Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Bylaw and Related Rule Changes, 7598-7601 [2011-2972]
Download as PDF
7598
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
be submitted on or before March 3,
2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–2973 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–63845; File No. SR–C2–
2011–003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Bylaw and Related
Rule Changes
February 4, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on January 27, 2011, C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘C2’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by C2. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
C2 proposes to (i) amend its Bylaws
and rules to eliminate its office of Vice
Chairman of the Board, (ii) amend its
Bylaws to provide that the Board of
Directors may establish an Advisory
Board, and (iii) amend its Bylaws to
eliminate its Audit Committee.
The text of the proposed amendments
to C2’s Bylaws and the proposed
amendments to C2’s rules is available
on C2’s Web site at (https://
www.c2exchange.com/Legal), at C2’s
Office of the Secretary, on the
Commission’s Web site at (https://
www.sec.gov), and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, C2
included statements concerning the
purpose of, and basis for, the proposed
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. C2 has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to eliminate the office of C2
Vice Chairman of the Board, to allow for
a C2 Advisory Board, and to eliminate
the C2 Audit Committee.
(a) Elimination of Office of Vice
Chairman of the Board
Based on the Exchange’s experience
since its registration as a national
securities exchange in December, 2009
and the launch of trading on the
Exchange in October, 2010, the
Exchange believes that it is no longer
necessary to provide for an office of
Vice Chairman of the Board (which is an
office held by one of the Exchange’s
Industry Directors). It was originally
contemplated that the Vice Chairman
would take a lead role in facilitating
communication between C2 and its
Trading Permit Holders and in
coordinating the activities of Trading
Permit Holder committees. The
Exchange now believes that C2
management is best able to take the lead
role in this regard. The Exchange also
believes that it will continue to be able
to obtain input from Trading Permit
Holders through, among other things,
direct communication with individual
Trading Permit Holders and the ability
to establish Trading Permit Holder
committees and an Advisory Board (as
proposed by this rule filing).
The Exchange Bylaws will also
continue to require that at least 30% of
the directors on the C2 Board of
Directors must be Industry Directors and
that at least 20% of C2’s directors must
be Representative Directors.
Representative Directors are Industry
Directors nominated (or otherwise
selected through a petition process) by
the Industry-Director Subcommittee of
the C2 Nominating and Governance
Committee. The Industry-Director
Subcommittee is composed of all of the
Industry Directors serving on the
Nominating and Governance
Committee. C2 Trading Permit Holders
may nominate alternative
Representative Director candidates to
those nominated by the Industry
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Director Subcommittee, in which case a
Run-off Election is held in which C2’s
Trading Permit Holders vote to
determine which candidates will be
elected to the C2 Board of Directors to
serve as Representative Directors. Thus,
the Exchange will continue to provide
for the fair representation of C2 Trading
Permit Holders in the selection of
directors and the administration of the
Exchange consistent with Section
6(b)(3) of the Act.3
The specific proposed C2 Bylaw and
rule changes related to the elimination
of the office of Vice Chairman of Board
include the following changes:
Section 3.7 of the Bylaws, which
describes the selection, the term, and
roles of the Vice Chairman, is proposed
to be deleted. The current roles of the
Vice Chairman listed in Section 3.7 of
the Bylaws (and how those roles will be
performed going forward) are (i)
Presiding over meetings of the Board of
Directors in the event that the Chairman
of the Board is absent or unable to do
so (which will be addressed by Section
3.8(a) of the Bylaws to be re-numbered
from Section 3.9(a), which is proposed
to be amended to eliminate references to
the Vice Chairman and which will
continue to allow the Board to designate
an Acting Chairman of the Board in the
absence or inability to act of the
Chairman, which could be the Lead
Director or another director); (ii) unless
otherwise provided in the rules or by
Board resolution, appointing, subject to
Board approval, the individuals to serve
on Trading Permit Holder committees
(which will be addressed by Section
4.1(b) of the Bylaws, which is proposed
to be amended to vest this appointment
authority, also subject to Board approval
of such appointments, in the Chief
Executive Officer or his or her
designee); and (iii) exercising such other
powers and performing such other
duties as are delegated to the Vice
Chairman by the Board (which is not an
item that needs to be addressed since
there are no such other powers of duties
that the Board has delegated to the Vice
Chairman).
