing the likelihood of a
vehicle striking a pedestrian while
performing a backing maneuver. The
agency is announcing two separate
public events to obtain additional
public input related to this proposal. In
a separate document appearing
elsewhere in today’s edition of the
Federal Register, the agency is
correcting various minor errors
regarding metric conversions, section
cross references and other matters.
The purpose of the first public event,
a public technical workshop, is to
provide interested parties an
opportunity to discuss technical issues
relevant to the test procedure. We are
holding the workshop after our
preliminary evaluation of comments
suggests that various test procedure
comments could be better presented
using a ‘‘hands-on’’ approach. The
workshop will be held in a lab
environment. The agency will provide a
vehicle and various test equipment to
aid parties in demonstrating compliance
testing concerns relevant to the
proposed rule.
The purpose of the second meeting, a
public hearing, is to provide the public
with an opportunity to present oral
comments regarding NHTSA’s proposal.
The agency wants to give the public this
additional opportunity to express their
views on effective ways of meeting the
mandate in the Cameron Gulbransen
Kids Transportation Safety Act.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Workshop Procedures
To ensure that all interested persons
have the benefit of the discussions at the
workshop, we will arrange for a written
transcript of the workshop. It will be
placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking. You may make
arrangements for copies of the transcript
directly with the court reporter.
Because the technical workshop will
be located in a lab environment, NHTSA
requests that the number of those
attending from each affiliation be held
to a minimum. For security purposes,
photo identification is required to enter
NHTSA’s vehicle research test center.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Public Hearing Procedures
Once NHTSA establishes how many
people have registered to speak at the
public hearing, it will allocate an
appropriate amount of time to each
participant, allowing time for necessary
breaks. In addition, we will reserve a
block of time for anyone else in the
audience who wants to give testimony.
For planning purposes, each speaker
should anticipate speaking for
approximately ten minutes, although we
may need to shorten that time if there
is a large turnout. We will accommodate
your requested presentation time to the
extent we can, consistent with the other
requests we receive. We request that you
bring three copies of your statement or
other material so that it can be placed
into the docket.
To accommodate as many speakers as
possible, we prefer that speakers not use
technological aids (e.g., audio-visuals,
computer slideshows). However, if you
plan to do so, you must notify the
contact person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above in
advance of the meeting and make
advance arrangements with that person
regarding the use of any aids in order to
facilitate set-up.
NHTSA will conduct the public
hearing informally; thus, technical rules
of evidence will not apply. Panel
members may ask clarifying questions
during the oral presentations, but will
not respond to presentations at that
time. We will arrange for a written
transcript of the meeting. You may make
arrangements for copies of the
transcripts directly with the court
reporter.
This meeting will be held in the
media room at the Department of
Transportation West Building.
Therefore, each participant must register
with building security personnel and be
escorted to the meeting room by the
contact person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, or
someone delegated by him for this
purpose. Please arrive at the security
desk sufficiently in advance of the
expected time of your presentation to
allow for the time necessary to obtain
security clearance. The length of time
will depend on the size of the audience
seeking to attend the meeting.
Public Comments
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Issued on: February 24, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–4736 Filed 2–28–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 571 and 585
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0162]
RIN 2127–AK43
Rear Visibility; Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard, Rearview Mirrors;
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard,
Low-Speed Vehicles; Phase-in
Reporting Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
corrections.
AGENCY:
In December 2010, we
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking proposing to amend the
agency’s Federal motor vehicle safety
standard on rearview mirrors to improve
the ability of a driver of a vehicle to
detect pedestrians in the area
immediately behind the vehicle and
thereby minimize the likelihood of the
SUMMARY:
Persons wishing to submit written
comments related to the proposal or
either public event may do so on or
before the new comment closing date
announced in this document. The
agency will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the new comment closing date
PO 00000
announced in the DATES section of this
preamble. The comments will be
available for examination in the docket
at the above address both before and
after that date.
