Labor Certification Process for the Temporary Employment of Aliens in Agriculture in the United States: 2011 Adverse Effect Wage Rates, Allowable Charges for Agricultural Workers' Meals, and Maximum Travel Subsistence Reimbursement, 11286-11287 [2011-4419]
Download as PDF
11286
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
supportive services necessary to achieve
the preceding four goals, including
strengthening the role of the public
workforce system in career pathway
programs. ETA proposes to fund
approximately 40 to 50 grants ranging
from $1 million to $5 million. Based on
statutory requirements, at least $65
million of the total designated funds
will be reserved for projects that focus
on the health care sector. In addition,
DOL intends to reserve funding of
approximately $6.25 million of the total
appropriation to award additional
funding to support grantee efforts to
conduct a third-party evaluation of the
grant activities with this SGA.
The complete SGA and any
subsequent SGA amendments, in
connection with the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998, Public Law
105–220 is described in further detail on
ETA’s Web site at https://www.doleta.gov
or on https://www.grants.gov. The Web
sites provide application information,
eligibility requirements, review and
selection procedures and other program
requirements governing this solicitation.
DATES: The closing date for receipt of
applications is March 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Forman, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N4716,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: 202–
693–3416.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
February, 2011.
Donna Kelly,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–4407 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Labor Certification Process for the
Temporary Employment of Aliens in
Agriculture in the United States: 2011
Adverse Effect Wage Rates, Allowable
Charges for Agricultural Workers’
Meals, and Maximum Travel
Subsistence Reimbursement
Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Employment and
Training Administration (ETA) of the
Department of Labor (Department) is
issuing this Notice to announce: (1) The
2011 Adverse Effect Wage Rates
(AEWRs) for employers seeking to
employ temporary or seasonal
nonimmigrant foreign workers to
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
perform agricultural labor or services
(H–2A workers); (2) the allowable
maximum amount for 2011 that
employers may charge their H–2A
workers for providing them with three
meals a day; and (3) the maximum
travel subsistence reimbursement which
a worker with receipts may claim in
2011.
DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William L. Carlson, Ph.D.,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification, U.S. Department of Labor,
Room C–4312, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone: 202–693–3010 (this is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States (U.S.) Citizenship and
Immigration Services of the Department
of Homeland Security may not approve
an employer’s petition for the admission
of H–2A nonimmigrant temporary
agricultural workers in the U.S. unless
the petitioner has received from the
Department of Labor (Department) an
H–2A labor certification. Approved
labor certifications attest that: (1) There
are not sufficient U.S. workers who are
able, willing, and qualified and who
will be available at the time and place
needed to perform the labor or services
involved in the petition; and (2) the
employment of the foreign worker in
such labor or services will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions
of workers in the U.S. similarly
employed. 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a),
1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b), 1184(c)(1), and
1188(a); and 8 CFR 214.2(h)(5) and (6).
The Department’s regulations for the
H–2A program require employers to
offer and pay their U.S. and H–2A
workers no less than the appropriate
hourly AEWR in effect at the time the
work is performed. 20 CFR 655.122(l).
A. Adverse Effect Wage Rates for 2011
Employers of H–2A workers must pay
the highest of (i) the AEWR, in effect, at
the time the work is performed; (ii) the
applicable prevailing wage; or (iii) the
statutory minimum wage, as specified in
the regulations. 20 CFR 655.120(a).
Except as otherwise provided in 20 CFR
part 655, Subpart B, the region-wide
AEWR for all agricultural employment
(except those occupations which are
exempted under the special procedure
provisions of 20 CFR 655.102) for which
temporary H–2A certification is being
sought is equal to the annual weighted
average hourly wage rate for field and
livestock workers (combined) for the
region as published annually by the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) based on its quarterly wage
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
survey. Pursuant to 20 CFR 655.120(c),
the Administrator of the Office of
Foreign Labor Certification must
publish USDA field and livestock
worker (combined) wage data as AEWRs
in a Federal Register Notice.
