Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 7585-7588 [2011-2964]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of January, 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–2965 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–72,851] jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES General Motors Corporation Milford Proving Grounds Including On-Site Leased Workers From Adroit Software & Consulting, Inc., Aerotek Professional Services, Inc., Aerotek, Inc., Ajilon Consulting (IS&S), Altair Engineering, Inc., Applied Computer Solutions, Inc., The Bartech Group, CDI Professional Services, Engineering Labs, Inc., Global Technology Associates, LTD., IAV Automotive Engineering, Inc., Infotrieve, Inc., Kelly Service, Inc., Populus Group, RCO Engineering, Inc., TEK Systems, Teledata Technology Solutions, WIPRO, Inc. and Hewlett Packard (HP) FKA EDS, Global Product Development, Non-IT Business Development and Engineering Application Support Teams Milford, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 23, 2010, applicable to workers of General Motors Corporation, Milford Proving Grounds, Milford, Michigan. The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 39046). The workers supply support services related to the production of automobiles, such as quality, reliability, and durability testing. The subject worker group includes on-site leased workers from various temporary staffing agencies. New information provided in another investigation shows that workers of the Non-IT Business Development Team and the Engineering Applications Support Team of the Global Product Development division of Hewlett Packard, formerly known as EDS, were employed on-site at General Motors Corporation, Milford Proving Grounds, VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 Milford, Michigan during the relevant period. Based on this new information, the Department reviewed the certification of TA–W–72,851. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers at the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased U.S. aggregate imports of articles like or directly competitive with automobiles produced by General Motors Corporation, Milford, Michigan. The Department has determined that the workers of Hewlett Packard formerly known as EDS, Global Product Development, Non-IT Business Development Team and Engineering Applications Support Team, were sufficiently under the control of General Motors, Milford Proving Grounds, Milford, Michigan, during the relevant period and are, therefore, part of the subject worker group. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include on-site leased workers from Hewlett Packard, formerly known as EDS, Global Product Development, Non-IT Business Development Team and Engineering Applications Support Team, Milford, Michigan. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–72,851 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of General Motors Corporation, Milford Proving Grounds, including on-site leased workers from Adroit Software & Consulting, Inc., Aerotek Professional Services, Inc., Aerotek, Inc., Ajilon Consulting (IS&S), Altair Engineering, Inc., Applied Computer Solutions, Inc., The Bartech Group, CDI Professional Services, Engineering Labs, Inc., Global Technology Associates, LTD., IAV Automotive Engineering, Inc., Infotrieve, Inc., Kelly Service, Inc., Populus Group, RCO Engineering, Inc., Tek Systems, Teledata Technology Solutions, Wipro, Inc. and Hewlett Packard formerly known as EDS, Global Product Development, Non-IT Business Development Team and Engineering Applications Support Team, Milford, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 20, 2008 through June 23, 2012, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of February, 2011. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–2968 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7585 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of January 24, 2011 through January 28, 2011. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 7586 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,169 .......... Teco-Westinghouse Motor Company, Teco Holdings USA, Inc.; Leased Workers from HT Staffing, Manpower, etc. Wiza Industries, Inc .............................................................................. Kinetic Enterprise, DBA Triem Electric Motors .................................... Alpine Custom Shutters, Inc ................................................................. Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Contact Holding Company ....................... Leased Workers from Mid Oregon Personnel Service, Working OnSite at Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. Forrest City Machine Works, Inc .......................................................... Chestnut Ridge Group, LLLP, I.C. Supermarkets, Inc.; Leased Workers The Callos Companies and Account Temps. Herskovits Corporation, DBA Elram Corporation ................................. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Furniture Brands International, Leased Workers from Manpower, Inc. Round Rock, TX ........................... May 27, 2009. Muskego, WI ................................. Mebane, NC .................................. Englewood, CO ............................. Prineville, OR ................................ Prineville, OR ................................ Forrest City, AR ............................ Latrobe, PA ................................... June 1, 2009. June 22, 2009. August 18, 2009. March 1, 2010. September 21, 2009. October 12, 2009. November 4, 2009. Fall River, MA ............................... Appomattox, VA ............................ November 23, 2009. January 14, 2011. 74,174 .......... 74,324 .......... 74,571 .......... 74,659 .......... 74,659A ........ 74,719 .......... 74,869 .......... jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES 74,959 .......... 75,079 .......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 services) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 Impact date 7587 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,658 .............. 74,798 .............. Broadview Networks ..................................................................... Hewlett Packard Company, Technology Support Group; Including Virtual Workers Reporting to this Location. International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division; Production Control, etc. Time Insurance Company (Assurant Health), IT; Leased Workers from Capgemeni. Digital River Education Services, Inc., Digital River, Inc.; Leased Workers of Serenity Staffing, Accountemps, etc. SuperMedia, LLC, Quality Assurance Software Testing Division; Leased Workers Advantage, etc. Faurecia, Emissions Control Technologies Division .................... Allstate Insurance Company, Technology and Operations Infrastructure Services; Leased Workers UST; etc. Thomson Reuters, Healthcare and Science Division; Leased Workers from Adecco. International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology, Storage Management, Teleworkers. International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology, Storage Management, Teleworkers. International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology, Storage Management, Teleworkers. International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology, Storage Management, Teleworkers. International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology, Storage Management, Teleworkers. Startek USA, Inc ........................................................................... Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc., Acuity Brands, Inc.; Leased Workers Express Employment Professionals, etc. Imation Corporation, Leased Workers of Express Employment Professionals. NIOXIN Research Laboratories, Inc., Proctor & Gamble; Leased Workers Selectsource Staffing, etc. Quincy, MA ............................... Farmington Hills, MI .................. September 21, 2009. October 8, 2009. Oklahoma City, OK ................... November 12, 2009. Miami, FL .................................. November 18, 2009. Austin and Dallas, TX ............... December 7, 2009. D/FW Airport, TX ...................... December 13, 2009. Dexter, MO ................................ Irving, TX ................................... February 6, 2011. December 29, 2009. Philadelphia, PA ........................ January 6, 2010. Glendale, San Jose, and San Ramon, CA. Smyrna, GA .............................. December 22, 2009. December 22, 2009. Des Moines, IA ......................... December 22, 2009. Bethesda, MD ........................... December 22, 2009. Charlotte, NC ............................ December 22, 2009. Alexandria, LA ........................... Austin, TX ................................. January 10, 2010. January 18, 2010. Weatherford, OK ....................... January 19, 2010. Lithia Springs, GA ..................... December 31, 2009. 74,871 .............. 74,903 .............. 74,975 .............. 74,992 .............. 75,016 .............. 75,057 .............. 75,073 .............. 75,087 .............. 75,087A ............ 75,087B ............ 75,087C ............ 75,087D ............ 75,089 .............. 75,117 .............. 75,124 .............. 75,132 .............. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Impact date are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,260 .............. XPEDX, International Paper Company; Leased Workers from Manpower. Cable Consultants, Inc., d/b/a Black Box Network Services, On Site At Hewlett Packard, Tek Systems. Livonia, MI ................................. May 26, 2009. Corvallis, OR ............................. November 12, 2009. 75,013 .............. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(f) (firms identified by the International Trade Commission) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,666 .............. Goodyear, Wingfoot Commercial Tire .......................................... Portland, OR ............................. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Impact date criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or Impact date June 25, 2008. (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,956 .......... 74,956A ........ Riverside Furniture Company, Retail Store Division ............................ Riverside Furniture Company, Retail Store Division ............................ Rogers, AR ................................... North Little Rock, AR .................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 Impact date 7588 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,653 .......... 74,733 .......... 74,870 .......... Unicare, WellPoint, Inc ......................................................................... Xpedite Systems, LLC, Easylink Services International Corporation .. International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services, SSO Band Support Capital One. Plano, TX ...................................... Deerfield Beach, FL ...................... Plano, TX ...................................... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance on the Department’s website, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 75,046 .......... Macsteel Service Centers USA ............................................................ Liverpool, NY ................................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and Impact date therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 75,098 .......... IBM ........................................................................................................ Research Triangle Park, NC ......... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 24, 2011 through January 28, 2011. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: February 2, 2011. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–2964 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Impact date VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221 (a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 22, 2011. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 22, 2011. Copies of these petitions may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of January 2011. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7585-7588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2964]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
January 24, 2011 through January 28, 2011.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially

[[Page 7586]]

separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 7587]]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,658.......................... Broadview Networks..... Quincy, MA........ September 21, 2009.
74,798.......................... Hewlett Packard Farmington Hills, October 8, 2009.
Company, Technology MI.
Support Group;
Including Virtual
Workers Reporting to
this Location.
74,871.......................... International Business Oklahoma City, OK. November 12, 2009.
Machines (IBM), Global
Technology Services
Delivery Division;
Production Control,
etc.
74,903.......................... Time Insurance Company Miami, FL......... November 18, 2009.
(Assurant Health), IT;
Leased Workers from
Capgemeni.
74,975.......................... Digital River Education Austin and Dallas, December 7, 2009.
Services, Inc., TX.
Digital River, Inc.;
Leased Workers of
Serenity Staffing,
Accountemps, etc.
74,992.......................... SuperMedia, LLC, D/FW Airport, TX.. December 13, 2009.
Quality Assurance
Software Testing
Division; Leased
Workers Advantage, etc.
75,016.......................... Faurecia, Emissions Dexter, MO........ February 6, 2011.
Control Technologies
Division.
75,057.......................... Allstate Insurance Irving, TX........ December 29, 2009.
Company, Technology
and Operations
Infrastructure
Services; Leased
Workers UST; etc.
75,073.......................... Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA.. January 6, 2010.
Healthcare and Science
Division; Leased
Workers from Adecco.
75,087.......................... International Business Glendale, San December 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM), Jose, and San
Integrated Technology, Ramon, CA.
Storage Management,
Teleworkers.
75,087A......................... International Business Smyrna, GA........ December 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM),
Integrated Technology,
Storage Management,
Teleworkers.
75,087B......................... International Business Des Moines, IA.... December 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM),
Integrated Technology,
Storage Management,
Teleworkers.
75,087C......................... International Business Bethesda, MD...... December 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM),
Integrated Technology,
Storage Management,
Teleworkers.
75,087D......................... International Business Charlotte, NC..... December 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM),
Integrated Technology,
Storage Management,
Teleworkers.
75,089.......................... Startek USA, Inc....... Alexandria, LA.... January 10, 2010.
75,117.......................... Acuity Brands Lighting, Austin, TX........ January 18, 2010.
Inc., Acuity Brands,
Inc.; Leased Workers
Express Employment
Professionals, etc.
75,124.......................... Imation Corporation, Weatherford, OK... January 19, 2010.
Leased Workers of
Express Employment
Professionals.
75,132.......................... NIOXIN Research Lithia Springs, GA December 31, 2009.
Laboratories, Inc.,
Proctor & Gamble;
Leased Workers
Selectsource Staffing,
etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(f) (firms identified by the International Trade Commission)
of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

[[Page 7588]]

The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's website, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of January 24, 2011 through January 28, 2011. Copies
of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations
also are available on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: February 2, 2011.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-2964 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.