To minimize the interval between the
issuance of the final rule and the
original statutory deadline, the agency
does not expect to be able to consider
any late comments. Rulemaking action
may proceed at any time after the
comment due date. Any comments
received after the closing date and too
late for consideration in regard to the
action will be treated as suggestions for
future rulemaking.
The NHTSA will continue to file
relevant material as it becomes available
in the docket after the closing date. It is
recommended that interested persons
continue to examine the docket for new
material.
Those persons desiring to be notified
upon receipt of their comments in the
public docket should enclose, in the
envelope with their comments, a selfaddressed stamped postcard. Upon
receiving the comments, the docket
supervisor will return the postcard by
mail.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
vehicle’s striking a pedestrian while the
vehicle is moving backward. This
document corrects various minor errors
regarding metric conversions, section
cross references and other matters. In a
separate document appearing in today’s
edition of the Federal Register, the
agency reopens the comment period for
the proposal and announces plans for
holding two public meetings regarding
the proposal.
DATES: The corrections made in this
document are effective upon
publication.
For
non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards (Phone: 202–366–0098; Fax:
202–366–7002). For legal issues, you
may call Mr. Steve Wood, Assistant
Chief Counsel for Vehicle Rulemaking
and Harmonization, (Phone: 202–366–
2992; FAX: 202–366–3820). You may
send mail to these officials at: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 7, 2010, NHTSA published in
the Federal Register (75 FR 76186) a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to expand the required field of view for
all passenger cars, trucks, multipurpose
passenger vehicles, buses, and lowspeed vehicles rated at 10,000 pounds
or less, gross vehicle weight.
Specifically, NHTSA proposed to
specify an area immediately behind
each vehicle that the driver must be able
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
to see when the vehicle’s transmission
is in reverse. It appears that, in the near
term, the only technology available with
the ability to comply with this proposal
would be a rear visibility system that
includes a rear-mounted video camera
and an in-vehicle visual display.
Adoption of this proposal would
significantly reduce fatalities and
injuries caused by backover crashes
involving children, persons with
disabilities, the elderly, and other
pedestrians. This proposal was issued in
response to the Cameron Gulbransen
Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007,
which directs NHTSA to issue a final
rule amending the agency’s Federal
motor vehicle safety standard on
rearview mirrors to improve the ability
of a driver to detect pedestrians in the
area immediately behind his or her
vehicle and thereby minimize the
likelihood of a vehicle striking a
pedestrian while its driver is backing
the vehicle.
We provided a 60-day comment
period that ended February 7, 2011. In
a separate document appearing
elsewhere in today’s edition of the
Federal Register, the agency reopens the
comment period for the proposal and
announces plans for holding two public
meetings regarding the proposal.
Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2010–30353, beginning on
page 76186 in the Federal Register of
Tuesday, December 7, 2010, the
following corrections are made:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11419
1. On page 76187, in the first column,
Section VII of the Table of Contents
references a subsection ‘‘Potential
Alternatives’’. There is no such
subsection; all discussion of alternatives
appears in the subsection ‘‘Comparison
of Regulatory Alternatives’’. Correct
version of VII of the Table of Contents
is:
VII. Proposal to Mandate Improved Rear
Visibility
A. Proposed Specifications
i. Improved Rear Field of View
ii. Visual Display Requirements
a. Rearview Image Size
b. Image Response Time
c. Image Linger Time
d. Visual Display Luminance
e. Other Aspects of Visual Display
iii. Requirements for External System
Components
B. Proposed Compliance Tests
i. Ambient Lighting Conditions
ii. Rear Visibility Test Object
iii. Rear Visibility Compliance Test
Procedures
a. Rear Field of View Test Procedure
b. Rearview Image Size Test Procedure
C. Proposed Effective Date and Phase-In
Schedule
D. Summary of Estimated Effectiveness,
Costs and Benefits of Available
Technologies
E. Comparison of Regulatory Alternatives
i. System Effectiveness
ii. Costs
iii. Benefits
iv. Net Benefits
v. Cost Effectiveness
2. On page 76234, figure 6 is corrected
to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
3. On page 76244, in the third
column, the introductory language of
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
S5.5.1.1 references ‘‘S14.1 through
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
EP02MR11.017
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
11420
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
S14.2.3’’. The correct reference is to
‘‘S14.1 through S14.3.3’’.