Two additional current roles of the
Vice Chairman are set forth in Section
5.3 of the Bylaws, which is also
proposed to be deleted. Those roles are
presiding at meetings of Trading Permit
Holders and coordinating the activities
of all Trading Permit Holder
committees. The Exchange’s expectation
is that C2 management will perform
these functions.
Section 2.3 of the Bylaws is proposed
to be amended to delete the Vice
Chairman as one of the parties that can
3 15
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
call a special meeting of the
stockholders. This Section will continue
to permit special meetings of the
stockholders to be called by either the
Chairman of the Board or a majority of
the Board.
Section 3.9(b) of the Bylaws is
proposed to be re-numbered as Section
3.8(b) and to be amended to delete how
the office of Vice Chairman is filled in
the event of a vacancy in that office.
Section 3.12 of the Bylaws is
proposed to be re-numbered as Section
3.11 and to be amended to delete the
Vice Chairman as one of the parties that
can call a special meeting of the Board
of Directors. This Section will continue
to permit special meetings of the Board
to be called by either the Chairman of
the Board or the Secretary upon the
written request of any four directors.
In a related change, Section 4.1(b) of
the Bylaws is proposed to be amended
to vest the authority to remove a
member of an Exchange committee (i.e.,
a non-Board committee) in the Chief
Executive Officer or his or her designee,
subject to the approval of the Board.
This authority was previously vested
with the Board itself. The Exchange is
proposing to vest this authority with the
Chief Executive Officer or his or her
designee in order to have consistency
with the proposed Exchange committee
appointment authority which, as is
described above, is also proposed to be
vested in the Chief Executive Officer or
his or her designee, subject to the
approval of the Board.
Section 4.2 of the Bylaws is proposed
to be amended to delete the Vice
Chairman as one of the required
members of the C2 Executive
Committee. Section 4.2 will continue to
require that the Executive Committee
include the Chairman of the Board, the
Chief Executive Officer (if a director),
the Lead Director (if any), at least one
Representative Director, and such other
number of directors that the Board
deems appropriate, provided that in no
event shall the number of Non-Industry
Directors constitute less than the
number of Industry Directors serving on
the Executive Committee (excluding the
Chief Executive Officer from the
calculation of Industry Directors for
such purpose).4
4 C2’s Executive Committee generally does not
make a decision unless there is a need for a C2
Board-level decision between C2 Board meetings
due to the time sensitivity of the matter. In
addition, in situations when the Executive
Committee does make a decision between C2 Board
meetings, the C2 Board is generally aware ahead of
time of the potential that the Executive Committee
may need to make the decision. The C2 Board is
fully informed of any decision made by the
Executive Committee at its next meeting and can
always decide to review that decision and take a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
Section 5.1 of the Bylaws is proposed
to be amended to delete the Vice
Chairman as one of the required officers
of the Exchange.
The title of Chapter XVI of the
Exchange’s rules is proposed to be
shortened from ‘‘Summary Suspension
by Chairman of the Board or Vice
Chairman of the Board’’ to ‘‘Summary
Suspension’’ in order to eliminate the
reference to the Vice Chairman. The text
of Chapter XVI is not proposed to be
revised and would continue to
incorporate by reference the summary
suspension rules contained in Chapter
XVI of the CBOE rules as they may be
in effect from time to time.
(b) Addition of Advisory Board
Provision
The Exchange proposes to provide in
new proposed Section 6.1 of the Bylaws
that the Board of Directors may establish
an Advisory Board which shall advise
the Office of the Chairman regarding
matters of interest to Trading Permit
Holders. The Exchange believes that the
ability to establish such a body is
beneficial in that it allows the Exchange
to establish an additional vehicle for
Exchange management to receive advice
from the perspective of Trading Permit
Holders and regarding matters that
impact Trading Permit Holders
Under proposed Section 6.1 of the
Bylaws, it is proposed that the Board of
Directors shall determine the number of
members of an Advisory Board, that the
Chief Executive Officer or his or her
designee shall serve as the Chairman of
an Advisory Board, and that the C2
Nominating and Governance Committee
shall recommend the members of an
Advisory Board for approval by the
Board of Directors.
