Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 7595-7596 [2011-2930]

Download as PDF jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices Rule 104 of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.104)—Stabilizing and Other Activities in Connection with an Offering permits stabilizing by a distribution participant during a distribution so long as the distribution participant discloses information to the market and investors. This rule requires disclosure in offering materials of the potential stabilizing transactions and that the distribution participant inform the market when a stabilizing bid is made. It also requires the distribution participants (i.e. the syndicate manager) to maintain information regarding syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids and disclose such information to the Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO). There are approximately 745 respondents per year that require an aggregate total of 149 hours to comply with this rule. Each respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes approximately 0.20 hours (12 minutes) to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 149 burden hours. The total internal labor compliance cost for the respondents is approximately $9,983.00, resulting in a cost of compliance for the respondent per response of approximately $13.40 (i.e., $9,983/745 responses). Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. Comments should be directed to: Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted within 60 days of this notice. Dated: February 3, 2011. Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–2932 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. Extension: Rule 101; SEC File No. 270–408; OMB Control No. 3235–0464. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. Rule 101 of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.101)—Activities by Distribution Participants, prohibits distribution participants from purchasing activities at specified times during a distribution of securities. Persons otherwise covered by these rules may seek to use several applicable exceptions such as a calculation of the average daily trading volume of the securities in distribution, the maintenance of policies regarding information barriers between their affiliates, and the maintenance a written policy regarding general compliance with Regulation M for de minimus transactions. There are approximately 1588 respondents per year that require an aggregate total of 31,309 hours to comply with this rule. Each respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes approximately 20 hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 31,309 burden hours. The total compliance internal labor cost for the respondents is approximately $1,783,673.73, resulting in a cost of compliance for the respondent per response of approximately $1123.22 (i.e., $1,783,673.73/1588 responses). Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7595 respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. Comments should be directed to: Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: February 3, 2011. Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–2931 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Rule 17d–1; SEC File No. 270–505; OMB Control No. 3235–0562] Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. Extension: Rule 17d–1, SEC File No. 270–505, OMB Control No. 3235–0562. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit these existing collections of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. Section 17(d) (15 U.S.C. 80a–17(d)) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.) (the ‘‘Act’’) prohibits first- and second-tier affiliates of a fund, the fund’s principal underwriters, and affiliated persons of the fund’s principal underwriters, acting as principal, to effect any transaction in which the fund or a company controlled by the fund is a joint or a joint and several participant in contravention of the Commission’s rules. Rule 17d–1 (17 CFR 270.17d–1) prohibits an affiliated person of or principal underwriter for any fund (a ‘‘first-tier affiliate’’), or any affiliated person of such person or underwriter (a ‘‘second-tier affiliate’’), acting as principal, from participating in or effecting any transaction in connection with a joint enterprise or E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES 7596 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices other joint arrangement in which the fund is a participant, unless prior to entering into the enterprise or arrangement ‘‘an application regarding [the transaction] has been filed with the Commission and has been granted by an order.’’ In reviewing the proposed affiliated transaction, the rule provides that the Commission will consider whether the proposal is (i) consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act, and (ii) on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants in determining whether to grant an exemptive application for a proposed joint enterprise, joint arrangement, or profitsharing plan. Rule 17d–1 also contains a number of exceptions to the requirement that a fund must obtain Commission approval prior to entering into joint transactions or arrangements with affiliates. For example, funds do not have to obtain Commission approval for certain employee compensation plans, certain tax-deferred employee benefit plans, certain transactions involving small business investment companies, the receipt of securities or cash by certain affiliates pursuant to a plan of reorganization, certain arrangements regarding liability insurance policies and transactions with ‘‘portfolio affiliates’’ (companies that are affiliated with the fund solely as a result of the fund (or an affiliated fund) controlling them or owning more than five percent of their voting securities) so long as certain other affiliated persons of the fund (e.g., the fund’s adviser, persons controlling the fund, and persons under common control with the fund) are not parties to the transaction and do not have a ‘‘financial interest’’ in a party to the transaction. The rule excludes from the definition of ‘‘financial interest’’ any interest that the fund’s board of directors (including a majority of the directors who are not interested persons of the fund) finds to be not material, as long as the board records the basis for its finding in their meeting minutes. Thus, the