4. On page 76245, in the first column,
the introductory language of S5.5.1.2
references ‘‘S14.1 through S14.2.3’’. The
correct reference is to ‘‘S14.1 through
S14.3.3’’.
5. On page 76245, in the first column,
the introductory language of S5.5.2
references ‘‘S14.2.1 through S14.2.3’’.
The correct reference is to ‘‘S14.3.1
through S14.3.3’’.
6. On page 76245, in the third
column, the third line of S6.2(a)
contains the weight figure of ‘‘4.536 kg’’.
The correct weight figure is ‘‘4,536 kg’’.
7. On page 76245, in the third
column, the third line of S6.2(b)
contains the weight figure of ‘‘4.536 kg’’.
The correct weight figure is ‘‘4,536 kg’’.
8. On page 76246, in the first column,
the sixth line of S6.2.3.2 contains the
weight figure of ‘‘4.536 kg’’. The correct
weight figure is ‘‘4,536 kg’’.
9. On page 76246, in the first column,
the sixth line of S6.2.3.3 contains the
weight figure of ‘‘4.536 kg’’. The correct
weight figure is ‘‘4,536 kg’’.
10. On page 76245, in the third
column, the introductory language of
S6.2.1.1 references ‘‘S14.1 through
S14.2.3’’. The correct reference is to
‘‘S14.1 through S14.3.3’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
11. On page 76245, in the third
column, the introductory language of
S6.2.1.2 references ‘‘S14.1 through
S14.2.3’’. The correct reference is to
‘‘S14.1 through S14.3.3’’.
12. On page 76246, in the first
column, the introductory language of
S6.2.2 references ‘‘S14.2.1 through
S14.2.3’’. The correct reference is to
‘‘S14.3.1 through S14.3.3’’.
13. On page 76246, in the first
column, the introductory language of
S6.2.3.2 contains the percentage figure
of ‘‘33 percent’’. The correct percentage
is ‘‘10 percent’’.
14. On page 76246, in the first
column, the introductory language of
S6.2.3.3 contains the percentage figure
of ‘‘67 percent’’. The correct percentage
is ‘‘40 percent’’.
15. On page 76246, in the third
column, the third line of S14.1.4
references ‘‘S14.1.5(a) through (d)’’. The
correct reference is to ‘‘S14.1.4(a)
through (d)’’.
16. On page 76246, in the third
column, the first line of S14.1.4(a)
references ‘‘cylinders G and F’’. The
correct reference is to ‘‘cylinders F and
G’’.
17. On page 76246, in the third
column, the sixth line of S14.1.4(a)
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11421
references ‘‘cylinders E and D’’. The
correct reference is to ‘‘cylinders D and
E’’.
18. On page 76247, in the first
column, the eighth line of S14.1.4(a)
contains the distance figure of ‘‘0.9 m’’.
The correct distance figure is ‘‘3.05 m’’.
19. On page 76247, in the first
column, the third line of S14.1.4(c)
contains the distance figure ‘‘1.5 m’’. The
correct distance figure is ‘‘1.52 m’’.
20. On page 76247, in the first
column, the fourth line of S14.1.4(c)
contains the direction ‘‘left’’. The correct
direction is ‘‘right’’.
21. On page 76247, in the first
column, the third line of S14.1.4(d)
contains the distance figure ‘‘1.5 m’’. The
correct distance figure is ‘‘1.52 m’’.
22. On page 76247, in the first
column, the fourth line of S14.1.4(d)
contains the direction ‘‘right’’. The
correct direction is ‘‘left’’.
