Comment Request for Information Collection for the Unemployment Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment Employment and Training Administration 9047 Report, Extension Without Revision, 9052-9054 [2011-3469]

Download as PDF 9052 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices Reservation (Ruby and Brown 1986:179). However, many Samish chose to remain in their old village sites. In 1996, the Samish Indian Tribe was rerecognized by the Federal Government. Officials of the University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, have determined, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), that the human remains described above represent the physical remains of one individual of Native American ancestry. Lastly, officials of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources and the University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, have determined, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), that there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and the Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Washington; Samish Indian Tribe, Washington; and the Swinomish Indians of the Swinomish Reservation, Washington. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Maurice Major, Cultural Resource Specialist, Washington State Department of Natural Resources; PO Box 47000, 1111 Washington St. SE., Olympia, WA 98504–7000, telephone (360) 902–1298, before March 18, 2011. Repatriation of the human remains to the Samish Indian Tribe, Washington, may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources is responsible for notifying the Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Washington; Samish Indian Tribe, Washington; and the Swinomish Indians of the Swinomish Reservation, Washington, that this notice has been published. Dated: February 11, 2011. David Tarler, Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2011–3522 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act Notice is hereby given that on February 10, 2011 a proposed Consent Decree (‘‘proposed Decree’’) in United States v. CEMEX, Inc. and CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, Civil Action No. 3:11–cv–00037, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In this action under Sections 113(b) and 167 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 7413(b) and 7477, the United States seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (‘‘PSD’’) provisions of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7470–7492, and the PSD regulation incorporated into the federally enforceable Ohio State Implementation Plan (‘‘Ohio SIP’’), and Title V of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f, and Title V’s implementing federal and Ohio regulations, at a portland cement manufacturing plant located in Greene County, Ohio. The proposed Decree resolves the United States’ claims against CEMEX, Inc. and CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC (‘‘Defendants’’) by requiring Defendants to install and operate appropriate emission controls at their kiln, and requires Defendants to pay a civil penalty of $1,400,000, twothirds of which will go to the United States and one-third of which will go to the Plaintiff Intervener, the State of Ohio. The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. CEMEX, Inc. and CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–08990. The proposed Decree may be examined at the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, Room 602, Federal Building, 200 West Second Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402, and at the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Region 5) Records Center, Room 714, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. During the public comment period, the proposed Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: https:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ ConsentDecrees.html. A copy of the proposed Decree may also be obtained via U.S. mail by making a written request to the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax number (202) 514–0097 (phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547). In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $17.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 U.S. Treasury or, if requesting by e-mail or fax, please forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address. Maureen Katz, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2011–3473 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Comment Request for Information Collection for the Unemployment Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment Employment and Training Administration 9047 Report, Extension Without Revision Employment and Training Administration (ETA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that the requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the Employment and Training Administration is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data about the proposed extension of the UI Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment (current expiration date is July 31, 2011). A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section of this notice. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addressee’s section below on or before April 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Andrew W. Spisak, Office of Workforce Security, Employment and Training Administration, U. S. Department of Labor, Room S–4519, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: 202–693–3196 (this is not a toll-free number); fax: 202–693–3975; email: spisak.andrew@dol.gov. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 9053 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Required by Congress under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department’s Strategic Plan is an integral part of the budget process. Among the purposes of the GPRA are to improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by focusing on program results, service quality, and customer satisfaction. Outcome Goal 1.3 in the Department’s fiscal year (FY) 2011—2016 Strategic Plan—Help workers who are in lowwage jobs or out of the labor market find a path into middle-class jobs—focuses on improving the operational performance and effectiveness of the federal/state UI program. This goal is supported in part by the performance measure: Percent of UI claimants reemployed by the end of the first quarter after the quarter in which they received their first payment. ETA collects the data to measure the facilitation of reemployment of UI benefit recipients through the ETA 9047 report. OMB approved the Department’s request to begin collecting UI reemployment data through the ETA 9047 report on July 26, 2005. This data collection was renewed in 2008 through July 31, 2011. ETA has also included UI reemployment as a performance measure for UI Performs, the Department of Labor’s performance management system. Per UI Program Letter (UIPL) No. 17–08 (May 14, 2008), Acceptable Levels of Performance (ALP)—the minimum performance criteria for UI Performs Core Measures— are set annually for each state. The ALPs take into account the state’s total unemployment rate and the percentage of UI claimants who are exempt from active work search or Employment Service registration requirements because they are job attached. Analyses of the data indicate that UI reemployment is strongly related to these two factors. Data Collection Each calendar quarter, states report on the ETA 9047 report separate counts for individuals receiving their first UI payments who are exempt from work search/employment service registration (‘‘exempt’’), in most cases because they are job-attached with definite recall dates, and those who must conduct work search or register with the employment service (‘‘nonexempt’’). States also report on the ETA 9047 report the number of those first payment recipients for whom intrastate or out-ofstate employers reported wages in the subsequent quarter. States obtain these counts by running computer crossmatches of the Social Security Numbers (SSNs) of the claimants who received a first UI payment with the UI wage records for the subsequent calendar quarter. ETA issued instructions on obtaining out-of-state reemployment data through matching the SSNs of UI first payment recipients with UI wage records in the National Directory of New Hires in UIPL No. 1– 06, Change 1 (August 2, 2006). UI Reemployment GPRA and UI Performs Measures The UI reemployment GPRA and UI Performs measures are defined as the percentage of all UI claimants receiving a first payment in a calendar quarter who were paid wages in the following calendar quarter that appear in UI wage records. ETA believes that this measure encourages the agencies that administer UI–which share responsibility with all Workforce Investment partners in facilitating the reemployment of UI beneficiaries—to be innovative in the steps they take to facilitate these individuals’ reemployment. The following table summarizes GPRA targets and performance for the UI reemployment measure. GPRA TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE Goal and indicator FY 2010 target Facilitate Reemployment: Percent of UI claimants who were reemployed by the end of the first quarter after the quarter in which they received their first payment. FY 2010 actual 58.6% FY 2011 target 53.1%* 54.4% FY 2012 target 56.40% mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES * Based on UI reemployment for the period July 2009 to June 2010, which is the most recent data available. ETA’s analyses of the UI reemployment data show that state performance in reemployment of UI benefit recipients is influenced by forces outside the control of the agency administering the state UI law, most notably by the economic conditions in the state, as measured by the total unemployment rate, and the percent of UI benefit recipients that are on temporary layoff, as measured by the percent of claimants who are not required to search for work or register with the state employment service. State ALPs for the UI Performs Core Measure reflect state-specific data for these two factors. State ALPs and performance for the performance period January to December 2009 are available at https:// www.oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/pdf/ alp.pdf. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 II. Review Focus The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. III. Current Actions Type of Review: Extension without change. Title: Unemployment Insurance Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment. OMB Number: 1205–0452. Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). Form: ETA 9047 Reemployment of UI Benefit Recipients. Total Annual Respondents: 53 SWAs. Annual Frequency: Quarterly. Total Annual Responses: 212 per year (53 SWAs × 4 quarterly reports per year). Average Time per Response: 10 hours. E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 9054 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,120 hours. Total Annual Burden Cost for Respondents: $86,517 (approximately $1,633 per SWA). This is an established data collection for which no changes are proposed; there are no startup costs. Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also become a matter of public record. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated: February 10, 2011. Jane Oates, Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration. SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2011–3469 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION National Science Board; Sunshine Act Meetings; Impromptu Notice of Change (Addition of Agenda Item) The National Science Board’s (NSB) Audit & Oversight (A&O) Committee, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the NSF Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n–5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of an Impromptu Change in regard to the addition of an agenda item that will be discussed during the closed session of the A&O Committee meeting scheduled for February 16, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., as follows: ORIGINAL DATE AND TIME: No change. 5 minute update on Cyber issues at NSF. SUBJECT MATTER (AGENDA ITEM ADDED): STATUS: No change. LOCATION: No change. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site https://www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this meeting is: Jennie Moehlmann, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292–7000. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: Daniel A. Lauretano, Counsel to the National Science Board. [FR Doc. 2011–3585 Filed 2–14–11; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 [NRC–2009–0187] Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement for the AREVA Enrichment Services LLC Proposed Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility in Bonneville County, ID Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has published the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the AREVA Enrichment Services LLC (AES) Proposed Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility (EREF). On December 30, 2008, AES submitted a license application to the NRC that proposes the construction, operation, and decommissioning of a gas centrifuge-based uranium enrichment facility on a presently undeveloped site near Idaho Falls in Bonneville County, Idaho (the ‘‘proposed action’’). This application is for a license to possess and use byproduct material, source material, and special nuclear material at the proposed uranium enrichment facility. The application included an Environmental Report (ER) regarding the proposed action. AES subsequently submitted revisions to the license application on April 23, 2009 (Revision 1), and April 30, 2010 (Revision 2), which included ER Revision 1 and ER Revision 2, respectively. License application Revision 1 addresses the expansion of the proposed EREF to increase its production capacity from 3.3 million Separative Work Units (SWUs) per year to 6.6 million SWUs per year; and ER Revision 1 includes information on the environmental impacts of the proposed 6.6-million-SWU-per-year EREF. Revision 2 to the license application and the ER incorporates into Revision 1 additional information that AES previously provided the NRC in response to NRC staff requests for additional information for its safety and environmental reviews, as well as supplemental information on a proposed electrical transmission line required to power the proposed EREF. On June 17, 2009, AES submitted a request for an exemption from certain NRC regulations so that it could commence certain preconstruction activities (e.g., site preparation) on the proposed EREF site prior to the NRC’s decision on whether to grant or deny a license. On March 17, 2010, the NRC PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 granted an exemption authorizing AES to conduct the requested preconstruction activities. The Final EIS is being issued as part of the NRC’s process to decide whether to issue a license to AES, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) parts 30, 40, and 70, to construct and operate the proposed uranium enrichment facility. Specifically, AES proposes to use gas centrifuge technology to enrich the uranium-235 isotope found in natural uranium to concentrations up to 5 percent by weight. The enriched uranium would be used to manufacture nuclear fuel for commercial nuclear power reactors. In the Final EIS, the NRC staff assessed the potential environmental impacts from the preconstruction, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the proposed EREF project. The Final EIS was prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the NRC’s regulations for implementing NEPA in 10 CFR part 51. The NRC staff assessed the impacts of the proposed action on land use, historic and cultural resources, visual and scenic resources, air quality, geology and soils, water resources, ecological resources, noise, transportation, public and occupational health, waste management, socioeconomics, and environmental justice. Additionally, the NRC staff analyzed and compared the benefits and costs of the proposed action. In preparing this Final EIS, the NRC staff also reviewed, considered, evaluated, and addressed the public comments received on the Draft EIS. In addition to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered the no-action alternative and other alternatives. Under the no-action alternative, the NRC would deny AES’s request to construct and operate a uranium enrichment facility at the EREF site. The no-action alternative serves as a baseline for comparison of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action. Other alternatives the NRC staff considered but eliminated from further analysis include: (1) Alternative sites for the EREF; (2) alternative sources of enriched uranium; and (3) alternative technologies for uranium enrichment. These alternatives were eliminated from further analysis due to economic, environmental, national security, technological maturity, or other reasons. The Final EIS also discusses alternatives for the disposition of depleted uranium hexafluoride (UF6) resulting from enrichment operations over the lifetime of the proposed EREF. E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9052-9054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Comment Request for Information Collection for the Unemployment 
Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment Employment and 
Training Administration 9047 Report, Extension Without Revision