Accordingly, the 2011 AEWRs for
agricultural work performed by U.S. and
H–2A workers on or after the effective
date of this Notice are set forth in the
table below:
TABLE—2011 ADVERSE EFFECT WAGE
RATES
State
Alabama ....................................
Arizona ......................................
Arkansas ...................................
California ...................................
Colorado ...................................
Connecticut ...............................
Delaware ...................................
Florida .......................................
Georgia .....................................
Hawaii .......................................
Idaho .........................................
Illinois ........................................
Indiana ......................................
Iowa ..........................................
Kansas ......................................
Kentucky ...................................
Louisiana ..................................
Maine ........................................
Maryland ...................................
Massachusetts ..........................
Michigan ...................................
Minnesota .................................
Mississippi ................................
Missouri ....................................
Montana ....................................
Nebraska ..................................
Nevada .....................................
New Hampshire ........................
New Jersey ...............................
New Mexico ..............................
New York ..................................
North Carolina ..........................
North Dakota ............................
Ohio ..........................................
Oklahoma .................................
Oregon ......................................
Pennsylvania ............................
Rhode Island ............................
South Carolina ..........................
South Dakota ............................
Tennessee ................................
Texas ........................................
Utah ..........................................
Vermont ....................................
Virginia ......................................
Washington ...............................
West Virginia ............................
Wisconsin .................................
Wyoming ...................................
2011
AEWRs
$9.12
9.60
8.97
10.31
10.48
10.25
10.60
9.50
9.12
12.01
9.90
10.84
10.84
11.03
11.52
9.48
8.97
10.25
10.60
10.25
10.62
10.62
8.97
11.03
9.90
11.52
10.48
10.25
10.60
9.60
10.25
9.30
11.52
10.84
9.65
10.60
10.60
10.25
9.12
11.52
9.48
9.65
10.48
10.25
9.30
10.60
9.48
10.62
9.90
B. Allowable Meal Charges
Among the minimum benefits and
working conditions which the
Department requires employers to offer
their U.S. and H–2A workers are three
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
meals a day or free and convenient
cooking and kitchen facilities. 20 CFR
655.122(g). When the employer provides
meals, the job offer must state the
charge, if any, to the worker for such
meals. 20 CFR 655.122(g).
The Department has published at 20
CFR 655.173(a) the methodology for
determining the maximum amounts that
H–2A agricultural employers may
charge their U.S. and foreign workers for
meals. These rules provide for annual
adjustments of the previous year’s
allowable charges based upon Consumer
Price Index (CPI) data. 20 CFR
655.173(a).
Each year, the maximum charges
allowed by 20 CFR 655.122(g) are
adjusted by the same percentage as the
12-month percent change for the CPI for
all Urban Consumers for Food (CPI–U
for Food). The Department may permit
an employer to charge workers no more
than the higher maximum amount set
forth in 20 CFR 655.173(b), as
applicable, for providing them with
three meals a day, if justified and
sufficiently documented. The H–2A
program’s regulations require the
Department to make the annual
adjustments and to publish a Notice in
the Federal Register each calendar year,
announcing annual adjustments in
allowable charges that may be made by
agricultural and logging employers for
providing three meals daily to their U.S.
and foreign workers. The 2010 rates
were published in the Federal Register
at 75 FR 7293, Feb. 18, 2010.
The Department has determined the
percentage change between December of
2009 and December of 2010 for the CPI–
U for Food was .8 percent. Accordingly,
the maximum allowable charges under
20 CFR 655.122(g) were adjusted using
this percentage change, and the new
permissible charges for 2011 shall be no
more than $10.73 per day, unless the
Department has approved a higher
charge pursuant to 20 CFR 655.173(b).