The Advisory Board would be
completely advisory in nature and not
be vested with any Exchange decisionmaking authority or other authority to
act on behalf of the Exchange. Although
proposed Section 6.1 of the Bylaws
provides the Board of Directors with the
discretion of whether or not to put in
place an Advisory Board, it is the
current intention of the Board of
Directors to establish an Advisory
Board.
(c) Elimination of Exchange Audit
Committee
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
its Audit Committee because its
different action. C2’s affiliate Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’)
previously noted the foregoing to the Commission
with respect to CBOE’s Executive Committee (see
Footnote 87 of Exchange Act Release No. 62158
(May 24, 2010), 75 FR 30082 (May 28, 2010) (SR–
CBOE–2008–88)) and the same is true with respect
to C2’s Executive Committee.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7599
functions are duplicative of the
functions of the Audit Committee of its
parent company, CBOE Holdings, Inc.
(‘‘CBOE Holdings’’).
Under its charter, the CBOE Holdings
Audit Committee has broad authority to
assist the CBOE Holdings Board of
Directors in discharging its
responsibilities relating to, among other
things, (i) the qualifications,
engagement, and oversight of CBOE
Holdings’ independent auditor, (ii)
CBOE Holdings’ financial statements
and disclosure matters, (iii) CBOE
Holdings’ internal audit function and
internal controls, and (iv) CBOE
Holdings’ oversight and risk
management, including compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements.
Because CBOE Holdings’ financial
statements are prepared on a
consolidated basis that includes the
financial results of CBOE Holdings’
subsidiaries, including C2, the CBOE
Holdings Audit Committee’s purview
necessarily includes C2. The CBOE
Holdings Audit Committee is composed
of at least three CBOE Holdings
directors, all of whom must be
independent within the meaning given
to that term in the CBOE Holdings
Bylaws and Corporate Governance
Guidelines and Rule 10A–3 under the
Act.5 All CBOE Holdings Audit
Committee members must be financially
literate (or become financially literate
within a reasonable period of time after
appointment to the Committee), and at
least one member of the Committee
must be an ‘‘audit committee financial
expert’’ as defined by the Commission.
By contrast, the C2 Audit Committee
has a more limited role, focused solely
on C2. Under its charter, the primary
functions of the C2 Audit Committee are
focused on (i) C2’s financial statements
and disclosure matters and (ii) C2’s
oversight and risk management,
including compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, in each case,
only to the extent required in
connection with C2’s discharge of its
obligations as a self-regulatory
organization. However, to the extent
that the C2 Audit Committee reviews
financial statements and disclosure
matters, its activities are duplicative of
the activities of the CBOE Holdings
Audit Committee, which is also charged
with review of financial statements and
disclosure matters. Similarly, the CBOE
Holdings Audit Committee has general
responsibility for oversight and risk
management, including compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements,
for CBOE Holdings and all of its
subsidiaries, including C2. Thus, the
5 17
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
CFR 240.10A–3.
10FEN1
7600
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
responsibilities of the C2 Audit
Committee are fully duplicated by the
responsibilities of the CBOE Holdings
Audit Committee. Accordingly, C2 is
proposing to delete Section 4.3 of the C2
Bylaws which provides for the C2 Audit
Committee and to delete a reference to
the C2 Audit Committee in Section
4.1(a) of the C2 Bylaws (which lists the
required C2 Board committees).
Although the CBOE Holdings Audit
Committee has and will continue to
have overall responsibilities with
respect to the internal audit function,
the C2 Board of Directors will still
maintain its own independent oversight
over the internal audit function with
respect to C2 regulatory functions
through the C2 Regulatory Oversight
Committee. Specifically, upon
elimination of the C2 Audit Committee,
the charter of the C2 Regulatory
Oversight Committee will be amended
to provide that the Regulatory Oversight
Committee will review all internal
audits relating to C2’s regulatory
functions and that the Regulatory
Oversight Committee will have the
authority to review the internal audit
plan with respect to C2’s regulatory
functions and to request at any time that
C2’s internal auditor conduct an audit
relating to those functions. These
changes are in addition to the current
C2 Regulatory Oversight Committee
charter provision which provides that
the Regulatory Oversight Committee
shall meet regularly with C2’s internal
auditor regarding regulatory functions
and are consistent with the Regulatory
Oversight Committee’s existing practice
of reviewing internal audits of C2’s
regulatory functions.