23. On page 76247, in the third
column, the sixth and seventh lines of
S14.3.3 contain the temperature range
‘‘176° ± 5° F (60° ± 3° C)’’. The correct
temperature range is ‘‘176° ± 5° F (80°
± 3° C)’’.
24. On page 76248, Figure 5 is
corrected to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
EP02MR11.018
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
11422
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Issued on: February 24, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–4737 Filed 2–28–11; 11:15 am]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
11423
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11418-11423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4737]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 571 and 585
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0162]
RIN 2127-AK43
Rear Visibility; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Rearview
Mirrors; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Low-Speed Vehicles;
Phase-in Reporting Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; corrections.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In December 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
proposing to amend the agency's Federal motor vehicle safety standard
on rearview mirrors to improve the ability of a driver of a vehicle to
detect pedestrians in the area immediately behind the vehicle and
thereby minimize the likelihood of the
[[Page 11419]]
vehicle's striking a pedestrian while the vehicle is moving backward.
This document corrects various minor errors regarding metric
conversions, section cross references and other matters. In a separate
document appearing in today's edition of the Federal Register, the
agency reopens the comment period for the proposal and announces plans
for holding two public meetings regarding the proposal.
DATES: The corrections made in this document are effective upon
publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards (Phone: 202-366-0098;
Fax: 202-366-7002). For legal issues, you may call Mr. Steve Wood,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Vehicle Rulemaking and Harmonization,
(Phone: 202-366-2992; FAX: 202-366-3820). You may send mail to these
officials at: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 7, 2010, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 76186) a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to expand the required field of view for all passenger cars, trucks,
multipurpose passenger vehicles, buses, and low-speed vehicles rated at
10,000 pounds or less, gross vehicle weight. Specifically, NHTSA
proposed to specify an area immediately behind each vehicle that the
driver must be able to see when the vehicle's transmission is in
reverse. It appears that, in the near term, the only technology
available with the ability to comply with this proposal would be a rear
visibility system that includes a rear-mounted video camera and an in-
vehicle visual display. Adoption of this proposal would significantly
reduce fatalities and injuries caused by backover crashes involving
children, persons with disabilities, the elderly, and other
pedestrians. This proposal was issued in response to the Cameron
Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007, which directs NHTSA
to issue a final rule amending the agency's Federal motor vehicle
safety standard on rearview mirrors to improve the ability of a driver
to detect pedestrians in the area immediately behind his or her vehicle
and thereby minimize the likelihood of a vehicle striking a pedestrian
while its driver is backing the vehicle.
We provided a 60-day comment period that ended February 7, 2011. In
a separate document appearing elsewhere in today's edition of the
Federal Register, the agency reopens the comment period for the
proposal and announces plans for holding two public meetings regarding
the proposal.
Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2010-30353, beginning on page 76186 in the Federal
Register of Tuesday, December 7, 2010, the following corrections are
made:
1. On page 76187, in the first column, Section VII of the Table of
Contents references a subsection ``Potential Alternatives''. There is
no such subsection; all discussion of alternatives appears in the
subsection ``Comparison of Regulatory Alternatives''. Correct version
of VII of the Table of Contents is:
VII. Proposal to Mandate Improved Rear Visibility
A. Proposed Specifications
i. Improved Rear Field of View
ii. Visual Display Requirements
a. Rearview Image Size
b. Image Response Time
c. Image Linger Time
d. Visual Display Luminance
e. Other Aspects of Visual Display
iii. Requirements for External System Components
B. Proposed Compliance Tests
i. Ambient Lighting Conditions
ii. Rear Visibility Test Object
iii. Rear Visibility Compliance Test Procedures
a. Rear Field of View Test Procedure
b. Rearview Image Size Test Procedure
C. Proposed Effective Date and Phase-In Schedule
D. Summary of Estimated Effectiveness, Costs and Benefits of
Available Technologies
E. Comparison of Regulatory Alternatives
i. System Effectiveness
ii. Costs
iii. Benefits
iv. Net Benefits
v. Cost Effectiveness
2. On page 76234, figure 6 is corrected to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
[[Page 11420]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02MR11.017
BILLING CODE 4910-59-C
3. On page 76244, in the third column, the introductory language of
S5.5.1.1 references ``S14.1 through
[[Page 11421]]
S14.2.3''. The correct reference is to ``S14.1 through S14.3.3''.
