Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 10875-10876 [2011-4397]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2008–0119 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send one copy of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0119,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2008–0119.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
George Balady, Staff Officer, Quarantine
Policy Analysis and Support, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 60,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
8295.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Lacey Act (16 U.S.C. 3371 et
seq.), first enacted in 1900 and
significantly amended in 1981, is the
United States’ oldest wildlife protection
statute. The Act combats trafficking in
‘‘illegal’’ wildlife, fish, and plants. The
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008, effective May 22, 2008, amended
the Lacey Act by expanding its
protections to a broader range of plants
and plant products (Section 8204,
Prevention of Illegal Logging Practices).
As amended, the Lacey Act now makes
it unlawful to import, export, transport,
sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in
interstate or foreign commerce any
plant, with some limited exceptions,
taken in violation of any Federal, State,
Tribal, or foreign law that protects
plants. The Lacey Act also now makes
it unlawful to make or submit any false
record, account, or label for, or any false
identification of, any plant covered by
the Act.
In addition, Section 3 of the Lacey
Act, as amended, made it unlawful,
beginning December 15, 2008, to import
certain plants and plant products
without an import declaration. The
declaration must contain, among other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:30 Feb 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
things, the scientific name of the plant,
value of the importation, quantity of the
plant, and name of the country from
which the plant was harvested.
Enforcement of the declaration
requirement is currently being phased
in.1
The Act also requires us to review the
implementation of the declaration
requirements, including the effect of
certain exclusions from those
requirements, and to provide public
notice and opportunity for comment
while conducting the review.
Furthermore, after we have completed
the review, we are required to submit a
report to Congress detailing the results
of that review. Specifically, the Act
directs us to include in the report the
following items:
(A) An evaluation of—
(i) The effectiveness of each type of
information required under paragraphs (1)
through (2) in assisting enforcement of this
section; and
(ii) The potential to harmonize each
requirement imposed by paragraphs (1) and
(2) with other applicable import regulations
in existence as of the date of the report;
(B) Recommendations for such legislation
as the Secretary determines to be appropriate
to assist in the identification of plants that
are imported into the United States in
violation of this section; and
(C) An analysis of the effect of subsection
(a) and this subsection on—
(i) The cost of legal plant imports; and
(ii) The extent and methodology of
illegal logging practices and trafficking.
Therefore, we are soliciting
information from the public about the
implementation of the import
declaration requirements. Interested
parties are invited to submit comments
on the issues stated above and other
pertinent issues related to the
implementation and enforcement of the
2008 Lacey Act amendments.
Information received in response to this
notice will be taken into account and
included with our analysis of the
implementation of the declaration
requirements in the report made to
Congress. Comments submitted in
response to previous notices regarding
implementation of the amended Lacey
Act will also be taken into account and
do not need to be resubmitted.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
1 Copies of notices published in the Federal
Register on the implementation of the Lacey Act
(including directions on how to view comments
received on them), guidance on complying with the
Lacey Act, and information about how to register
for stakeholder notification can be found on the
APHIS Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
plant_health/lacey_act/index.shtml.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10875
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
February 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–4357 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the
People’s Republic of China: Extension
of Time Limit for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 28,
2011.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office
6, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 28, 2010, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on chlorinated
isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
covering the period June 1, 2009,
through May 31, 2010. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocations in Part, 75 FR 44224
(July 28, 2010). The current deadline for
the preliminary results of review is
March 2, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 245-day period to 365 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
10876
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices
results of the administrative review of
chlorinated isos from the PRC within
this time limit. Specifically, due to
additional time needed to review the
first supplemental questionnaire
response and to issue further
supplemental questionnaires, we find
that additional time is needed to
complete these preliminary results.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for
completion of the preliminary results of
this review from 245 days to 365 days;
from March 2, 2011 until June 30, 2011.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 22, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
2009, petitioner timely withdrew its
request for a review of Blue Bird (India)
Limited (Blue Bird). Therefore, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Blue Bird.
As a result of our analysis of the
comments received, these final results
differ from the Preliminary Results.
For our final results, we continue to
find that Navneet did not make sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value (NV) (i.e., sales were made at de
minimis dumping margins). We also
find that U.S. sales have not been made
below NV by Super Impex. In addition,
based on the final results for Super
Impex, we have determined that the 29
remaining non-selected companies will
receive the non-selected respondent rate
from the previous review.
DATES: Effective Date: February 28,
2011.
