1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 7532-7534 [2011-3018]

Download as PDF 7532 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices Dated: February 4, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: Northeast Region Gear Identification Requirements. OMB Control Number: 0648–0351. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a current information collection). Number of Respondents: 7,088. Average Hours per Response: 1 minute to mark each piece of gear. Burden Hours: 23,256. Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a current information collection. As part of fishery management plans developed under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), Federal fishing permit holders using specified fishing gear are required to mark that gear with specified information for the purposes of identification (e.g., United States Coast Guard official vessel number, Federal permit number, or other methods identified in the regulations at 50 CFR 648–84 and others). The regulations specify how the gear is to be marked for the purposes of visibility (e.g., buoys, radar reflectors, or other methods identified in the regulations). The display of the identifying characters on fishing gear aids in fishery law enforcement, and the marking of gear for visibility increases safety at sea. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Frequency: Annually. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 [FR Doc. 2011–2906 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–905] Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of the administrative review of certain polyester staple fiber from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). This review covers the period June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010. DATES: Effective Date: February 10, 2011. AGENCY: Jerry Huang or Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4047 or (202) 482– 0116, respectively. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background On July 28, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from the PRC. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocations in Part, 75 FR 44224 (July 28, 2010). The preliminary results of this review are currently due no later than March 2, 2011. Statutory Time Limits In antidumping duty administrative reviews, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 complete the review within these time periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days after the last day of the anniversary month. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary results of this administrative review within the original time limit because the Department requires additional time to analyze questionnaire responses, issue supplemental questionnaires, and conduct verification. Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results of this administrative review by 90 days. The preliminary results will now be due no later than May 31, 2011. The final results continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the preliminary results. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: February 4, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–3010 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–847] 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1Diphosphonic Acid from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 29, 2010, the Department of Commerce (Department) published the preliminary results of the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 1Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid from India. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States: Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd. (Aquapharm). The period of review (POR) is April 23, 2009, through March 31, 2010. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the manufacturer/ exporter is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices DATES: Effective Date: February 10, Assessment Rates 2011. The Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) David Goldberger or Brandon Custard, shall assess, antidumping duties on all AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import appropriate entries, in accordance with Administration, International Trade 19 CFR 351.212. The Department Administration, U.S. Department of intends to issue appropriate Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution appraisement instructions for the Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; respondent subject to this review telephone: (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482– directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 1823, respectively. publication of the final results of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: review. Where the respondent reported Background entered value for its U.S. sales, we have The review covers one manufacturer/ calculated importer-specific ad valorem exporter of the subject merchandise to duty assessment rates based on the ratio the United States: Aquapharm. of the total amount of antidumping On November 29, 2010, the duties calculated for the examined sales Department published in the Federal to the total entered value of the Register the preliminary results of the examined sales for that importer. first administrative review of the Where the respondent did not report antidumping duty order on 1entered value for its U.S. sales, we have Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic calculated importer-specific per-unit Acid from India (75 FR 73042). duty assessment rates by aggregating the We invited parties to comment on the total amount of antidumping duties preliminary results of the review. No calculated for the examined sales and interested party submitted comments. dividing this amount by the total Therefore, the final results do not differ quantity of those sales. To determine from the preliminary results. The whether the duty assessment rates are Department has conducted this de minimis, in accordance with the administrative review in accordance requirement set forth in 19 CFR with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 351.106(c)(2), we have calculated 1930, as amended (the Act). importer-specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Scope of the Order We will instruct CBP to assess The merchandise covered by this antidumping duties on all appropriate order includes all grades of aqueous, entries covered by this review if any acidic (non-neutralized) concentrations importer-specific assessment rate of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1calculated in the final results of this 1 also referred to as diphosphonic acid review is above de minimis (i.e., at or hydroxethlylidenediphosphonic acid, above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid, 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to acetodiphosphonic acid, and etidronic liquidate without regard to antidumping acid. The CAS (Chemical Abstract duties any entries for which the Service) registry number for HEDP is assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 2809–21–4. The merchandise subject to than 0.50 percent). The final results of this order is currently classified in the this review shall be the basis for the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the assessment of antidumping duties on United States (HTSUS) at subheading entries of merchandise covered by the 2931.00.9043. It may also enter under final results of this review and for future HTSUS subheading 2811.19.6090. While HTSUS subheadings are provided deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. for convenience and customs purposes The Department clarified its only, the written description of the ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on scope of this order is dispositive. May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Final Results of the Review Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 As a result of our review, we determined that the following weighted- FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). This clarification will average margin percentage applies for apply to entries of subject merchandise the period April 23, 2009, through during the POR produced by the March 31, 2010: company included in these final results Margin of review for which the reviewed Manufacturer/exporter (percent) company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd 0.00 (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United 1 C H O P or C(CH )(OH)(PO H ) States. In such instances, we will 2 8 7 2 3 3 2 2 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7533 instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the transaction. See Assessment Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company listed above is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), and therefore the cash deposit rate is 0 percent; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.10 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. See 1Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid from India: Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 74 FR 10543 (March 11, 2009). These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This administrative review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221. E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 7534 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices Dated: February 3, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–1655. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2011–3018 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–506] Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-steel cooking ware (‘‘POS cookware’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’). See Initiation of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 60731 (October 1, 2010) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’); see also Antidumping Duty Order; Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from the People’s Republic of China, 51 FR 43414 (December 2, 1986) (‘‘Order’’). On October 18, 2010, Columbian Home Products, LLC (formerly General Housewares Corporation) (‘‘Columbian’’), the petitioner in the POS cookware investigation, notified the Department that it intended to participate in the sunset review. The Department did not receive a substantive response from any respondent party. Based on the notice of intent to participate and adequate response filed by the domestic interested party, and the lack of response from any respondent interested party, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the Order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice, infra. DATES: Effective Date: February 10, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Dach; AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 Background On October 1, 2010, the Department initiated a sunset review of the order on POS cookware pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Sunset Initiation, 75 FR 60731. On October 18, 2010, the Department received a timely notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Columbian, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii)(A), Columbian claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of the domestic like product. On November 1, 2010, Columbian filed a substantive response in the sunset review, within the 30-day deadline as specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party in the sunset review. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is porcelain-on-steel cooking ware from the PRC, including tea kettles, which do not have self-contained electric heating elements. All of the foregoing are constructed of steel and are enameled or glazed with vitreous glasses. The merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading 7323.94.00. The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope remains dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. See the Department’s memorandum entitled, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated January 27, 2011 (‘‘I&D Memo’’). The issues discussed in the accompanying I&D Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the dumping margin likely to prevail if the Order was revoked. Parties can obtain a public copy of the I&D Memo on file in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046, of PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete public copy of the I&D Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the I&D Memo are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review The Department determines that revocation of the Order on POS cookware would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The Department also determines that the dumping margins likely to prevail if the order was revoked are as follows: Manufacturers/exporters/ producers Weightedaverage margin (percent) China National Light Industrial Products Import and Export Corporation ............................. PRC-Wide Entity ......................... 66.65 66.65 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 27, 2011. Christian Marsh, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–3008 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent To Rescind Review in Part Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7532-7534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-847]