C2 believes that its proposal to
eliminate its Audit Committee is
substantially similar to prior actions by
other securities exchanges with parent
company audit committees to eliminate
their exchange-level audit committees.6
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
(d) Miscellaneous Non-Substantive
Bylaw Changes
In addition to the changes set forth
above, the Exchange proposes to make
the following non-substantive changes
to the Bylaws.
First, the Exchange proposes to
amend the title of the Bylaws from
‘‘Amended and Restated Bylaws of C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated’’ to
‘‘Second Amended and Restated Bylaws
of C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated’’
since the Exchange is making the Bylaw
changes proposed by this rule filing
6 See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 60276 (July
9, 2009), 74 FR 34840 (July 17, 2009) (File No.
NASDAQ–2009–042).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
through as second amendment and
restatement of its Bylaws.
Second, the Exchange is proposing to
re-number various sections of the
Bylaws to eliminate gaps in the
numbering of the Bylaw sections
resulting from the proposed deletion of
certain of the Bylaw sections as
described above.
Third, the Exchange proposes to make
a clarifying change to Section 3.2 of the
Bylaws to change a reference to the
Industry-Director Subcommittee of the
Nominating and Governance Committee
from ‘‘committee’’ to ‘‘Subcommittee.’’
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to
delete some out-dated provisions from
the Bylaws. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to delete a paragraph of
Section 3.2 of the Bylaws which
describes the initial election process for
Representative Directors following the
commencement of trading on the
Exchange and which has already been
completed. Similarly, the Exchange
proposes to delete provisions in Section
4.1 of the Bylaws and Section 4.4 of the
Bylaws (to be re-numbered from Section
4.5) regarding the initial appointment of
the Nominating and Governance
Committee and the initial appointment
of other Board committees since these
appointments have already occurred.
(e) Effectiveness of Changes
The Exchange proposes to make
effective the proposed Bylaw and rule
changes related to the elimination of the
Vice Chairman of the Board that are
described in subsection (a)(1) of Item 3
of this rule filing on the date of the
annual election of C2 directors in 2011
(which is anticipated to occur in May
2011). The Exchange proposes to make
effective these changes at that time
because the current term of the Vice
Chairman expires on that date and this
will permit the current Vice Chairman
to serve out his current term of office.
The Exchange proposes to make
effective all of the other changes
proposed by this rule filing at the time
that the Commission approves this rule
filing. These changes include those
relating to the addition of an Advisory
Board provision and to the elimination
of the C2 Audit Committee as well as
the miscellaneous non-substantive
Bylaw changes, all of which are
described in subsections (a)(2)–(a)(4) of
Item 3 of this rule filing.
2. Statutory Basis
For the reasons set forth above, C2
believes that this filing is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(1) of the Act 8 and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act 9 in particular, in that (i) it
enables C2 to be so organized as to have
the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and
to enforce compliance by its Trading
Permit Holders and persons associated
with its Trading Permit Holders, with
the provisions of the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
C2 and (ii) to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the proposed changes will
streamline, make more efficient, and
improve C2’s governance structure by
eliminating the position of Vice
Chairman of the Board which C2 no
longer believes is necessary; by adding
a Bylaw provision that the Board of
Directors may establish an Advisory
Board, which C2 views as a useful
vehicle that the Board may utilize to
receive input from the perspective of
Trading Permit Holders and with
respect to matters of interest to Trading
Permit Holders; and by eliminating the
C2 Audit Committee, which C2 believes
is duplicative of the CBOE Holdings
Audit Committee and which change
will allow C2 directors to focus their
attention on matters falling directly
within the purview of the C2 Board of
Directors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
8 15
7 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
9 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
003 and should be submitted on or
before March 3, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–2972 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–C2–2011–003 on the
subject line.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the Fees
Schedule for the CBOE Stock
Exchange
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2011–003. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–C2–2011–
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’), 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
27, 2011, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63831; File No. SR–CBOE–
2011–011]
February 3, 2011.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the
Fees Schedule for its CBOE Stock
Exchange (‘‘CBSX’’). The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
CBSX Fees Schedule to modify the
CBSX regulatory fees. Currently, CBOE
charges a $2,500 fee to CBSX Trading
Permit Holders who apply for CBOE to
act as their designated examining
authority as well as $2,500 per month to
CBSX Trading Permit Holders for whom
CBOE acts as the designated examining
authority. To offset an increase in the
cost associated with processing these
applications and acting as the regulatory
authority, the Exchange proposes to
raise the $2,500 fees to $3,000. The
Exchange believes the regulatory fees
are appropriate and reasonable in that
they help offset costs incurred in
connection with regulation of CBSX.