[FR Doc. 2011–4397 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Stephanie Moore (Navneet) and Cindy
Robinson (Super Impex), AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3692, (202) 482–
3797, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Background
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 21, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
antidumping duty administrative review
for certain lined paper products from
India (CLPP). See Certain Lined Paper
Products From India: Notice of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
64988 (October 21, 2010) (Preliminary
Results). This review covers 31
manufacturers and exporters of the
subject merchandise.1 On October 26,
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 On September 30, 2009, the Department
received a timely request to conduct an
administrative review of the following 32
companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.;
American Scholar, Inc., and/or I–Scholar;
Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; Bafna Exports;
Cello International Pvt. Ltd (M/S Cello Paper
Products); Creative Divya; Corporate Stationery Pvt.
Ltd.; D.D. International; Exmart International Pvt.
Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar; FFI International;
Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International
Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Lodha Offset Limited; Magic
International Pvt. Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.;
Marisa International; Navneet Publications (India)
Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:30 Feb 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
On January 29, 2010, the Department
selected Navneet and Super Impex as
companies to be individually examined
in this administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CLPP from
India. See Memorandum to Melissa
Skinner, Director, Office 3 Through
James Terpstra, Program Manager,
Office 3 from Stephanie Moore, Case
Analyst titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Selection of
Respondents for Individual Review’’
(Respondent Selection Memo), dated
January 29, 2010.
As stated in the Preliminary Results,
on October 26, 2009, petitioner timely
withdrew its request for a review of
Blue Bird. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind
an administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the parties that requested a
review withdraw the request within 90
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the requested
review. The instant review was initiated
Premier Exports; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB
International; SAR Transport Systems; Seet Kamal
International; Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Eternity
Int’l Freight, forwarder on behalf of Solitaire
Logistics Pvt. Ltd.); Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd.; Super
Impex; Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash
Laminates.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on October 26, 2009. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 74 FR 54956
(October 26, 2009) (Initiation Notice).
The petitioner’s withdrawal of request
for a review of Blue Bird falls within the
90-day deadline for rescission by the
Department, and no other party
requested an administrative review of
this particular respondent. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
and consistent with our practice, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Blue Bird. See, e.g., Lightweight
Thermal Paper from Germany: Notice of
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 75 FR 11135
(March 10, 2010).
On October 21, 2010, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. On
October 25, 2010, petitioner submitted
additional factual information obtained
from the Web site https://
www.cellopapers.com/ruled-plainpapers.html, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.301(b)(2).
Comments From Interested Parties
We invited parties to comment on our
Preliminary Results. Case briefs were
filed on November 18, 2010, by Super
Impex and on November 23, 2010, by
petitioner and Navneet. On December
13 and 14, 2010, Super Impex and
petitioner, respectively, filed rebuttal
briefs.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes
certain lined paper products, typically
school supplies (for purposes of this
scope definition, the actual use of or
labeling these products as school
supplies or non-school supplies is not a
defining characteristic) composed of or
including paper that incorporates
straight horizontal and/or vertical lines
on ten or more paper sheets (there shall
be no minimum page requirement for
loose leaf filler paper) including but not
limited to such products as single- and
multi-subject notebooks, composition
books, wireless notebooks, loose leaf or
glued filler paper, graph paper, and
laboratory notebooks, and with the
smaller dimension of the paper
measuring 6 inches to 15 inches
(inclusive) and the larger dimension of
the paper measuring 8-3/4 inches to 15
inches (inclusive). Page dimensions are
measured size (not advertised, stated, or
‘‘tear-out’’ size), and are measured as
they appear in the product (i.e., stitched
and folded pages in a notebook are
measured by the size of the page as it
appears in the notebook page, not the
size of the unfolded paper). However,
for measurement purposes, pages with
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10875-10876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4397]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 28, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office
6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 28, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
initiated the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from the People's Republic
of China (PRC) covering the period June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010.
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocations in Part, 75 FR 44224 (July 28,
2010). The current deadline for the preliminary results of review is
March 2, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the Department shall make a preliminary
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date
of publication of the order. The Act further provides, however, that
the Department may extend that 245-day period to 365 days if it
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary
[[Page 10876]]
results of the administrative review of chlorinated isos from the PRC
within this time limit. Specifically, due to additional time needed to
review the first supplemental questionnaire response and to issue
further supplemental questionnaires, we find that additional time is
needed to complete these preliminary results. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the
time period for completion of the preliminary results of this review
from 245 days to 365 days; from March 2, 2011 until June 30, 2011.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 22, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-4397 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
