In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of Investigation, 11512-11513 [2011-4585]

Download as PDF 11512 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain set-top boxes, and hardware and software components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,585,838 (‘‘the ’838 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 5,731,844 (‘‘the ’844 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,028,604 (‘‘the ’604 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 5,758,258 (‘‘the ’258 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2571. emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.10 (2010). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 22, 2010, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain set-top boxes, and VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:34 Mar 01, 2011 Jkt 223001 hardware and software components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 1 and 13 of the ’838 patent; claims 1, 7, 11–15, and 21 of the ’844 patent; claims 1, 2, 7–9, 14–16, and 19 of the ’604 patent; and claims 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 of the ’258 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052. (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: TiVo Inc., 2160 Gold Street, Alviso, CA 95002. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 By order of the Commission. Issued: February 23, 2011. William R. Bishop, Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. [FR Doc. 2011–4571 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–760] In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 24, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sharp Corporation of Japan. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on February 11 and February 14, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices, products containing same, and methods for using the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,879,364 (‘‘the ‘364 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,304,626 (‘‘the ‘626 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,532,183 (‘‘the ‘183 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,283,192 (‘‘the ‘192 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,937,300 (‘‘the ‘300 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,057,689 (‘‘the ‘689 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,838,881 (‘‘the ‘881 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. SUMMARY: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2767. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 22, 2011, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices, products containing same, and methods for using the same that infringe one or more of claims 5– 7 of the ‘364 patent; claims 10, 17, and 18 of the ‘626 patent; claims 1–6 of the ‘183 patent; claims 1 and 11 of the ‘192 patent; claim 1 of the ‘300 patent; claims 1–4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 27, 31, and 33 of the ‘689 patent; and claims 1–7 and 10–13 of the ‘‘881 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Sharp Corporation, 22–22 Nagaike-cho, Abenoku, Osaka 545–8522, Japan. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: AU Optronics Corp., No. 1 Li-Hsin Road 2, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan. Au Optronics Corporation America, 9720 Cypresswood Drive, Suite 241, Houston, TX 77070. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:12 Mar 01, 2011 Jkt 223001 BenQ America Corp., 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A–205, Irvine, CA 92618. BenQ Corporation, 16 Jihu Road, Neihu, Taipei 114, Taiwan. Haier America Trading LLC, 1356 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. Haier Group Company, 1 Haier Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Qingdao 266101, China. LG Electronics Inc., LG Twin Towers 20, Yoido-dong, Youngdungpo-gu, Seoul 150–721, Korea. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., 5–5, KeihanHondori 2-chome, Moriguchi City, Osaka 570–8677, Japan. SANYO North America Corporation, 2055 SANYO Avenue, San Diego, CA 92154. TCL Corporation, TCL Industrial Tower, No. 6 South Eling Road, Huizhou, Guangdong Province 516001, China. TTE Technology, Inc., d/b/a TCL America, 5541 West 74th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46268. VIZIO, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11513 alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 24, 2011. William R. Bishop, Meetings and Hearings Coordinator. [FR Doc. 2011–4585 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–0035] Agency Information Collection Activities; Existing Collection; Comments Requested 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Approval of a existing collection; The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Point of Contact (POC) State Final Determination Electronic Submission. ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division’s NICS Section will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until May 2, 2011. This process is conducted in accordance with Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 1320.10. If you have comments (especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time), suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Sherry L. Kuneff, Management and Program Analyst, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, National Instant Criminal Background Check System Section, Module A–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306, or facsimile at (304) 625–7540. Written comments concerning this information collection should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11512-11513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-760]


In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Products 
Containing Same, and Methods for Using the Same; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 24, 2011, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Sharp Corporation of Japan. Letters supplementing the complaint were 
filed on February 11 and February 14, 2011. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices, products 
containing same, and methods for using the same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,879,364 (``the `364 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,304,626 (``the `626 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 7,532,183 (``the `183 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,283,192 (``the 
`192 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,937,300 (``the `300 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 7,057,689 (``the `689 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 
7,838,881 (``the `881 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by

[[Page 11513]]

contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with 
mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access 
to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-
205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
(202) 205-2767.
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in 
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 
CFR 210.10 (2010).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on February 22, 2011, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid 
crystal display devices, products containing same, and methods for 
using the same that infringe one or more of claims 5-7 of the `364 
patent; claims 10, 17, and 18 of the `626 patent; claims 1-6 of the 
`183 patent; claims 1 and 11 of the `192 patent; claim 1 of the `300 
patent; claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 27, 31, and 33 of 
the `689 patent; and claims 1-7 and 10-13 of the ``881 patent, and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Sharp Corporation, 22-22 Nagaike-cho, 
Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522, Japan.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

AU Optronics Corp., No. 1 Li-Hsin Road 2, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 
300, Taiwan.
Au Optronics Corporation America, 9720 Cypresswood Drive, Suite 241, 
Houston, TX 77070.
BenQ America Corp., 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-205, Irvine, CA 
92618.
BenQ Corporation, 16 Jihu Road, Neihu, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Haier America Trading LLC, 1356 Broadway, New York, NY 10018.
Haier Group Company, 1 Haier Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Qingdao 266101, China.
LG Electronics Inc., LG Twin Towers 20, Yoido-dong, Youngdungpo-gu, 
Seoul 150-721, Korea.
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 
07632.
SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., 5-5, Keihan-Hondori 2-chome, Moriguchi City, 
Osaka 570-8677, Japan.
SANYO North America Corporation, 2055 SANYO Avenue, San Diego, CA 
92154.
TCL Corporation, TCL Industrial Tower, No. 6 South Eling Road, Huizhou, 
Guangdong Province 516001, China.
TTE Technology, Inc., d/b/a TCL America, 5541 West 74th Street, 
Indianapolis, IN 46268.
VIZIO, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.

    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 24, 2011.
William R. Bishop,
Meetings and Hearings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2011-4585 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.