Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 11198-11199 [2011-4523]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
11198
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters.2 If the interested party
intends for the Secretary to review sales
of merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Please note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department
has clarified its practice with respect to
the collection of final antidumping
duties on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov.
Six copies of the request should be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. The Department
also asks parties to serve a copy of their
requests to the Office of Antidumping/
Countervailing Operations, Attention:
Sheila Forbes, in room 3508 of the main
Commerce Building. Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request
must be served on the petitioner and
each exporter or producer specified in
the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of March 2011. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of March 2011, a request for review
of entries covered by an order, finding,
or suspended investigation listed in this
notice and for the period identified
above, the Department will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping or countervailing
duties on those entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of (or bond for)
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the POR.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: February 18, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–4530 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April
2011
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in April 2011
and will appear in that month’s Notice
of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset
Reviews.
Department Contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (A–588–850) (2nd Review) ........
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (A–588–851) (2nd Review) ......
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Romania (A–485–805) (2nd Review) ..
Sulfanilic Acid from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–815) (3rd Review) ......................................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Sulfanilic Acid from India (A–533–806) (3rd Review) ................................................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from India (C–533–807) (3rd Review) ................................................................................................................
2 If the review request involves a non-market
economy and the parties subject to the review
request do not qualify for separate rates, all other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a
separate rate will be covered by the review as part
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
David Goldberger
(202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger
(202) 482–4136.
Dana Mermelstein
(202) 482–1391.
Julia Hancock
(202) 482–1394.
Julia Hancock
(202) 482–1394.
David Goldberger
(202) 482–4136.
of the single entity of which the named firms are
a part.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
11199
Department Contact
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in April 2011.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—
Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998).
The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further
information regarding what is required
of all parties to participate in Sunset
Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: February 16, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–4523 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Public Law
106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301),
we invite comments on the question of
whether instruments of equivalent
scientific value, for the purposes for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
which the instruments shown below are
intended to be used, are being
manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be postmarked on or before March 21,
2011. Address written comments to
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Washington, DC 20230. Applications
may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and
5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of
Commerce in Room 3720.
Docket Number: 10–045. Applicant:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific
Northwest Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, 3335 Q Ave.,
Richland, WA 99354. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: This instrument will be used as an
analytical tool for doing serial
sectioning and producing 3D analytical
analysis for both geological and material
science samples. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of
the same general category manufactured
in the United States. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
February 2, 2011.
Docket Number: 10–072. Applicant:
University of Puerto Rico, Institute of
Neurobiology, PO Box 365067, San
Juan, Puerto Rico 00936–5067.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: The instrument will be
used to reconstruct the remodeling
synapses in the regenerating tectum,
quantify the numbers and types of
synapses, and quantify the effect that
changes in brain-derived neurotrophic
factors have on these synapses made by
regenerated axons in the brain. The
instrument will also enable the
unequivocal identification of synapses
made by Engrailed-expressing neurons,
something that is impossible to do any
other way. Additionally, the instrument
will be used to study the location of
aminergic receptors and transporter
molecules in specific areas of the central
nervous systems of freshwater prawns.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: December
22, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–076. Applicant:
Regents of the University of Minnesota,
12 Shepherd Labs 100 Union St, SE.,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Inc., Czech Republic. Intended Use: The
instrument will support structural study
of the mechanisms of virus assembly
and infection, kidney structure and
function in disease, bacterial infection
and host response, and other
applications. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category manufactured in
the United States. Application accepted
by Commissioner of Customs: December
29, 2010.
Docket Number: 11–002. Applicant:
Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell
University, 1300 York Avenue, New
York, NY 10065. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: The instrument
will allow users to acquire well focused,
high contrast, high quality images
through the full range of magnifications,
from 50x to 1,200,000x. Justification for
Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: January 11,
2011.
Docket Number: 11–003. Applicant:
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
Department of Veterinary Pathology,
Bldg. 54, Room G111, 6825 16th St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20306–6000.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: The instrument will be
used to examine tissue specimens to
identify and characterize pathologic
tissue changes, determine disease
diagnosis and severity, and aid in
prognosis and treatment of patients as
applicable. The required capabilities
that this instrument provides are a
voltage range between 40kV and 120 kV,
a resolution of 0.2nm line and 0.38nm
point, and a magnification of x50 to
600,000, among other requirements.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: January 11,
2011.
Docket Number: 11–004. Applicant:
San Diego State University, 5500
Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Inc., Czech Republic.
Intended Use: The instrument will be
used for many applications including
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11198-11199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4523]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2011
The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in April
2011 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
Sunset Reviews.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department Contact
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & David Goldberger
Pressure Pipe (Over 4\1/2\ Inches) from (202) 482-4136.
Japan (A-588-850) (2nd Review).
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & David Goldberger
Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from (202) 482-4136.
Japan (A-588-851) (2nd Review).
Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Dana Mermelstein
Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from (202) 482-1391.
Romania (A-485-805) (2nd Review).
Sulfanilic Acid from the People's Republic Julia Hancock
of China (A-570-815) (3rd Review). (202) 482-1394.
Sulfanilic Acid from India (A-533-806) (3rd Julia Hancock
Review). (202) 482-1394.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from India (C-533-807) (3rd David Goldberger
Review). (202) 482-4136.
[[Page 11199]]
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations are scheduled for
initiation in April 2011.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical
issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set
forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the
Conduct of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16,
1998). The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews
provides further information regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: February 16, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-4523 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