C. Maximum Travel Subsistence
Expense
The regulations at 20 CFR 655.122(h)
establish that the minimum daily travel
subsistence expense, for which a worker
is entitled to reimbursement, is at least
as much as the employer would charge
the worker for providing the worker
with three meals a day during
employment (if applicable), but in no
event less than the amount permitted
under 20 CFR 655.173(a). The regulation
is silent about the maximum amount to
which a qualifying worker is entitled.
The Department based the maximum
meals component on the standard
Continental United States (CONUS) per
diem rate established by the General
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Services Administration (GSA),
published at 41 CFR Part 301, Appendix
A. The CONUS meal component is now
$46.00 per day.
Workers who qualify for travel
reimbursement are entitled to
reimbursement up to the CONUS meal
rate for related subsistence when they
provide receipts. In determining the
appropriate amount of subsistence
reimbursement, the employer may use
the GSA system under which a traveler
qualifies for meal expense
reimbursement at 75 percent of the
subsistence for the first partial day of
travel and 75 percent of the subsistence
for the last partial day per quarter of a
day. If a worker has no receipts, the
employer is not obligated to reimburse
above the minimum stated at 20 CFR
655.173(a), as specified above.
Signed in Washington, DC this 18th day of
February, 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–4419 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
[Docket No. 2010–8 CRB DD 2005–2008]
Distribution of 2005 Through 2008
DART Musical Works Funds Royalties
Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice soliciting comments on
motion for partial distribution.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty Judges
are soliciting comments on a motion for
partial distribution in connection with
2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 DART
Musical Works Fund royalties.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
March 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent
electronically to crb@loc.gov. In the
alternative, send an original, five copies,
and an electronic copy on a CD either
by mail or hand delivery. Please do not
use multiple means of transmission.
Comments may not be delivered by an
overnight delivery service other than the
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail. If by
mail (including overnight delivery),
comments must be addressed to:
Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box
70977, Washington, DC 20024–0977. If
hand delivered by a private party,
comments must be brought to the
Library of Congress, James Madison
Memorial Building, LM–401, 101
Independence Avenue, SE.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11287
Washington, DC 20559–6000. If
delivered by a commercial courier,
comments must be delivered to the
Congressional Courier Acceptance Site
located at 2nd and D Street, NE.,
Washington, DC. The envelope must be
addressed to: Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress, James Madison
Memorial Building, LM–403, 101
Independence Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20559–6000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Strasser, Senior Attorney, or
Gina Giuffreda, Attorney Advisor, by
telephone at (202) 707–7658 or e-mail at
crb@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
8, 2010, Broadcast Music, Inc., the
American Society of Composers,
Authors and Publishers, SESAC, Inc.
and The Harry Fox Agency, Inc.
(hereinafter ‘‘Settling Claimants’’) filed
with the Judges a Motion for Partial
Distribution of the Digital Audio
Recording Technology (‘‘DART’’)
Musical Works Funds for 2005, 2006,
2007, and 2008. In the Motion the
Settling Claimants state that they have
reached confidential settlements
concerning their respective distribution
shares for these years. The Settling
Claimants request that the Judges,
pursuant to Section 801(b)(3)(A) of the
Copyright Act, distribute to the Settling
Claimants 95% of the 2005–2008 DART
Musical Works Funds, for the Writers
and Music Publishers Subfunds. They
also request that the Copyright Royalty
Judges (‘‘Judges’’) publish notice in the
Federal Register requesting comments
on their proposed partial distribution.
Section 801(b)(3)(A) authorizes the
Judges to order distributions of royalty
funds to the extent that the Judges find
that the distribution of such fees is not
subject to controversy. 17 U.S.C.