The fee changes will become effective
on February 1, 2011.
2. Statutory Basis
Because the filing increases certain
regulatory-related fees to offset
regulatory costs, the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b) of
Act,3 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 4
in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among CBOE members and other
persons using its facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is
designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
10 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7601
3 15
4 15
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7598-7601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2972]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63845; File No. SR-C2-2011-003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Bylaw and
Related Rule Changes
February 4, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'' or ``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\
notice is hereby given that on January 27, 2011, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by C2. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
C2 proposes to (i) amend its Bylaws and rules to eliminate its
office of Vice Chairman of the Board, (ii) amend its Bylaws to provide
that the Board of Directors may establish an Advisory Board, and (iii)
amend its Bylaws to eliminate its Audit Committee.
The text of the proposed amendments to C2's Bylaws and the proposed
amendments to C2's rules is available on C2's Web site at (https://www.c2exchange.com/Legal), at C2's Office of the Secretary, on the
Commission's Web site at (https://www.sec.gov), and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, C2 included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. C2 has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to eliminate the office
of C2 Vice Chairman of the Board, to allow for a C2 Advisory Board, and
to eliminate the C2 Audit Committee.
(a) Elimination of Office of Vice Chairman of the Board
Based on the Exchange's experience since its registration as a
national securities exchange in December, 2009 and the launch of
trading on the Exchange in October, 2010, the Exchange believes that it
is no longer necessary to provide for an office of Vice Chairman of the
Board (which is an office held by one of the Exchange's Industry
Directors). It was originally contemplated that the Vice Chairman would
take a lead role in facilitating communication between C2 and its
Trading Permit Holders and in coordinating the activities of Trading
Permit Holder committees. The Exchange now believes that C2 management
is best able to take the lead role in this regard. The Exchange also
believes that it will continue to be able to obtain input from Trading
Permit Holders through, among other things, direct communication with
individual Trading Permit Holders and the ability to establish Trading
Permit Holder committees and an Advisory Board (as proposed by this
rule filing).
The Exchange Bylaws will also continue to require that at least 30%
of the directors on the C2 Board of Directors must be Industry
Directors and that at least 20% of C2's directors must be
Representative Directors. Representative Directors are Industry
Directors nominated (or otherwise selected through a petition process)
by the Industry-Director Subcommittee of the C2 Nominating and
Governance Committee. The Industry-Director Subcommittee is composed of
all of the Industry Directors serving on the Nominating and Governance
Committee. C2 Trading Permit Holders may nominate alternative
Representative Director candidates to those nominated by the Industry
Director Subcommittee, in which case a Run-off Election is held in
which C2's Trading Permit Holders vote to determine which candidates
will be elected to the C2 Board of Directors to serve as Representative
Directors. Thus, the Exchange will continue to provide for the fair
representation of C2 Trading Permit Holders in the selection of
directors and the administration of the Exchange consistent with
Section 6(b)(3) of the Act.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The specific proposed C2 Bylaw and rule changes related to the
elimination of the office of Vice Chairman of Board include the
following changes:
Section 3.7 of the Bylaws, which describes the selection, the term,
and roles of the Vice Chairman, is proposed to be deleted. The current
roles of the Vice Chairman listed in Section 3.7 of the Bylaws (and how
those roles will be performed going forward) are (i) Presiding over
meetings of the Board of Directors in the event that the Chairman of
the Board is absent or unable to do so (which will be addressed by
Section 3.8(a) of the Bylaws to be re-numbered from Section 3.9(a),
which is proposed to be amended to eliminate references to the Vice
Chairman and which will continue to allow the Board to designate an
Acting Chairman of the Board in the absence or inability to act of the
Chairman, which could be the Lead Director or another director); (ii)
unless otherwise provided in the rules or by Board resolution,
appointing, subject to Board approval, the individuals to serve on
Trading Permit Holder committees (which will be addressed by Section
4.1(b) of the Bylaws, which is proposed to be amended to vest this
appointment authority, also subject to Board approval of such
appointments, in the Chief Executive Officer or his or her designee);
and (iii) exercising such other powers and performing such other duties
as are delegated to the Vice Chairman by the Board (which is not an
item that needs to be addressed since there are no such other powers of
duties that the Board has delegated to the Vice Chairman).