4. On page 76245, in the first column, the introductory language of
S5.5.1.2 references ``S14.1 through S14.2.3''. The correct reference is
to ``S14.1 through S14.3.3''.
5. On page 76245, in the first column, the introductory language of
S5.5.2 references ``S14.2.1 through S14.2.3''. The correct reference is
to ``S14.3.1 through S14.3.3''.
6. On page 76245, in the third column, the third line of S6.2(a)
contains the weight figure of ``4.536 kg''. The correct weight figure
is ``4,536 kg''.
7. On page 76245, in the third column, the third line of S6.2(b)
contains the weight figure of ``4.536 kg''. The correct weight figure
is ``4,536 kg''.
8. On page 76246, in the first column, the sixth line of S6.2.3.2
contains the weight figure of ``4.536 kg''. The correct weight figure
is ``4,536 kg''.
9. On page 76246, in the first column, the sixth line of S6.2.3.3
contains the weight figure of ``4.536 kg''. The correct weight figure
is ``4,536 kg''.
10. On page 76245, in the third column, the introductory language
of S6.2.1.1 references ``S14.1 through S14.2.3''. The correct reference
is to ``S14.1 through S14.3.3''.
11. On page 76245, in the third column, the introductory language
of S6.2.1.2 references ``S14.1 through S14.2.3''. The correct reference
is to ``S14.1 through S14.3.3''.
12. On page 76246, in the first column, the introductory language
of S6.2.2 references ``S14.2.1 through S14.2.3''. The correct reference
is to ``S14.3.1 through S14.3.3''.
13. On page 76246, in the first column, the introductory language
of S6.2.3.2 contains the percentage figure of ``33 percent''. The
correct percentage is ``10 percent''.
14. On page 76246, in the first column, the introductory language
of S6.2.3.3 contains the percentage figure of ``67 percent''. The
correct percentage is ``40 percent''.
15. On page 76246, in the third column, the third line of S14.1.4
references ``S14.1.5(a) through (d)''. The correct reference is to
``S14.1.4(a) through (d)''.
16. On page 76246, in the third column, the first line of
S14.1.4(a) references ``cylinders G and F''. The correct reference is
to ``cylinders F and G''.
17. On page 76246, in the third column, the sixth line of
S14.1.4(a) references ``cylinders E and D''. The correct reference is
to ``cylinders D and E''.
18. On page 76247, in the first column, the eighth line of
S14.1.4(a) contains the distance figure of ``0.9 m''. The correct
distance figure is ``3.05 m''.
19. On page 76247, in the first column, the third line of
S14.1.4(c) contains the distance figure ``1.5 m''. The correct distance
figure is ``1.52 m''.
20. On page 76247, in the first column, the fourth line of
S14.1.4(c) contains the direction ``left''. The correct direction is
``right''.
21. On page 76247, in the first column, the third line of
S14.1.4(d) contains the distance figure ``1.5 m''. The correct distance
figure is ``1.52 m''.
22. On page 76247, in the first column, the fourth line of
S14.1.4(d) contains the direction ``right''. The correct direction is
``left''.
23. On page 76247, in the third column, the sixth and seventh lines
of S14.3.3 contain the temperature range ``176[deg] 5[deg]
F (60[deg] 3[deg] C)''. The correct temperature range is
``176[deg] 5[deg] F (80[deg] 3[deg] C)''.
24. On page 76248, Figure 5 is corrected to read as follows:
[[Page 11422]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02MR11.018
[[Page 11423]]
Issued on: February 24, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-4737 Filed 2-28-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-C