801(b)(3)(A). That section of the
Copyright Act does not require
publication in the Federal Register, but
it does require that the Judges find that
the fees requested are not subject to
controversy. The Settling Claimants do
not make such a representation. Rather
they represent that they have agreed
among themselves how any distributed
funds should be allocated among
themselves. The Settling Claimants state
that the Judges ‘‘have the discretion,
within a zone of reasonableness, to find
that 95% of the royalties are not in
controversy.’’ Motion at 4. As support
for this assertion, they state that ‘‘[i]n the
past four DART proceedings, nonsettling individual writer and publisher
claimants collectively have either
received less than one tenth of one
percent (0.1%) of the royalty funds or
have been dismissed altogether * * *.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11286-11287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4419]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Labor Certification Process for the Temporary Employment of
Aliens in Agriculture in the United States: 2011 Adverse Effect Wage
Rates, Allowable Charges for Agricultural Workers' Meals, and Maximum
Travel Subsistence Reimbursement
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) of the
Department of Labor (Department) is issuing this Notice to announce:
(1) The 2011 Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWRs) for employers seeking to
employ temporary or seasonal nonimmigrant foreign workers to perform
agricultural labor or services (H-2A workers); (2) the allowable
maximum amount for 2011 that employers may charge their H-2A workers
for providing them with three meals a day; and (3) the maximum travel
subsistence reimbursement which a worker with receipts may claim in
2011.
DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William L. Carlson, Ph.D.,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, U.S. Department
of Labor, Room C-4312, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210. Telephone: 202-693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States (U.S.) Citizenship and
Immigration Services of the Department of Homeland Security may not
approve an employer's petition for the admission of H-2A nonimmigrant
temporary agricultural workers in the U.S. unless the petitioner has
received from the Department of Labor (Department) an H-2A labor
certification. Approved labor certifications attest that: (1) There are
not sufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, and qualified and
who will be available at the time and place needed to perform the labor
or services involved in the petition; and (2) the employment of the
foreign worker in such labor or services will not adversely affect the
wages and working conditions of workers in the U.S. similarly employed.
8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b), 1184(c)(1), and
1188(a); and 8 CFR 214.2(h)(5) and (6).
The Department's regulations for the H-2A program require employers
to offer and pay their U.S. and H-2A workers no less than the
appropriate hourly AEWR in effect at the time the work is performed. 20
CFR 655.122(l).
A. Adverse Effect Wage Rates for 2011
Employers of H-2A workers must pay the highest of (i) the AEWR, in
effect, at the time the work is performed; (ii) the applicable
prevailing wage; or (iii) the statutory minimum wage, as specified in
the regulations. 20 CFR 655.120(a). Except as otherwise provided in 20
CFR part 655, Subpart B, the region-wide AEWR for all agricultural
employment (except those occupations which are exempted under the
special procedure provisions of 20 CFR 655.102) for which temporary H-
2A certification is being sought is equal to the annual weighted
average hourly wage rate for field and livestock workers (combined) for
the region as published annually by the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) based on its quarterly wage survey. Pursuant to 20
CFR 655.120(c), the Administrator of the Office of Foreign Labor
Certification must publish USDA field and livestock worker (combined)
wage data as AEWRs in a Federal Register Notice. Accordingly, the 2011
AEWRs for agricultural work performed by U.S. and H-2A workers on or
after the effective date of this Notice are set forth in the table
below:
Table--2011 Adverse Effect Wage Rates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State 2011 AEWRs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama.................................................... $9.12
Arizona.................................................... 9.60
Arkansas................................................... 8.97
California................................................. 10.31
Colorado................................................... 10.48
Connecticut................................................ 10.25
Delaware................................................... 10.60
Florida.................................................... 9.50
Georgia.................................................... 9.12
Hawaii..................................................... 12.01
Idaho...................................................... 9.90
Illinois................................................... 10.84
Indiana.................................................... 10.84
Iowa....................................................... 11.03
Kansas..................................................... 11.52
Kentucky................................................... 9.48
Louisiana.................................................. 8.97