Two additional current roles of the Vice Chairman are set forth in
Section 5.3 of the Bylaws, which is also proposed to be deleted. Those
roles are presiding at meetings of Trading Permit Holders and
coordinating the activities of all Trading Permit Holder committees.
The Exchange's expectation is that C2 management will perform these
functions.
Section 2.3 of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to delete the
Vice Chairman as one of the parties that can
[[Page 7599]]
call a special meeting of the stockholders. This Section will continue
to permit special meetings of the stockholders to be called by either
the Chairman of the Board or a majority of the Board.
Section 3.9(b) of the Bylaws is proposed to be re-numbered as
Section 3.8(b) and to be amended to delete how the office of Vice
Chairman is filled in the event of a vacancy in that office.
Section 3.12 of the Bylaws is proposed to be re-numbered as Section
3.11 and to be amended to delete the Vice Chairman as one of the
parties that can call a special meeting of the Board of Directors. This
Section will continue to permit special meetings of the Board to be
called by either the Chairman of the Board or the Secretary upon the
written request of any four directors.
In a related change, Section 4.1(b) of the Bylaws is proposed to be
amended to vest the authority to remove a member of an Exchange
committee (i.e., a non-Board committee) in the Chief Executive Officer
or his or her designee, subject to the approval of the Board. This
authority was previously vested with the Board itself. The Exchange is
proposing to vest this authority with the Chief Executive Officer or
his or her designee in order to have consistency with the proposed
Exchange committee appointment authority which, as is described above,
is also proposed to be vested in the Chief Executive Officer or his or
her designee, subject to the approval of the Board.
Section 4.2 of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to delete the
Vice Chairman as one of the required members of the C2 Executive
Committee. Section 4.2 will continue to require that the Executive
Committee include the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive
Officer (if a director), the Lead Director (if any), at least one
Representative Director, and such other number of directors that the
Board deems appropriate, provided that in no event shall the number of
Non-Industry Directors constitute less than the number of Industry
Directors serving on the Executive Committee (excluding the Chief
Executive Officer from the calculation of Industry Directors for such
purpose).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ C2's Executive Committee generally does not make a decision
unless there is a need for a C2 Board-level decision between C2
Board meetings due to the time sensitivity of the matter. In
addition, in situations when the Executive Committee does make a
decision between C2 Board meetings, the C2 Board is generally aware
ahead of time of the potential that the Executive Committee may need
to make the decision. The C2 Board is fully informed of any decision
made by the Executive Committee at its next meeting and can always
decide to review that decision and take a different action. C2's
affiliate Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'')
previously noted the foregoing to the Commission with respect to
CBOE's Executive Committee (see Footnote 87 of Exchange Act Release
No. 62158 (May 24, 2010), 75 FR 30082 (May 28, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2008-
88)) and the same is true with respect to C2's Executive Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 5.1 of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to delete the
Vice Chairman as one of the required officers of the Exchange.