rule contains two filing and recordkeeping requirements that constitute collections of information. First, rule 17d–1 requires funds that wish to engage in a joint transaction or arrangement with affiliates to meet the procedural requirements for obtaining exemptive relief from the rule’s prohibition on joint transactions or arrangements involving first- or secondtier affiliates. Second, rule 17d–1 permits a portfolio affiliate to enter into a joint transaction or arrangement with the fund if a prohibited participant has a financial interest that the fund’s board determines is not material and records VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 the basis for this finding in their meeting minutes. These requirements of rule 17d–1 are designed to prevent fund insiders from managing funds for their own benefit, rather than for the benefit of the funds’ shareholders. Based on an analysis of past filings, Commission staff estimates that 8 funds file applications under section 17(d) and rule 17d–1 per year. The staff understands that funds that file an application generally obtain assistance from outside counsel to prepare the application. The cost burden of using outside counsel is discussed below. Based on a limited survey of persons in the mutual fund industry, the Commission staff estimates that each applicant will spend an average of 154 hours to comply with the Commission’s applications process. The Commission staff therefore estimates the annual burden hours per year for all funds under rule 17d–1’s application process to be 1,232 hours at a cost of $445,328.1 The Commission, therefore, requests authorization to increase the inventory of total burden hours per year for all funds under rule 17d–1 from the current authorized burden of 616 hours to 1,232 hours. The increase is due to an increase in the number of funds that filed applications for exemptions under rule 17d–1. As noted above, the Commission staff understands that funds that file an application under rule 17d–1 generally use outside counsel to assist in preparing the application.2 The staff estimates that, on average, funds spend an additional $93,131 for outside legal services in connection with seeking Commission approval of affiliated joint transactions. Thus, the staff estimates that the total annual cost burden imposed by the exemptive application requirements of rule 17d–1 is $745,048.3 1 The Commission staff estimates that a senior executive, such as the fund’s chief compliance officer, will spend an average of 62 hours and a mid-level compliance attorney will spend an average of 92 hours to comply with this collection of information: 62 hours + 92 hours = 154 hours. 8 funds × 154 burden hours = 1,232 burden hours. The Commission staff estimate that the chief compliance officer is paid $423 per hour and the compliance attorney is paid $320 per hour. ($423 per hour × 62 hours) + ($320 per hour × 92 hours) = $55,666 per fund. $55,666 × 8 funds = $445,328. The $423 and $320 per hour figures are based on salary information compiled by SIFMA’s Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry, 2010. The Commission staff has modified SIFMA’s information to account for an 1,800-hour work year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and overhead. 2 This understanding is based on conversations with representatives from the fund industry. 3 The estimate is based on the following calculation: $93,131 × 8 funds = $745,048. PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Based on staff discussions with fund representatives, we estimate that funds currently do not rely on the exemption from the term ‘‘financial interest’’ with respect to any interest that the fund’s board of directors (including a majority of the directors who are not interested persons of the fund) finds to be not material. Accordingly, we estimate that annually there will be no transactions under rule 17d–1 that will result in this aspect of the collection of information. Based on these calculations, the total annual hour burden is estimated to be 1,232 hours and the total annual cost burden is estimated to be $745,048. The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules. Complying with these collections of information requirement is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying on rule 17d–1. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: February 3, 2011. Cathy H. Ahn, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–2930 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7595-7596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Rule 17d-1; SEC File No. 270-505; OMB Control No. 3235-0562]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17d-1, SEC File No. 270-505, OMB Control No. 3235-0562.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections 
of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit these 
existing collections of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Section 17(d) (15 U.S.C. 80a-17(d)) of the Investment Company Act 
of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.) (the ``Act'') prohibits first- and 
second-tier affiliates of a fund, the fund's principal underwriters, 
and affiliated persons of the fund's principal underwriters, acting as 
principal, to effect any transaction in which the fund or a company 
controlled by the fund is a joint or a joint and several participant in 
contravention of the Commission's rules. Rule 17d-1 (17 CFR 270.17d-1) 
prohibits an affiliated person of or principal underwriter for any fund 
(a ``first-tier affiliate''), or any affiliated person of such person 
or underwriter (a ``second-tier affiliate''), acting as principal, from 
participating in or effecting any transaction in connection with a 
joint enterprise or

[[Page 7596]]

other joint arrangement in which the fund is a participant, unless 
prior to entering into the enterprise or arrangement ``an application 
regarding [the transaction] has been filed with the Commission and has 
been granted by an order.'' In reviewing the proposed affiliated 
transaction, the rule provides that the Commission will consider 
whether the proposal is (i) consistent with the provisions, policies, 
and purposes of the Act, and (ii) on a basis different from or less 
advantageous than that of other participants in determining whether to 
grant an exemptive application for a proposed joint enterprise, joint 
arrangement, or profit-sharing plan.