1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid from India: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On November 29, 2010, the Department of Commerce (Department) 
published the preliminary results of the first administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic 
Acid from India. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the 
subject merchandise to the United States: Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., 
Ltd. (Aquapharm). The period of review (POR) is April 23, 2009, through 
March 31, 2010. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the 
manufacturer/exporter is listed below in the ``Final Results of 
Review'' section of this notice.

[[Page 7533]]


DATES: Effective Date: February 10, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Brandon Custard, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4136 or (202) 482-1823, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject 
merchandise to the United States: Aquapharm.
    On November 29, 2010, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the preliminary results of the first administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic 
Acid from India (75 FR 73042).
    We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the 
review. No interested party submitted comments. Therefore, the final 
results do not differ from the preliminary results. The Department has 
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order includes all grades of 
aqueous, acidic (non-neutralized) concentrations of 1-
hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid \1\ also referred to as 
hydroxethlylidenediphosphonic acid, hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid, 
acetodiphosphonic acid, and etidronic acid. The CAS (Chemical Abstract 
Service) registry number for HEDP is 2809-21-4. The merchandise subject 
to this order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2931.00.9043. It may also 
enter under HTSUS subheading 2811.19.6090. While HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes only, the written 
description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ C2H8O7P2 or 
C(CH3)(OH)(PO3H2)2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of our review, we determined that the following 
weighted-average margin percentage applies for the period April 23, 
2009, through March 31, 2010:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                   Manufacturer/exporter                      (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd..............................         0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department intends to issue 
appropriate appraisement instructions for the respondent subject to 
this review directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
the final results of this review.
    Where the respondent reported entered value for its U.S. sales, we 
have calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates 
based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated 
for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales 
for that importer.
    Where the respondent did not report entered value for its U.S. 
sales, we have calculated importer-specific per-unit duty assessment 
rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated 
for the examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity 
of those sales. To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de 
minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we have calculated importer-specific ad valorem ratios 
based on the estimated entered value.
    We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific 
assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above 
de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to 
antidumping duties any entries for which the assessment rate is de 
minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The final results of this 
review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on 
entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and 
for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment 
Policy Notice). This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by the company included in these 
final results of review for which the reviewed company did not know 
that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 
trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In 
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 
the all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for 
the intermediary involved in the transaction. See Assessment Policy 
Notice for a full discussion of this clarification.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company 
listed above is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), and therefore the cash 
deposit rate is 0 percent; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or the 
original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) 
the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will 
continue to be 3.10 percent, the all-others rate established in the 
LTFV investigation. See 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid from 
India: Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 
74 FR 10543 (March 11, 2009). These requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This administrative review and notice are published in accordance 
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.


[[Page 7534]]


    Dated: February 3, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3018 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P