The title of Chapter XVI of the Exchange's rules is proposed to be
shortened from ``Summary Suspension by Chairman of the Board or Vice
Chairman of the Board'' to ``Summary Suspension'' in order to eliminate
the reference to the Vice Chairman. The text of Chapter XVI is not
proposed to be revised and would continue to incorporate by reference
the summary suspension rules contained in Chapter XVI of the CBOE rules
as they may be in effect from time to time.
(b) Addition of Advisory Board Provision
The Exchange proposes to provide in new proposed Section 6.1 of the
Bylaws that the Board of Directors may establish an Advisory Board
which shall advise the Office of the Chairman regarding matters of
interest to Trading Permit Holders. The Exchange believes that the
ability to establish such a body is beneficial in that it allows the
Exchange to establish an additional vehicle for Exchange management to
receive advice from the perspective of Trading Permit Holders and
regarding matters that impact Trading Permit Holders
Under proposed Section 6.1 of the Bylaws, it is proposed that the
Board of Directors shall determine the number of members of an Advisory
Board, that the Chief Executive Officer or his or her designee shall
serve as the Chairman of an Advisory Board, and that the C2 Nominating
and Governance Committee shall recommend the members of an Advisory
Board for approval by the Board of Directors.
The Advisory Board would be completely advisory in nature and not
be vested with any Exchange decision-making authority or other
authority to act on behalf of the Exchange. Although proposed Section
6.1 of the Bylaws provides the Board of Directors with the discretion
of whether or not to put in place an Advisory Board, it is the current
intention of the Board of Directors to establish an Advisory Board.
(c) Elimination of Exchange Audit Committee
The Exchange proposes to eliminate its Audit Committee because its
functions are duplicative of the functions of the Audit Committee of
its parent company, CBOE Holdings, Inc. (``CBOE Holdings'').
Under its charter, the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee has broad
authority to assist the CBOE Holdings Board of Directors in discharging
its responsibilities relating to, among other things, (i) the
qualifications, engagement, and oversight of CBOE Holdings' independent
auditor, (ii) CBOE Holdings' financial statements and disclosure
matters, (iii) CBOE Holdings' internal audit function and internal
controls, and (iv) CBOE Holdings' oversight and risk management,
including compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Because
CBOE Holdings' financial statements are prepared on a consolidated
basis that includes the financial results of CBOE Holdings'
subsidiaries, including C2, the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee's purview
necessarily includes C2. The CBOE Holdings Audit Committee is composed
of at least three CBOE Holdings directors, all of whom must be
independent within the meaning given to that term in the CBOE Holdings
Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines and Rule 10A-3 under the
Act.\5\ All CBOE Holdings Audit Committee members must be financially
literate (or become financially literate within a reasonable period of
time after appointment to the Committee), and at least one member of
the Committee must be an ``audit committee financial expert'' as
defined by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By contrast, the C2 Audit Committee has a more limited role,
focused solely on C2. Under its charter, the primary functions of the
C2 Audit Committee are focused on (i) C2's financial statements and
disclosure matters and (ii) C2's oversight and risk management,
including compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in each
case, only to the extent required in connection with C2's discharge of
its obligations as a self-regulatory organization. However, to the
extent that the C2 Audit Committee reviews financial statements and
disclosure matters, its activities are duplicative of the activities of
the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee, which is also charged with review of
financial statements and disclosure matters. Similarly, the CBOE
Holdings Audit Committee has general responsibility for oversight and
risk management, including compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, for CBOE Holdings and all of its subsidiaries, including
C2. Thus, the
[[Page 7600]]
responsibilities of the C2 Audit Committee are fully duplicated by the
responsibilities of the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee. Accordingly, C2
is proposing to delete Section 4.3 of the C2 Bylaws which provides for
the C2 Audit Committee and to delete a reference to the C2 Audit
Committee in Section 4.1(a) of the C2 Bylaws (which lists the required
C2 Board committees).
Although the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee has and will continue to
have overall responsibilities with respect to the internal audit
function, the C2 Board of Directors will still maintain its own
independent oversight over the internal audit function with respect to
C2 regulatory functions through the C2 Regulatory Oversight Committee.