    Rule 17d-1 also contains a number of exceptions to the requirement 
that a fund must obtain Commission approval prior to entering into 
joint transactions or arrangements with affiliates. For example, funds 
do not have to obtain Commission approval for certain employee 
compensation plans, certain tax-deferred employee benefit plans, 
certain transactions involving small business investment companies, the 
receipt of securities or cash by certain affiliates pursuant to a plan 
of reorganization, certain arrangements regarding liability insurance 
policies and transactions with ``portfolio affiliates'' (companies that 
are affiliated with the fund solely as a result of the fund (or an 
affiliated fund) controlling them or owning more than five percent of 
their voting securities) so long as certain other affiliated persons of 
the fund (e.g., the fund's adviser, persons controlling the fund, and 
persons under common control with the fund) are not parties to the 
transaction and do not have a ``financial interest'' in a party to the 
transaction. The rule excludes from the definition of ``financial 
interest'' any interest that the fund's board of directors (including a 
majority of the directors who are not interested persons of the fund) 
finds to be not material, as long as the board records the basis for 
its finding in their meeting minutes.
    Thus, the rule contains two filing and recordkeeping requirements 
that constitute collections of information. First, rule 17d-1 requires 
funds that wish to engage in a joint transaction or arrangement with 
affiliates to meet the procedural requirements for obtaining exemptive 
relief from the rule's prohibition on joint transactions or 
arrangements involving first- or second-tier affiliates. Second, rule 
17d-1 permits a portfolio affiliate to enter into a joint transaction 
or arrangement with the fund if a prohibited participant has a 
financial interest that the fund's board determines is not material and 
records the basis for this finding in their meeting minutes. These 
requirements of rule 17d-1 are designed to prevent fund insiders from 
managing funds for their own benefit, rather than for the benefit of 
the funds' shareholders.
    Based on an analysis of past filings, Commission staff estimates 
that 8 funds file applications under section 17(d) and rule 17d-1 per 
year. The staff understands that funds that file an application 
generally obtain assistance from outside counsel to prepare the 
application. The cost burden of using outside counsel is discussed 
below. Based on a limited survey of persons in the mutual fund 
industry, the Commission staff estimates that each applicant will spend 
an average of 154 hours to comply with the Commission's applications 
process. The Commission staff therefore estimates the annual burden 
hours per year for all funds under rule 17d-1's application process to 
be 1,232 hours at a cost of $445,328.\1\ The Commission, therefore, 
requests authorization to increase the inventory of total burden hours 
per year for all funds under rule 17d-1 from the current authorized 
burden of 616 hours to 1,232 hours. The increase is due to an increase 
in the number of funds that filed applications for exemptions under 
rule 17d-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission staff estimates that a senior executive, such 
as the fund's chief compliance officer, will spend an average of 62 
hours and a mid-level compliance attorney will spend an average of 
92 hours to comply with this collection of information: 62 hours + 
92 hours = 154 hours. 8 funds x 154 burden hours = 1,232 burden 
hours. The Commission staff estimate that the chief compliance 
officer is paid $423 per hour and the compliance attorney is paid 
$320 per hour. ($423 per hour x 62 hours) + ($320 per hour x 92 
hours) = $55,666 per fund. $55,666 x 8 funds = $445,328. The $423 
and $320 per hour figures are based on salary information compiled 
by SIFMA's Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities 
Industry, 2010. The Commission staff has modified SIFMA's 
information to account for an 1,800-hour work year and multiplied by 
5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and 
overhead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the Commission staff understands that funds that 
file an application under rule 17d-1 generally use outside counsel to 
assist in preparing the application.\2\ The staff estimates that, on 
average, funds spend an additional $93,131 for outside legal services 
in connection with seeking Commission approval of affiliated joint 
transactions. Thus, the staff estimates that the total annual cost 
burden imposed by the exemptive application requirements of rule 17d-1 
is $745,048.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ This understanding is based on conversations with 
representatives from the fund industry.
    \3\ The estimate is based on the following calculation: $93,131 
x 8 funds = $745,048.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on staff discussions with fund representatives, we estimate 
that funds currently do not rely on the exemption from the term 
``financial interest'' with respect to any interest that the fund's 
board of directors (including a majority of the directors who are not 
interested persons of the fund) finds to be not material. Accordingly, 
we estimate that annually there will be no transactions under rule 17d-
1 that will result in this aspect of the collection of information.
    Based on these calculations, the total annual hour burden is 
estimated to be 1,232 hours and the total annual cost burden is 
estimated to be $745,048.
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived 
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the 
costs of Commission rules. Complying with these collections of 
information requirement is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying 
on rule 17d-1. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may 
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control 
number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an 
e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.

    Dated: February 3, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2930 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P