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance 
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies 
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing 
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to 
ensure that the requested data can be provided in the desired format, 
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the Employment and Training Administration is soliciting 
comments concerning the collection of data about the proposed extension 
of the UI Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment (current expiration 
date is July 31, 2011).
    A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be 
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section 
of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
addressee's section below on or before April 18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Andrew W. Spisak, Office of Workforce 
Security, Employment and Training Administration, U. S. Department of 
Labor, Room S-4519, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 
telephone: 202-693-3196 (this is not a toll-free number); fax: 202-693-
3975; e-mail: spisak.andrew@dol.gov.

[[Page 9053]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Required by Congress under the Government Performance and Results 
Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department's Strategic Plan is an integral part 
of the budget process. Among the purposes of the GPRA are to improve 
Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by focusing on 
program results, service quality, and customer satisfaction.
    Outcome Goal 1.3 in the Department's fiscal year (FY) 2011--2016 
Strategic Plan--Help workers who are in low-wage jobs or out of the 
labor market find a path into middle-class jobs--focuses on improving 
the operational performance and effectiveness of the federal/state UI 
program. This goal is supported in part by the performance measure:

    Percent of UI claimants reemployed by the end of the first 
quarter after the quarter in which they received their first 
payment.

    ETA collects the data to measure the facilitation of reemployment 
of UI benefit recipients through the ETA 9047 report. OMB approved the 
Department's request to begin collecting UI reemployment data through 
the ETA 9047 report on July 26, 2005. This data collection was renewed 
in 2008 through July 31, 2011.
    ETA has also included UI reemployment as a performance measure for 
UI Performs, the Department of Labor's performance management system. 
Per UI Program Letter (UIPL) No. 17-08 (May 14, 2008), Acceptable 
Levels of Performance (ALP)--the minimum performance criteria for UI 
Performs Core Measures--are set annually for each state. The ALPs take 
into account the state's total unemployment rate and the percentage of 
UI claimants who are exempt from active work search or Employment 
Service registration requirements because they are job attached. 
Analyses of the data indicate that UI reemployment is strongly related 
to these two factors.

Data Collection

    Each calendar quarter, states report on the ETA 9047 report 
separate counts for individuals receiving their first UI payments who 
are exempt from work search/employment service registration 
(``exempt''), in most cases because they are job-attached with definite 
recall dates, and those who must conduct work search or register with 
the employment service (``nonexempt''). States also report on the ETA 
9047 report the number of those first payment recipients for whom 
intrastate or out-of-state employers reported wages in the subsequent 
quarter. States obtain these counts by running computer crossmatches of 
the Social Security Numbers (SSNs) of the claimants who received a 
first UI payment with the UI wage records for the subsequent calendar 
quarter. ETA issued instructions on obtaining out-of-state reemployment 
data through matching the SSNs of UI first payment recipients with UI 
wage records in the National Directory of New Hires in UIPL No. 1-06, 
Change 1 (August 2, 2006).

UI Reemployment GPRA and UI Performs Measures

    The UI reemployment GPRA and UI Performs measures are defined as 
the percentage of all UI claimants receiving a first payment in a 
calendar quarter who were paid wages in the following calendar quarter 
that appear in UI wage records.
    ETA believes that this measure encourages the agencies that 
administer UI-which share responsibility with all Workforce Investment 
partners in facilitating the reemployment of UI beneficiaries--to be 
innovative in the steps they take to facilitate these individuals' 
reemployment.
    The following table summarizes GPRA targets and performance for the 
UI reemployment measure.

                                          GPRA Targets and Performance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Goal and indicator             FY 2010 target     FY 2010 actual     FY 2011 target     FY 2012 target
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilitate Reemployment:                          58.6%             53.1%*              54.4%             56.40%
    Percent of UI claimants who were
     reemployed by the end of the
     first quarter after the quarter
     in which they received their
     first payment..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Based on UI reemployment for the period July 2009 to June 2010, which is the most recent data available.

    ETA's analyses of the UI reemployment data show that state 
performance in reemployment of UI benefit recipients is influenced by 
forces outside the control of the agency administering the state UI 
law, most notably by the economic conditions in the state, as measured 
by the total unemployment rate, and the percent of UI benefit 
recipients that are on temporary layoff, as measured by the percent of 
claimants who are not required to search for work or register with the 
state employment service. State ALPs for the UI Performs Core Measure 
reflect state-specific data for these two factors. State ALPs and 
performance for the performance period January to December 2009 are 
available at https://www.oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/pdf/alp.pdf.

II. Review Focus

    The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments 
which:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses.

III. Current Actions

    Type of Review: Extension without change.
    Title: Unemployment Insurance Facilitation of Claimant 
Reemployment.
    OMB Number: 1205-0452.
    Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies (SWAs).
    Form: ETA 9047 Reemployment of UI Benefit Recipients.
    Total Annual Respondents: 53 SWAs.
    Annual Frequency: Quarterly.
    Total Annual Responses: 212 per year (53 SWAs x 4 quarterly reports 
per year).
    Average Time per Response: 10 hours.

[[Page 9054]]

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,120 hours.
    Total Annual Burden Cost for Respondents: $86,517 (approximately 
$1,633 per SWA). This is an established data collection for which no 
changes are proposed; there are no startup costs.
    Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget 
approval of the information collection request; they will also become a 
matter of public record.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3469 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.