Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 8399-8400 [2011-3194]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 30 / Monday, February 14, 2011 / Notices
development of an investment-grade
business plan and the preparation of a
separate Tier 1 EIS.
The Midwest Regional Rail Initiative
(MWRRI) is an effort led by the
Wisconsin Department of
Transportation and supported by eight
other Midwestern States to upgrade
Amtrak service in those States, with
maximum speeds of 79 to 110 mph
depending on the level of improvements
made. A Chicago-St. Louis corridor is
included in MWRRI’s September 2004
Executive Report and November 2006
Benefit Cost and Economic Analysis.
Additional corridors proposed by
MWRRI include: Chicago-Green Bay,
Wisconsin; Chicago-Minneapolis,
Minnesota; St. Louis-Kansas City,
Missouri; Chicago-Cincinnati, Ohio;
Chicago-Cleveland, Ohio; ChicagoDetroit, Michigan; Chicago-Port Huron,
Michigan; Chicago-Carbondale, Illinois;
Chicago-Quincy, Illinois; and ChicagoOmaha, Nebraska. Several other feeder
corridors connecting smaller
municipalities to the primary corridors
are also included. More information is
available at https://
www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/
rail.htm.
Public Involvement: Letters describing
the proposed action and soliciting
comments will be sent to appropriate
Federal, State, and local agencies, and to
private organizations and citizens who
have previously expressed or are known
to have interest in this proposal. A
minimum of two public informational
meetings will be held during the study.
In addition, a public hearing will be
held on the Draft EIS. Public notice will
be given of the time and place of the
meetings and of the hearing. The Draft
EIS will be available for public and
agency review and comment prior to the
public hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and that all significant issues
are identified, comments and
suggestions are invited from all
interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed
action and the EIS should be directed to
IDOT or FRA at the addresses provided
above.
Scoping and Comments: FRA
encourages broad participation in the
EIS process during scoping and review
of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments are invited from
all interested agencies and the public to
ensure the full range of issues related to
the proposed action, and the reasonable
alternatives, are addressed and all
significant issues are identified. In
particular, FRA is interested in
identifying areas of environmental
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Feb 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
concern where there might be a
potential for significant impacts. Public
agencies with jurisdiction are requested
to advise FRA and IDOT of the
applicable permit and environmental
review requirements of each agency,
and the scope and content of the
environmental information that is
germane to the agency’s statutory
responsibilities in connection with the
proposed Project. Public agencies are
requested to advise FRA if they
anticipate taking a major action in
connection with the proposed Project
and if they wish to cooperate in the
preparation of the EIS. Public scoping
meetings have been scheduled as an
important component of the scoping
process for both the State and Federal
environmental review. The scoping
meetings described in this Notice will
also be the subject of additional public
notification.
FRA is seeking participation and
input of all interested Federal, State,
and local agencies, Native American
groups, and other concerned private
organizations and individuals on the
scope of the EIS. This Project is a federal
undertaking with the potential to affect
historic properties. As such, it is subject
to the requirements of section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (NHPA) (16 U.S.C. 470(f)). In
accordance with regulations issued by
the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, 36 CFR part 800, FRA
intends to coordinate compliance with
section 106 of the NHPA with the
preparation of the EIS, beginning with
the identification of consulting parties
through the scoping process, in a
manner consistent with the standards
set out in 36 CFR 800.8.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 9,
2011.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Policy
and Development.
[FR Doc. 2011–3248 Filed 2–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8399
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on September 2,
2010 (75 FR 54000). The agency
received no comments.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if
OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck at the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
Office of International Policy, Fuel
Economy and Consumer Programs, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Room W43–443, Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Mazyck’s telephone number is
(202–366–4139).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Title: 49 CFR Part 583—Automobile
Parts Content Labeling.
OMB Number: 2127–0573.
Type of Request: Request for public
comment on a previously approved
collection of information.
Abstract: Part 583 establishes
requirements for the disclosure of
information relating to the countries of
origin of the equipment of new
passenger motor vehicles. This
information will be used by NHTSA to
determine whether manufacturers are
complying with the American
Automobile Labeling Act (49 U.S.C.
32304). The American Automobile
Labeling Act requires all new passenger
motor vehicles (including passenger
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
8400
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 30 / Monday, February 14, 2011 / Notices
cars, certain small buses, all light trucks
and multipurpose passenger vehicles
with a gross vehicle weight rating of
8,500 pounds or less), to bear labels
providing information about domestic
and foreign content of their equipment.
With the affixed label on the new
passenger motor vehicles, it serves as an
aid to potential purchasers in the
selection of new passenger motor
vehicles by providing them with
information about the value of the U.S./
Canadian and foreign parts of each
vehicle, the countries of origin of the
engine and transmission, and the site of
the vehicle’s final assembly.
NHTSA anticipates approximately 22
vehicle manufacturers will be affected
by these reporting requirements.
NHTSA does not believe that any of
these 22 manufacturers are a small
business (i.e., one that employs less than
500 persons) since each manufacturer
employs more than 500 persons.
Manufacturers of new passenger motor
vehicles, including passenger cars,
certain small buses, and light trucks
with a gross vehicle weight rating of
8,500 pounds or less, must file a report
annually.