Specifically, upon elimination of the C2 Audit Committee, the charter
of the C2 Regulatory Oversight Committee will be amended to provide
that the Regulatory Oversight Committee will review all internal audits
relating to C2's regulatory functions and that the Regulatory Oversight
Committee will have the authority to review the internal audit plan
with respect to C2's regulatory functions and to request at any time
that C2's internal auditor conduct an audit relating to those
functions. These changes are in addition to the current C2 Regulatory
Oversight Committee charter provision which provides that the
Regulatory Oversight Committee shall meet regularly with C2's internal
auditor regarding regulatory functions and are consistent with the
Regulatory Oversight Committee's existing practice of reviewing
internal audits of C2's regulatory functions.
C2 believes that its proposal to eliminate its Audit Committee is
substantially similar to prior actions by other securities exchanges
with parent company audit committees to eliminate their exchange-level
audit committees.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 60276 (July 9, 2009), 74
FR 34840 (July 17, 2009) (File No. NASDAQ-2009-042).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Miscellaneous Non-Substantive Bylaw Changes
In addition to the changes set forth above, the Exchange proposes
to make the following non-substantive changes to the Bylaws.
First, the Exchange proposes to amend the title of the Bylaws from
``Amended and Restated Bylaws of C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated'' to
``Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated'' since the Exchange is making the Bylaw changes proposed
by this rule filing through as second amendment and restatement of its
Bylaws.
Second, the Exchange is proposing to re-number various sections of
the Bylaws to eliminate gaps in the numbering of the Bylaw sections
resulting from the proposed deletion of certain of the Bylaw sections
as described above.
Third, the Exchange proposes to make a clarifying change to Section
3.2 of the Bylaws to change a reference to the Industry-Director
Subcommittee of the Nominating and Governance Committee from
``committee'' to ``Subcommittee.''
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to delete some out-dated provisions
from the Bylaws. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to delete a
paragraph of Section 3.2 of the Bylaws which describes the initial
election process for Representative Directors following the
commencement of trading on the Exchange and which has already been
completed. Similarly, the Exchange proposes to delete provisions in
Section 4.1 of the Bylaws and Section 4.4 of the Bylaws (to be re-
numbered from Section 4.5) regarding the initial appointment of the
Nominating and Governance Committee and the initial appointment of
other Board committees since these appointments have already occurred.
(e) Effectiveness of Changes
The Exchange proposes to make effective the proposed Bylaw and rule
changes related to the elimination of the Vice Chairman of the Board
that are described in subsection (a)(1) of Item 3 of this rule filing
on the date of the annual election of C2 directors in 2011 (which is
anticipated to occur in May 2011). The Exchange proposes to make
effective these changes at that time because the current term of the
Vice Chairman expires on that date and this will permit the current
Vice Chairman to serve out his current term of office.
The Exchange proposes to make effective all of the other changes
proposed by this rule filing at the time that the Commission approves
this rule filing. These changes include those relating to the addition
of an Advisory Board provision and to the elimination of the C2 Audit
Committee as well as the miscellaneous non-substantive Bylaw changes,
all of which are described in subsections (a)(2)-(a)(4) of Item 3 of
this rule filing.
2. Statutory Basis
For the reasons set forth above, C2 believes that this filing is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act \8\ and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act \9\ in particular, in that (i) it enables C2 to be so organized
as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Act
and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its Trading Permit Holders
and persons associated with its Trading Permit Holders, with the
provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the
rules of C2 and (ii) to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the proposed changes will streamline, make more
efficient, and improve C2's governance structure by eliminating the
position of Vice Chairman of the Board which C2 no longer believes is
necessary; by adding a Bylaw provision that the Board of Directors may
establish an Advisory Board, which C2 views as a useful vehicle that
the Board may utilize to receive input from the perspective of Trading
Permit Holders and with respect to matters of interest to Trading
Permit Holders; and by eliminating the C2 Audit Committee, which C2
believes is duplicative of the CBOE Holdings Audit Committee and which
change will allow C2 directors to focus their attention on matters
falling directly within the purview of the C2 Board of Directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory
[[Page 7601]]
organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2011-003 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2011-003. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-C2-2011-003 and should be
submitted on or before March 3, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2972 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P