General Motors Company, Pontiac Assembly; Pontiac, MI; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 10403 [2011-4093]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2011–4089 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
Conclusion
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–72,949]
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Western
Digital Technologies, Inc., Corporate
Headquarters/Hard Drive Development
Division, Lake Forest, California.
Western Digital Technologies, Inc.,
Coporate Headquaters/Hard Drive
Development Division, Lake Forest,
CA; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 4th day
of February, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Employment and Training
Administration
On October 7, 2010, the Department
of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Western Digital
Technologies, Inc., Corporate
Headquarters/Hard Drive Development
Division, Lake Forest, California
(Western Digital Technologies). The
Department’s Notice was published in
the Federal Register on October 25,
2010 (75 FR 65517). The subject workers
supply engineering (development)
services in support of hard drive (also
known as disk drive) manufacturing.
The initial negative determination
was based on the Department’s findings
that that the subject firm did not
increase imports of like or directly
competitive services and did not shift to
a foreign country the supply of these
services. The investigation also revealed
that the subject firm does not supply
services that were directly used in the
production of an article by a firm that
employed a worker group eligible to
apply for TAA. Because the services
were supplied internally, no customer
survey was conducted.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that increased imports of articles
that were produced directly using the
services supplied by the subject workers
contributed importantly to separations
at the subject firm.
Information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
that, during the relevant period, the
workers’ firm did not shift to a foreign
country the supply of services like or
directly competitive with the
engineering services supplied by the
workers nor has there has been an
acquisition by the subject firm from a
foreign country of like or directly
competitive services; that the subject
firm did not increase services like or
directly competitive with the
engineering services supplied by the
workers; and the subject firm did not
increase imports of articles that were
produced directly using services
supplied by the subject workers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–4095 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,554]
General Motors Company, Pontiac
Assembly; Pontiac, MI; Notice of
Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On October 7, 2010, the Department
of Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for the
workers and former workers of General
Motors Company, Pontiac Assembly,
Pontiac, Michigan (GM–Pontiac). The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65513).
Workers at GM–Pontiac are engaged in
employment related to the production of
the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado
vehicles.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that there was no increase in
imports by the subject firm or its
customers or a shift to/acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles like or directly competitive
with the automobiles produced by the
workers. The investigation also revealed
that the workers did not produce a
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10403
component part that was used by a firm
that both employed workers eligible to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
and directly incorporated the
component parts into the article that
was the basis for the TAA certification.
In the request for reconsideration, the
International Union of United
Automobile, Aerospace, and
Agricultural Implement Workers of
America (UAW) stated that production
of standard cab and extended cab GMC
Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado vehicles
shifted to an affiliated GM facility in
Mexico (‘‘Pontiac Assembly ceased
producing * * * production from
Pontiac * * * shifted, at least in part, to
Silao, Mexico.’’
Information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
that the subject firm did not shift to/
acquire from an affiliated facility in
Mexico or any other foreign country the
production of standard cab and
extended cab GMC Sierra and Chevrolet
Silverado vehicles (or like or directly
competitive articles). The company
official also confirmed that production
of the aforementioned vehicles was
shifted to affiliated locations within the
United States.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of General
Motors, Pontiac Assembly, Pontiac,
Michigan.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 4th day
of February, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–4093 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,488]
Hewlett Packard (HP), Global Product
Development, Engineering Workstation
Refresh Team, Working On-Site at
General Motors Corporation, Milford,
MI; Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On June 8, 2010, the Department
issued a Notice of Termination of
Investigation, stating that the petitioning
worker group is part of an on-going
investigation (TA–W–72,851). On June
30, 2010, the Department issued a
Notice of Revised Termination of
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4093]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,554]
General Motors Company, Pontiac Assembly; Pontiac, MI; Notice of
Negative Determination on Reconsideration
On October 7, 2010, the Department of Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for
the workers and former workers of General Motors Company, Pontiac
Assembly, Pontiac, Michigan (GM-Pontiac). The Department's Notice of
determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010
(75 FR 65513). Workers at GM-Pontiac are engaged in employment related
to the production of the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado vehicles.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the finding that there was no increase in imports by the
subject firm or its customers or a shift to/acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles like or directly competitive
with the automobiles produced by the workers. The investigation also
revealed that the workers did not produce a component part that was
used by a firm that both employed workers eligible to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance and directly incorporated the component parts
into the article that was the basis for the TAA certification.
In the request for reconsideration, the International Union of
United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America (UAW) stated that production of standard cab and extended cab
GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado vehicles shifted to an affiliated GM
facility in Mexico (``Pontiac Assembly ceased producing * * *
production from Pontiac * * * shifted, at least in part, to Silao,
Mexico.''
Information obtained during the reconsideration investigation
confirmed that the subject firm did not shift to/acquire from an
affiliated facility in Mexico or any other foreign country the
production of standard cab and extended cab GMC Sierra and Chevrolet
Silverado vehicles (or like or directly competitive articles). The
company official also confirmed that production of the aforementioned
vehicles was shifted to affiliated locations within the United States.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of General Motors, Pontiac Assembly,
Pontiac, Michigan.
Signed in Washington, DC, on this 4th day of February, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-4093 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