Affected Public: Vehicle
manufacturers.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
NHTSA estimates that the vehicle
manufacturers will incur a total annual
reporting hour and cost burden of
52,962 hours and $2,355,150. The
amount includes annual burden hours
incurred by multi-stage manufacturers
and motor vehicle equipment suppliers.
There is a decrease in the annual
reporting and recordkeeping hour
burden from 55,484 to 52,962 because
the number of respondents decreased
from 22 to 21. There is a decrease in
annual reporting and recordkeeping cost
burden from $2,467,300 to $2,355,150
because there will be fewer responses.
The hour burden and cost burden
published in the Federal Register are
different due to errors in the
preliminary information provided.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Feb 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued on: February 8, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–3194 Filed 2–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Mitsubishi Motors
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America’s
(Mitsubishi) petition for exemption of
the Outlander Sport vehicle line in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part
541). Mitsubishi requested confidential
treatment for some of the information
and attachments it submitted in support
of its petition. The agency addressed
Mitsubishi’s request for confidential
treatment by letter dated January 11,
2011.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–443, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck’s
phone number is (202) 366–0846. Her
fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated November 30, 2010,
Mitsubishi requested exemption from
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part
541) for the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport
vehicle line, beginning with MY 2012.
The petition requested an exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Mitsubishi provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the Outlander Sport vehicle line.
Mitsubishi will install a passive,
transponder-based, electronic engine
immobilizer device as standard
equipment on its Outlander Sport
vehicle line beginning with MY 2012.
Features of the antitheft device will
include a transponder key, electronic
control unit (ECU), and a passive
immobilizer. Mitsubishi will also
incorporate an audible and visual alarm
system as standard equipment on all
trimline vehicles. Mitsubishi’s
submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in
that it meets the general requirements
contained in 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of 543.6.
Mitsubishi stated that its entry models
for the Outlander Sport vehicle line will
be equipped with a Wireless Control
Module (WCM). Mitsubishi stated that
this is a keyless entry system in which
the transponder is located in a
traditional key that must be inserted
into the key cylinder in order to activate
the ignition. All other models of the
Outlander Sport vehicle line are
equipped with a One-touch Starting
System (OSS), which utilizes a keyless
system that allows the driver to press a
button located on the instrument panel
to activate and deactivate the ignition
(instead of using a traditional key in the
key cylinder) as long as the transponder
is located in close proximity to the
driver. Mitsubishi stated that the
performance of the immobilizer will be
the same in all models whether the
vehicle has a WCM or OSS entry
system. Mitsubishi further stated that
the only difference between the two
keyless entry systems is the ‘‘key’’ and
the method used to transmit the
information from the key to the
immobilizer.
Once the ignition switch is pushed to
the ‘‘on’’ position, the transceiver
module reads the specific ignition key
code for the vehicle and transmits an
encrypted message containing the key
code to the electronic control unit
(ECU). The immobilizer receives the key
code signal transmitted from either type
of key (WCM or OSS) and verifies that
the key code signal is correct. The
immobilizer then sends a separate
encrypted start-code signal to the engine
ECU to allow the driver to start the
vehicle. The engine only will function
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8399-8400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3194]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on September 2, 2010 (75 FR 54000). The agency received no
comments.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck at the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of International Policy,
Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building, Room W43-443, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's telephone
number is (202-366-4139).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Title: 49 CFR Part 583--Automobile Parts Content Labeling.
OMB Number: 2127-0573.
Type of Request: Request for public comment on a previously
approved collection of information.
Abstract: Part 583 establishes requirements for the disclosure of
information relating to the countries of origin of the equipment of new
passenger motor vehicles. This information will be used by NHTSA to
determine whether manufacturers are complying with the American
Automobile Labeling Act (49 U.S.C. 32304). The American Automobile
Labeling Act requires all new passenger motor vehicles (including
passenger
[[Page 8400]]
cars, certain small buses, all light trucks and multipurpose passenger
vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 8,500 pounds or less),
to bear labels providing information about domestic and foreign content
of their equipment. With the affixed label on the new passenger motor
vehicles, it serves as an aid to potential purchasers in the selection
of new passenger motor vehicles by providing them with information
about the value of the U.S./Canadian and foreign parts of each vehicle,
the countries of origin of the engine and transmission, and the site of
the vehicle's final assembly.
NHTSA anticipates approximately 22 vehicle manufacturers will be
affected by these reporting requirements. NHTSA does not believe that
any of these 22 manufacturers are a small business (i.e., one that
employs less than 500 persons) since each manufacturer employs more
than 500 persons. Manufacturers of new passenger motor vehicles,
including passenger cars, certain small buses, and light trucks with a
gross vehicle weight rating of 8,500 pounds or less, must file a report
annually.
Affected Public: Vehicle manufacturers.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: NHTSA estimates that the vehicle
manufacturers will incur a total annual reporting hour and cost burden
of 52,962 hours and $2,355,150. The amount includes annual burden hours
incurred by multi-stage manufacturers and motor vehicle equipment
suppliers.
There is a decrease in the annual reporting and recordkeeping hour
burden from 55,484 to 52,962 because the number of respondents
decreased from 22 to 21. There is a decrease in annual reporting and
recordkeeping cost burden from $2,467,300 to $2,355,150 because there
will be fewer responses. The hour burden and cost burden published in
the Federal Register are different due to errors in the preliminary
information provided.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication.
Issued on: February 8, 2011.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-3194 Filed 2-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P