Maine...................................................... 10.25
Maryland................................................... 10.60
Massachusetts.............................................. 10.25
Michigan................................................... 10.62
Minnesota.................................................. 10.62
Mississippi................................................ 8.97
Missouri................................................... 11.03
Montana.................................................... 9.90
Nebraska................................................... 11.52
Nevada..................................................... 10.48
New Hampshire.............................................. 10.25
New Jersey................................................. 10.60
New Mexico................................................. 9.60
New York................................................... 10.25
North Carolina............................................. 9.30
North Dakota............................................... 11.52
Ohio....................................................... 10.84
Oklahoma................................................... 9.65
Oregon..................................................... 10.60
Pennsylvania............................................... 10.60
Rhode Island............................................... 10.25
South Carolina............................................. 9.12
South Dakota............................................... 11.52
Tennessee.................................................. 9.48
Texas...................................................... 9.65
Utah....................................................... 10.48
Vermont.................................................... 10.25
Virginia................................................... 9.30
Washington................................................. 10.60
West Virginia.............................................. 9.48
Wisconsin.................................................. 10.62
Wyoming.................................................... 9.90
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Allowable Meal Charges
Among the minimum benefits and working conditions which the
Department requires employers to offer their U.S. and H-2A workers are
three
[[Page 11287]]
meals a day or free and convenient cooking and kitchen facilities. 20
CFR 655.122(g). When the employer provides meals, the job offer must
state the charge, if any, to the worker for such meals. 20 CFR
655.122(g).
The Department has published at 20 CFR 655.173(a) the methodology
for determining the maximum amounts that H-2A agricultural employers
may charge their U.S. and foreign workers for meals. These rules
provide for annual adjustments of the previous year's allowable charges
based upon Consumer Price Index (CPI) data. 20 CFR 655.173(a).
Each year, the maximum charges allowed by 20 CFR 655.122(g) are
adjusted by the same percentage as the 12-month percent change for the
CPI for all Urban Consumers for Food (CPI-U for Food). The Department
may permit an employer to charge workers no more than the higher
maximum amount set forth in 20 CFR 655.173(b), as applicable, for
providing them with three meals a day, if justified and sufficiently
documented. The H-2A program's regulations require the Department to
make the annual adjustments and to publish a Notice in the Federal
Register each calendar year, announcing annual adjustments in allowable
charges that may be made by agricultural and logging employers for
providing three meals daily to their U.S. and foreign workers. The 2010
rates were published in the Federal Register at 75 FR 7293, Feb. 18,
2010.
The Department has determined the percentage change between
December of 2009 and December of 2010 for the CPI-U for Food was .8
percent. Accordingly, the maximum allowable charges under 20 CFR
655.122(g) were adjusted using this percentage change, and the new
permissible charges for 2011 shall be no more than $10.73 per day,
unless the Department has approved a higher charge pursuant to 20 CFR
655.173(b).
C. Maximum Travel Subsistence Expense
The regulations at 20 CFR 655.122(h) establish that the minimum
daily travel subsistence expense, for which a worker is entitled to
reimbursement, is at least as much as the employer would charge the
worker for providing the worker with three meals a day during
employment (if applicable), but in no event less than the amount
permitted under 20 CFR 655.173(a). The regulation is silent about the
maximum amount to which a qualifying worker is entitled.
The Department based the maximum meals component on the standard
Continental United States (CONUS) per diem rate established by the
General Services Administration (GSA), published at 41 CFR Part 301,
Appendix A. The CONUS meal component is now $46.00 per day.
Workers who qualify for travel reimbursement are entitled to
reimbursement up to the CONUS meal rate for related subsistence when
they provide receipts. In determining the appropriate amount of
subsistence reimbursement, the employer may use the GSA system under
which a traveler qualifies for meal expense reimbursement at 75 percent
of the subsistence for the first partial day of travel and 75 percent
of the subsistence for the last partial day per quarter of a day. If a
worker has no receipts, the employer is not obligated to reimburse
above the minimum stated at 20 CFR 655.173(a), as specified above.
Signed in Washington, DC this 18th day of February, 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-4419 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P